Welcome to Debate Club! Please be aware that this is a space for respectful debate, and that your ideas will be challenged here. Please remember to critique the argument, not the author.

NYT article about obesity stating it's genetic, not lack of willpower

BrunetteRunner87
BrunetteRunner87 Posts: 591 Member
edited November 13 in Debate Club
I just saw this article in the New York Times today:

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/01/health/americans-obesity-willpower-genetics-study.html?&moduleDetail=section-news-2&action=click&contentCollection=Health&region=Footer&module=MoreInSection&version=WhatsNext&contentID=WhatsNext&pgtype=article&_r=0

I don't generally tend to put much stock in what the NYT says, but is it possible that obesity can't be helped by willpower? Should we bother to try to lose weight? My first thought about this is that it's a load of crap, but if it's what science says how can I dispute it?
«13456789

Replies

  • zyxst
    zyxst Posts: 9,149 Member
    Since it's genetic, can I eat more food again? I'm obese anyway.

    What @GottaBurnEmAll said.
  • cmriverside
    cmriverside Posts: 34,416 Member
    erickirb wrote: »
    If it were genetics, why do we now have more obesity than 20 years ago?

    Evolution!!!!

    Natural Selection!

    no
  • erickirb
    erickirb Posts: 12,294 Member
    erickirb wrote: »
    If it were genetics, why do we now have more obesity than 20 years ago?

    Evolution!!!!

    Natural Selection!

    no

    evolution takes generations and natural selection even longer, like in the 100's if not 1000's of years to show up.
  • Vailara
    Vailara Posts: 2,467 Member
    erickirb wrote: »
    If it were genetics, why do we now have more obesity than 20 years ago?

    Good point. But if it was willpower, then why do we apparently have much less willpower than 20 years ago?

    And why do I apparently have much less willpower than I did 20 years ago? But more than I did four years ago, when I was heavier?

    I think it has to be mixture of genetics and other factors. I find it difficult to believe it's just down to a massive decrease in the population's willpower.
  • zamphir66
    zamphir66 Posts: 582 Member
    Genetics is not destiny. Even something like height is mutable by environmental conditions.

    On the flip side, saying something is NOT entirely genetic is not the same as saying it IS a choice.
  • Vailara
    Vailara Posts: 2,467 Member
    edited November 2016
    Also, I don't know if this makes much difference statistically, but people are getting taller (in the UK at least, but it might be a general trend). If you look at the BMI calculations, taller people have a higher BMI than shorter people with the same proportions.

    There was a study of body sizes done a few years ago in the UK, comparing to a study done in 1951. I was surpised to see that the average woman a few years ago was only 7.5 lb heavier than the average woman in 1951. Those few pounds are enough to take a lot of people over the threshold for overweight.
  • AnvilHead
    AnvilHead Posts: 18,343 Member
    Vailara wrote: »
    erickirb wrote: »
    If it were genetics, why do we now have more obesity than 20 years ago?

    Good point. But if it was willpower, then why do we apparently have much less willpower than 20 years ago?

    And why do I apparently have much less willpower than I did 20 years ago? But more than I did four years ago, when I was heavier?

    I think it has to be mixture of genetics and other factors. I find it difficult to believe it's just down to a massive decrease in the population's willpower.

    The problem is complex and multi-factorial, but it certainly doesn't just come down to genetics. To ignore the multitude of involved factors/issues cascading upon each other is a shallow, one-dimensional approach which will accomplish nothing.
  • crzycatlady1
    crzycatlady1 Posts: 1,930 Member
    WinoGelato wrote: »
    erickirb wrote: »
    If it were genetics, why do we now have more obesity than 20 years ago?

    I heard it was because of cats.

    Seriously just laughed out loud and my son is asking me if I'm ok LOL! Just got done reading that other thread :D
  • lemurcat12
    lemurcat12 Posts: 30,886 Member
    erickirb wrote: »
    If it were genetics, why do we now have more obesity than 20 years ago?

    This is always my thought.

    Sure, there are genetic predispositions that might make some of us find it more difficult to resist the various environmental influences on obesity, but that doesn't mean we CAN'T, just that it might take a little more thought or attention or other strategies.
  • NorthCascades
    NorthCascades Posts: 10,968 Member
    ladyreva78 wrote: »
    As far as I'm concerned it's a scaremongering piece of *kitten*, not even very well written, that rests on a 'representative' survey of barely 1'500 people. How that can be representative is beyond me to be honest.

    It's kind of like making a soup. Sometimes you stir it, sometimes you pull a spoonful out to taste it and see if you need to add anything. You don't have to eat the entire soup to know it needs more salt, that would defeat the purpose, you just have to sample a spoonful.
  • ladyreva78
    ladyreva78 Posts: 4,080 Member
    ladyreva78 wrote: »
    As far as I'm concerned it's a scaremongering piece of *kitten*, not even very well written, that rests on a 'representative' survey of barely 1'500 people. How that can be representative is beyond me to be honest.

    It's kind of like making a soup. Sometimes you stir it, sometimes you pull a spoonful out to taste it and see if you need to add anything. You don't have to eat the entire soup to know it needs more salt, that would defeat the purpose, you just have to sample a spoonful.

    True. But a soup is supposed to be homogeneous. Meaning if you taste one spoonful you taste the whole and can accurately judge from that whether you've dumped too much salt in or not. I'm having trouble believing that you can represent the views of a country's population with 1500 people. I find it ridiculous in my country (8 million inhabitants), I find it even more ridiculous in a country of the US's proportions.

    I also often wonder how they select the 'representative' people they survey. Not to mention, how honest the answers are. Anything based on a representative survey tends to leave a bitter aftertaste in my mouth as there's just too many factors that don't add up in my mind. Not to mention I know how so-so I tend to answer surveys myself. (Agreed, that's just me, but still... I tend to assume the worst of everyone).

    That it then warrants an article in the NYTimes... :neutral:
  • NorthCascades
    NorthCascades Posts: 10,968 Member
    I understand. I totally don't believe airplanes can fly. I mean, they're made out of metal, and metal is really heavy. Way heavier than air, for sure. The idea is ridiculous. And yet planes fly every day. Just like representative surveys can predict who will be elected. Because they work, if done properly, even if some people don't believe it.
This discussion has been closed.