Survey time: Should a guy pay on a first date?

How does a woman paying for a date or part of one complicate things? Its very simple LOL. The only complication is coming from men that take it as some assault against their masculinity instead of what it really is, a person just paying for their portion or paying for the date if she was the one who asked the date.

I was more so referring to the women saying it was a control thing. I highly doubt any guy is thinking that far.

^

I don't know about "should"; whatever works for other people is their business, but personally I won't and never have let a guy pay. The way I see it, I expect a man to treat me as an equal, so I need to behave like one by paying my own share - otherwise I'd feel like I was taking advantage by trying to have my cake and eat it, too. That's just my personal take, though, like I said, I don't think it's "wrong" or anything if other people prefer to do it differently.

This girl said she never let a guy pay

Actually, I haven't seen any woman say to NEVER let a man pay. I thought I had an understanding but reading more of your post you have proven my point. If a guy is that uptight about a date then who knows what else he'll be uptight about so I see to weed them out

Actually, there's been no small number that have said that. Here's the most recent.

I don't know about "should"; whatever works for other people is their business, but personally I won't and never have let a guy pay. The way I see it, I expect a man to treat me as an equal, so I need to behave like one by paying my own share - otherwise I'd feel like I was taking advantage by trying to have my cake and eat it, too. That's just my personal take, though, like I said, I don't think it's "wrong" or anything if other people prefer to do it differently.

And on top of that...I can, and have said the same thing. If a woman is so uptight that she can't accept such a small gift of appreciation for her company, she's surely not going to comprehend all of the other things I do, happily...to show my appreciation.

There isn't anything wrong with someone paying for their own portion. Its not complicated.

Actually, I haven't seen any woman say to NEVER let a man pay. I thought I had an understanding but reading more of your post you have proven my point. If a guy is that uptight about a date then who knows what else he'll be uptight about so I see to weed them out

Actually, there's been no small number that have said that. Here's the most recent.

I don't know about "should"; whatever works for other people is their business, but personally I won't and never have let a guy pay. The way I see it, I expect a man to treat me as an equal, so I need to behave like one by paying my own share - otherwise I'd feel like I was taking advantage by trying to have my cake and eat it, too. That's just my personal take, though, like I said, I don't think it's "wrong" or anything if other people prefer to do it differently.

And on top of that...I can, and have said the same thing. If a woman is so uptight that she can't accept such a small gift of appreciation for her company, she's surely not going to comprehend all of the other things I do, happily...to show my appreciation.

There isn't anything wrong with someone paying for their own portion. Its not complicated.

There isn't anything wrong with someone paying both portions. It's not complicated.

Are you seeing a trend here yet?

I don't know about "should"; whatever works for other people is their business, but personally I won't and never have let a guy pay. The way I see it, I expect a man to treat me as an equal, so I need to behave like one by paying my own share - otherwise I'd feel like I was taking advantage by trying to have my cake and eat it, too. That's just my personal take, though, like I said, I don't think it's "wrong" or anything if other people prefer to do it differently.

Ahh, this is where it's going to get interesting, and please don't take this as an attack against you, because it isn't. Your post is simply what brought it to mind.

I was called out directly more than once, citing my behavior in wanting to pay for dates as 'controlling' and based on my 'insecurity' as a man.

Here's the thing...isn't the behavior where you absolutely HAVE to DEMAND equal treatment in EVERY situation...just so it's clear you're an equal...a mask of insecurity as well? Doesn't giving actually prove that you are an equal with far more effect than stomping your foot and demanding to be treated as one? I mean, if I know I'm equal...it hurts me not at all to give...even to give often and deeply. That giving takes NOTHING from who I am, nor our respective equality.

If you know you're an equal...and you ARE an equal...what's the big deal about giving, and in the process, receiving?

I think you may misunderstand me; I don't by any means think that the vast, vast majority of men who offer to pay for a first date are doing so because they're plotting ways to be controlling or they're insecure and compensating for something! In my experience, most are either simply trying to be nice without any ulterior motive, or are doing it because they've been raised with the man paying as the social norm and as a result they feel uncomfortable, as if they are mistreating their date, if they don't pay, which still comes from a place of decency and respect, not anything sordid. I have to say - and I don't mean to offend, so hopefully you won't take it that way - but the people who called you out with those accusations sound paranoid and just plain *****y - it's pretty nuts to me to immediately jump to the conclusion that those must be a guy's motivations in that situation, yikes!

That said, I don't see how a calm, friendly, "Hey, I'd prefer to spilt the bill, cool?" qualifies as stomping one's foot or being unreasonably demanding. Perhaps some women are motivated by insecurity, but I think that's as unfair an assumption to gneralise as jumping to the conclusion that a man who wants to pay is motivated by a desire to control or a need to prove some kind of point. For me personally (as I said, no judgement of how others choose to deal with this), I simply don't feel comfortable having someone else pay my way (and FTR, it's not an issue of gender for me - I have never let any of the women I've dated pay on a first date, either, for the same reason). Now, if I'm dating someone on an ongoing basis, that's a different story - I don't mind if he/she treats sometimes, because then I can reciprocate and treat sometimes as well, and it more or less balances out.

chrisanderson
you said:
If you know you're an equal...and you ARE an equal...what's the big deal about giving, and in the process, receiving?

Why wouldn't that work both ways i.e. the woman treating a man to a dinner out?

SHOULD he? I don't know if I like the choice of words. It's not a "should" sort of thing. It's nice if he offers, and I would let him, but I'm a grownup with a job. I always take enough money to cover my own and assume it's a possibility.

I've also experienced the guy who thinks that I owe him since he paid, ifyouknowwhatImean, andIthinkyoudo. Not an ideal situation to be in.

Yes! The women should offer to pay and the man should refuse to let her. :happy: That's how it works people.

This!

My daddy taught me old skool way and said, "If he can't pay he should not be dating!" I expect that he would pay!

Why is this thread still going?

In my world, yeah, the guy pays for the pleasure of my company. I'm not offering anything, no game playing or pretending to pay.