When you SHOULDN'T count calories

24567

Replies

  • LKArgh
    LKArgh Posts: 5,178 Member
    ftsolk wrote: »
    I understand that the basic premise of weight loss is that one must burn more calories than he or she consumes.

    Of course, it is not always an exact science. The 3,500 calories= a pound rule is an estimation, and it doesn't take into account the 20% margin of error allowed on nutritional labels here in the USA (as well as personal user error in calculating portion sizes, etc). Still, as long as you eat less than what you burn, you should eventually lose weight. (Just know that other factors such as water retention and the timing/weight of your last meal and bathroom visit may influence the scale as well).

    That being said, I am also aware that calorie counting does not work for me. I am aware that if I stick to meticulously counting calories (or Weight Watchers points, as I have done in the past), I will lose weight. However, I have not been able to stick to it long-term.

    I would even go as far as saying that I, personally, should NOT count calories.

    Let me explain.

    I am a very black and white thinker with a history of anxiety and depression. Often, calorie counting means I become obsessive. I weigh everything I eat down to the last gram. Eating out in a social situation is only permissible if nutritional information is readily available (I cannot cope with just estimating calories or portion sizes). This is becoming more of a challenge as, although I do not eat out as frequently as I have in the past (I tend to go to a restaurant once every 2 weeks or so during the school, year), my current social life revolves more around church groups with homemade food, or dinners at friends' houses.

    So, if I'm in a situation where I don't know the exact numbers, I tend to cope by not eating anything at all, or binging. Either way, my need for perfection drives me to destruction even before I get into the details of my Fitbit calorie burn, TDEE calculators, deficit sizes, and the like. I also worry that, with my personal history, I could very likely spiral into the realms of an eating disorder if I get too engrossed in calorie counting.

    I know that I am not the only person out there who cannot deal with counting calories- or SHOULDN'T. While I have never struggled with anorexia or another eating disorder, I can see how someone with a history of anorexia who could also afford to lose some weight after recovery, should steer away from diet plans that involve counting calories simply because it could trigger a relapse of self-destructive behaviors.

    So, how do you lose weight without counting calories or cutting out any major food groups? I understand that it may be slow weight loss, but I'm becoming more and more content with that idea. I'm already trying to make small changes like consistently eating a packed lunch at work (with fruits, vegetables, lean proteins, and whole grains) instead of opting for quick-on the go options like potato chips, snack cakes, hummus with pretzel chips, or Lunchables. That, coupled with the fact that I've gone from eating at restaurants 1 to 3 times a week (up to 4 or 5 days at one point) to eating at a restaurant roughly 2-3 times a month should help. (Eating at a friends' house usually happens a couple times a month- if that. Church food events are more frequent, but I tend to nibble at the food there, so it's less of an issue.

    You lose weight by eating less. Whether you do this by counting calories, or estimating what you need to eat and changing your lifestyle accordingly, it is up to you. Obviously you do not need to log everything forever, it is just a tool to help you figure out things, and not one that is the best choice foe everyone or suitable to all situations.
    There are several alternatives you could try:
    Keep eating whatever you are eating, but eat smaller portions. Keep reducing portions a little at a time, until you start seeing results.
    Look for lower calorie alternatives of your usual foods, like figure out how to cook with less fat, bake instead of fry, or find lower calorie side-dishes, replace your snacks with lower calorie choices, switch to zero or low calorie beverages, cut down alcohol, avoid sauces, and so on.
    Try foods that are low in calories and will help you feel fuller, like for example, make a habit of eating a large salad of low calorie vegetables (greens, tomatoes etc) in the beginning of your meals, so you will have a smaller portion of whatever else you are usually eating.
    Increase your physical activity, either by starting (and committing to ) a new sport, or by increasing overall activity, like walking everywhere instead of driving or using the bus etc.
    Or a combination of all the above.
    It all comes down to eating less than you burn, but whether you actually count it or just control the calories in some indirect way, it is up to you.
  • LloydGK
    LloydGK Posts: 86 Member
    When you SHOULDN'T count calories
    'When YOU shouldn't count calories'
    There...fixed that for ya ;)

    Have a great one, everybody!
  • upgradeddiddy
    upgradeddiddy Posts: 281 Member
    LloydGK wrote: »
    When you SHOULDN'T count calories
    'When YOU shouldn't count calories'
    There...fixed that for ya ;)

    Have a great one, everybody!

    ^ this may come off a little harsh but you cant lose weight without counting and analyzing first and seeing how your body responds first...period. On top of that if you are worried about your mental issues when doing a diet, then don't diet! Get right with yourself first and fix your mind before you even attempt to fix your body.

    If your mind ain't right then it will be near impossible to be consistent in any part of health and fitness.
  • ftsolk
    ftsolk Posts: 202 Member
    Whether I am or am not speaking with a professional regarding some of the issues I am going through is my concern. I'd rather not get into any details regarding that right now.

    I understand that calorie counting isn't hard, but I, personally, just cannot (and probably should not) do it. I own a kitchen scale and measuring cups (including serving spoons that hold 1/2 cup and 1 cup portions). Most of the time, I eat off of 8.5 to 9 inch plates- and when I don't, it's because I went overboard on vegetable servings or because I need a little extra room for a little container of dip for something on my plate. I drink water, seltzer (no sweeteners, but flavored), and unsweetened iced tea primarily. However, I do enjoy indulging in a bottle of Synergy, a glass of organic whole milk, or a Naked/Bolthouse Farms/True Organics juice on occasion. (More rarely, I'll go to Starbucks for a Frappucino).

    I wish I could get more into IF, but I'm just not sure how to do it with my eating schedule. Ideally, I'd like a window from around 1pm to 9pm (or 12 to 10 if I were to do a 14/10 fast rather than the 16/8). However, there are many days where I don't eat lunch until after 4pm. I'm not sure I'd be able to function going that long without eating. Or, rather, I know I'd be able to function, but it would set me up to binge later on. I've gained weight the few times I've attempted IF, so I'm hesitant about trying it again.
  • paperpudding
    paperpudding Posts: 9,279 Member
    LloydGK wrote: »
    When you SHOULDN'T count calories
    'When YOU shouldn't count calories'
    There...fixed that for ya ;)

    Have a great one, everybody!

    ^ this may come off a little harsh but you cant lose weight without counting and analyzing first and seeing how your body responds first...period. On top of that if you are worried about your mental issues when doing a diet, then don't diet! Get right with yourself first and fix your mind before you even attempt to fix your body.

    If your mind ain't right then it will be near impossible to be consistent in any part of health and fitness.

    Of course you can lose weight without counting first - and many people do.

    They cut out sweets or second helpings or snacks between meals or sugary drinks or whatever or start exercising regularly and by doing so create a caloric deficit and thus they lose weight.

    I like calorie counting ( although I approximate a lot too) and I have done it for over 2 years - but I don't claim it is the only or the best method for everybody.

  • Mischievous_Rascal
    Mischievous_Rascal Posts: 1,791 Member
    WBB55 wrote: »
    Can you count one macro? Could you count something like your protein grams?

    Have you tried IF? A form of 16:8 might work for your lifestyle if you combine it with sensible choices when you do eat.

    I have to disagree here. Intermittent fasting can end up being a really bad fit for someone with anxiety about calorie counting. I do IF and the "Oh my god, my friend had to move our lunch date up by an hour!!!" used to cause me anxiety, and I don't mind counting calories.

    Actually, the book Ditching Diets recommended by @msf74 looks like it could address some of the issues the OP may be having. And there has been some really good advice offered on here for her, as well, most importantly getting professional help.

    Best of luck, OP.
  • lrachel011
    lrachel011 Posts: 34 Member
    Calorie counting doesn't really help me but I've become slightly obsessed. Because if in supposed to have 1200 calories, and I've eaten 1100, I'll see a 100 cal chocolate bar an be like "well I still have 100 calories left might aswell eat it!" Whereas I wouldn't have eaten it otherwise. Or I'll go slightly over my allowance and beat myself up over it, so I think it's best if I don't count calories, but just eat healthily... Unfortunately it's a very hard habit to break out of
  • zoeysasha37
    zoeysasha37 Posts: 7,088 Member
    Well if counting calories isn't for you, don't count them. Its really simple.
    Don't count calories, find what will work for you, and actually do it .
    Were familiar with you posts and its clear you have issues that need to be dealt with.
  • kshama2001
    kshama2001 Posts: 28,052 Member
    Sure, I've lost weight many times without calorie counting. But to not calorie count because of anxiety, depression, and obsessiveness is to ignore the elephant in the room of anxiety, depression, and obsessiveness.

    I currently measure every gram of food and home and can totally relate to the anxiety of being in a situation where weighing is not an option. I use my best judgment and the scale will eventually tell me if I was right or not. Also, I know how my stomach feels after having a 400 calorie meal, vs an 800 or 1200 calorie meal.

    But I'm not advocating my path for you. There are many paths up the mountain and I hope you find yours.
  • Timelordlady85
    Timelordlady85 Posts: 797 Member
    w734q672 wrote: »
    This is America, do whatever the F((k you want.

    ^ this right here. you don't need anyone's permission or approval. I personally like knowing how much I am eating and with the free myfitnesspal app and bar code scanner I find it hard to believe that it isn't easy to track food now a days. Even If I go out and the restaurant doesn't offer calories, I find something that is closest in weight and calories and use that. To me, seeing how many calories are in something helps me make better choices. Good luck OP

  • SarahxApple
    SarahxApple Posts: 166 Member
    Hi OP :smile: I think I have some idea what you mean when it comes to counting, I have some (mild) anxiety/OCD one thing for me has always been numbers (it's weird I memorise numbers/car registration plates, then get stressed when I cannot recall them, there are other things too). I have regularly taken breaks on here as I became waaaay too obsessive when counting, the only thing I have found that helps is to just not count one/two days a week I cannot start counting for the day and decide not to it has be conscious decision not to do it.

    It sounds as though your anxiety is worse than mine but perhaps it's worth a try.

    Feel free to add me :smile:
  • jessathemessa
    jessathemessa Posts: 65 Member
    You need to do what works for you. Everyone is going to be different. If you aren't going to count calories, it's still important to have an idea of how much you should be eating per meal -- basically a far less intense type of calorie counting in your head.

    Personally, I know I probably won't calorie count for the rest of my life, and I don't want to have to. I'm hoping that by calorie counting for a while, I'll better learn how to eat healthily and in moderation of higher calorie items. Without calorie counting and measuring, I'm simply not paying enough attention. If that weren't true for many people, we wouldn't be here now trying to lose weight.

    If you can estimate, that's great. Try it out for a while. If you see you are gaining weight, evaluate your diet. Maybe you could try just writing down estimates of what you are eating, even without measurements, for a couple weeks and if you gain weight, you can look at that and think about what you can change.

    As someone who also has anxiety, I feel your pain. I log my calories and if I go over on any given day, I obsess about it. It wasn't until just recently that I started talking to my doctor about my anxiety because for years I've had issues sleeping, or even thinking/existing in any kind of meaningful or positive manner. So not sure if you mentioned it, but definitely see a doctor if possible. It was really hard for me to actually do, but it was definitely worth it.

    Feel free to add me if you'd like! Support is always helpful.
  • patrikc333
    patrikc333 Posts: 436 Member
    too much negativity around calorie counting

    no one forces anyone to do it, but the link between anorexia and eating disorders, in this context (MFP community), looks excessive to me

  • This content has been removed.
  • nvmomketo
    nvmomketo Posts: 12,019 Member
    ftsolk wrote: »
    Whether I am or am not speaking with a professional regarding some of the issues I am going through is my concern. I'd rather not get into any details regarding that right now.

    I understand that calorie counting isn't hard, but I, personally, just cannot (and probably should not) do it. I own a kitchen scale and measuring cups (including serving spoons that hold 1/2 cup and 1 cup portions). Most of the time, I eat off of 8.5 to 9 inch plates- and when I don't, it's because I went overboard on vegetable servings or because I need a little extra room for a little container of dip for something on my plate. I drink water, seltzer (no sweeteners, but flavored), and unsweetened iced tea primarily. However, I do enjoy indulging in a bottle of Synergy, a glass of organic whole milk, or a Naked/Bolthouse Farms/True Organics juice on occasion. (More rarely, I'll go to Starbucks for a Frappucino).

    I wish I could get more into IF, but I'm just not sure how to do it with my eating schedule. Ideally, I'd like a window from around 1pm to 9pm (or 12 to 10 if I were to do a 14/10 fast rather than the 16/8). However, there are many days where I don't eat lunch until after 4pm. I'm not sure I'd be able to function going that long without eating. Or, rather, I know I'd be able to function, but it would set me up to binge later on. I've gained weight the few times I've attempted IF, so I'm hesitant about trying it again.

    I've lost all my weight once before by just writing down all of my foods in a food journal at a forum set up by Tocsa Reno (figure competitor) which was based loosely on her Eat Clean Diet books. The diet is basically no, or very few processed foods with no sugar added. At the time I modified it so I ate thing I would have recognized from nature with a few exceptions for foods with very few ingredients (like tzatziki - greek yogurt, garlic, cucumber). Most people did not count calories there, and we were all experiencing success with weight loss.

    Logging food was simpler because I was logging it for me. For example, if I made a 12 egg fritata, I just eyeballed my piece and said "~3egg fritata w/ peppers, mushrooms and onion".

    I'm sure I ate over my attempted deficit once in a while, but I think varying your diet probably helps with weight loss and health. I'm guessing it is like a sport and if you switch it up you'll keep your body guessing.

    BTW IF seems fairly common among the LCHF group over at Low Carbers Daily forum. My guess is that because many are fat adapted, they don't notice missed meals as much. I'm pretty new to it, and (shockingly) find it very easy to forget about a meal because I'm just not hungry - my lunch is often at 3:00. LOL Perhaps check out the threads in there on IF and see if you find anything helpful.

    Best wishes. :)
  • Alluminati
    Alluminati Posts: 6,208 Member
    nvsmomketo wrote: »
    ftsolk wrote: »
    Whether I am or am not speaking with a professional regarding some of the issues I am going through is my concern. I'd rather not get into any details regarding that right now.

    I understand that calorie counting isn't hard, but I, personally, just cannot (and probably should not) do it. I own a kitchen scale and measuring cups (including serving spoons that hold 1/2 cup and 1 cup portions). Most of the time, I eat off of 8.5 to 9 inch plates- and when I don't, it's because I went overboard on vegetable servings or because I need a little extra room for a little container of dip for something on my plate. I drink water, seltzer (no sweeteners, but flavored), and unsweetened iced tea primarily. However, I do enjoy indulging in a bottle of Synergy, a glass of organic whole milk, or a Naked/Bolthouse Farms/True Organics juice on occasion. (More rarely, I'll go to Starbucks for a Frappucino).

    I wish I could get more into IF, but I'm just not sure how to do it with my eating schedule. Ideally, I'd like a window from around 1pm to 9pm (or 12 to 10 if I were to do a 14/10 fast rather than the 16/8). However, there are many days where I don't eat lunch until after 4pm. I'm not sure I'd be able to function going that long without eating. Or, rather, I know I'd be able to function, but it would set me up to binge later on. I've gained weight the few times I've attempted IF, so I'm hesitant about trying it again.

    I've lost all my weight once before by just writing down all of my foods in a food journal at a forum set up by Tocsa Reno (figure competitor) which was based loosely on her Eat Clean Diet books. The diet is basically no, or very few processed foods with no sugar added. At the time I modified it so I ate thing I would have recognized from nature with a few exceptions for foods with very few ingredients (like tzatziki - greek yogurt, garlic, cucumber). Most people did not count calories there, and we were all experiencing success with weight loss.

    Logging food was simpler because I was logging it for me. For example, if I made a 12 egg fritata, I just eyeballed my piece and said "~3egg fritata w/ peppers, mushrooms and onion".

    I'm sure I ate over my attempted deficit once in a while, but I think varying your diet probably helps with weight loss and health. I'm guessing it is like a sport and if you switch it up you'll keep your body guessing.

    BTW IF seems fairly common among the LCHF group over at Low Carbers Daily forum. My guess is that because many are fat adapted, they don't notice missed meals as much. I'm pretty new to it, and (shockingly) find it very easy to forget about a meal because I'm just not hungry - my lunch is often at 3:00. LOL Perhaps check out the threads in there on IF and see if you find anything helpful.

    Best wishes. :)
    In case you missed this in the original OP
    ftsolk wrote: »
    So, how do you lose weight without counting calories or cutting out any major food groups?


  • andylllI
    andylllI Posts: 379 Member
    EDNOS. BED. Orthorexia. There is recognition that ED comes in way more flavours than anorexia and bulimia. ED can affect people of every weight. Food is just food. Eating food doesn't have morality attached to it. It doesn't define what kind of person you are. Neither does your weight. Maybe it would be better to focus on health and not lose weight right now. Including your mental health...with an ED therapist.
  • msf74
    msf74 Posts: 3,498 Member

    Actually, the book Ditching Diets recommended by @msf74 looks like it could address some of the issues the OP may be having.

    Yep, there are a number of useful and simple strategies in that book to help with mindful eating (as opposed to intuitive eating) to curb over eating and give people the confidence that they have control over compulsive behaviour.

    They can be applied to anything really - it can be used in conjunction with calorie counting for example or a non counting approach.

    I don't agree with all the nutritional advice outlined in the book (the author seems to have been convinced by the "wheat is bad" rhetoric for example) but the strategies are very helpful.
  • upgradeddiddy
    upgradeddiddy Posts: 281 Member
    LloydGK wrote: »
    When you SHOULDN'T count calories
    'When YOU shouldn't count calories'
    There...fixed that for ya ;)

    Have a great one, everybody!

    ^ this may come off a little harsh but you cant lose weight without counting and analyzing first and seeing how your body responds first...period. On top of that if you are worried about your mental issues when doing a diet, then don't diet! Get right with yourself first and fix your mind before you even attempt to fix your body.

    If your mind ain't right then it will be near impossible to be consistent in any part of health and fitness.

    Of course you can lose weight without counting first - and many people do.

    They cut out sweets or second helpings or snacks between meals or sugary drinks or whatever or start exercising regularly and by doing so create a caloric deficit and thus they lose weight.

    I like calorie counting ( although I approximate a lot too) and I have done it for over 2 years - but I don't claim it is the only or the best method for everybody.

    Yes and many people who do the small changes who look in the mirror after a long time of doing that still look in the mirror and are depressed that even though they are lighter, they don't like themselves. Hence the fix your mind first then do the work. Everyone is different so yes some people are good with "average" and mediocre and the whole nine but those same people are right with themselves and their heads are on straight. I was speaking more in terms of the worrying that past mental issues being the reason for not calorie counting and backing off cause of that
  • nvmomketo
    nvmomketo Posts: 12,019 Member
    edited July 2015
    Alluminati wrote: »
    In case you missed this in the original OP
    ftsolk wrote: »
    So, how do you lose weight without counting calories or cutting out any major food groups?

    I don't think processed foods and sugar have their own food group. I still ate meat, some dairy, fats, veggies and fruit and some grains (rice, steel cut oatmeal).

    When I ate (mostly) unprocessed foods, I lost weight at the same rate that I am now, when I am counting calories. I think not counting calories can work well, but one must be somewhat educated in what foods are like nutritionally. Logging your food is just a tool to help you eat mindfully. If someone does not realize that eating a large, loaded pizza may not be a good idea for them from a weiht loss stand point, then logging will not be helpful.
  • coreyreichle
    coreyreichle Posts: 1,031 Member
    ftsolk wrote: »
    Of course, it is not always an exact science. The 3,500 calories= a pound rule is an estimation, and it doesn't take into account the 20% margin of error allowed on nutritional labels here in the USA (as well as personal user error in calculating portion sizes, etc).

    Slight correction. 3500 calories == 1 pound of body fat IS an exact science, and it can be replicated time and time again in a calorimeter, with a slight margin of error (We're talking +/- 5%, a statistical blip).

    The 20% margin of error on USDA required labeling has nothing to do with that.
  • DeguelloTex
    DeguelloTex Posts: 6,652 Member
    ftsolk wrote: »
    Of course, it is not always an exact science. The 3,500 calories= a pound rule is an estimation, and it doesn't take into account the 20% margin of error allowed on nutritional labels here in the USA (as well as personal user error in calculating portion sizes, etc).

    Slight correction. 3500 calories == 1 pound of body fat IS an exact science, and it can be replicated time and time again in a calorimeter, with a slight margin of error (We're talking +/- 5%, a statistical blip).

    The 20% margin of error on USDA required labeling has nothing to do with that.
    And the 20% error in nutrition -- even if it really existed -- wouldn't always be in the same direction.

    Again, that whole argument is like saying speedometers aren't 100% accurate, so they can't be helpful. It's silly. A reasonable basis for decisions is better than pulling something magical out of the air.

  • tomatoey
    tomatoey Posts: 5,446 Member
    ftsolk wrote: »
    Whether I am or am not speaking with a professional regarding some of the issues I am going through is my concern. I'd rather not get into any details regarding that right now.

    I understand that calorie counting isn't hard, but I, personally, just cannot (and probably should not) do it. I own a kitchen scale and measuring cups (including serving spoons that hold 1/2 cup and 1 cup portions). Most of the time, I eat off of 8.5 to 9 inch plates- and when I don't, it's because I went overboard on vegetable servings or because I need a little extra room for a little container of dip for something on my plate. I drink water, seltzer (no sweeteners, but flavored), and unsweetened iced tea primarily. However, I do enjoy indulging in a bottle of Synergy, a glass of organic whole milk, or a Naked/Bolthouse Farms/True Organics juice on occasion. (More rarely, I'll go to Starbucks for a Frappucino).

    I wish I could get more into IF, but I'm just not sure how to do it with my eating schedule. Ideally, I'd like a window from around 1pm to 9pm (or 12 to 10 if I were to do a 14/10 fast rather than the 16/8). However, there are many days where I don't eat lunch until after 4pm. I'm not sure I'd be able to function going that long without eating. Or, rather, I know I'd be able to function, but it would set me up to binge later on. I've gained weight the few times I've attempted IF, so I'm hesitant about trying it again.

    If you find yourself binging with fasting protocols, best to avoid that. I'd say really that any kind of diet with sharp restrictions like that, whether it's to do with meal timing, avoiding categories of food, etc., is probably not ideal for you.

    Would include some of the diets people have suggested in that. However, I have also found my hunger attenuated when I've focused *more* on proteins, veggies, legumes, whole grains, fruits, and dairy; it's true that this helps many people with satiety (not all, of course, but many).

    If that appeals, a way of looking at it might be that you're ADDING nutrients and tasty things , rather than restricting (and negatively judging) other foods. It helps to experiment with recipes and use your creativity to make these additions as appetizing as possible, and to aim to get some pleasure out of that effort, as well.
  • gothchiq
    gothchiq Posts: 4,590 Member
    You could try the MyPlate method. 1/4 of your plate is lean protein, 1/4 is starch, 1/2 is nonstarchy vegetables and fruit.
  • boogiewookie
    boogiewookie Posts: 206 Member
    you have just described exactly to the t why I cannot count calories. I tried at first but I was far too obsessive. now I just mentally track everything I eat and use common sense. it's working and I've lost 10lbs/month.for 2 months in a row so I know I don't NEED to track calories like everyone says, which is so much better for my mental health! I just weigh myself every morning to make sure I'm on track and don't regress into old habits. I have treats in strict moderation but when I do slip up (like way too much movie theater popcorn) I'm just extra conscious of what I eat for the next few days
  • dubird
    dubird Posts: 1,849 Member
    If the counting part will trigger OCD, there are other ways to do it. I've never been strict about counting my calories. I did weigh things at first, and from time to time to check myself, but most of the time I estimate. What I do a lot of times is check the package to see what the calories say, then estimate a serving. It's not perfect, but it's been working because I err on the side of caution and over-estimate what I enter. Once it becomes a habit, it's much easier. That's how I can estimate decently now; I worked hard at first to retrain my brain into seeing what listed portion size is. I wouldn't start some kind of diet plan though. Diets don't work because they're meant to be temporary. Now, if you find an eating plan that aims to change how you eat for the long term, that might be the best thing for you. I personally would find that too restrictive, but you might not. Maybe talk to a licensed nutritionist and work out a daily plan with them.
  • Blueseraphchaos
    Blueseraphchaos Posts: 843 Member
    ftsolk wrote: »
    Whether I am or am not speaking with a professional regarding some of the issues I am going through is my concern. I'd rather not get into any details regarding that right now.


    You are correct, it's your monkeys, your circus, etc. In reality, this is the first time I've ever seen you post an actual QUESTION with your huge-paragraphs post, so it appears something is working somewhere. However, as someone else pointed out, maybe you should focus on THAT before you focus on THIS. You haven't started fighting all the advice yet and making excuses yet (although other people are correct in that you seem to be needing approval to not do this). But your long history of making excuses and fighting everyone or ignoring everyone with questions or suggestions suggests to me that you should fix the elephant in the room before you attempt any kind of weight loss program.

    If nothing else, just try mindful eating of the things you know are filled with nutrients (your average protein, veggies, fruits, grains), throw in a bit of exercise or just a walk a couple times a week, and focus on fixing the mindset. You are smart, definitely smart enough to realize how health isn't all about weight.

    As always, I'm left with the question of "what do you want from US, the MFP community?" if you have never thought about that, now would be a good time. If you have thought about that, let us know (and if the only question you asked is truly all you want from us, let us know if anything is helping.)
  • ftsolk
    ftsolk Posts: 202 Member
    I am not asking for approval. I'm asking for diet plans/advice that don't necessarily involve counting calories (or points)- but also don't involve eliminating foods. Limiting? Sure. I can even give up some of my favorites for weeks at a time, but I don't want to go on a plan that says "no ice cream; no exceptions." That will ultimately lead to failure.

    A plan that says I can indulge in one pint of premium ice cream (Ben and Jerry's, Talenti, etc) or I can only have ice cream if I am out with friends as part of a social event? That's more reasonable.

    Avoiding all added sugar and processed foods? That's not going to happen for me. But I'm definitely ok with making smaller changes in that department: picking the more expensive, organic chicken tenders over Perdue or Tyson ones, or opting for Cheddar Bunnies over Goldfish. I rarely eat any of those things, but if I only allow myself to have the slightly "better" versions of those foods (which are also usually more expensive), I'll eat them even less frequently.

    I'm just looking for other ideas to help me lose weight without counting/measuring. I'm not so much against TRACKING, but rather than my diary looking like this (all estimations below):

    Van's Multigrain Waffles....2....200 calories
    Raspberry All Fruit Spread.... 1 tbs....40 calories
    SR All Natural Peanut Butter... 2.5 tbs.... 300 calories
    Hardboiled Egg....1 Large....70 calories
    Raspberries.... 168 grams.... 75 calories

    It'll look more like this:

    PB&J Waffle Sandwich
    Hardboiled Egg
    Raspberries

    No numbers (aside from, perhaps, noting the number of cookies eaten after church [usually none], or that I only had 1 bite of the cheesecake someone brought to the church picnic). Just listing the food itself.

    Perhaps starting out with tracking in that sense- noting the times eaten- could be beneficial. I also invested in some new lunch containers and a lunchbox, so that should help me make better choices at work. I've learned that if I pack lunch- no matter how unhealthy it is- I am more likely to eat fruits and vegetables. Today, I'm having mac and cheese with hot dogs, but I also added broccoli, roasted carrot fries, and pureed butternut squash (mixed into the pasta).
  • jkal1979
    jkal1979 Posts: 1,896 Member
    If you just want to track what you ate and not have any of the NI or amounts along with it, then get a notebook and a pen and keep track that way.

    One thing hasn't changed, you still like to make things more complicated than they need to be, even when trying to simplify things.

    Bianca-Del-Rio-RuPauls-Drag-Race-Not-Today-Satan-Gif.gif
  • janejellyroll
    janejellyroll Posts: 25,763 Member
    ftsolk wrote: »
    I am not asking for approval. I'm asking for diet plans/advice that don't necessarily involve counting calories (or points)- but also don't involve eliminating foods. Limiting? Sure. I can even give up some of my favorites for weeks at a time, but I don't want to go on a plan that says "no ice cream; no exceptions." That will ultimately lead to failure.

    A plan that says I can indulge in one pint of premium ice cream (Ben and Jerry's, Talenti, etc) or I can only have ice cream if I am out with friends as part of a social event? That's more reasonable.

    Avoiding all added sugar and processed foods? That's not going to happen for me. But I'm definitely ok with making smaller changes in that department: picking the more expensive, organic chicken tenders over Perdue or Tyson ones, or opting for Cheddar Bunnies over Goldfish. I rarely eat any of those things, but if I only allow myself to have the slightly "better" versions of those foods (which are also usually more expensive), I'll eat them even less frequently.

    I'm just looking for other ideas to help me lose weight without counting/measuring. I'm not so much against TRACKING, but rather than my diary looking like this (all estimations below):

    Van's Multigrain Waffles....2....200 calories
    Raspberry All Fruit Spread.... 1 tbs....40 calories
    SR All Natural Peanut Butter... 2.5 tbs.... 300 calories
    Hardboiled Egg....1 Large....70 calories
    Raspberries.... 168 grams.... 75 calories

    It'll look more like this:

    PB&J Waffle Sandwich
    Hardboiled Egg
    Raspberries

    No numbers (aside from, perhaps, noting the number of cookies eaten after church [usually none], or that I only had 1 bite of the cheesecake someone brought to the church picnic). Just listing the food itself.

    Perhaps starting out with tracking in that sense- noting the times eaten- could be beneficial. I also invested in some new lunch containers and a lunchbox, so that should help me make better choices at work. I've learned that if I pack lunch- no matter how unhealthy it is- I am more likely to eat fruits and vegetables. Today, I'm having mac and cheese with hot dogs, but I also added broccoli, roasted carrot fries, and pureed butternut squash (mixed into the pasta).

    You don't need anyone's permission to track however you would like. The disadvantage of tracking in the second way is that if you run into weight gain or a stall, you may not be able to tell why (a peanut butter sandwich can have 1 tablespoon of peanut butter or it can have 1/4 cup of peanut butter, for example).

    The methods recommended here are recommended because they have worked for people. That doesn't mean that nothing else has ever worked or that nothing else will work for you. But I get a certain sense of swimming upstream here. "Raspberries" can mean anything, so it's not especially useful for ME in terms of tracking. But if you think it will work for you, why not try it?