Random Thought For the Day
Replies
-
2 -
honeybee__12 wrote: »
😂😂😂😂1 -
There's no logical reason for shorts to be the same price as pants.3
-
The most unrealistic thing about most sitcoms is how everyone's schedules line up perfectly so groups of 5+ people can get together every single day.6
-
Is the fact that irons are not made from iron an example of irony?3
-
I did this once
He was not amused
4 -
2
-
Hey woo,
woo know who woo are,
3 -
I find it fascinating how women can compliment each other about their looks and not attach any homosexual undertones to it. Yet, if men do it most feel they have to add a "No homo" disclaimer. I just think "C'mon man, be a woman".5
-
This content has been removed.
-
This content has been removed.
-
MistressSara wrote: »MrSunshinez wrote: »I find it fascinating how women can compliment each other about their looks and not attach any homosexual undertones to it. Yet, if men do it most feel they have to add a "No homo" disclaimer. I just think "C'mon man, be a woman".
Then again if a man compliments a woman there are also often sexual intentions
Yep and thats not right ,,,I tell my mom she looks great all the time and my sisters and Women I work with ,,
Doesn't mean I want to bed them.1 -
MistressSara wrote: »MrSunshinez wrote: »I find it fascinating how women can compliment each other about their looks and not attach any homosexual undertones to it. Yet, if men do it most feel they have to add a "No homo" disclaimer. I just think "C'mon man, be a woman".
Then again if a man compliments a woman there are also often sexual intentions
True but my thinking was more of undertones than intentions. A man's no homo disclaimer seems to stem to from the appearance of loss of masculinity while still trying to convey a somewhat feminine trait of revealing one's self with the compliment. Whereas if it's between a man and a woman I think it can be taken as a sincere, non-sexual compliment or more but the need to over-emphasize masculinity isn't there.1 -
This content has been removed.
-
MistressSara wrote: »MrSunshinez wrote: »MistressSara wrote: »MrSunshinez wrote: »I find it fascinating how women can compliment each other about their looks and not attach any homosexual undertones to it. Yet, if men do it most feel they have to add a "No homo" disclaimer. I just think "C'mon man, be a woman".
Then again if a man compliments a woman there are also often sexual intentions
True but my thinking was more of undertones than intentions. A man's no homo disclaimer seems to stem to from the appearance of loss of masculinity while still trying to convey a somewhat feminine trait of revealing one's self with the compliment. Whereas if it's between a man and a woman I think it can be taken as a sincere, non-sexual compliment or more but the need to over-emphasize masculinity isn't there.
You’re probably right but again I think all this nuance is often lost on me. I can’t catch it. I will ponder for a bit to see if it sinks in.
Does that mean I can still see you in leather boots? Because from here you look
1 -
This content has been removed.
-
MistressSara wrote: »MrSunshinez wrote: »MistressSara wrote: »MrSunshinez wrote: »MistressSara wrote: »MrSunshinez wrote: »I find it fascinating how women can compliment each other about their looks and not attach any homosexual undertones to it. Yet, if men do it most feel they have to add a "No homo" disclaimer. I just think "C'mon man, be a woman".
Then again if a man compliments a woman there are also often sexual intentions
True but my thinking was more of undertones than intentions. A man's no homo disclaimer seems to stem to from the appearance of loss of masculinity while still trying to convey a somewhat feminine trait of revealing one's self with the compliment. Whereas if it's between a man and a woman I think it can be taken as a sincere, non-sexual compliment or more but the need to over-emphasize masculinity isn't there.
You’re probably right but again I think all this nuance is often lost on me. I can’t catch it. I will ponder for a bit to see if it sinks in.
Does that mean I can still see you in leather boots? Because from here you look
Lol. You can picture me however you like.
It's that name again. Please...don't change it!0 -
This content has been removed.
-
MistressSara wrote: »MrSunshinez wrote: »MistressSara wrote: »MrSunshinez wrote: »MistressSara wrote: »MrSunshinez wrote: »MistressSara wrote: »MrSunshinez wrote: »I find it fascinating how women can compliment each other about their looks and not attach any homosexual undertones to it. Yet, if men do it most feel they have to add a "No homo" disclaimer. I just think "C'mon man, be a woman".
Then again if a man compliments a woman there are also often sexual intentions
True but my thinking was more of undertones than intentions. A man's no homo disclaimer seems to stem to from the appearance of loss of masculinity while still trying to convey a somewhat feminine trait of revealing one's self with the compliment. Whereas if it's between a man and a woman I think it can be taken as a sincere, non-sexual compliment or more but the need to over-emphasize masculinity isn't there.
You’re probably right but again I think all this nuance is often lost on me. I can’t catch it. I will ponder for a bit to see if it sinks in.
Does that mean I can still see you in leather boots? Because from here you look
Lol. You can picture me however you like.
It's that name again. Please...don't change it!
I thought maybe Sister Mary Ignatius so I could explain it all to you
I'll have nun of that. Wait. I have google Sister Mary Ignatius so I know what I'm saying nun to.3 -
This content has been removed.
-
This content has been removed.
-
I like! Mistress Contradiction?1
-
This content has been removed.
-
MistressSara wrote: »MistressSara wrote: »MrSunshinez wrote: »MistressSara wrote: »MrSunshinez wrote: »MistressSara wrote: »MrSunshinez wrote: »MistressSara wrote: »MrSunshinez wrote: »MistressSara wrote: »MrSunshinez wrote: »I find it fascinating how women can compliment each other about their looks and not attach any homosexual undertones to it. Yet, if men do it most feel they have to add a "No homo" disclaimer. I just think "C'mon man, be a woman".
Then again if a man compliments a woman there are also often sexual intentions
True but my thinking was more of undertones than intentions. A man's no homo disclaimer seems to stem to from the appearance of loss of masculinity while still trying to convey a somewhat feminine trait of revealing one's self with the compliment. Whereas if it's between a man and a woman I think it can be taken as a sincere, non-sexual compliment or more but the need to over-emphasize masculinity isn't there.
You’re probably right but again I think all this nuance is often lost on me. I can’t catch it. I will ponder for a bit to see if it sinks in.
Does that mean I can still see you in leather boots? Because from here you look
Lol. You can picture me however you like.
It's that name again. Please...don't change it!
I thought maybe Sister Mary Ignatius so I could explain it all to you
I'll have nun of that. Wait. I have google Sister Mary Ignatius so I know what I'm saying nun to.
Or how about just O?
Google O’s story too while you’re at it
I know O1 -
This content has been removed.
-
This content has been removed.
-
-
This content has been removed.
-
My new word for the day:
commensalism -
an association between two organisms in which one benefits and the other derives neither harm nor benefit.
2 -
This content has been removed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.4K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.2K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 424 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.7K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions