Random Thought For the Day

1133134136138139299

Replies

  • honeybee__12
    honeybee__12 Posts: 15,688 Member
    v4e71d5burwc.jpeg
  • RhiAnLewis17
    RhiAnLewis17 Posts: 2,299 Member
    v4e71d5burwc.jpeg

    😂😂😂😂
  • cee134
    cee134 Posts: 33,711 Member
    There's no logical reason for shorts to be the same price as pants.
  • cee134
    cee134 Posts: 33,711 Member
    Is the fact that irons are not made from iron an example of irony?
  • honeybee__12
    honeybee__12 Posts: 15,688 Member
    lha01lu71c5s.jpeg

    I did this once
    He was not amused :#
  • MrSunshinez
    MrSunshinez Posts: 573 Member
    edited February 2019
    lha01lu71c5s.jpeg

    I did this once
    He was not amused :#

    Love it :D
  • honeybee__12
    honeybee__12 Posts: 15,688 Member
    Hey woo,
    woo know who woo are,

    93pfmixqt1vu.jpeg
  • This content has been removed.
  • This content has been removed.
  • Tigg_er
    Tigg_er Posts: 22,001 Member
    I find it fascinating how women can compliment each other about their looks and not attach any homosexual undertones to it. Yet, if men do it most feel they have to add a "No homo" disclaimer. I just think "C'mon man, be a woman".

    Then again if a man compliments a woman there are also often sexual intentions

    Yep and thats not right ,,,I tell my mom she looks great all the time and my sisters and Women I work with ,,
    Doesn't mean I want to bed them.
  • MrSunshinez
    MrSunshinez Posts: 573 Member
    edited February 2019
    I find it fascinating how women can compliment each other about their looks and not attach any homosexual undertones to it. Yet, if men do it most feel they have to add a "No homo" disclaimer. I just think "C'mon man, be a woman".

    Then again if a man compliments a woman there are also often sexual intentions

    True but my thinking was more of undertones than intentions. A man's no homo disclaimer seems to stem to from the appearance of loss of masculinity while still trying to convey a somewhat feminine trait of revealing one's self with the compliment. Whereas if it's between a man and a woman I think it can be taken as a sincere, non-sexual compliment or more but the need to over-emphasize masculinity isn't there.
  • This content has been removed.
  • MrSunshinez
    MrSunshinez Posts: 573 Member
    I find it fascinating how women can compliment each other about their looks and not attach any homosexual undertones to it. Yet, if men do it most feel they have to add a "No homo" disclaimer. I just think "C'mon man, be a woman".

    Then again if a man compliments a woman there are also often sexual intentions

    True but my thinking was more of undertones than intentions. A man's no homo disclaimer seems to stem to from the appearance of loss of masculinity while still trying to convey a somewhat feminine trait of revealing one's self with the compliment. Whereas if it's between a man and a woman I think it can be taken as a sincere, non-sexual compliment or more but the need to over-emphasize masculinity isn't there.

    You’re probably right but again I think all this nuance is often lost on me. I can’t catch it. I will ponder for a bit to see if it sinks in.

    Does that mean I can still see you in leather boots? Because from here you look >:)
  • This content has been removed.
  • MrSunshinez
    MrSunshinez Posts: 573 Member
    I find it fascinating how women can compliment each other about their looks and not attach any homosexual undertones to it. Yet, if men do it most feel they have to add a "No homo" disclaimer. I just think "C'mon man, be a woman".

    Then again if a man compliments a woman there are also often sexual intentions

    True but my thinking was more of undertones than intentions. A man's no homo disclaimer seems to stem to from the appearance of loss of masculinity while still trying to convey a somewhat feminine trait of revealing one's self with the compliment. Whereas if it's between a man and a woman I think it can be taken as a sincere, non-sexual compliment or more but the need to over-emphasize masculinity isn't there.

    You’re probably right but again I think all this nuance is often lost on me. I can’t catch it. I will ponder for a bit to see if it sinks in.

    Does that mean I can still see you in leather boots? Because from here you look >:)

    Lol. You can picture me however you like.

    It's that name again. Please...don't change it!
  • This content has been removed.
  • MrSunshinez
    MrSunshinez Posts: 573 Member
    edited February 2019
    I find it fascinating how women can compliment each other about their looks and not attach any homosexual undertones to it. Yet, if men do it most feel they have to add a "No homo" disclaimer. I just think "C'mon man, be a woman".

    Then again if a man compliments a woman there are also often sexual intentions

    True but my thinking was more of undertones than intentions. A man's no homo disclaimer seems to stem to from the appearance of loss of masculinity while still trying to convey a somewhat feminine trait of revealing one's self with the compliment. Whereas if it's between a man and a woman I think it can be taken as a sincere, non-sexual compliment or more but the need to over-emphasize masculinity isn't there.

    You’re probably right but again I think all this nuance is often lost on me. I can’t catch it. I will ponder for a bit to see if it sinks in.

    Does that mean I can still see you in leather boots? Because from here you look >:)

    Lol. You can picture me however you like.

    It's that name again. Please...don't change it!

    I thought maybe Sister Mary Ignatius so I could explain it all to you

    I'll have nun of that. Wait. I have google Sister Mary Ignatius so I know what I'm saying nun to.
  • This content has been removed.
  • This content has been removed.
  • MrSunshinez
    MrSunshinez Posts: 573 Member
    I like! Mistress Contradiction?
  • This content has been removed.
  • MrSunshinez
    MrSunshinez Posts: 573 Member
    I find it fascinating how women can compliment each other about their looks and not attach any homosexual undertones to it. Yet, if men do it most feel they have to add a "No homo" disclaimer. I just think "C'mon man, be a woman".

    Then again if a man compliments a woman there are also often sexual intentions

    True but my thinking was more of undertones than intentions. A man's no homo disclaimer seems to stem to from the appearance of loss of masculinity while still trying to convey a somewhat feminine trait of revealing one's self with the compliment. Whereas if it's between a man and a woman I think it can be taken as a sincere, non-sexual compliment or more but the need to over-emphasize masculinity isn't there.

    You’re probably right but again I think all this nuance is often lost on me. I can’t catch it. I will ponder for a bit to see if it sinks in.

    Does that mean I can still see you in leather boots? Because from here you look >:)

    Lol. You can picture me however you like.

    It's that name again. Please...don't change it!

    I thought maybe Sister Mary Ignatius so I could explain it all to you

    I'll have nun of that. Wait. I have google Sister Mary Ignatius so I know what I'm saying nun to.

    Or how about just O?

    Google O’s story too while you’re at it

    I know O
  • This content has been removed.
  • This content has been removed.
  • MrSunshinez
    MrSunshinez Posts: 573 Member
    1sphere wrote: »
    I won't surrender to darkness, but I might surrender to failure.

    I prefer to surrender to the unknown. I'll be ready for the fight and ready for the light.
  • This content has been removed.
  • honeybee__12
    honeybee__12 Posts: 15,688 Member
    My new word for the day:

    commensalism -
    an association between two organisms in which one benefits and the other derives neither harm nor benefit.
    :/
  • Unknown
    edited February 2019
    This content has been removed.