Welcome to Debate Club! Please be aware that this is a space for respectful debate, and that your ideas will be challenged here. Please remember to critique the argument, not the author.

This decades “health woo”

1235714

Replies

  • Sloth2016
    Sloth2016 Posts: 838 Member
    edited October 2017
    .
  • This content has been removed.
  • Packerjohn
    Packerjohn Posts: 4,855 Member
    I think MLM scemes have been around for decades, they get a face lift every now and then but they will never go away

    They have been but have festered and become an epidemic with the spread of social media.
  • This content has been removed.
  • byustrongman
    byustrongman Posts: 74 Member
    Chronic Lyme Disease
    Morgellon's
  • celiah909
    celiah909 Posts: 141 Member

    What I have been noticing more lately is that people are not blaming weight gain on the right things. It's either too many carbs, some random disease, etc. I hate to be blunt, but it's because everyone eats TOO much. We as a society, put way too much importance on food. We celebrate with it, we gift it, restaurants serve WAY too much of it...we raise our kids to "clean their plates"...we value that "full" feeling.

    I couldn’t agree more

  • lporter229
    lporter229 Posts: 4,907 Member
    lporter229 wrote: »
    I think the protein obsession is getting out of hand.

    That's because research is showing how important it is. The older you get, the more you need. Sarcopenia is no joke.

    Now. Putting it in foods like breakfast cereals and having the label scream "PROTEIN!" when it's a lousy source of low quality protein? That's silly.

    This is exactly what I am talking about. Also that I see post after post from 150 lb people asking how they can get 200g of protein in their diet.
  • jseams1234
    jseams1234 Posts: 1,219 Member
    lporter229 wrote: »
    lporter229 wrote: »
    I think the protein obsession is getting out of hand.

    That's because research is showing how important it is. The older you get, the more you need. Sarcopenia is no joke.

    Now. Putting it in foods like breakfast cereals and having the label scream "PROTEIN!" when it's a lousy source of low quality protein? That's silly.

    This is exactly what I am talking about. Also that I see post after post from 150 lb people asking how they can get 200g of protein in their diet.

    "1 gram of protein per pound of body weight (2.2 g/kg of BW) per day has been a bodybuilding rule of thumb for decades. Higher levels of protein intake, usually in the range of 1.2 – 1.5 grams per pound of body weight (2.6 – 3.3 g/kg BW) per day, are commonly recommended when “cutting” to lose fat."

    1.5 x 150 = 225g
    1.2 x 150 = 180g

    I think 200g for a 150 pound individual who is lifting heavy and in the midst of a cut isn't unreasonable. It's probably more than they need, as it is sometimes unclear if that recommendation means total body weight or LBM. Personally, I've always just counted my total body weight, as it's simply easier to figure out. ;)
  • GottaBurnEmAll
    GottaBurnEmAll Posts: 7,722 Member
    lporter229 wrote: »
    lporter229 wrote: »
    I think the protein obsession is getting out of hand.

    That's because research is showing how important it is. The older you get, the more you need. Sarcopenia is no joke.

    Now. Putting it in foods like breakfast cereals and having the label scream "PROTEIN!" when it's a lousy source of low quality protein? That's silly.

    This is exactly what I am talking about. Also that I see post after post from 150 lb people asking how they can get 200g of protein in their diet.

    For some very lean individuals who are in certain situations (like cutting for contest prep), that is not actually an outlandish protein intake.

    I was listening to a Lyle McDonald podcast recently, and he was talking about how he had a group of people he dieted down to contest lean and they lost no muscle though most people doing contest prep usually do, and it was because he had them eating INSANE amounts of protein while training.
  • lemurcat12
    lemurcat12 Posts: 30,886 Member
    jdlobb wrote: »
    lemurcat12 wrote: »
    jdlobb wrote: »
    Aaron_K123 wrote: »
    Anti-vax, anti-GMO, "organic", "natural". I'm not a terribly political person but for a while there I thought the right in the United States had a pretty strong lead in the conspiracy theory nutjobbery until I ran into these communities of "activists".

    none of these are unique to the left. There are TONS of believers in all of these among your right-wing, evangelical, suburb demographics. Especially anti-vax. The current, Republican, president is an anti-vaxxer.

    anti-GMO is more on the far left, but it also cut across political ideologies.

    Yeah, a lot of the anti medical stuff is kind of located where the extreme left meets the extreme right.

    it's generally symptomatic of mistrust of institutions, which is a common feature of left and right extremists.

    Agree. I've seen it among the same people who want to figure out how not to have a SocSec # and stuff like that.
  • jdlobb
    jdlobb Posts: 1,232 Member
    edited October 2017
    CSARdiver wrote: »
    jdlobb wrote: »
    lemurcat12 wrote: »
    jdlobb wrote: »
    Aaron_K123 wrote: »
    Anti-vax, anti-GMO, "organic", "natural". I'm not a terribly political person but for a while there I thought the right in the United States had a pretty strong lead in the conspiracy theory nutjobbery until I ran into these communities of "activists".

    none of these are unique to the left. There are TONS of believers in all of these among your right-wing, evangelical, suburb demographics. Especially anti-vax. The current, Republican, president is an anti-vaxxer.

    anti-GMO is more on the far left, but it also cut across political ideologies.

    Yeah, a lot of the anti medical stuff is kind of located where the extreme left meets the extreme right.

    it's generally symptomatic of mistrust of institutions, which is a common feature of left and right extremists.

    I've always found this phenomenon fascinating as the extreme wings also trend towards authoritarian, yet both right and left mistrust institutions. Is this textbook transference in that the extremists do not trust people with power because they secretly know that they could not be trusted with power? ...but yet they are willing to commit violence to gain power.

    I don't know if it's transference, maybe. I think it's definitely a case of they don't trust OTHERS with power and want it exclusively for themselves.

    Interestingly, both groups can look at the same institution and perceive different, sometimes diametrically opposed, "others" as being the ones currently with power. A phenomenon I've always found fascinating.
  • NorthCascades
    NorthCascades Posts: 10,968 Member
    I don't think most people who don't like GMOs or vaccines want much power, most people don't. Obviously some turn their pet worry into a media career but got every one of those there are a thousand quiet followers who are just looking their day to day lives.

    I suspect they have varied reasons. One of the original OJ jurors voted not guilty because she took a pregnancy test that gave the wrong answer, and therefore didn't trust science.
  • jdlobb
    jdlobb Posts: 1,232 Member
    I don't think most people who don't like GMOs or vaccines want much power, most people don't. Obviously some turn their pet worry into a media career but got every one of those there are a thousand quiet followers who are just looking their day to day lives.

    I suspect they have varied reasons. One of the original OJ jurors voted not guilty because she took a pregnancy test that gave the wrong answer, and therefore didn't trust science.

    I absolutely think they want power, even if not for themselves individually, but for people who share their beliefs. That's still definitely definable as wanting power.