Finding Meaning & Delivering Confessions
Replies
-
You're vs. your
Then vs. than
I'm not certain even you qualify to post in this thread, OP.
Also:^my point was driving conversation to philosophy - to see if I could get people that divulge in lackluster entertainment through reading text - yet entertain them enough to guide them through philosophical discourse.
When referring to homo sapiens, it is always "who" rather than "that."
Bravo!
LMAO! - if my grammatical blunders is what constitutes being taken seriously or not I will be sure to slave over every sentence structure.
However, I think for the fellow thinkers out there - my points came across accurately.
agree that there were much more poignant arguments to denounce you with then gramar.
Sadly, I was begging for a denouncement - yet I received NONE.
With every word you type in every thread, you beg for denouncement.
yet - I repeat once again. I received no denouncement, not an iota of even a pause for me to reconsider or elaborate.
I welcome and have welcomed diversity and questioning of the positions I put forth - yet no one made a single case.
I was expecting at least 1-2% of the participants to actually help me. Ironically, the only one that helped me is one of the last ones I would have expected - but I hit my 1-2% target.
Ignorance may be bliss
-to some it's just unsophisticated.
You mentioned a handful of philosophers. You didn't present any original critical thinking about their ideas. What was there to denounce?
Positive disintegration? o.O0 -
Sadly, I was begging for a denouncement - yet I received NONE.
people were pulling YOU apart left and right.
if what you really wanted them to examine were the ideas of the pyschologists or philosophers you mentioned, your going to get almost none of that because of the arogant, snide atmosphere of your OP
^ I think in actuality - I'm talking in constructs - abstracts - there is simply not a capacity for them to even understand because they have no true 'self' to even have internal dialogue and debate about my points. - they are stuck in a collective and can't see the folly in it - in fact they can't see much of anything. To them life is simply waiting to the next weekend where they can waste it away doing nothing, and they also drive on for the two weeks of PTO each year to sit on a beach or mountain and once again simply waste away and die. They have no idea of their true mortality. They have no idea of how temporary this life is for them and how fast time will begin to move once they realize in their internal clock the percentages are going to be getting much less and less.
Money, power, family, relationships, friends, food, knowledge, even happiness itself - its all vain.
They are already to accept death because they never accepted life.
No, most people got it. You're not that smart. In fact, the sheer fact that you are unable to translate basic philosophical concepts into every day language confirms that you aren't that smart.0 -
I totally agree with him, I'm not boasting about my IQ - the TOPIC OF CONVERSATION IS ABOUT THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE GIFTED!
Da FAQ?! How does this BASIC BASIC observation get lost on SO many of you?
And I get grief for using the word SIMPLETON?!0 -
I totally agree with him, I'm not boasting about my IQ - the TOPIC OF CONVERSATION IS ABOUT THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE GIFTED!
Da FAQ?! How does this BASIC BASIC observation get lost on SO many of you?
And I get grief for using the word SIMPLETON?!
Weren't you supposed to leave the thread like an hour ago? lol0 -
Tearing something down to build it up? Now where would one find an example of that on this thread? Or in the military?You're vs. your
Then vs. than
I'm not certain even you qualify to post in this thread, OP.
Also:^my point was driving conversation to philosophy - to see if I could get people that divulge in lackluster entertainment through reading text - yet entertain them enough to guide them through philosophical discourse.
When referring to homo sapiens, it is always "who" rather than "that."
Bravo!
LMAO! - if my grammatical blunders is what constitutes being taken seriously or not I will be sure to slave over every sentence structure.
However, I think for the fellow thinkers out there - my points came across accurately.
agree that there were much more poignant arguments to denounce you with then gramar.
Sadly, I was begging for a denouncement - yet I received NONE.
With every word you type in every thread, you beg for denouncement.
yet - I repeat once again. I received no denouncement, not an iota of even a pause for me to reconsider or elaborate.
I welcome and have welcomed diversity and questioning of the positions I put forth - yet no one made a single case.
I was expecting at least 1-2% of the participants to actually help me. Ironically, the only one that helped me is one of the last ones I would have expected - but I hit my 1-2% target.
Ignorance may be bliss
-to some it's just unsophisticated.
You mentioned a handful of philosophers. You didn't present any original critical thinking about their ideas. What was there to denounce?
Positive disintegration? o.O
What about it?0 -
Your point has been to let us all know how intelligent you are. But your lack of adequate grammar, spelling and punctuation tell another story entirely.You're vs. your
Then vs. than
I'm not certain even you qualify to post in this thread, OP.
Also:^my point was driving conversation to philosophy - to see if I could get people that divulge in lackluster entertainment through reading text - yet entertain them enough to guide them through philosophical discourse.
When referring to homo sapiens, it is always "who" rather than "that."
Bravo!
LMAO! - if my grammatical blunders is what constitutes being taken seriously or not I will be sure to slave over every sentence structure.
However, I think for the fellow thinkers out there - my points came across accurately.
No? that has not been my point?
Entirely shocking. Like shocking- as in I get goosebumps at these assumptions that are undertaken not by a person but by the herd.
Just shocking.0 -
I totally agree with him, I'm not boasting about my IQ - the TOPIC OF CONVERSATION IS ABOUT THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE GIFTED!
Da FAQ?! How does this BASIC BASIC observation get lost on SO many of you?
And I get grief for using the word SIMPLETON?!
Weren't you supposed to leave the thread like an hour ago? lol
aren't you sassy?0 -
Sadly, I was begging for a denouncement - yet I received NONE.
people were pulling YOU apart left and right.
if what you really wanted them to examine were the ideas of the pyschologists or philosophers you mentioned, your going to get almost none of that because of the arogant, snide atmosphere of your OP
^ I think in actuality - I'm talking in constructs - abstracts - there is simply not a capacity for them to even understand because they have no true 'self' to even have internal dialogue and debate about my points. - they are stuck in a collective and can't see the folly in it - in fact they can't see much of anything. To them life is simply waiting to the next weekend where they can waste it away doing nothing, and they also drive on for the two weeks of PTO each year to sit on a beach or mountain and once again simply waste away and die. They have no idea of their true mortality. They have no idea of how temporary this life is for them and how fast time will begin to move once they realize in their internal clock the percentages are going to be getting much less and less.
Money, power, family, relationships, friends, food, knowledge, even happiness itself - its all vain.
They are already to accept death because they never accepted life.
I liked the opera "Dialogues des Carmélites" better.
eta - Got the name of the opera wrong. Sorry.0 -
Oh my sweet summer child ...
Your point has been to let us all know how intelligent you are. But your lack of adequate grammar, spelling and punctuation tell another story entirely.You're vs. your
Then vs. than
I'm not certain even you qualify to post in this thread, OP.
Also:^my point was driving conversation to philosophy - to see if I could get people that divulge in lackluster entertainment through reading text - yet entertain them enough to guide them through philosophical discourse.
When referring to homo sapiens, it is always "who" rather than "that."
Bravo!
LMAO! - if my grammatical blunders is what constitutes being taken seriously or not I will be sure to slave over every sentence structure.
However, I think for the fellow thinkers out there - my points came across accurately.
No? that has not been my point?
Entirely shocking. Like shocking- as in I get goosebumps at these assumptions that are undertaken not by a person but by the herd.
Just shocking.
I could tell you something right now that would absolutely blow your mind. But I have no interest in assisting someone as self-involved as you are so I won't.
Now I must go read about Edward V, his little brother and Richard III.0 -
Considering your post history...Money, power, family, relationships, friends, food, knowledge, even happiness itself - its all vain.
They are already to accept death because they never accepted life.
0 -
I totally agree with him, I'm not boasting about my IQ - the TOPIC OF CONVERSATION IS ABOUT THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE GIFTED!
Da FAQ?! How does this BASIC BASIC observation get lost on SO many of you?
And I get grief for using the word SIMPLETON?!
Weren't you supposed to leave the thread like an hour ago? lol
aren't you sassy?
huehuehue.:flowerforyou:
In all fairness, he did say he couldn't waste time on any of us simpletons anymore. I guess his schedule freed up.0 -
It's because he's so busy accepting life and being superior.
I totally agree with him, I'm not boasting about my IQ - the TOPIC OF CONVERSATION IS ABOUT THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE GIFTED!
Da FAQ?! How does this BASIC BASIC observation get lost on SO many of you?
And I get grief for using the word SIMPLETON?!
Weren't you supposed to leave the thread like an hour ago? lol
aren't you sassy?
huehuehue.:flowerforyou:
In all fairness, he did say he couldn't waste time on any of us simpletons anymore. I guess his schedule freed up.0 -
You are sooo boring. I knew a guy like you on another message board. If you want satisfaction, sit in a corner and talk to yourself. You'll always like what you hear that way.0
-
Tearing something down to build it up? Now where would one find an example of that on this thread? Or in the military?You're vs. your
Then vs. than
I'm not certain even you qualify to post in this thread, OP.
Also:^my point was driving conversation to philosophy - to see if I could get people that divulge in lackluster entertainment through reading text - yet entertain them enough to guide them through philosophical discourse.
When referring to homo sapiens, it is always "who" rather than "that."
Bravo!
LMAO! - if my grammatical blunders is what constitutes being taken seriously or not I will be sure to slave over every sentence structure.
However, I think for the fellow thinkers out there - my points came across accurately.
agree that there were much more poignant arguments to denounce you with then gramar.
Sadly, I was begging for a denouncement - yet I received NONE.
With every word you type in every thread, you beg for denouncement.
yet - I repeat once again. I received no denouncement, not an iota of even a pause for me to reconsider or elaborate.
I welcome and have welcomed diversity and questioning of the positions I put forth - yet no one made a single case.
I was expecting at least 1-2% of the participants to actually help me. Ironically, the only one that helped me is one of the last ones I would have expected - but I hit my 1-2% target.
Ignorance may be bliss
-to some it's just unsophisticated.
You mentioned a handful of philosophers. You didn't present any original critical thinking about their ideas. What was there to denounce?
Positive disintegration? o.O
What about it?
omg.
WHAT DA FAQ.
-if you can't relate and exhibit NO OVEREXCITABIITIES YOU WILL NOT BE ABLE TO EVEN UNDERSTAND THIS! Much less provide me any light on it. The example is yourself! YOU! YOUR LIFE EXPERIENCE! The MILITARY! Have you not seen my thoughts on herd and collective thinking?! I of course have nothing wrong with the military but it runs against the whole concept of the development of the individual running against the herd! I made that like CRYSTAL FAQING CLEAR on the FIRST FAQING post. Now the geniuses that did PM - THEY exhibit at least 3+ of the overexcitabilities. I immediately could tell if they were genius or not- they can shed light or negate from my points. - if you can't even experience so it I don't know how you could think you could provide insight to the discussion?0 -
0 -
Considering your post history...Money, power, family, relationships, friends, food, knowledge, even happiness itself - its all vain.
They are already to accept death because they never accepted life.
more so than you even realize..0 -
Oh my sweet summer child ...
Your point has been to let us all know how intelligent you are. But your lack of adequate grammar, spelling and punctuation tell another story entirely.You're vs. your
Then vs. than
I'm not certain even you qualify to post in this thread, OP.
Also:^my point was driving conversation to philosophy - to see if I could get people that divulge in lackluster entertainment through reading text - yet entertain them enough to guide them through philosophical discourse.
When referring to homo sapiens, it is always "who" rather than "that."
Bravo!
LMAO! - if my grammatical blunders is what constitutes being taken seriously or not I will be sure to slave over every sentence structure.
However, I think for the fellow thinkers out there - my points came across accurately.
No? that has not been my point?
Entirely shocking. Like shocking- as in I get goosebumps at these assumptions that are undertaken not by a person but by the herd.
Just shocking.
I could tell you something right now that would absolutely blow your mind. But I have no interest in assisting someone as self-involved as you are so I won't.
Now I must go read about Edward V, his little brother and Richard III.
ahh.. well don't do that!
what is it?!0 -
Well, dear, I read your little link and I exhibit four out of five and my IQ, by your standards, is genius.
Tearing something down to build it up? Now where would one find an example of that on this thread? Or in the military?You're vs. your
Then vs. than
I'm not certain even you qualify to post in this thread, OP.
Also:^my point was driving conversation to philosophy - to see if I could get people that divulge in lackluster entertainment through reading text - yet entertain them enough to guide them through philosophical discourse.
When referring to homo sapiens, it is always "who" rather than "that."
Bravo!
LMAO! - if my grammatical blunders is what constitutes being taken seriously or not I will be sure to slave over every sentence structure.
However, I think for the fellow thinkers out there - my points came across accurately.
agree that there were much more poignant arguments to denounce you with then gramar.
Sadly, I was begging for a denouncement - yet I received NONE.
With every word you type in every thread, you beg for denouncement.
yet - I repeat once again. I received no denouncement, not an iota of even a pause for me to reconsider or elaborate.
I welcome and have welcomed diversity and questioning of the positions I put forth - yet no one made a single case.
I was expecting at least 1-2% of the participants to actually help me. Ironically, the only one that helped me is one of the last ones I would have expected - but I hit my 1-2% target.
Ignorance may be bliss
-to some it's just unsophisticated.
You mentioned a handful of philosophers. You didn't present any original critical thinking about their ideas. What was there to denounce?
Positive disintegration? o.O
What about it?
omg.
WHAT DA FAQ.
-if you can't relate and exhibit NO OVEREXCITABIITIES YOU WILL NOT BE ABLE TO EVEN UNDERSTAND THIS! Much less provide me any light on it. The example is yourself! YOU! YOUR LIFE EXPERIENCE! The MILITARY! Have you not seen my thoughts on herd and collective thinking?! I of course have nothing wrong with the military but it runs against the whole concept of the development of the individual running against the herd! I made that like CRYSTAL FAQING CLEAR on the FIRST FAQING post. Now the geniuses that did PM - THEY exhibit at least 3+ of the overexcitabilities. I immediately could tell if they were genius or not- they can shed light or negate from my points. - if you can't even experience so it I don't know how you could think you could provide insight to the discussion?
Perhaps, just perhaps, I understand this better than you understand it. Thus my ability to put it into layman's terms rather than throwing around a bunch of big words and sentences that are barely readable (in the sense that I'm not sure English is your first language, not that I don't know what the words mean).
And you're planning to write a book?0 -
You are sooo boring. I knew a guy like you on another message board. If you want satisfaction, sit in a corner and talk to yourself. You'll always like what you hear that way.
^sigh...your obviously not a thinker...0 -
Once again considering your post history...Have you not seen my thoughts on herd and collective thinking? 0 -
Well, dear, I read your little link and I exhibit four out of five and my IQ, by your standards, is genius.
Tearing something down to build it up? Now where would one find an example of that on this thread? Or in the military?You're vs. your
Then vs. than
I'm not certain even you qualify to post in this thread, OP.
Also:^my point was driving conversation to philosophy - to see if I could get people that divulge in lackluster entertainment through reading text - yet entertain them enough to guide them through philosophical discourse.
When referring to homo sapiens, it is always "who" rather than "that."
Bravo!
LMAO! - if my grammatical blunders is what constitutes being taken seriously or not I will be sure to slave over every sentence structure.
However, I think for the fellow thinkers out there - my points came across accurately.
agree that there were much more poignant arguments to denounce you with then gramar.
Sadly, I was begging for a denouncement - yet I received NONE.
With every word you type in every thread, you beg for denouncement.
yet - I repeat once again. I received no denouncement, not an iota of even a pause for me to reconsider or elaborate.
I welcome and have welcomed diversity and questioning of the positions I put forth - yet no one made a single case.
I was expecting at least 1-2% of the participants to actually help me. Ironically, the only one that helped me is one of the last ones I would have expected - but I hit my 1-2% target.
Ignorance may be bliss
-to some it's just unsophisticated.
You mentioned a handful of philosophers. You didn't present any original critical thinking about their ideas. What was there to denounce?
Positive disintegration? o.O
What about it?
omg.
WHAT DA FAQ.
-if you can't relate and exhibit NO OVEREXCITABIITIES YOU WILL NOT BE ABLE TO EVEN UNDERSTAND THIS! Much less provide me any light on it. The example is yourself! YOU! YOUR LIFE EXPERIENCE! The MILITARY! Have you not seen my thoughts on herd and collective thinking?! I of course have nothing wrong with the military but it runs against the whole concept of the development of the individual running against the herd! I made that like CRYSTAL FAQING CLEAR on the FIRST FAQING post. Now the geniuses that did PM - THEY exhibit at least 3+ of the overexcitabilities. I immediately could tell if they were genius or not- they can shed light or negate from my points. - if you can't even experience so it I don't know how you could think you could provide insight to the discussion?
Perhaps, just perhaps, I understand this better than you understand it. Thus my ability to put it into layman's terms rather than throwing around a bunch of big words and sentences that are barely readable (in the sense that I'm not sure English is your first language, not that I don't know what the words mean).
And you're planning to write a book?
Ok, apologies on my attitude with you then. I'll PM.0 -
You are sooo boring. I knew a guy like you on another message board. If you want satisfaction, sit in a corner and talk to yourself. You'll always like what you hear that way.
^sigh...your obviously not a thinker...
You're obviously not a writer.0 -
Once again considering your post history...Have you not seen my thoughts on herd and collective thinking?
? I've consistently moved up the river?
Don't see your point there.0 -
You are sooo boring. I knew a guy like you on another message board. If you want satisfaction, sit in a corner and talk to yourself. You'll always like what you hear that way.
^sigh...your obviously not a thinker...
the irony.... :laugh:0 -
:noway:You are sooo boring. I knew a guy like you on another message board. If you want satisfaction, sit in a corner and talk to yourself. You'll always like what you hear that way.
^sigh...your obviously not a thinker...
the irony.... :laugh:
lmao.. indeed.0 -
Have you not seen my thoughts on herd and collective thinking?
So, how does one see your thoughts on herd and collective thinking? Visual telepathy? Is there a book in the works for how to master this?0 -
You didn't actually submit research for your biography. You submitted a large, awkward, random assemblage of sentences. In fact, the sentences you apparently kidnapped in the dead of night and forced into this violent and arbitrary plan of yours clearly seemed to be placed on the thread against their will. Reading your post(s)/responses was like watching unfamiliar, uncomfortable people interact at a cocktail party that no one wanted to attend in the first place. You didn't submit research. You submitted a hostage situation.0
-
You didn't actually submit research for your biography. You submitted a large, awkward, random assemblage of sentences. In fact, the sentences you apparently kidnapped in the dead of night and forced into this violent and arbitrary plan of yours clearly seemed to be placed on the thread against their will. Reading your post(s)/responses was like watching unfamiliar, uncomfortable people interact at a cocktail party that no one wanted to attend in the first place. You didn't submit research. You submitted a hostage situation.
Are you writing a book? I would read your book.0 -
“If you can't explain it to a six year old, you don't understand it yourself.”
― Albert Einstein
After 10 pages not one six year old here knows what the hell you're on about. Maybe you're not as smart as you think you are.0 -
You are sooo boring. I knew a guy like you on another message board. If you want satisfaction, sit in a corner and talk to yourself. You'll always like what you hear that way.
^sigh...your obviously not a thinker...
Child, you do not even know me. You have no idea what my mind is capable of. I wouldn't be so quick to make judgements or be dismissive. In this instance- you may want to accept that YOU JUST DON'T KNOW.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.4K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.2K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 426 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.7K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions