Finding Meaning & Delivering Confessions

likitisplit

Don't know how beneficial it is once you break out terms like simpleton, accusations like "left to your own devices many of you move strictly off of impulse & 'herd' mentality rather then forming your own identity".

The current manner of enforcement of the community guidelines is entirely perplexing to me.

Yah. That's why it's such a low score. The OP should not have been overtly insulting, It is antithetical to his original premise. I guess there's always next time.

I referenced Nietzsche's point of the difference between the gifted individual being as different from primitive man as an ape is to the primitive man.

When I mention the above, sure it sounds condescending - then again I feel like I was just being direct - if you look into positive disintegration almost every average person is only at stage 1- aka moving off of impulse, and herd mentality - and yes I believe you all lack free will and take a very deterministic outlook when considering the odds of you having any free will.

Condescending? - You condescend your inner self by not crafting your own identity. - that is the true fault.

:shrugs:

Please define "primitive man"

While you're at it, define "ape"

No_Finish_Line

maybe you've stumbled onto something here... draw the readers in by pissing them off

likitisplit

Not enough GIFs.

Seriously, OP... I'd stop wasting your time with writing. You already know that no one is smart enough to "get" you.

Wait until he reads Wittgenstein.

cronly

puggglet

I don't have enough calories left for the amount of wine I'd need to be part of this thread

MRSpivey

You're vs. your
Then vs. than

I'm not certain even you qualify to post in this thread, OP.

Also:

^my point was driving conversation to philosophy - to see if I could get people that divulge in lackluster entertainment through reading text - yet entertain them enough to guide them through philosophical discourse.

When referring to homo sapiens, it is always "who" rather than "that."

Bravo Rml_16!
BTW OP, excellent choice of bait!

mommabenefield

MrTolerable

Don't know how beneficial it is once you break out terms like simpleton, accusations like "left to your own devices many of you move strictly off of impulse & 'herd' mentality rather then forming your own identity".

The current manner of enforcement of the community guidelines is entirely perplexing to me.

Yah. That's why it's such a low score. The OP should not have been overtly insulting, It is antithetical to his original premise. I guess there's always next time.

There won't be another next time for MFP you already served your utility. - Some of you have helped a great deal though! :flowerforyou:

The accusations of thinking collectively? - Well, frankly I'm happy to see are even coming across as accusatory.

Username_Not_Required

I don't have enough calories left for the amount of wine I'd need to be part of this thread

Forget the wine, this thread is full on weed mode right now

MrTolerable

You're vs. your
Then vs. than

I'm not certain even you qualify to post in this thread, OP.

Also:

^my point was driving conversation to philosophy - to see if I could get people that divulge in lackluster entertainment through reading text - yet entertain them enough to guide them through philosophical discourse.

When referring to homo sapiens, it is always "who" rather than "that."

Bravo!

LMAO! - if my grammatical blunders is what constitutes being taken seriously or not I will be sure to slave over every sentence structure.

However, I think for the fellow thinkers out there - my points came across accurately.

MrTolerable

I don't have enough calories left for the amount of wine I'd need to be part of this thread

Forget the wine, this thread is full on weed mode right now

We've all spent too much time in the psychosphere.

laterz

puggglet

I don't have enough calories left for the amount of wine I'd need to be part of this thread

Forget the wine, this thread is full on weed mode right now

That's only going to give me the munchies. No good can come of that lol over and out

Username_Not_Required

I don't have enough calories left for the amount of wine I'd need to be part of this thread

Forget the wine, this thread is full on weed mode right now

That's only going to give me the munchies. No good can come of that lol over and out

mmm frozen reece's pb cups

MrTolerable

Don't know how beneficial it is once you break out terms like simpleton, accusations like "left to your own devices many of you move strictly off of impulse & 'herd' mentality rather then forming your own identity".

The current manner of enforcement of the community guidelines is entirely perplexing to me.

Yah. That's why it's such a low score. The OP should not have been overtly insulting, It is antithetical to his original premise. I guess there's always next time.

I referenced Nietzsche's point of the difference between the gifted individual being as different from primitive man as an ape is to the primitive man.

When I mention the above, sure it sounds condescending - then again I feel like I was just being direct - if you look into positive disintegration almost every average person is only at stage 1- aka moving off of impulse, and herd mentality - and yes I believe you all lack free will and take a very deterministic outlook when considering the odds of you having any free will.

Condescending? - You condescend your inner self by not crafting your own identity. - that is the true fault.

:shrugs:

Please define "primitive man"

While you're at it, define "ape"

...

puggglet

I don't have enough calories left for the amount of wine I'd need to be part of this thread

Forget the wine, this thread is full on weed mode right now

That's only going to give me the munchies. No good can come of that lol over and out

mmm frozen reece's pb cups

Funny you should say that, just talking of munchies made me want to run to the freezer for pb cup Ben and jerrys!!!

Username_Not_Required

I don't have enough calories left for the amount of wine I'd need to be part of this thread

Forget the wine, this thread is full on weed mode right now

That's only going to give me the munchies. No good can come of that lol over and out

mmm frozen reece's pb cups

Funny you should say that, just talking of munchies made me want to run to the freezer for pb cup Ben and jerrys!!!

I have Ben and Jerry's Chunky Monkey calling my name

AllOutof_Bubblegum

10/10 would not read your auto/biography if I were offered money.

No_Finish_Line

You're vs. your
Then vs. than

I'm not certain even you qualify to post in this thread, OP.

Also:

^my point was driving conversation to philosophy - to see if I could get people that divulge in lackluster entertainment through reading text - yet entertain them enough to guide them through philosophical discourse.

When referring to homo sapiens, it is always "who" rather than "that."

Bravo!

LMAO! - if my grammatical blunders is what constitutes being taken seriously or not I will be sure to slave over every sentence structure.

However, I think for the fellow thinkers out there - my points came across accurately.

agree that there were much more poignant arguments to denounce you with then gramar.

puggglet

I don't have enough calories left for the amount of wine I'd need to be part of this thread

Forget the wine, this thread is full on weed mode right now

That's only going to give me the munchies. No good can come of that lol over and out

mmm frozen reece's pb cups

Funny you should say that, just talking of munchies made me want to run to the freezer for pb cup Ben and jerrys!!!

I have Ben and Jerry's Chunky Monkey calling my name

10 minutes here and I'm mentally knee deep in icecream and wine. You can all have a field day psycho analysing what that says about me ha I'm off to a thread better suited to my IQ

MrTolerable

You're vs. your
Then vs. than

I'm not certain even you qualify to post in this thread, OP.

Also:

^my point was driving conversation to philosophy - to see if I could get people that divulge in lackluster entertainment through reading text - yet entertain them enough to guide them through philosophical discourse.

When referring to homo sapiens, it is always "who" rather than "that."

Bravo!

LMAO! - if my grammatical blunders is what constitutes being taken seriously or not I will be sure to slave over every sentence structure.

However, I think for the fellow thinkers out there - my points came across accurately.

agree that there were much more poignant arguments to denounce you with then gramar.

Sadly, I was begging for a denouncement - yet I received NONE.

rml_16

Respectfully, left to your own devices many of you move strictly off of impulse & 'herd' mentality rather then forming your own identity

I think I have a new ambition...to be part of an alpaca herd.

I would if it meant Mike Rowe would come and shave me.

Where can I sign up for this?

You think if I knew I'd be here?

He did it on a Dirty Jobs episode. It's actually my favorite episode. They shave the cameraman at the end.

That was the funniest episode! Strapping the poor guy down on the table! Haha. And that one tuft of hair that was left by his ear always cracks me up.
This is where I make a dirty remark about Mike Rowe strapping me to a table...hehee:devil:

"And now it's time for mating ..."

If you don't follow him on Facebook, you should. He's so funny.

I also really like Val Kilmer, but my favorite thing about him is he'll put up something incredibly bizarre and people with comment with the angriest things. They get SO MAD when they don't get his joke, but it's always very surreal.

AllOutof_Bubblegum

You're vs. your
Then vs. than

I'm not certain even you qualify to post in this thread, OP.

Also:

^my point was driving conversation to philosophy - to see if I could get people that divulge in lackluster entertainment through reading text - yet entertain them enough to guide them through philosophical discourse.

When referring to homo sapiens, it is always "who" rather than "that."

Bravo!

LMAO! - if my grammatical blunders is what constitutes being taken seriously or not I will be sure to slave over every sentence structure.

However, I think for the fellow thinkers out there - my points came across accurately.

agree that there were much more poignant arguments to denounce you with then gramar.

Sadly, I was begging for a denouncement - yet I received NONE.

With every word you type in every thread, you beg for denouncement.

No_Finish_Line

Sadly, I was begging for a denouncement - yet I received NONE.

people were pulling YOU apart left and right.

if what you really wanted them to examine were the ideas of the pyschologists or philosophers you mentioned, your going to get almost none of that because of the arogant, snide atmosphere of your OP

MrTolerable

You're vs. your
Then vs. than

I'm not certain even you qualify to post in this thread, OP.

Also:

^my point was driving conversation to philosophy - to see if I could get people that divulge in lackluster entertainment through reading text - yet entertain them enough to guide them through philosophical discourse.

When referring to homo sapiens, it is always "who" rather than "that."

Bravo!

LMAO! - if my grammatical blunders is what constitutes being taken seriously or not I will be sure to slave over every sentence structure.

However, I think for the fellow thinkers out there - my points came across accurately.

agree that there were much more poignant arguments to denounce you with then gramar.

Sadly, I was begging for a denouncement - yet I received NONE.

With every word you type in every thread, you beg for denouncement.

yet - I repeat once again. I received no denouncement, not an iota of even a pause for me to reconsider or elaborate.

I welcome and have welcomed diversity and questioning of the positions I put forth - yet no one made a single case.

I was expecting at least 1-2% of the participants to actually help me. Ironically, the only one that helped me is one of the last ones I would have expected - but I hit my 1-2% target.

Ignorance may be bliss

-to some it's just unsophisticated.

MrTolerable

Sadly, I was begging for a denouncement - yet I received NONE.

people were pulling YOU apart left and right.

if what you really wanted them to examine were the ideas of the pyschologists or philosophers you mentioned, your going to get almost none of that because of the arogant, snide atmosphere of your OP

'pulling me apart left and right' - I've reanalyzed all of my post on MFP over and over. Researching the average makeup - the anonymity enables me to observe them just being them - and in a sense their ideal form of them self - what they seek most to portray - consciously or not. If a fellow thinker were to stumble onto this thread having a basic understanding of the philosophy and psychology approach I mention - what he would see before him - well, frankly I rest easy my case - the herd made many of my points for me.

rml_16

You're vs. your
Then vs. than

I'm not certain even you qualify to post in this thread, OP.

Also:

^my point was driving conversation to philosophy - to see if I could get people that divulge in lackluster entertainment through reading text - yet entertain them enough to guide them through philosophical discourse.

When referring to homo sapiens, it is always "who" rather than "that."

Bravo!

LMAO! - if my grammatical blunders is what constitutes being taken seriously or not I will be sure to slave over every sentence structure.

However, I think for the fellow thinkers out there - my points came across accurately.

Your point has been to let us all know how intelligent you are. But your lack of adequate grammar, spelling and punctuation tell another story entirely.

Cryptonomnomicon

likitisplit

You're vs. your
Then vs. than

I'm not certain even you qualify to post in this thread, OP.

Also:

^my point was driving conversation to philosophy - to see if I could get people that divulge in lackluster entertainment through reading text - yet entertain them enough to guide them through philosophical discourse.

When referring to homo sapiens, it is always "who" rather than "that."

Bravo!

LMAO! - if my grammatical blunders is what constitutes being taken seriously or not I will be sure to slave over every sentence structure.

However, I think for the fellow thinkers out there - my points came across accurately.

agree that there were much more poignant arguments to denounce you with then gramar.

Sadly, I was begging for a denouncement - yet I received NONE.

With every word you type in every thread, you beg for denouncement.

yet - I repeat once again. I received no denouncement, not an iota of even a pause for me to reconsider or elaborate.

I welcome and have welcomed diversity and questioning of the positions I put forth - yet no one made a single case.

I was expecting at least 1-2% of the participants to actually help me. Ironically, the only one that helped me is one of the last ones I would have expected - but I hit my 1-2% target.

Ignorance may be bliss

-to some it's just unsophisticated.

You mentioned a handful of philosophers. You didn't present any original critical thinking about their ideas. What was there to denounce?

Username_Not_Required

Sadly, I was begging for a denouncement - yet I received NONE.

people were pulling YOU apart left and right.

if what you really wanted them to examine were the ideas of the pyschologists or philosophers you mentioned, your going to get almost none of that because of the arogant, snide atmosphere of your OP

'pulling me apart left and right' - I've reanalyzed all of my post on MFP over and over. Researching the average makeup - the anonymity enables me to observe them just being them - and in a sense their ideal form of them self - what they seek most to portray - consciously or not. If a fellow thinker were to stumble onto this thread having a basic understanding of the philosophy and psychology approach I mention - what he would see before him - well, frankly I rest easy my case - the herd made many of my points for me.

The reason no one has directly addressed any of your points is because you haven't made any.

So they've done the next best thing - call you out for being a pseudo-intellectual bombast.

Please leave. No one in this thread likes you.

MrTolerable

Sadly, I was begging for a denouncement - yet I received NONE.

people were pulling YOU apart left and right.

if what you really wanted them to examine were the ideas of the pyschologists or philosophers you mentioned, your going to get almost none of that because of the arogant, snide atmosphere of your OP

^ I think in actuality - I'm talking in constructs - abstracts - there is simply not a capacity for them to even understand because they have no true 'self' to even have internal dialogue and debate about my points. - they are stuck in a collective and can't see the folly in it - in fact they can't see much of anything. To them life is simply waiting to the next weekend where they can waste it away doing nothing, and they also drive on for the two weeks of PTO each year to sit on a beach or mountain and once again simply waste away and die. They have no idea of their true mortality. They have no idea of how temporary this life is for them and how fast time will begin to move once they realize in their internal clock the percentages are going to be getting much less and less.

Money, power, family, relationships, friends, food, knowledge, even happiness itself - its all vain.

They are already to accept death because they never accepted life.