Home school vs public school?

ArtGeek22

From the point of view of a "certified, licensed school teacher," homeschooling can be suspicious. I have seen it done terribly - to the point where DHS gets involved - and I have seen it done perfectly.

It shouldn't really seem suspicious. In the state of Florida, if I am not mistaken, if you are a home schooler you are *required* to show some form of progress to show that your child isn't falling behind.

saragato

If she has anxiety problems that merit medication, it might be something that can be done temporarily until it's under enough control with therapy and meds for her to be on a campus without shutting down.

I wasn't raised in homeschooling, but I had to do it my senior year of high school. My junior year second semester I had a mental breakdown and had panic attacks just thinking about going to school that would keep me up literally all night and if I went anyway, by noon I had another attack and had to be picked up. After going through two psychiatrists and an outpatient mental facility I had been diagnosed with PTSD, Bipolar II, General Anxiety Disorder, Agoraphobia (generally a fear of people), OCD, and Androphobia (fear of men). I was just being put on proper medication so it was decided I was not stable enough to handle going back to school and I was put on something similar to homeschooling called "homebound" which is for kids already in the system who can't attend school because of injury, illness, pregnancy, etc.

The setup there was I saw the teacher once a week for an hour, was given homework and basic instruction, and had the rest of the week to do my work. And I had a lot of classes, I was doing my 4 senior year classes plus two semesters of chemistry and all the other classes I'd had the second semester of my junior year. I ended up with good grades and graduated. I don't regret not going my senior year because I knew I couldn't handle it emotionally. I wasn't stabilized, I barely knew what triggered my anxiety or anything else.

Like I said if it's because of her condition, I don't see it being bad as a temporary situation. If your sister or mom decides to try schooling on a campus for a semester or a school year sometime down the road and she's still not ready to be around her peers and with that much more pressure academic-wise, then she can go back until she's ready.

cannonsky

I don't have any ready answers for how to transform the public American education system, just the very beginnings of an approach. I do know that NCLB needs to go. My mother, who teaches 1st grade in an urban school district, and my father, who teaches high school English and German in a rural school district, despise it because it constrains them to the detriment of their students. My other thought is to make it much harder to become a teacher so that only the best and brightest can be in front of the classroom. In Finland, teaching is a high-status profession that pays well and has the same amount of respect (if not more) as the law and medicine because only the absolute best can become teachers (one reason why Finland is kicking America's butt in terms of education). In other words, the standards for becoming a teacher in America must be increased a lot. Lastly, since education is a political issue, we all must become involved with the political process, however dysfunctional it is. Federal and state educational mandates did not appear out of thin air.

I agree the NCLB has to go... but I'm not sure that the problem is that teachers are under-qualified or lack the will-power... No one becomes a teacher just to become one... considering the low pay/ low praise nature of the job... most teachers WANT to teach.. and they WANT to do it well.. I think the system is a failed one. I would personally get rid of many of the standardized tests...

ki4yxo

I homeschool our 8 year old son, and he has no social
issues with kids his own age, or with adults. I have a
schedule I follow where he tracks out when the neighbor's
kids are out of school. My neighbor says he's very bright,
and is a little ahead of there kid.

I think he's pretty well rounded. He loves to play outside
with his friends, ride his motorcycle, (TTR90) and is into
video games as well. When it comes time for school work,
everything gets shut off, and he does his work. If he gets
anything wrong, I send him back to correct the work. 9/10
times he gets it right the 2nd time. He's great in math,
reads at his level, and his writing needs improvement.
We're working on that...

I'm ordering a national standardized test for him today
from: http://www.setontesting.com/

kaetmarie

Btw, before I leave due to all these posts quite frankly pissing me off... Let me say this to all of the "professionals, psychiatrists, and teachers" who seem to be in absolute disagreement with home school in terms of social awkwardness, mental issues as I believe one person put it, and the ability to handle depression/anxiety. I'm really sorry to say this is such a harsh way and you can flame me all you want, but your degrees mean nothing unless you've experienced it yourself. You can sit there all day and argue psych 101 and the effects on children all you want, but unless you've actually been tormented day by day, experienced anxiety, depression, and tried home school for yourself as a alternative, you have no clue to the ACTUAL effects these things do to you. You're education tells you the most popular theories, methods and reasoning in order to gain a better understanding on human mentality, but the fact stands is that all of that knowledge exists without compassion and true understanding of what the individual experiences. Likewise most of those popular theories stem from small/large group studies done on a certain number of children in each given situation ,so to say that it stands for the majority is most of the time false. Like I said, you wouldn't understand unless you've been there yourself. While I agree the parents will must be strong and they must be prepared at the fullest in order for home school to work as it should with the child, how can you say that statistically the teachers in the US public schools are doing that? From personal experience, 90% of them don't give a rats *kitten* and hardly ever step in to prevent bullying or fooling around etc. Same goes with what some said about mental illness and shi* seriously wtf? I'd like to see some actual statistics that PROVE that home schooled children are more likely to become mentally unstable, and socially awkward than those in public school. And if you want to shoot me these statistics, don't forget to to include the fact that home schooled children make up a much smaller portion of children in the US okay? lol, I'm done, let the flaming begin.

I am said professional you're mad at. I also had serious anxiety issues when I was a kid/teenager/young adult. In my opinion, your logic can be used against your argument ... because unless you sat in one of my classes or conducted one of my studies, you are unable to say that I don't understand. Furthermore, I know very few people in my field who did not have some kind of negative experience fueling their desire to enter the field ... because truthfully, most people hate us and just based on your reaction and others on here, it's not a field that is FUN to be in a lot of the time.

I'm not going to speak for teachers, even though I was one briefly, but many parents came to me and yelled about how I didn't know what I was doing becaue I never had a learning disability. Now people get mad when I work with their [autistic, adhd, conduct disorder, bipolar, whatever] child because I never had those disorders. However, would anyone think twice about going to an oncologist who never actually had cancer? There's a reason that college and graduate school exist, because things have been learned and have been SUCCESSFULLY used with kids.

A personal experience is n=1. That's absolutely useful! I do case studies all the time, but I also do small and larger research studies. While there are a lot of intrapersonal differences between children, the truth of the matter is that there are also a lot of similarities. Not every single thing is going to work with every single child, but that's to be expected.

By the same token, homeschooling is not a one-size-fits-all-save-the-day solution for kids either. Do some kids benefit, absolutely! There are lots of great success stories with homeschooling, but there are also lots of success stories with public education.

I agree with you that you need not experience each person's reality to help him/her. But, on the other hand, reading case studies and the like, while helpful, might inform, as well as distort, your analysis of another case, since each case is unique.

I also agree there are home-schooling, as well as public schooling success stories, but even with public schooling success stories, many are the result of dedicated parents supporting the education at school and augmenting it.

Education stems primarily from the home environment in my opinion. And it's important to remember that most states place the responsibility to educate children squarely on the shoulders of parents, empowering them to make the ultimate decisions. It's as it should be.

Absolutely! I don't think anyone could seriously argue that good parents are not correlated with increased levels of academic, social, and emotional success. Obviously, the more support and love you have at home, the better you are going to be ... homeschooled or educated in the public system.

I also agree that some case studies could inform/distort work with another child. For me personally, I use research and case studies and my own experience as a starting point when I get a new student to work with. From there, I adjust as necessary. I recognize that I may be in the minority of school psychologists who do this (I hope not...), but I work very hard to find out what works for my students and they typically do very well, regardless of their personal issues, diagnoses, and home life. My kids have a LOT to overcome.

I guess what I've been trying to say all along is that public schools are not all bad and there are people who care very much. It's my hope that there are people like this in every district, but it does fall on the parents to seek out these people and get the supports for their kids. Just like, if they choose to homeschool, that it's their job to provide the best academic and social learning opportunities.

hillm12345

"Teaching would be a lot easier if parents weren't so uninvolved and actually cared about their child's education more".

I completely agree with this. I've met a variety of families over my years of teaching, and one thing the most successful students have in common is a solid home life with consistency, communication, and trust. Trust that the teacher is doing their job, and trust that the student will be held accountable for his or her work.

kaetmarie

Whoops!

HollyAus

Here is something kinda funny!!! My husband has a history degree and is alternatively certified and teaches middle school history at the public school in our town. I have a Math Education Degree, but I stay home with our three little ones, oldest will be 5 in September. I am homeschool oldest for pre-K and will continue to do so until I feel he is mature enough to hold his ground in public school. It's not that I don't think Public school is "good" enough for my kids, We just want them to have a good foundation first. Yes we do it for "religious" reasons as well. We are Baptist and my husband is a preacher, and we are getting ready to go to South Africa to be missionaries, so Our kids will probablly never be in public school. I have to laugh at it since we both could teach in public schools lol

But seriously... What's with all the nagging? I mean it's one thing to just state your opinion but to get all upset and "butt hurt" about is a little imature. So people think different than you? So what! Get used to it. lol. . Homeschooling wil work for some people and for others it wont. Its a choice that the parents have to make. Not anyone else.

Good luck with your sister! (At least I think it was your sister, I forgot by now lol)

vim_n_vigor

"Teaching would be a lot easier if parents weren't so uninvolved and actually cared about their child's education more".

I completely agree with this. I've met a variety of families over my years of teaching, and one thing the most successful students have in common is a solid home life with consistency, communication, and trust. Trust that the teacher is doing their job, and trust that the student will be held accountable for his or her work.

I can trust that the teacher is doing their job, but that doesn't mean that the job being assigned to them (NCLB regulations, etc) are really in the best interest of the children in their class. I had no problem with my son's teacher before I pulled him out of school. He was doing exactly what he was told he had to do for the curriculum of the Kindergarteners in the school district.

hillm12345

"Teaching would be a lot easier if parents weren't so uninvolved and actually cared about their child's education more".

I completely agree with this. I've met a variety of families over my years of teaching, and one thing the most successful students have in common is a solid home life with consistency, communication, and trust. Trust that the teacher is doing their job, and trust that the student will be held accountable for his or her work.

I can trust that the teacher is doing their job, but that doesn't mean that the job being assigned to them (NCLB regulations, etc) are really in the best interest of the children in their class. I had no problem with my son's teacher before I pulled him out of school. He was doing exactly what he was told he had to do for the curriculum of the Kindergarteners in the school district.

I do agree that the federal regulations get a bit ridiculous. I was mostly commenting to the fact that there are a large percentage of parents in the public school system that look at their underachieving child, and instead of holding said child accountable, they place blame on the teacher

ETA: These parents are also the parents that will switch schools 3 or 4 different times in a school year assuming the school/teacher is to blame for the child not performing up to potential.

_VoV

"Teaching would be a lot easier if parents weren't so uninvolved and actually cared about their child's education more".

I completely agree with this. I've met a variety of families over my years of teaching, and one thing the most successful students have in common is a solid home life with consistency, communication, and trust. Trust that the teacher is doing their job, and trust that the student will be held accountable for his or her work.

When I first read that first quote, I read it as 'Teaching would be a lot easier if parents weren't so *involved*....' Mainly, because that was what I experienced.

My oldest attended 1st grade for about 6 weeks before he crashed and burned. But, before we withdrew him, we went to parents' night, and were told what our 'involvement' was expected to be: feeding our kids, making sure they had enough sleep, and getting them out to the bus on time. All that sounded very 'hands off' to me, since all that custodial care was the bare minimum I was providing my child. I expected to be a lot more involved than that.

k8blujay2

From the point of view of a "certified, licensed school teacher," homeschooling can be suspicious. I have seen it done terribly - to the point where DHS gets involved - and I have seen it done perfectly.

It shouldn't really seem suspicious. In the state of Florida, if I am not mistaken, if you are a home schooler you are *required* to show some form of progress to show that your child isn't falling behind.

Many States are this way, if I am not mistaken.

_VoV

From the point of view of a "certified, licensed school teacher," homeschooling can be suspicious. I have seen it done terribly - to the point where DHS gets involved - and I have seen it done perfectly.

It shouldn't really seem suspicious. In the state of Florida, if I am not mistaken, if you are a home schooler you are *required* to show some form of progress to show that your child isn't falling behind.

Many States are this way, if I am not mistaken.

Some states do. But here in Connecticut, the state statutes merely say that children are expected to be educated in various academic subjects, including Connecticut history. The responsibility, according to state law, falls on the parents to see this is accomplished. Even filing a notice of intent to home-school with the public schools is suggested, not mandated by the state education department, not the legislation. Since it is not law, home schoolers can fly solo if they like. This may make some people nervous, but what I saw firsthand through the various home-school groups we joined was a lot of diverse styles of conscientious home-schooling. And most things came out in the wash, as the old expression goes.

tquig

Again, I want to re-iterate that the most important part of a home school program is the parent's ability to keep their child on track and focused. Also, it's important to note that curriculums change all the time as well as state standards. To choose a program that is outdated and assume it's okay can be destructive. I teach language arts and science. I am only licensed to teach 4-9 grade. I would never be able to step into a high school biology classroom and assume I know what I'm doing. The same with algebra, calculus, physics, etc. To think that a parent without much of a college background can "teach" their child concepts that they themselves are not familiar enough with, is ridiculous. That's why teaching is a professional job requiring extensive training and retraining just to get and keep a license. It is far more complicated than what many parents think. Personally, I couldn't homeschool my own kids -- they'd drive me nuts.

Look at it this way - would you want someone without a medical license examining your child? Would you claim to know how to diagnose and treat your child's illness "at home"? A big risk, huh? Would you want your child's education to be put at risk?

This ^^^^

I think many times parents are trying to do the right thing for their children but don't truely understand how difficult of a task it can be to actually conduct a successfull home-schooling program. It isn't just as simple as reading from a couple of books each day. Yes, there are many success stories but a lot more failures.

Really? There are a lot more failures? What are you basing this assumption on? Because national statistics would disagree with you.

Actually no they don't. The major studies conducted and publicized on homeschooling vs. public schooling results are sponsored by the pro-home-schooling organization the National Home Education Research Institute- go figure. Also any comparison between ACT / SAT scores shows they are nearly equal between both education paths. The problem is this only reflects the kids pursuing college. When I was in the Army I spent a tour in the recruiting command. Home schooled kids pursuing the military had the lowest scores on the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery (ASVAB). The majority of them barely met the minimum qualifications for enlisting.

I am not against home-schooling, btw. I just think many parents jump into it without truely understanding the commitment or without having the ability to educate their children as well as a traditional public school.

LillysGranny

I think your parents should consider putting your sister in a confidence building activity like martial arts. I've seen kids go from scared to say hello to strong leaders in just a few months! With summer break coming, there might be just enough time for her to feel better about school by the fall. I know children who are receiving excellent educations at home, but I just don't think running away from the world is the best way to learn how to deal with it--which we all must do sooner or later.

Agree and disagree.

My kids and I all have black belts in Shaolin Kempo Karate. I have no doubt it helped their confidence, and the fact that we did this as a family was also important. However, I disagree that homeschooling is "running away from the world." The Karate class is itself an excellent example of how our kids learned about facing the world. Their group classes, by the way, were all homeschoolers and scheduled at a convenient time when public school was in session and there weren't so many students that they couldn't get private attention. Homeschooling also has advantages for taking trips to the seashore after school has started in September, but I digress.

I hope you noticed that I did say I know many kids receiving excellent educations at home--I definitely do not think homeschooling is bad. BUT if it is being considered solely as a way to deal with social issues, then it can certainly be running from the problem instead of really solving it.

Justacoffeenut

Bottom line: Each parent has to make the best choices they can for there child. All we can do is speak in general we dont know you or your family. It is good to get the facts but bottom line to each or us is we have to make our own choices. I hope your sister will be ok.

_VoV

I think your parents should consider putting your sister in a confidence building activity like martial arts. I've seen kids go from scared to say hello to strong leaders in just a few months! With summer break coming, there might be just enough time for her to feel better about school by the fall. I know children who are receiving excellent educations at home, but I just don't think running away from the world is the best way to learn how to deal with it--which we all must do sooner or later.

Agree and disagree.

My kids and I all have black belts in Shaolin Kempo Karate. I have no doubt it helped their confidence, and the fact that we did this as a family was also important. However, I disagree that homeschooling is "running away from the world." The Karate class is itself an excellent example of how our kids learned about facing the world. Their group classes, by the way, were all homeschoolers and scheduled at a convenient time when public school was in session and there weren't so many students that they couldn't get private attention. Homeschooling also has advantages for taking trips to the seashore after school has started in September, but I digress.

I hope you noticed that I did say I know many kids receiving excellent educations at home--I definitely do not think homeschooling is bad. BUT if it is being considered solely as a way to deal with social issues, then it can certainly be running from the problem instead of really solving it.

If you work in a hostile work environment with co-workers who disrespect and undermine you, and you seek other employment, do you consider that "running from the problem instead of really solving it"? This happens all the time.

Marla64

From the point of view of a "certified, licensed school teacher," homeschooling can be suspicious. I have seen it done terribly - to the point where DHS gets involved - and I have seen it done perfectly.

It shouldn't really seem suspicious. In the state of Florida, if I am not mistaken, if you are a home schooler you are *required* to show some form of progress to show that your child isn't falling behind.

Many States are this way, if I am not mistaken.

Some states do. But here in Connecticut, the state statutes merely say that children are expected to be educated in various academic subjects, including Connecticut history. The responsibility, according to state law, falls on the parents to see this is accomplished. Even filing a notice of intent to home-school with the public schools is suggested, not mandated by the state education department, but that is not law. So home schoolers can fly solo if they like. This may make some people nervous, but what I saw firsthand through the various home-school groups we joined was a lot of diverse styles of conscientious home-schooling. And most things came out in the wash, as the old expression goes.

Same in Jersey.

Sure, there are some bad apples....like in all things.....but with good parenting....like in all things.... It works very well.

CrazyGraciegirl

I am homeschooled and I used to go to public school. A lot of students at public schools aren't very nice and that's probably another reason she doesn't want to go. I have only been in for 2 years now and I have grown academically way more than I would have at a traditional school. There are more opportunities open for her and she'll probably become closer with your parents.

I used K12, which is an online public school, this just means that it goes by all the state's standards so if she wanted to go back into public school there would be no problem.

The only downsides I've found about homeschooling, is that you get really lonely. Well, I'm not in any groups though so that's a solution your parents could use if she misses having her friends around.

ArtGeek22

I know a few kids who were home schooled who turned out fine - but they were normal to begin with. If she has a disorder she should go to regular school or end up like the physcopath I live with.

Ridiculous. I am normal, thank you very much

thomassd1969

I have 5 children. My older three were homeschooled from 9th grade on. The program I used was strictly old school. There were no computers. They had to read and then reguratate what they learned through essays and written worksheets. They were in charge of their school themselves and they have all 3 graducated with very good averages. They also held down jobs at the same time. My children were raised to be very responsible for themselves. As for the friends issue or social issue. They had the same friends they had in grade school in fact most of their friends were jealous because they were learning at such a faster pace then them because public schools have to tailor the lessons so that every intelligence level can adapt. Probably the only thing I would say they might have missed out on was sports. My boys played football from 4th grade to 8th.
My younger two are still in school and seem to be thriving so I have not considered taking them out yet. There is just so much wasted time in public schools during the day that you dont even realize it until your kids are home schooled.

thomassd1969

Oh and I will warn everyone if homeschooling isnt common in your community then get ready for the "well whats wrong with your kids comment" This used to crack me up when I said they were being homeschooled. The other parents would make comments that my kids got kicked out of school or were drop outs. Oh ya even heard a teacher say that about one of my kids once. Now I just laugh at those parents that said harsh things because their kids are either still at home at 22 or addicted to drugs and alcohol. Mine are 18, 21, and 23 all with full time jobs making 30-40 thousand dollars each! Shows you what thinking outside the box, not following the norm, and teaching your kids to be responsible for their own lives will do. Wish parents would try it.

ArtGeek22

Oh and I will warn everyone if homeschooling isnt common in your community then get ready for the "well whats wrong with your kids comment" This used to crack me up when I said they were being homeschooled. The other parents would make comments that my kids got kicked out of school or were drop outs. Oh ya even heard a teacher say that about one of my kids once. Now I just laugh at those parents that said harsh things because their kids are either still at home at 22 or addicted to drugs and alcohol. Mine are 18, 21, and 23 all with full time jobs making 30-40 thousand dollars each! Shows you what thinking outside the box, not following the norm, and teaching your kids to be responsible for their own lives will do. Wish parents would try it.

^^ I love this! Very well said and, by the sound of your kids, congrats on a job well done :flowerforyou:

KimmyEB

My mom is thinking about homeschooling my eight year old sister. My sister is smart and nice, but she is socially awkward and has really bad anxiety (has meds for it) and this causes her to not want to go to school. My parents are considering homeschool, but I am unsure that it is a good idea. Does anybody have any opinions or experience with this? Thank you!

I was taught at home from the 4th grade on up through graduation. There are MANY resources out there that help parents keep their children on track, from curriculum through the school to places that will keep records for you. And the teachers editions for homeschooling are very detailed. I liked it cause I could go at my own pace, as I always got bored in a regular classroom (they always went too slow for me). And as for social aspects, there are always co-ops and associations that a family can join to get the experiences of field trips, prom and graduation (among other things). I personally (nor my brothers) are socially awkward or stunted nor are we ignorant or behind. I hold my bachelor's in science and my youngest brother striving for medical school (he is transferring to a 4 year university this fall).

Edit: gee I wonder how I graduated high school or college at all... My mom isn't a certified teacher and only had her high school diploma, yet I still did well. By the way, the textbooks are very detailed as well... More so than in traditional schools, because they assume the student is working on their own at some degree, in addition to the very detailed teachers additions, instead of having a teacher fill in the blanks.

You are fortunate you had a mother who put in her time and effort to ensure you had a balanced education. But there are parents out there who can't answer or assist their children in upper grade math concepts, grammar rules, etc, I have had many parents contact me and say "I can't help junior with his grammar, because I haven't had to study this since I was 12 and I don't remember it". If a parent does not understand the content, they are doing a disservice to their child, period. They don't have to be certified teachers, but they do have to be informed enough to help their child.

This is my biggest concern with home schooling. I would be very leery of any child who is "homeschooled" by what I consider to be unqualified adults.. Giving birth to a child does not make you automatically qualified to teach. Being educated does.

My parents couldn't remember how to factor a polynomial. I don't think they even remembered if they ever learned it in the first place (and my dad went to college to become a chemist)... The thing is, we still figured it out with the plethora of resources that were out there.

And to think you spent all that extra time learning how to do it online, when a licensed math teacher could have explained it much better and in less time.

I haven't had time to read the rest of this thread, but I had to literally laugh out loud at this.

I sucked at math. Horribly. So horribly that I was held back in high school because I kept failing at math. I started college at below elementary algebra level, and managed to barely pass those. When I made it to elementary algebra, I took it online. I thought I was nuts to do so, since I sucked at math, but I decided to try it anyway.

I ended up passing the class with an A+. Was it hard? Hell yeah. But I learned better from MyMathLab than I ever did from any math teacher or professor. Not because all of them were bad teachers, but because I learn better independently in some subjects. As do many others.

I have a friend who is homeschooling her 2 small children right now, and as far as I know, plans on educating her youngest when he's old enough, as well. I observed their schooling one day for a project. It was more fulfilling than any classroom setting I'd ever been to. That one day, I learned more, observed more, and saw a better learning environment than an entire summer internship last year. Her kids could name all 50 states + capitals, and were venturing into world geography (they're 3 and 5). They know more about the political system of the United States than most adults do. Their knowledge of history is at least at the middle-school level. Their reading and writing are up-to-date. And they learned basic mathematics while learning to bake their home-made after-school snack. Is every home-school set-up the same? No. My friend is very much dedicated to her children and family, and works with a homeschooling group of families that meet up at least once a week. However, I know parents who simply let their students work on the computer at independent studying, and they do just fine, as well.

^Positive examples to negate your negative ones, since apparently that's what the bulk of this thread is all about. /sarcasm

Sure, some children haven't done so well with homeschooling. Let's not forget how many kids fail at being public and private school students too, though.

CrazyTrackLady

From the point of view of a "certified, licensed school teacher," homeschooling can be suspicious. I have seen it done terribly - to the point where DHS gets involved - and I have seen it done perfectly.

It shouldn't really seem suspicious. In the state of Florida, if I am not mistaken, if you are a home schooler you are *required* to show some form of progress to show that your child isn't falling behind.

Many States are this way, if I am not mistaken.

Some states do. But here in Connecticut, the state statutes merely say that children are expected to be educated in various academic subjects, including Connecticut history. The responsibility, according to state law, falls on the parents to see this is accomplished. Even filing a notice of intent to home-school with the public schools is suggested, not mandated by the state education department, but that is not law. So home schoolers can fly solo if they like. This may make some people nervous, but what I saw firsthand through the various home-school groups we joined was a lot of diverse styles of conscientious home-schooling. And most things came out in the wash, as the old expression goes.

Same in Jersey.

Sure, there are some bad apples....like in all things.....but with good parenting....like in all things.... It works very well.

That's what I'm talking about. When a program is following standards, is staying in contact with educators, and conscientious parents who are willing to work with their kids, then I'm all for it. Just like lumping all home schools into a category, I refuse to allow anyone to lump education that takes place in a classroom into the same category of ineffectiveness. I gave very legitimate and good reasons when I responded, and I am not going to apologize for my opinion. To be labeled as "spewing educational mumbo jumbo clap trap" is downright rude.

BrettPGH

As a certified, licensed school teacher, I am always concerned when parents pull their children out of regular school and say they will be "homeschooling" their child from that point forward. I will share my reasons below:

4. Schools provide the opportunity for children to learn HOW to get along with others, even if the children are being bullied. Instead of retreating into a "safe" world, it is better to learn how to handle the bullying and work on developing self esteem. Running away from it doesn't build self confidence, it only pushes the real issues aside.

Only a "certified, licensed school teacher" could point to bullying as a positive aspect of school.

Kudos to all the parents who pull their kids out of schools where being picked on and beat up by larger children is seen as a good thing by the adults who run the place.

macpatti

4. Schools provide the opportunity for children to learn HOW to get along with others, even if the children are being bullied. Instead of retreating into a "safe" world, it is better to learn how to handle the bullying and work on developing self esteem. Running away from it doesn't build self confidence, it only pushes the real issues aside.

I work at a private, Catholic school. Our oldest 3 attended Catholic schools (even colleges) and our 2 youngest are in public school (one has autism and one is dyslexic so they need the programs at public schools). However, if I ever felt they were in a place that was unsafe and run by certified, licensed teachers who believe children should be forced to learn to handle bullying or that suggest that people being bullied need to "work on developing self esteem", they'd be out of there and I'd teach them at home. You're not helping argue your point with this one.

Marla64

As a certified, licensed school teacher, I am always concerned when parents pull their children out of regular school and say they will be "homeschooling" their child from that point forward. I will share my reasons below:

4. Schools provide the opportunity for children to learn HOW to get along with others, even if the children are being bullied. Instead of retreating into a "safe" world, it is better to learn how to handle the bullying and work on developing self esteem. Running away from it doesn't build self confidence, it only pushes the real issues aside.

Only a "certified, licensed school teacher" could point to bullying as a positive aspect of school.

OH, Snap!!

:laugh:

Marla64

4. Schools provide the opportunity for children to learn HOW to get along with others, even if the children are being bullied. Instead of retreating into a "safe" world, it is better to learn how to handle the bullying and work on developing self esteem. Running away from it doesn't build self confidence, it only pushes the real issues aside.

I work at a private, Catholic school. Our oldest 3 attended Catholic schools (even colleges) and our 2 youngest are in public school (one has autism and one is dyslexic so they need the programs at public schools). However, if I ever felt they were in a place that was unsafe and run by certified, licensed teachers who believe children should be forced to learn to handle bullying or that suggest that people being bullied need to "work on developing self esteem", they'd be out of there and I'd teach them at home. You're not helping argue your point with this one.

^^ this.

_VoV

From the point of view of a "certified, licensed school teacher," homeschooling can be suspicious. I have seen it done terribly - to the point where DHS gets involved - and I have seen it done perfectly.

It shouldn't really seem suspicious. In the state of Florida, if I am not mistaken, if you are a home schooler you are *required* to show some form of progress to show that your child isn't falling behind.

Many States are this way, if I am not mistaken.

Some states do. But here in Connecticut, the state statutes merely say that children are expected to be educated in various academic subjects, including Connecticut history. The responsibility, according to state law, falls on the parents to see this is accomplished. Even filing a notice of intent to home-school with the public schools is suggested, not mandated by the state education department, but that is not law. So home schoolers can fly solo if they like. This may make some people nervous, but what I saw firsthand through the various home-school groups we joined was a lot of diverse styles of conscientious home-schooling. And most things came out in the wash, as the old expression goes.

Same in Jersey.

Sure, there are some bad apples....like in all things.....but with good parenting....like in all things.... It works very well.

That's what I'm talking about. When a program is following standards, is staying in contact with educators, and conscientious parents who are willing to work with their kids, then I'm all for it. Just like lumping all home schools into a category, I refuse to allow anyone to lump education that takes place in a classroom into the same category of ineffectiveness. I gave very legitimate and good reasons when I responded, and I am not going to apologize for my opinion. To be labeled as "spewing educational mumbo jumbo clap trap" is downright rude.

I don't understand what you are saying. For my part of this thread, I said that many home-schoolers in CT fly solo WITHOUT any contact with educators. I would have disliked oversight, and micromanagement by our local school system, since I was no fan of their methods and philosophies in the first place. This state-sanctioned freedom allowed me to develop my own curriculum, and provide optimal challenge to my children. This is why my son graduated college and entered law school at age 19. It's also why my 16 year-old is earning her associate's degree next week, and transferring to university as a Junior. Neither of them are geniuses, but the efficiency of our homeschooling model allowed them to cover more ground in less time. So, if what you said above is implying that home-schooling is in a 'category of ineffectiveness', I'm baffled.

I also don't think you are 'spewing educational mumbo jumbo clap trap', and must have missed any post that accused you of that. This has been one of the most polite discussions of this subject that I have ever read.