Health concerns about dairy products
Options
Replies
-
If Milk was bad....woman would not produce it for their babies. Milk is part of a balanced diet supported by many state governments in their food guides.
Having said that, in Canada milk is tested at the producer (farm) and if any atibiotics or steroids are dectected the shipment is dumped. This process does not occur in th US though and you may be exposed to steroids in you milk. WIthin Canada milk is completely safe to drink.
Chicken...on the other hand....is full of antiboitics in US and Canada. They bulk those babies up to keep them healthy and strong....but they are still tasty!
I'm sorry I couldn't get past the first paragraph. That was the most hilarious thing that I've ever read. lol! :laugh: Yes, Women do produce milk for their babies as do all mammals. But I believe that humans are the only species to ingest the milk of OTHER mammals.
I DO NOT restrict my diet of dairy but I am not really a big fan either. I have been doing a lot of research on the pasteurization process and consuming pasteurized milk vs. consuming raw milk. Ya, but milk in its liquid form I am not a big fan of however I do eat cheese and other dairy products so I can't stand on any soap box.
Thanks for the laugh anyhow :laugh:0 -
If Milk was bad....woman would not produce it for their babies. Milk is part of a balanced diet supported by many state governments in their food guides.
Having said that, in Canada milk is tested at the producer (farm) and if any atibiotics or steroids are dectected the shipment is dumped. This process does not occur in th US though and you may be exposed to steroids in you milk. WIthin Canada milk is completely safe to drink.
Chicken...on the other hand....is full of antiboitics in US and Canada. They bulk those babies up to keep them healthy and strong....but they are still tasty!
Nobody is disputing natural maternal breast milk....
Im out
Hilarious!!!0 -
If Milk was bad....woman would not produce it for their babies. Milk is part of a balanced diet supported by many state governments in their food guides.
Having said that, in Canada milk is tested at the producer (farm) and if any atibiotics or steroids are dectected the shipment is dumped. This process does not occur in th US though and you may be exposed to steroids in you milk. WIthin Canada milk is completely safe to drink.
Chicken...on the other hand....is full of antiboitics in US and Canada. They bulk those babies up to keep them healthy and strong....but they are still tasty!
Nobody is disputing natural maternal breast milk....
Im out
Hilarious!!!
Read above! I thought you were quoting the original moronic post! gah, must go outside...0 -
Milk is GREAT for you....if it hasn't been pasteurized. When you want to know if something good for you or not ask yourself thses questions?
-Is it natural?
-has is been processed?
-(if its anything animal related) was it fed natural foods of corn fed? free range or kept caged?
The more "pure" and natural something is the better it is for you0 -
If Milk was bad....woman would not produce it for their babies. Milk is part of a balanced diet supported by many state governments in their food guides.
Having said that, in Canada milk is tested at the producer (farm) and if any atibiotics or steroids are dectected the shipment is dumped. This process does not occur in th US though and you may be exposed to steroids in you milk. WIthin Canada milk is completely safe to drink.
Chicken...on the other hand....is full of antiboitics in US and Canada. They bulk those babies up to keep them healthy and strong....but they are still tasty!
Nobody is disputing natural maternal breast milk....
Im out
Hilarious!!!
Read above! I thought you were quoting the original moronic post! gah, must go outside...
Well I was joining forces with your post but when I posted to reply to you it carried over your quote of that guys quote.
Anyhow, I don't even know what else that guy posted. Honestly, I was laughing so hard I couldn't read on. Whatever you think of milk that post had no relevance to the original post....and was hiiiiilarious!0 -
That looks YUMMY0
-
Science starts out with a hypothesis. The PCRM starts out with a conclusion: "meat bad," and then they cherry-pick and obfuscate in every way possible to suit their pre-drawn conclusion, based on their fundamentalist belief in the infallibility of veganism. True science goes where the data leads... it does not lead the data. If you think there is anything objective about their work, you are gravely mistaken.
I wonder if there's already a website called "vegans say the darndest things."0 -
Science starts out with a hypothesis. The PCRM starts out with a conclusion: "meat bad," and then they cherry-pick and obfuscate in every way possible to suit their pre-drawn conclusion, based on their fundamentalist belief in the infallibility of veganism. True science goes where the data leads... it does not lead the data. If you think there is anything objective about their work, you are gravely mistaken.
I wonder if there's already a website called "vegans say the darndest things."
nah. veganism is based on making an intelligent decision based on a wealth of information and the realities of crappy animal processing in this country.
creationism is based in ignorance. so really... i feel like it's the people who blindly trust that the FDA is looking out for them who are the "creationists" of the nutrition world.0 -
Science starts out with a hypothesis. The PCRM starts out with a conclusion: "meat bad," and then they cherry-pick and obfuscate in every way possible to suit their pre-drawn conclusion, based on their fundamentalist belief in the infallibility of veganism. True science goes where the data leads... it does not lead the data. If you think there is anything objective about their work, you are gravely mistaken.
I wonder if there's already a website called "vegans say the darndest things."
nah. veganism is based on making an intelligent decision based on a wealth of information and the realities of crappy animal processing in this country.
creationism is based in ignorance. so really... i feel like it's the people who blindly trust that the FDA is looking out for them who are the "creationists" of the nutrition world.
You know how you can tell there's a vegan at a party?... Just wait 5 mins. They'll tell you.
Hey-ohh!!0 -
You know how you can tell there's a vegan at a party?... Just wait 5 mins. They'll tell you.
Hey-ohh!!0 -
Science starts out with a hypothesis. The PCRM starts out with a conclusion: "meat bad," and then they cherry-pick and obfuscate in every way possible to suit their pre-drawn conclusion, based on their fundamentalist belief in the infallibility of veganism. True science goes where the data leads... it does not lead the data. If you think there is anything objective about their work, you are gravely mistaken.
I wonder if there's already a website called "vegans say the darndest things."0 -
I'm pretty sure one of the rules of the board is not to bash other people's dietary choices right? Just wanted to clarify for myself.0
-
I'm pretty sure one of the rules of the board is not to bash other people's dietary choices right? Just wanted to clarify for myself.
Okay to bash their religious choices though, eh?0 -
I'm pretty sure one of the rules of the board is not to bash other people's dietary choices right? Just wanted to clarify for myself.
Okay to bash their religious choices though, eh?Veganism is to nutrition as creationism is to biology.
I wonder if there's already a website called "vegans say the darndest things."0 -
I'm pretty sure one of the rules of the board is not to bash other people's dietary choices right? Just wanted to clarify for myself.
Okay to bash their religious choices though, eh?Veganism is to nutrition as creationism is to biology.
I wonder if there's already a website called "vegans say the darndest things."
???creationism is based in ignorance. so really...0 -
I'm pretty sure one of the rules of the board is not to bash other people's dietary choices right? Just wanted to clarify for myself.
Okay to bash their religious choices though, eh?Veganism is to nutrition as creationism is to biology.
I wonder if there's already a website called "vegans say the darndest things."
???creationism is based in ignorance. so really...
Exactly! (beat me to it)0 -
I'm pretty sure one of the rules of the board is not to bash other people's dietary choices right? Just wanted to clarify for myself.0
-
its not always possible.0 -
I'm pretty sure one of the rules of the board is not to bash other people's dietary choices right? Just wanted to clarify for myself.
Okay to bash their religious choices though, eh?Veganism is to nutrition as creationism is to biology.
I wonder if there's already a website called "vegans say the darndest things."
???creationism is based in ignorance. so really...
Exactly! (beat me to it)
lolerz0 -
I'm pretty sure one of the rules of the board is not to bash other people's dietary choices right? Just wanted to clarify for myself.
i'm not a vegan. there goes your argument...0
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 391.9K Introduce Yourself
- 43.5K Getting Started
- 259.8K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.7K Food and Nutrition
- 47.3K Recipes
- 232.3K Fitness and Exercise
- 399 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.4K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 152.8K Motivation and Support
- 7.9K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.4K MyFitnessPal Information
- 23 News and Announcements
- 981 Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.4K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions