Viewing the message boards in:

Absence Before Marriage

18911131418

Replies

  • Posts: 36 Member
    All this talk of "reputations happen, get over it" is stretching- perpetuating stereotypes by calling people sluts for sleeping with more than one person (or even NOT sleeping with people, as someone pointed out earlier) doesn't help. Just like every other stereotype and nasty word out there. Funny how the ones against women seem to linger so prominently in our culture.
  • Posts: 1,893 Member

    Reputation by definition is what someone else judges you to be, whether or not it be fair or accurate.
    In a way you substantiated my point.
    You were called a slut before you even slept with someone.
    My point was that a guy may start spreading rumors and a bad reputation about you whether you thought you were acting like a slut or not.
    I'm not saying it's fair, right or "modern" thinking.
    I'm just saying it still exists.

    But you said to prevent the derogatory label not to sleep with anyone. The label was given to me because I was a tomboy and played sports *gasp* with boys. What I'm saying is that labeling people in any such way is wrong. There is no excuse and no magical number of sexual partners that makes it okay to give a person that kind of reputation.
  • Posts: 645 Member

    I first I disagreed, I thought there was anal also until I read the STI part. Oral can be effective unless there is some swallowing or someone is on their monthly cycle.

    HPV (which can cause cancer) is transmitted through oral sex so it's not correct to say oral sex is a way to avoid STIs.
  • Posts: 469 Member
    All this talk of "reputations happen, get over it" is stretching- perpetuating stereotypes by calling people sluts for sleeping with more than one person (or even NOT sleeping with people, as someone pointed out earlier) doesn't help. Just like every other stereotype and nasty word out there. Funny how the ones against women seem to linger so prominently in our culture.

    I haven't seen one person here say that reputations happen, so get over it. Just because we recognize something as being a reality, doesn't mean we condone it. And funny how YOU focused on reputations based on someone who sleeps with people when what I said was based on sexual activity (meaning that even those who don't have sex get reputations as well). I love social experiments like this.
  • Posts: 605 Member
    Gotta test drive that car first, if the engine has too many miles on it just thank the salesman for the ride and move on to another vehicle.

    Now see, THIS is the only thing that gets on my nerves. I HATE that men are encouraged to "sow their wild oats" before settling down with the right (preferably virginal??...but clearly not a "well experienced") woman. If a woman does the same, she's a slut. :/

    If all the "good" girls are being abstinent and the good boys are "sowing oats"....either the good girls aren't so good, or there's a LOT of guys going to prostitutes and bringing THAT home to their new bride.....
  • Posts: 864 Member

    You and I are reading her comments, yet comprehending very differently. Her point was about reputations people can get. People get reputations based on sexual activity all the time. GASP. Yes, even in this century. Where have YOU been?

    So, a woman's sex life is up for judgement. Who's judgement shall we take? The Taliban's? Oooh, no, they are baddies. Who's then? Shall we look at the sexual behaviour of the Inuit? The Pitjantjatjara?

    You assume that the prevailing opinions on morality are just. We don't have to accept the status quo.
  • Posts: 7,045 Member

    But you said to prevent the derogatory label not to sleep with anyone. The label was given to me because I was a tomboy and played sports *gasp* with boys. What I'm saying is that labeling people in any such way is wrong. There is no excuse and no magical number of sexual partners that makes it okay to give a person that kind of reputation.

    It is wrong.
  • Posts: 36 Member
    Even if you don't agree with it, but not doing anything to counter it, not standing up for people who are called names based on stuff like this is perpetuating in my mind.

    I don't even know what you're talking about when you say I'm focusing on reputations. I'm trying to say we need to stop using the word because it keeps the cycle going. I wasn't even referring to your post anyway :S
  • Posts: 379
    I didn't. I was kind of a "free-spirit" when I was a teenager. But if you want to, I don't care.

    Live and let live.
  • Posts: 469 Member
    So, a woman's sex life is up for judgement. Who's judgement shall we take? The Taliban's? Oooh, no, they are baddies. Who's then? Shall we look at the sexual behaviour of the Inuit? The Pitjantjatjara? You assume that the prevailing opinions on morality are just. We don't have to accept the status quo.

    All actions are up for judgement. If you say that you never judge someone based on their actions, you're lying. I am not condoning reputations, especially harmful ones, but I am supporting Mustang_Susie's comment that they exist. You act like only religious people judge others and give others reputations. That's hilarious. I know plenty of people who don't believe in God who judge people.
  • Posts: 1,133 Member
    Now see, THIS is the only thing that gets on my nerves. I HATE that men are encouraged to "sow their wild oats" before settling down with the right (preferably virginal??...but clearly not a "well experienced") woman.

    I hate to break it to you, but not all men are not encouraged to do this, like you think we are. Stop being so sexist and thinking all men are the same.

    Exactly *zero* people encouraged me to sleep around. Zero parents, zero church elders, zero grandparents, zero uncles, zero friends, zero teachers. Zero. Did say zero enough?

    You might want find out which men are brought up that way, and not assume we all are. It might be less than you think.
  • Posts: 379
    I don't understand why people still think of sex as this dirty, immoral thing. Our bodies are designed for sex, physically and emotionally (we crave human touch and closeness). The old Christian leaders have really done a number on society. If you are safe and responsible, why should it matter?
  • Posts: 469 Member
    Even if you don't agree with it, but not doing anything to counter it, not standing up for people who are called names based on stuff like this is perpetuating in my mind.
    I don't even know what you're talking about when you say I'm focusing on reputations. I'm trying to say we need to stop using the word because it keeps the cycle going. I wasn't even referring to your post anyway :S

    I never use the word slut. I work at an all boys high school. I never allow the guys to use this word, and I actually give detentions to those who do. I always take a stand when I hear people use words of which I don't approve.
  • Posts: 36 Member

    I never use the word slut. I work at an all boys high school. I never allow the guys to use this word, and I actually give detentions to those who do. I always take a stand when I hear people use words of which I don't approve.

    Great then, I'm going to assume there was misunderstanding somewhere in our posts!
  • Posts: 6,664 Member
    I don't understand why people still think of sex as this dirty, immoral thing. Our bodies are designed for sex, physically and emotionally (we crave human touch and closeness). The old Christian leaders have really done a number on society. If you are safe and responsible, why should it matter?

    Not everybody who is christian does think that way. But there's a REAL LOUD minority who still do.

    And safe and responsible isn't the first thing that comes to mind with sex. :laugh:
  • Posts: 379

    Not everybody who is christian does think that way. But there's a REAL LOUD minority who still do.

    And safe and responsible isn't the first thing that comes to mind with sex. :laugh:

    As in, not mixing your love juices with every hobo or hobette you find at the local truck stop...
  • Posts: 864 Member

    All actions are up for judgement. If you say that you never judge someone based on their actions, you're lying. I am not condoning reputations, especially harmful ones, but I am supporting Mustang_Susie's comment that they exist. You act like only religious people judge others and give others reputations. That's hilarious. I know plenty of people who don't believe in God who judge people.

    Of course I judge people according to their actions. Murderers, bad. People who don't pick up their dog's poop, bad. I don't judge people by who they sleep with, and I don't think anyone should. People who judge others according to who they sleep with, bad.
  • Posts: 469 Member
    I don't understand why people still think of sex as this dirty, immoral thing.

    Speaking from the Church's position, sex itself is not immoral. Sex outside of marriage is wrong. There are plenty of Christians who do not follow all of the Church's teachings, not just on sex. Just because someone chooses to abstain from sex prior to marriage, does not mean they believe sex is a "dirty, immoral thing".
  • Posts: 469 Member
    Of course I judge people according to their actions. Murderers, bad. People who don't pick up their dog's poop, bad. I don't judge people by who they sleep with, and I don't think anyone should. People who judge others according to who they sleep with, bad.

    Who are you to tell others what to judge and what not to judge? Maybe someone else would come into this thread saying they don't think it's bad not to pick up your dog's poop.
  • Posts: 490
    Personal issue. Never discuss religion, politics or child rearing unless you want a good argument. I put this in the lines of religion.
  • Posts: 83 Member
    this is how i think of it, if a guy really loved you, he'd be willing to wait. :)
  • Posts: 668 Member
    This thread is still on?! Why?
  • Posts: 22,834 Member
    Why deny what is great (as long as you stay safe?)!

    lol. That is ironic on a weight loss website. :laugh:
  • Wow, that escalated quickly...


    Whether someone believes in sex or no sex before marriage is entirely up to them and neither should be judged for it. Everyone has different beliefs and if it works for them, more power to em!

    I think this whole name-calling is ridiculous, why can we not have an adult conversation without resorting to second grade tactics?
  • Posts: 864 Member

    Who are you to tell others what to judge and what not to judge? Maybe someone else would come into this thread saying they don't think it's bad not to pick up your dog's poop.

    That is the whole point. What is right, and what is wrong.

    It is wrong for anyone to tell anyone what they can and can't do with their body. Everyone is born free in dignity, everyone has the right to freedom in thought and expression.
  • Posts: 10 Member
    Holy crap I went to sleep in 2013 and I woke up in Puritanical times!!! Do what's right for YOU. But when you do, make sure you don't attach religion, moral value, or any other sort of judgement. Leave all that stuff on the floor with your panties or you won't have any fun!!!!
  • Posts: 2,925 Member

    Now see, THIS is the only thing that gets on my nerves. I HATE that men are encouraged to "sow their wild oats" before settling down with the right (preferably virginal??...but clearly not a "well experienced") woman. If a woman does the same, she's a slut. :/

    If all the "good" girls are being abstinent and the good boys are "sowing oats"....either the good girls aren't so good, or there's a LOT of guys going to prostitutes and bringing THAT home to their new bride.....
    Sense of humor....you have none
  • Posts: 7
    I think people should talk about this more often. I thought it was okay because everybody said it was okay. I thought it was normal to have sex before marriage. I think everyone should always be reminded that it's a sin or else they will forget.
  • Posts: 668 Member
    Holy crap I went to sleep in 2013 and I woke up in Puritanical times!!! Do what's right for YOU. But when you do, make sure you don't attach religion, moral value, or any other sort of judgement. Leave all that stuff on the floor with your panties or you won't have any fun!!!!

    She said it.
  • Posts: 1,608 Member
    My husband and I dealt with absence before marriage. We were long distance - him the UK and me in the US, so he was absent for a big portion of our relationship. Actually, I guess *I* was absent because I moved to the UK to be with *him*. But I'm here now!





    What.

    :wink:
This discussion has been closed.