We are pleased to announce that as of March 4, 2025, an updated Rich Text Editor has been introduced in the MyFitnessPal Community. To learn more about the changes, please click here. We look forward to sharing this new feature with you!

Cutting Sugar From my Diet entirely

1356789

Replies

  • Posts: 71 Member

    My point is that people are so divorced from what goes in their food these days that they don't seem to have any idea that there is sugar in things like ketchup, and bread and all sports of foods that aren't commonly thought of as sugary, but then are made out to have "hidden" sugar, when really it's just a lack of food knowledge on the part of the consumer.
    So you know everything that is in your food? It's trial and error, people learn through mistakes and exploring food labels
  • Posts: 71 Member
    sijomial wrote: »
    Heinz Tomato Ketchup (UK) label.

    Ingredients: Tomatoes, Spirit Vinegar, Sugar, Salt, Spice & Herb Extracts, Spice.
    How disgraceful to hide an ingredient right there in the list of ingredients in third place!

    And then they tell you how many calories by weight and by suggested serving size.
    Isn't that awful? It's almost like they are giving people the information to take personal responsibility for how many calories they eat.

    /sarcasm


    So if I am craving something sweet I will just eat a spoon of ketchup

  • Posts: 25,929 Member


    So if I am craving something sweet I will just eat a spoon of ketchup

    You could!! It is that sweet to the taste. When I'm in NA, if I actually use ketchup on anything (very rare), I will salt it to try to cut the syrupy sweet taste.
  • Posts: 71 Member
    Guys I get everyone's point but I was trying to state sugar isn't normally what someone thinks of when they think of sugar-idk about you guys but personally one tablespoon of ketchup is not satisfactory for me when eating meat for example so it adds up without realising
  • Posts: 71 Member
    * I mean ketchup typo sorry
  • Posts: 25,929 Member
    edited May 2017
    Guys I get everyone's point but I was trying to state sugar isn't normally what someone thinks of when they think of ketchup-idk about you guys but personally one tablespoon of ketchup is not satisfactory for me when eating meat for example so it adds up without realising

    But some of us do think "sugar" the moment a tiny drop of that stuff touches our tongues. It's one of the reasons I don't like it.

    When it comes to meat, I'd rather just salt it or add spices like garlic, chili, or curry ... or several others depending on what I'm making.

  • Posts: 71 Member
    People are here for different reasons and one is to learn but there is a difference openly exposing people and simply informing
  • Posts: 694 Member
    ninerbuff wrote: »
    NOT a peer reviewed article and written by a guy that SUPPORTS and sells Paleo books. FAIL.

    A.C.E. Certified Personal and Group Fitness Trainer
    IDEA Fitness member
    Kickboxing Certified Instructor
    Been in fitness for 30 years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition

    9285851.png


    Given. But he is simply summarising peer reviewed studies that are published on PubMed and are referenced within his article via hyperlinks. It's up to you if you want to ignore the actual studies he's referencing simply because this news reporter as it were is not an expert and has personal views you don't agree with. Me, I don't really dig into the personal background of reporters, I just skip to the scientific studies behind it. You're never going to find an article without bias one way or another. But it seems you'd only actually consider articles by people with the same bias as yourself, which is a bit narrow minded imho. I'm not a Paleo advocate myself simply because there is no one Paleo Diet that ever existed in human history so the name itself and its whole theory is based on a nonexistent premise. But that said, doesn't mean I'm not going to be open to information from all sources. I'd be happy to review any articles or studies you may wish to post on the subject. Saying you don't agree because of the credential of a reporter isn't really presenting additional information so much as criticising a spokespersons personal views...somewhat irrelevant. Cheers.
  • Posts: 71 Member
    Machka9 wrote: »

    But some of us do think "sugar" the moment a tiny drop of that stuff touches our tongues. It's one of the reasons I don't like it.

    When it comes to meat, I'd rather just salt it or add spices like garlic, chili, or curry ... or several others depending on what I'm making.
    Different opinions I guess, I personally eat ketchup with virtually everything and avoid salt but I appreciate the clarity thank you :)

  • Posts: 694 Member
    Different opinions I guess, I personally eat ketchup with virtually everything and avoid salt but I appreciate the clarity thank you :)

    For what it's worth I thought ketchup was a good example not because it has sugar in it, but because over time the amount of sugar added to it has increased substantially. You see once HFCS became widely available, they started using it as well as sugar. So today's ketchup from a Heinz and other brands is much sweeter than it used to be.
  • Posts: 8,911 Member
    Macy9336 wrote: »

    For what it's worth I thought ketchup was a good example not because it has sugar in it, but because over time the amount of sugar added to it has increased substantially. You see once HFCS became widely available, they started using it as well as sugar. So today's ketchup from a Heinz and other brands is much sweeter than it used to be.

    http://www.heinzketchup.com/Products/Heinz Ketchup 32oz

    No sugar in it, only hfcs, a tiny bit more total sugars than the one I calculated the amount of added sugar for where it was below 1 gram per serving.
  • Posts: 694 Member

    http://www.heinzketchup.com/Products/Heinz Ketchup 32oz

    No sugar in it, only hfcs, a tiny bit more total sugars than the one I calculated the amount of added sugar for where it was below 1 gram per serving.

    Ah, but that's only one line of Heinz ketchup and it's recipe today. I was talking about the recipe overvtime and all their ketchups. If you look. You'll see that today their simply ketchup and organic ketchup lines use sugar not HFCS. Too, Heinz doubled the sugar content in all their ketchups in 1970. They later switched to adding HFCS in various levels over the years...as HFCS got cheaper than sugar the amount of HFCS vs sugar ratio increased until recently earlier THIS year they made their regular line of ketchup sweetened entirely with HFCS.
  • Posts: 661 Member
    I loooooooooove ketchup! If you see me eating ketchup, you would say, "Would you like some fries with your ketchup?"

    I try to keep my sodium levels down, and ketchup, sadly, has a lot of sodium.
  • Posts: 25,929 Member
    lemurcat12 wrote: »

    Normal ketchup has salt in it.

    Yes, and that's another reason I don't use it. I figure if I've got to salt it to cut the sweetness and make it taste OK, and it already has lots of salt in it ... what's the point?
  • Posts: 30,886 Member
    edited May 2017
    Machka9 wrote: »

    Yes, and that's another reason I don't use it. I figure if I've got to salt it to cut the sweetness and make it taste OK, and it already has lots of salt in it ... what's the point?

    I do wonder about this claim that HFCS was added and it became sweeter in the '70s, as that may be consistent with my memories. I was into salty foods as a kid (would add salt liberally--the idea of doing it to the extent I did seems disgusting now) but never had a huge sweet tooth and HATED when things were sweeter than I thought they should be (I still think sweet salad dressings are weird and an abomination, loathe honey mustard, etc.). We'd do fast food on rare occasion, usually as a group thing, and I remember preferring McD's to BK because the ketchup (which I put on my fries and which came on the burger) at BK's was noticeably sweeter to my palate and ruined everything with it's awful taste. Maybe the brand BK used was just slightly ahead, as this was when I was pretty young, probably between 1975 and 1978 based on where I'm thinking we were living. Hmm.

    Or the McD's brand just had more salt to balance the sugar!
  • Posts: 25,929 Member
    lemurcat12 wrote: »

    ... and HATED when things were sweeter than I thought they should be (I still think sweet salad dressings are weird and an abomination, loathe honey mustard, etc.). ...

    I'm right there with you. I have never been a fan of sweet and sour anything ... or pineapple on pizza ... or here in Australia a big thing is "sweet chili". That's a big NO for me.

    Seems to me McD's in Canada, back in the late 1980s, used to offer a selection of dipping sauces for their McNuggets. I didn't like the McNuggets but I had a friend who really did and he tried all the dipping sauces, so I'd have one McNugget and try a sauce ... dislike them all. Haven't touched McNuggets or dipping sauces since.

    And it also seems to me that perhaps McD's either added more salt to their ketchup than other places, or maybe the fries were just that salty.
  • Posts: 4,571 Member
    Guys I get everyone's point but I was trying to state sugar isn't normally what someone thinks of when they think of sugar-idk about you guys but personally one tablespoon of ketchup is not satisfactory for me when eating meat for example so it adds up without realising

    I like to eat a lot of ketchup. I buy the reduced sugar so that I can have a lot for 20 calories instead of 100
  • Posts: 5,468 Member
    If you have a can of soda (coke) a day, in a year you will be 1kg heavier. Take 20 years and wonder why you are 50lbs overweight.

    Lots of people could have a can of soda a day and not gain weight - as long as it fits in their calorie level.

    Or conversely they could eat ,say, 2 apples a day for a year and gain 1kg if takes them over their calorie level.

    Silly comment is really silly. :o
    +1
  • Posts: 7,722 Member
    Machka9 wrote: »

    I can't speak for everyone here, but I've been reading labels for 30+ years ... ever since labels have started appearing on food! So yeah, I've got a reasonable idea what's in there. Even as a kid, I read the ingredients lists on cereal boxes in both English and French.

    I've also been counting calories for 30+ years. When there weren't helpful sites like this, I went to the library and researched how many calories were in things ... and what was in things.

    Fortunately, my mother was a nurse and she had numerous medical texts some of which also assisted me in finding out what was in the food I ate.

    I have celiac disease, and my kids had various food issues. So I read labels like a hawk, but I seem to remember reading labels long before that. I vaguely remember twigging onto the habit as part of getting my cooking badge as a Girl Scout back when I was 10 years old. Part of that involved planning and shopping for the ingredients for a meal.
  • Posts: 7,722 Member
    bbell1985 wrote: »

    I like to eat a lot of ketchup. I buy the reduced sugar so that I can have a lot for 20 calories instead of 100

    Same. For me, the products taste the same and I save calories where I can.
  • Posts: 694 Member
    ninerbuff wrote: »
    I don't disagree because of a "personal view". I disagree because that's just not how biology works. Look up the digestive system and there is NO DISPUTE by any Journal of SCIENCE, PHYSIOLOGY or BIOLOGY on how the body digests any saccharide. As with all of them, they get broken down to their simplest forms (usually glucose or fructose) then digested. That's pretty much it.
    People here look for information. But they also look for information that's accurate and not just written to fill a blog. I remember having to write articles for my Wellness Center. You LOOKED for stuff to write just to fill space.

    A.C.E. Certified Personal and Group Fitness Trainer
    IDEA Fitness member
    Kickboxing Certified Instructor
    Been in fitness for 30 years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition

    9285851.png


    Ok, well then if every journal of biology, physiology and science supports you opinion, then why haven't you posted any links to any studies supporting your viewpoint? And I've posted an article that references a dozen studies on PubMed that do support my viewpoint. Hmmmm, could it be because you can't find any? Obviously telling me to "look it up" isn't working because I have gone and looked it up and it all repeats what I posted...so yeah...right now I have the words of a lot of specialised Drs in lab coats versus a, what are you? Oh yeah a "certified personal trainer" who says otherwise. So, please bring on some guys in lab coats with doctorates that agree with you and I'd be happy to listen to you then.
This discussion has been closed.