Coronavirus prep
Options
Replies
-
bmeadows380 wrote: »janejellyroll wrote: »bmeadows380 wrote: »My best friend is really upset with her employer right now. She has been going into work because of difficulties setting her to up work from home. They make them take their temperature everyday before coming into work. She has bad allergies, and springtime is the worst, and Friday, her temp was up to 100 degrees due to what she knew was nothing more than a sinus infection that she gets every year due to allergies. She debated on telling the employer, but finally felt honesty was right. All they heard was her temp was up and sent her home, telling her she has to self quarantine for 2 weeks. She contacted her doctor on the phone; he ordered a flu test and a COVID test. Talking with him, he also agreed it was highly unlikely she had COVID - she does have very bad lungs and is a prime candidate for the pneumonia if she does get it. Besides, she doesn't have a cough, she doesn't have body aches, and she doesn't have tightness in her chest.
The flu test came back negative; the COVID test is supposed to be back in 4 to 12 days as lab corp is backed up (and I thought they had a rapid test now? Guess it's not in WV). However, her employer told her that it does not matter if the test comes back negative; she still has to stay self quarantined until she shows no other symptoms - no fever, no shortness of breath. Except she always has shortness of breath due to bad asthma and the allergies! AND they are making her take vacation time for this 2 week period!
She says she'll have to lie when the 2 weeks is up just so she can do her job and get her paycheck.
Usually, she's really behind her company and pointing out how it is better than the utility I work for (she works for the other power utility in the state); this time, however, my corporation actually put into place a better policy than hers has, because my utility is paying straight time for anyone who has to self-quarantine and cannot work from home, and sick leave automatically goes into place for the entire time one needs to be home with the illness until they test negative and are released by their doctor.
I get her frustration, but people with allergies aren't immune to COVID-19. It's possible that her fever could be due to the virus. The alternative is to expect her co-workers to accept the risk of possible transmission and that's a lot to ask of people right now.
She's well aware that she's not immune; in fact, she's much more susceptible due to her weak lungs. But the thing is, all she has is a fever; none of the other symptoms are present - she does not have a cough, chills, body aches, sore throat, headache, or shortness of breath that are on the list as symptoms of COVID-19. There are a ton of things that can cause a mild fever in a human being. I wouldn't immediately jump to a conclusion that its COVID-19 if all I had is one symptom, especially if her doctor also agrees that its not the virus.
It's probably too late for your friend, but my allergies are already horrible this year and what I've been doing is tracking my temperature. I've started a pandemic journal just to get thoughts out of my head and every day's entry starts with my recorded temperature. I take it mid-morning after I've been working (and still) for a while, so it can be a bit more consistent. I've also noted if I have any unusual symptoms so I can see any patterns. I'm not at all concerned about getting the virus, but would hate to be transmitting it while thinking I'm just still having allergies. I also have a record of temps and symptoms in case I need to prove that I'm not infected if I have to.5 -
amusedmonkey wrote: »
I'm isolating with my husband and two teenagers. I imagine isolating alone would be much harder and really feel for everyone in that situation. At least I have other people to interact with - even if they do annoy me occasionally; for the most part, we get along very well though. Plus we have the advantage of a yard and two outbuildings so we aren't stuck staring at each other all day.cwolfman13 wrote: »I have a question............where is the logic of shutting down certain aisles in stores such as WalMart? I'm sure their reasoning is sound, but everybody I've talked with says the same thing. Now they're going to be shoving more people into less room/ Unless they're also limiting number of consumers? And toys? I know adults are on the prowl for new and different things to do; wouldn't it make sense kids might be getting ultra bored too? Wouldn't buying toys be as essential as, oh say,....stocking up on soda, chips, or something?
No disagreeing necessary, just asking a question for opinions.
They aren't doing that here...but my guess would be to curb "joy shopping" and people just getting out of the house to browse around Wal-Mart and such.
What they're doing here as of 8 AM this morning is limiting the number of people in the store to 20% of capacity which means if you need to go get something it's probably actually going to be an essential need because you'll likely be waiting in a line outside the store to get in. I haven't seen much of an issue in regards to large numbers of people when I go to the regular grocery store or even Costco, but I've driven by the Walmart parking lot a few times and it looks like the week before Christmas or something, so I was kind of expecting these people limits to come down the pipe.
I have also heard complaints from other non-essential retailers that it isn't fair that they have to shut down, but Walmart and Target can continue to sell those "non-essential" items.
I'm reasonably sure that "joy shopping" can't be stopped. I seriously spent probably fifteen or twenty minutes looking at baby/kid clothes at Target last week, just to have something to do. I don't have kids. I don't even know anyone who has kids. But it was there, it was retail and it wasn't my *kitten* apartment. Today is going to be liquor store day and I can't decide whether I should walk or drive so I can bring more home. I am also extremely likely to examine every bottle of wine and spirits they have, just to kill an hour outside my prison. And hopefully find every clerk in the store to deeply discuss drink options with. I stay home for as long as I can stand it, but every chance I have to get out where actual living human people are is stretched out to the utmost justifiable limit. They can shut down whatever aisles they want, limit the numbers inside as much as they want, but for a lot of folks, that's our only connection with actual people and I will soak up every single second and then hoard the memory for days. Text and FaceTime are moderately adequate to try and connect, but there's nothing like the feeling of being around PEOPLE. And stores are just about the only places left that have PEOPLE in them.
Lowe's appears to be the joy shopping destination in my town. I get it. The weather is perfect for gardening and all those home tasks they suddenly have time for. It's really defeating the purpose, though...
This is just FTR, not to criticize anyone else or minimize their experience in any way at all. Humans are varied, and that variety is a wonderful thing about the world.
Whether isolating alone is hard(er) is a very individual thing. I live alone, only shopped once since 3/13, talked to a neighbor one day from a long distance, and a friend similarly on another day, and that's my in-person social contact (other than "good afternoon" or a hand wave to strangers when out for a walk). Happy as a clam.
I'm isolating with people and it's harder for me than isolating alone. I'm used to being alone while they're at work, now I feel like I've lost my "alone time" and I miss it. I can go and be alone in another room, but it isn't the same as having the entire house to myself. I'm feeling a bit suffocated, but it's not as bad as I thought. I have gone out twice in the last 30 days and only because I had to. I have never shopped for the sake of shopping, so joy shopping is a foreign concept to me. I understand it, but I can't comprehend it.
As in introvert, isolating alone would be a piece of cake. If this happened pre-wife and kids, I would be fine, I would probably have read 15 books, played 100 games of chess on the internet, and burned a lot more calories exercising over the past month.
Being quarantined with two young kids is very stressful at times. Especially when most of our neighborhood thinks that social isolating is discretionary and only necessary if it is convenient. A neighbor mom had a birthday yesterday, and 20 neighbors and their kids all gathered outside of her house to sing to her, then essentially had a block party for an hour. My kids weren't allowed, and both had serious meltdowns, it was awful (one mom had an Easter bunny costume "why can't we see the Easter bunny?"). We are definitely the meanest parents on the block - hopefully they will appreciate our efforts someday, but right now it is completely thankless.25 -
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wT70BPRxTF8&feature=youtu.be
Sooo easy. I'm placing a coffee filter underneath with safety pins.0 -
Bry_Fitness70 wrote: »amusedmonkey wrote: »
I'm isolating with my husband and two teenagers. I imagine isolating alone would be much harder and really feel for everyone in that situation. At least I have other people to interact with - even if they do annoy me occasionally; for the most part, we get along very well though. Plus we have the advantage of a yard and two outbuildings so we aren't stuck staring at each other all day.cwolfman13 wrote: »I have a question............where is the logic of shutting down certain aisles in stores such as WalMart? I'm sure their reasoning is sound, but everybody I've talked with says the same thing. Now they're going to be shoving more people into less room/ Unless they're also limiting number of consumers? And toys? I know adults are on the prowl for new and different things to do; wouldn't it make sense kids might be getting ultra bored too? Wouldn't buying toys be as essential as, oh say,....stocking up on soda, chips, or something?
No disagreeing necessary, just asking a question for opinions.
They aren't doing that here...but my guess would be to curb "joy shopping" and people just getting out of the house to browse around Wal-Mart and such.
What they're doing here as of 8 AM this morning is limiting the number of people in the store to 20% of capacity which means if you need to go get something it's probably actually going to be an essential need because you'll likely be waiting in a line outside the store to get in. I haven't seen much of an issue in regards to large numbers of people when I go to the regular grocery store or even Costco, but I've driven by the Walmart parking lot a few times and it looks like the week before Christmas or something, so I was kind of expecting these people limits to come down the pipe.
I have also heard complaints from other non-essential retailers that it isn't fair that they have to shut down, but Walmart and Target can continue to sell those "non-essential" items.
I'm reasonably sure that "joy shopping" can't be stopped. I seriously spent probably fifteen or twenty minutes looking at baby/kid clothes at Target last week, just to have something to do. I don't have kids. I don't even know anyone who has kids. But it was there, it was retail and it wasn't my *kitten* apartment. Today is going to be liquor store day and I can't decide whether I should walk or drive so I can bring more home. I am also extremely likely to examine every bottle of wine and spirits they have, just to kill an hour outside my prison. And hopefully find every clerk in the store to deeply discuss drink options with. I stay home for as long as I can stand it, but every chance I have to get out where actual living human people are is stretched out to the utmost justifiable limit. They can shut down whatever aisles they want, limit the numbers inside as much as they want, but for a lot of folks, that's our only connection with actual people and I will soak up every single second and then hoard the memory for days. Text and FaceTime are moderately adequate to try and connect, but there's nothing like the feeling of being around PEOPLE. And stores are just about the only places left that have PEOPLE in them.
Lowe's appears to be the joy shopping destination in my town. I get it. The weather is perfect for gardening and all those home tasks they suddenly have time for. It's really defeating the purpose, though...
This is just FTR, not to criticize anyone else or minimize their experience in any way at all. Humans are varied, and that variety is a wonderful thing about the world.
Whether isolating alone is hard(er) is a very individual thing. I live alone, only shopped once since 3/13, talked to a neighbor one day from a long distance, and a friend similarly on another day, and that's my in-person social contact (other than "good afternoon" or a hand wave to strangers when out for a walk). Happy as a clam.
I'm isolating with people and it's harder for me than isolating alone. I'm used to being alone while they're at work, now I feel like I've lost my "alone time" and I miss it. I can go and be alone in another room, but it isn't the same as having the entire house to myself. I'm feeling a bit suffocated, but it's not as bad as I thought. I have gone out twice in the last 30 days and only because I had to. I have never shopped for the sake of shopping, so joy shopping is a foreign concept to me. I understand it, but I can't comprehend it.
As in introvert, isolating alone would be a piece of cake. If this happened pre-wife and kids, I would be fine, I would probably have read 15 books, played 100 games of chess on the internet, and burned a lot more calories exercising over the past month.
Being quarantined with two young kids is very stressful at times. Especially when most of our neighborhood thinks that social isolating is discretionary and only necessary if it is convenient. A neighbor mom had a birthday yesterday, and 20 neighbors and their kids all gathered outside of her house to sing to her, then essentially had a block party for an hour. My kids weren't allowed, and both had serious meltdowns, it was awful (one mom had an Easter bunny costume "why can't we see the Easter bunny?"). We are definitely the meanest parents on the block - hopefully they will appreciate our efforts someday, but right now it is completely thankless.
I am so sorry for this! In the long run of course they will understand and appreciate the measures you took to keep them safe, but in the short run it's heartbreaking to have to be the "meanest parents" around
eta: Your neighbors are idiots.14 -
Bry_Fitness70 wrote: »amusedmonkey wrote: »
I'm isolating with my husband and two teenagers. I imagine isolating alone would be much harder and really feel for everyone in that situation. At least I have other people to interact with - even if they do annoy me occasionally; for the most part, we get along very well though. Plus we have the advantage of a yard and two outbuildings so we aren't stuck staring at each other all day.cwolfman13 wrote: »I have a question............where is the logic of shutting down certain aisles in stores such as WalMart? I'm sure their reasoning is sound, but everybody I've talked with says the same thing. Now they're going to be shoving more people into less room/ Unless they're also limiting number of consumers? And toys? I know adults are on the prowl for new and different things to do; wouldn't it make sense kids might be getting ultra bored too? Wouldn't buying toys be as essential as, oh say,....stocking up on soda, chips, or something?
No disagreeing necessary, just asking a question for opinions.
They aren't doing that here...but my guess would be to curb "joy shopping" and people just getting out of the house to browse around Wal-Mart and such.
What they're doing here as of 8 AM this morning is limiting the number of people in the store to 20% of capacity which means if you need to go get something it's probably actually going to be an essential need because you'll likely be waiting in a line outside the store to get in. I haven't seen much of an issue in regards to large numbers of people when I go to the regular grocery store or even Costco, but I've driven by the Walmart parking lot a few times and it looks like the week before Christmas or something, so I was kind of expecting these people limits to come down the pipe.
I have also heard complaints from other non-essential retailers that it isn't fair that they have to shut down, but Walmart and Target can continue to sell those "non-essential" items.
I'm reasonably sure that "joy shopping" can't be stopped. I seriously spent probably fifteen or twenty minutes looking at baby/kid clothes at Target last week, just to have something to do. I don't have kids. I don't even know anyone who has kids. But it was there, it was retail and it wasn't my *kitten* apartment. Today is going to be liquor store day and I can't decide whether I should walk or drive so I can bring more home. I am also extremely likely to examine every bottle of wine and spirits they have, just to kill an hour outside my prison. And hopefully find every clerk in the store to deeply discuss drink options with. I stay home for as long as I can stand it, but every chance I have to get out where actual living human people are is stretched out to the utmost justifiable limit. They can shut down whatever aisles they want, limit the numbers inside as much as they want, but for a lot of folks, that's our only connection with actual people and I will soak up every single second and then hoard the memory for days. Text and FaceTime are moderately adequate to try and connect, but there's nothing like the feeling of being around PEOPLE. And stores are just about the only places left that have PEOPLE in them.
Lowe's appears to be the joy shopping destination in my town. I get it. The weather is perfect for gardening and all those home tasks they suddenly have time for. It's really defeating the purpose, though...
This is just FTR, not to criticize anyone else or minimize their experience in any way at all. Humans are varied, and that variety is a wonderful thing about the world.
Whether isolating alone is hard(er) is a very individual thing. I live alone, only shopped once since 3/13, talked to a neighbor one day from a long distance, and a friend similarly on another day, and that's my in-person social contact (other than "good afternoon" or a hand wave to strangers when out for a walk). Happy as a clam.
I'm isolating with people and it's harder for me than isolating alone. I'm used to being alone while they're at work, now I feel like I've lost my "alone time" and I miss it. I can go and be alone in another room, but it isn't the same as having the entire house to myself. I'm feeling a bit suffocated, but it's not as bad as I thought. I have gone out twice in the last 30 days and only because I had to. I have never shopped for the sake of shopping, so joy shopping is a foreign concept to me. I understand it, but I can't comprehend it.
As in introvert, isolating alone would be a piece of cake. If this happened pre-wife and kids, I would be fine, I would probably have read 15 books, played 100 games of chess on the internet, and burned a lot more calories exercising over the past month.
Being quarantined with two young kids is very stressful at times. Especially when most of our neighborhood thinks that social isolating is discretionary and only necessary if it is convenient. A neighbor mom had a birthday yesterday, and 20 neighbors and their kids all gathered outside of her house to sing to her, then essentially had a block party for an hour. My kids weren't allowed, and both had serious meltdowns, it was awful (one mom had an Easter bunny costume "why can't we see the Easter bunny?"). We are definitely the meanest parents on the block - hopefully they will appreciate our efforts someday, but right now it is completely thankless.
Okay, that gives me a moment of gratitude. I could be quarantined with children. I can't think of a child I liked being around for 20 minutes, much less 20+ days of lockdown....although at this point, I'd probably be willing to give it a shot. I mean, I've kept a couple of plants alive for a few years now, that's pretty much the same as kids, right?
8 -
bmeadows380 wrote: »janejellyroll wrote: »bmeadows380 wrote: »My best friend is really upset with her employer right now. She has been going into work because of difficulties setting her to up work from home. They make them take their temperature everyday before coming into work. She has bad allergies, and springtime is the worst, and Friday, her temp was up to 100 degrees due to what she knew was nothing more than a sinus infection that she gets every year due to allergies. She debated on telling the employer, but finally felt honesty was right. All they heard was her temp was up and sent her home, telling her she has to self quarantine for 2 weeks. She contacted her doctor on the phone; he ordered a flu test and a COVID test. Talking with him, he also agreed it was highly unlikely she had COVID - she does have very bad lungs and is a prime candidate for the pneumonia if she does get it. Besides, she doesn't have a cough, she doesn't have body aches, and she doesn't have tightness in her chest.
The flu test came back negative; the COVID test is supposed to be back in 4 to 12 days as lab corp is backed up (and I thought they had a rapid test now? Guess it's not in WV). However, her employer told her that it does not matter if the test comes back negative; she still has to stay self quarantined until she shows no other symptoms - no fever, no shortness of breath. Except she always has shortness of breath due to bad asthma and the allergies! AND they are making her take vacation time for this 2 week period!
She says she'll have to lie when the 2 weeks is up just so she can do her job and get her paycheck.
Usually, she's really behind her company and pointing out how it is better than the utility I work for (she works for the other power utility in the state); this time, however, my corporation actually put into place a better policy than hers has, because my utility is paying straight time for anyone who has to self-quarantine and cannot work from home, and sick leave automatically goes into place for the entire time one needs to be home with the illness until they test negative and are released by their doctor.
I get her frustration, but people with allergies aren't immune to COVID-19. It's possible that her fever could be due to the virus. The alternative is to expect her co-workers to accept the risk of possible transmission and that's a lot to ask of people right now.
She's well aware that she's not immune; in fact, she's much more susceptible due to her weak lungs. But the thing is, all she has is a fever; none of the other symptoms are present - she does not have a cough, chills, body aches, sore throat, headache, or shortness of breath that are on the list as symptoms of COVID-19. There are a ton of things that can cause a mild fever in a human being. I wouldn't immediately jump to a conclusion that its COVID-19 if all I had is one symptom, especially if her doctor also agrees that its not the virus.
I think we're all going to know more about how this manifests once medical professionals have more time to study and discuss their observations, but with what we're hearing about atypical symptom clusters and even asymptomatic transmission, I don't know if it is safe to assume that someone with "just a fever" doesn't have COVID-19. There are a lot of things that can cause a fever in a human being, but I wouldn't fault anyone right now for taking the reasonable precaution and acting *as if* someone with a fever potentially has it and therefore should stay home from work.11 -
Bry_Fitness70 wrote: »amusedmonkey wrote: »
I'm isolating with my husband and two teenagers. I imagine isolating alone would be much harder and really feel for everyone in that situation. At least I have other people to interact with - even if they do annoy me occasionally; for the most part, we get along very well though. Plus we have the advantage of a yard and two outbuildings so we aren't stuck staring at each other all day.cwolfman13 wrote: »I have a question............where is the logic of shutting down certain aisles in stores such as WalMart? I'm sure their reasoning is sound, but everybody I've talked with says the same thing. Now they're going to be shoving more people into less room/ Unless they're also limiting number of consumers? And toys? I know adults are on the prowl for new and different things to do; wouldn't it make sense kids might be getting ultra bored too? Wouldn't buying toys be as essential as, oh say,....stocking up on soda, chips, or something?
No disagreeing necessary, just asking a question for opinions.
They aren't doing that here...but my guess would be to curb "joy shopping" and people just getting out of the house to browse around Wal-Mart and such.
What they're doing here as of 8 AM this morning is limiting the number of people in the store to 20% of capacity which means if you need to go get something it's probably actually going to be an essential need because you'll likely be waiting in a line outside the store to get in. I haven't seen much of an issue in regards to large numbers of people when I go to the regular grocery store or even Costco, but I've driven by the Walmart parking lot a few times and it looks like the week before Christmas or something, so I was kind of expecting these people limits to come down the pipe.
I have also heard complaints from other non-essential retailers that it isn't fair that they have to shut down, but Walmart and Target can continue to sell those "non-essential" items.
I'm reasonably sure that "joy shopping" can't be stopped. I seriously spent probably fifteen or twenty minutes looking at baby/kid clothes at Target last week, just to have something to do. I don't have kids. I don't even know anyone who has kids. But it was there, it was retail and it wasn't my *kitten* apartment. Today is going to be liquor store day and I can't decide whether I should walk or drive so I can bring more home. I am also extremely likely to examine every bottle of wine and spirits they have, just to kill an hour outside my prison. And hopefully find every clerk in the store to deeply discuss drink options with. I stay home for as long as I can stand it, but every chance I have to get out where actual living human people are is stretched out to the utmost justifiable limit. They can shut down whatever aisles they want, limit the numbers inside as much as they want, but for a lot of folks, that's our only connection with actual people and I will soak up every single second and then hoard the memory for days. Text and FaceTime are moderately adequate to try and connect, but there's nothing like the feeling of being around PEOPLE. And stores are just about the only places left that have PEOPLE in them.
Lowe's appears to be the joy shopping destination in my town. I get it. The weather is perfect for gardening and all those home tasks they suddenly have time for. It's really defeating the purpose, though...
This is just FTR, not to criticize anyone else or minimize their experience in any way at all. Humans are varied, and that variety is a wonderful thing about the world.
Whether isolating alone is hard(er) is a very individual thing. I live alone, only shopped once since 3/13, talked to a neighbor one day from a long distance, and a friend similarly on another day, and that's my in-person social contact (other than "good afternoon" or a hand wave to strangers when out for a walk). Happy as a clam.
I'm isolating with people and it's harder for me than isolating alone. I'm used to being alone while they're at work, now I feel like I've lost my "alone time" and I miss it. I can go and be alone in another room, but it isn't the same as having the entire house to myself. I'm feeling a bit suffocated, but it's not as bad as I thought. I have gone out twice in the last 30 days and only because I had to. I have never shopped for the sake of shopping, so joy shopping is a foreign concept to me. I understand it, but I can't comprehend it.
As in introvert, isolating alone would be a piece of cake. If this happened pre-wife and kids, I would be fine, I would probably have read 15 books, played 100 games of chess on the internet, and burned a lot more calories exercising over the past month.
Being quarantined with two young kids is very stressful at times. Especially when most of our neighborhood thinks that social isolating is discretionary and only necessary if it is convenient. A neighbor mom had a birthday yesterday, and 20 neighbors and their kids all gathered outside of her house to sing to her, then essentially had a block party for an hour. My kids weren't allowed, and both had serious meltdowns, it was awful (one mom had an Easter bunny costume "why can't we see the Easter bunny?"). We are definitely the meanest parents on the block - hopefully they will appreciate our efforts someday, but right now it is completely thankless.
Okay, that gives me a moment of gratitude. I could be quarantined with children. I can't think of a child I liked being around for 20 minutes, much less 20+ days of lockdown....although at this point, I'd probably be willing to give it a shot. I mean, I've kept a couple of plants alive for a few years now, that's pretty much the same as kids, right?
Kids will usually tell you when they need a drink of water. 11 -
Re missing birthdays. Our grand daughter’s 11th birthday was the end of March. Even though they live 400 miles away, under normal circumstances, we would have been there. Had to miss it..I think it was the first birthday of any of our 4 grandkids that we have missed. 😢 On the plus side, the next one is not until Sept & will only be 2 miles away. Hopefully by then, we will be able to do that. 🤞🙂8
-
My grandmother's birthday is this week. She will be 92. Tomorrow we will be gathering a number of cars to drive past where she lives. Everyone will make signs and decorate their cars. A little birthday parade while still social distancing! We even have permission from our cities taskforce to do this.17
-
Bry_Fitness70 wrote: »amusedmonkey wrote: »
I'm isolating with my husband and two teenagers. I imagine isolating alone would be much harder and really feel for everyone in that situation. At least I have other people to interact with - even if they do annoy me occasionally; for the most part, we get along very well though. Plus we have the advantage of a yard and two outbuildings so we aren't stuck staring at each other all day.cwolfman13 wrote: »I have a question............where is the logic of shutting down certain aisles in stores such as WalMart? I'm sure their reasoning is sound, but everybody I've talked with says the same thing. Now they're going to be shoving more people into less room/ Unless they're also limiting number of consumers? And toys? I know adults are on the prowl for new and different things to do; wouldn't it make sense kids might be getting ultra bored too? Wouldn't buying toys be as essential as, oh say,....stocking up on soda, chips, or something?
No disagreeing necessary, just asking a question for opinions.
They aren't doing that here...but my guess would be to curb "joy shopping" and people just getting out of the house to browse around Wal-Mart and such.
What they're doing here as of 8 AM this morning is limiting the number of people in the store to 20% of capacity which means if you need to go get something it's probably actually going to be an essential need because you'll likely be waiting in a line outside the store to get in. I haven't seen much of an issue in regards to large numbers of people when I go to the regular grocery store or even Costco, but I've driven by the Walmart parking lot a few times and it looks like the week before Christmas or something, so I was kind of expecting these people limits to come down the pipe.
I have also heard complaints from other non-essential retailers that it isn't fair that they have to shut down, but Walmart and Target can continue to sell those "non-essential" items.
I'm reasonably sure that "joy shopping" can't be stopped. I seriously spent probably fifteen or twenty minutes looking at baby/kid clothes at Target last week, just to have something to do. I don't have kids. I don't even know anyone who has kids. But it was there, it was retail and it wasn't my *kitten* apartment. Today is going to be liquor store day and I can't decide whether I should walk or drive so I can bring more home. I am also extremely likely to examine every bottle of wine and spirits they have, just to kill an hour outside my prison. And hopefully find every clerk in the store to deeply discuss drink options with. I stay home for as long as I can stand it, but every chance I have to get out where actual living human people are is stretched out to the utmost justifiable limit. They can shut down whatever aisles they want, limit the numbers inside as much as they want, but for a lot of folks, that's our only connection with actual people and I will soak up every single second and then hoard the memory for days. Text and FaceTime are moderately adequate to try and connect, but there's nothing like the feeling of being around PEOPLE. And stores are just about the only places left that have PEOPLE in them.
Lowe's appears to be the joy shopping destination in my town. I get it. The weather is perfect for gardening and all those home tasks they suddenly have time for. It's really defeating the purpose, though...
This is just FTR, not to criticize anyone else or minimize their experience in any way at all. Humans are varied, and that variety is a wonderful thing about the world.
Whether isolating alone is hard(er) is a very individual thing. I live alone, only shopped once since 3/13, talked to a neighbor one day from a long distance, and a friend similarly on another day, and that's my in-person social contact (other than "good afternoon" or a hand wave to strangers when out for a walk). Happy as a clam.
I'm isolating with people and it's harder for me than isolating alone. I'm used to being alone while they're at work, now I feel like I've lost my "alone time" and I miss it. I can go and be alone in another room, but it isn't the same as having the entire house to myself. I'm feeling a bit suffocated, but it's not as bad as I thought. I have gone out twice in the last 30 days and only because I had to. I have never shopped for the sake of shopping, so joy shopping is a foreign concept to me. I understand it, but I can't comprehend it.
As in introvert, isolating alone would be a piece of cake. If this happened pre-wife and kids, I would be fine, I would probably have read 15 books, played 100 games of chess on the internet, and burned a lot more calories exercising over the past month.
Being quarantined with two young kids is very stressful at times. Especially when most of our neighborhood thinks that social isolating is discretionary and only necessary if it is convenient. A neighbor mom had a birthday yesterday, and 20 neighbors and their kids all gathered outside of her house to sing to her, then essentially had a block party for an hour. My kids weren't allowed, and both had serious meltdowns, it was awful (one mom had an Easter bunny costume "why can't we see the Easter bunny?"). We are definitely the meanest parents on the block - hopefully they will appreciate our efforts someday, but right now it is completely thankless.
Good job on protecting your kids, even if you had to enforce tough love. I read today on line Pink's description of her infection and battle with CONV-19, and of her 3 years old son's ordeal. It sounded terrifying
.
(https://www.cnn.com/2020/04/07/entertainment/pink-coronavirus/index.html).4 -
snowflake954 wrote: »Bry_Fitness70 wrote: »amusedmonkey wrote: »
I'm isolating with my husband and two teenagers. I imagine isolating alone would be much harder and really feel for everyone in that situation. At least I have other people to interact with - even if they do annoy me occasionally; for the most part, we get along very well though. Plus we have the advantage of a yard and two outbuildings so we aren't stuck staring at each other all day.cwolfman13 wrote: »I have a question............where is the logic of shutting down certain aisles in stores such as WalMart? I'm sure their reasoning is sound, but everybody I've talked with says the same thing. Now they're going to be shoving more people into less room/ Unless they're also limiting number of consumers? And toys? I know adults are on the prowl for new and different things to do; wouldn't it make sense kids might be getting ultra bored too? Wouldn't buying toys be as essential as, oh say,....stocking up on soda, chips, or something?
No disagreeing necessary, just asking a question for opinions.
They aren't doing that here...but my guess would be to curb "joy shopping" and people just getting out of the house to browse around Wal-Mart and such.
What they're doing here as of 8 AM this morning is limiting the number of people in the store to 20% of capacity which means if you need to go get something it's probably actually going to be an essential need because you'll likely be waiting in a line outside the store to get in. I haven't seen much of an issue in regards to large numbers of people when I go to the regular grocery store or even Costco, but I've driven by the Walmart parking lot a few times and it looks like the week before Christmas or something, so I was kind of expecting these people limits to come down the pipe.
I have also heard complaints from other non-essential retailers that it isn't fair that they have to shut down, but Walmart and Target can continue to sell those "non-essential" items.
I'm reasonably sure that "joy shopping" can't be stopped. I seriously spent probably fifteen or twenty minutes looking at baby/kid clothes at Target last week, just to have something to do. I don't have kids. I don't even know anyone who has kids. But it was there, it was retail and it wasn't my *kitten* apartment. Today is going to be liquor store day and I can't decide whether I should walk or drive so I can bring more home. I am also extremely likely to examine every bottle of wine and spirits they have, just to kill an hour outside my prison. And hopefully find every clerk in the store to deeply discuss drink options with. I stay home for as long as I can stand it, but every chance I have to get out where actual living human people are is stretched out to the utmost justifiable limit. They can shut down whatever aisles they want, limit the numbers inside as much as they want, but for a lot of folks, that's our only connection with actual people and I will soak up every single second and then hoard the memory for days. Text and FaceTime are moderately adequate to try and connect, but there's nothing like the feeling of being around PEOPLE. And stores are just about the only places left that have PEOPLE in them.
Lowe's appears to be the joy shopping destination in my town. I get it. The weather is perfect for gardening and all those home tasks they suddenly have time for. It's really defeating the purpose, though...
This is just FTR, not to criticize anyone else or minimize their experience in any way at all. Humans are varied, and that variety is a wonderful thing about the world.
Whether isolating alone is hard(er) is a very individual thing. I live alone, only shopped once since 3/13, talked to a neighbor one day from a long distance, and a friend similarly on another day, and that's my in-person social contact (other than "good afternoon" or a hand wave to strangers when out for a walk). Happy as a clam.
I'm isolating with people and it's harder for me than isolating alone. I'm used to being alone while they're at work, now I feel like I've lost my "alone time" and I miss it. I can go and be alone in another room, but it isn't the same as having the entire house to myself. I'm feeling a bit suffocated, but it's not as bad as I thought. I have gone out twice in the last 30 days and only because I had to. I have never shopped for the sake of shopping, so joy shopping is a foreign concept to me. I understand it, but I can't comprehend it.
As in introvert, isolating alone would be a piece of cake. If this happened pre-wife and kids, I would be fine, I would probably have read 15 books, played 100 games of chess on the internet, and burned a lot more calories exercising over the past month.
Being quarantined with two young kids is very stressful at times. Especially when most of our neighborhood thinks that social isolating is discretionary and only necessary if it is convenient. A neighbor mom had a birthday yesterday, and 20 neighbors and their kids all gathered outside of her house to sing to her, then essentially had a block party for an hour. My kids weren't allowed, and both had serious meltdowns, it was awful (one mom had an Easter bunny costume "why can't we see the Easter bunny?"). We are definitely the meanest parents on the block - hopefully they will appreciate our efforts someday, but right now it is completely thankless.
Okay, that gives me a moment of gratitude. I could be quarantined with children. I can't think of a child I liked being around for 20 minutes, much less 20+ days of lockdown....although at this point, I'd probably be willing to give it a shot. I mean, I've kept a couple of plants alive for a few years now, that's pretty much the same as kids, right?
Kids will usually tell you when they need a drink of water.
See there? What could possibly go wrong??? CLEARLY I'm an expert already
5 -
Re the socializing needs: my parents live on a farm a few miles away and I live alone. We have all been strictly quarantining ourselves for several weeks and now feel safe to spend time together. I'm normally fine being alone, but it felt very good to be able to hug them again.
Growing up rural in a northern state, we always kept enough basics on hand to get through weeks cut off from the stores. That has really come in handy; the only thing I needed to stock up on was chicken feed. I have run out of lettuce, but will make do until the garden is producing. Seedlings are growing nicely.
Partially stressed from worrying about friends and family and partially from keeping too busy to snack, I have been losing weight steadily. Silver lining?7 -
I like the comment about the birthday parade. Around here the teachers are decorating their cars & driving through their school neighborhoods to see the kids at a safe distance, since school is probably not going to restart through the end of school year.6
-
RetiredAndLovingIt wrote: »I like the comment about the birthday parade. Around here the teachers are decorating their cars & driving through their school neighborhoods to see the kids at a safe distance, since school is probably not going to restart through the end of school year.
That would have been a great option.
My birthday was a few weeks ago and I would have been mortified if the neighbors all gathered and risked everyone's health on my behalf. Stay home, let's celebrate in a few months.11 -
cwolfman13 wrote: »I have a question............where is the logic of shutting down certain aisles in stores such as WalMart? I'm sure their reasoning is sound, but everybody I've talked with says the same thing. Now they're going to be shoving more people into less room/ Unless they're also limiting number of consumers? And toys? I know adults are on the prowl for new and different things to do; wouldn't it make sense kids might be getting ultra bored too? Wouldn't buying toys be as essential as, oh say,....stocking up on soda, chips, or something?
No disagreeing necessary, just asking a question for opinions.
They aren't doing that here...but my guess would be to curb "joy shopping" and people just getting out of the house to browse around Wal-Mart and such.
What they're doing here as of 8 AM this morning is limiting the number of people in the store to 20% of capacity which means if you need to go get something it's probably actually going to be an essential need because you'll likely be waiting in a line outside the store to get in. I haven't seen much of an issue in regards to large numbers of people when I go to the regular grocery store or even Costco, but I've driven by the Walmart parking lot a few times and it looks like the week before Christmas or something, so I was kind of expecting these people limits to come down the pipe.
I have also heard complaints from other non-essential retailers that it isn't fair that they have to shut down, but Walmart and Target can continue to sell those "non-essential" items.
I'm reasonably sure that "joy shopping" can't be stopped. I seriously spent probably fifteen or twenty minutes looking at baby/kid clothes at Target last week, just to have something to do. I don't have kids. I don't even know anyone who has kids. But it was there, it was retail and it wasn't my *kitten* apartment. Today is going to be liquor store day and I can't decide whether I should walk or drive so I can bring more home. I am also extremely likely to examine every bottle of wine and spirits they have, just to kill an hour outside my prison. And hopefully find every clerk in the store to deeply discuss drink options with. I stay home for as long as I can stand it, but every chance I have to get out where actual living human people are is stretched out to the utmost justifiable limit. They can shut down whatever aisles they want, limit the numbers inside as much as they want, but for a lot of folks, that's our only connection with actual people and I will soak up every single second and then hoard the memory for days. Text and FaceTime are moderately adequate to try and connect, but there's nothing like the feeling of being around PEOPLE. And stores are just about the only places left that have PEOPLE in them.
And this is why everything except supermarkets, convenience stores, petrol stations, pharmacies, and medical centres is shut in NZ.14 -
So the state came out with their recommendation a couple days ago about wearing masks when going out into public...ie stores, running errands, etc. Yesterday evening I went to Costco and I saw what I would estimate to be about 70% compliance with this recommendation (including myself) from both our governor, CDC, and the national government at large...also saw a ton of face touching to adjust masks, etc. which seems to be defeatist.
Also, as I thought would happen, the governor has just had to come out with a reminder that while the CDC and the state recommends masks as an additional measure to possibly curb things, it doesn't discount social distancing and staying at home, washing hands, etc...she had to do that because people are all, "we got masks...everything is fine" and more movement has been noted. I figured that would happen. That was my biggest worry with masks...not that they couldn't provide a bit more protection, though I still feel it's nominal...but that it could actually make things worse because more people going out and feeling "safe" and more people touching the crap out of their face while they adjust their mask after they've had their hands all over shopping carts and other things.6 -
My grandmother's birthday is this week. She will be 92. Tomorrow we will be gathering a number of cars to drive past where she lives. Everyone will make signs and decorate their cars. A little birthday parade while still social distancing! We even have permission from our cities taskforce to do this.
My neighborhood is going to have the teachers drive through today and honk and their kids on the front porches waving to them. At 3 PM. Yeah, I could grumble a bit about working through it from home, but I won't. Teachers are very important to kids and vice versa. I hope they have a blast. I might even peak out for a bit though my kids haven't been school aged in years.3 -
Bry_Fitness70 wrote: »amusedmonkey wrote: »
I'm isolating with my husband and two teenagers. I imagine isolating alone would be much harder and really feel for everyone in that situation. At least I have other people to interact with - even if they do annoy me occasionally; for the most part, we get along very well though. Plus we have the advantage of a yard and two outbuildings so we aren't stuck staring at each other all day.cwolfman13 wrote: »I have a question............where is the logic of shutting down certain aisles in stores such as WalMart? I'm sure their reasoning is sound, but everybody I've talked with says the same thing. Now they're going to be shoving more people into less room/ Unless they're also limiting number of consumers? And toys? I know adults are on the prowl for new and different things to do; wouldn't it make sense kids might be getting ultra bored too? Wouldn't buying toys be as essential as, oh say,....stocking up on soda, chips, or something?
No disagreeing necessary, just asking a question for opinions.
They aren't doing that here...but my guess would be to curb "joy shopping" and people just getting out of the house to browse around Wal-Mart and such.
What they're doing here as of 8 AM this morning is limiting the number of people in the store to 20% of capacity which means if you need to go get something it's probably actually going to be an essential need because you'll likely be waiting in a line outside the store to get in. I haven't seen much of an issue in regards to large numbers of people when I go to the regular grocery store or even Costco, but I've driven by the Walmart parking lot a few times and it looks like the week before Christmas or something, so I was kind of expecting these people limits to come down the pipe.
I have also heard complaints from other non-essential retailers that it isn't fair that they have to shut down, but Walmart and Target can continue to sell those "non-essential" items.
I'm reasonably sure that "joy shopping" can't be stopped. I seriously spent probably fifteen or twenty minutes looking at baby/kid clothes at Target last week, just to have something to do. I don't have kids. I don't even know anyone who has kids. But it was there, it was retail and it wasn't my *kitten* apartment. Today is going to be liquor store day and I can't decide whether I should walk or drive so I can bring more home. I am also extremely likely to examine every bottle of wine and spirits they have, just to kill an hour outside my prison. And hopefully find every clerk in the store to deeply discuss drink options with. I stay home for as long as I can stand it, but every chance I have to get out where actual living human people are is stretched out to the utmost justifiable limit. They can shut down whatever aisles they want, limit the numbers inside as much as they want, but for a lot of folks, that's our only connection with actual people and I will soak up every single second and then hoard the memory for days. Text and FaceTime are moderately adequate to try and connect, but there's nothing like the feeling of being around PEOPLE. And stores are just about the only places left that have PEOPLE in them.
Lowe's appears to be the joy shopping destination in my town. I get it. The weather is perfect for gardening and all those home tasks they suddenly have time for. It's really defeating the purpose, though...
This is just FTR, not to criticize anyone else or minimize their experience in any way at all. Humans are varied, and that variety is a wonderful thing about the world.
Whether isolating alone is hard(er) is a very individual thing. I live alone, only shopped once since 3/13, talked to a neighbor one day from a long distance, and a friend similarly on another day, and that's my in-person social contact (other than "good afternoon" or a hand wave to strangers when out for a walk). Happy as a clam.
I'm isolating with people and it's harder for me than isolating alone. I'm used to being alone while they're at work, now I feel like I've lost my "alone time" and I miss it. I can go and be alone in another room, but it isn't the same as having the entire house to myself. I'm feeling a bit suffocated, but it's not as bad as I thought. I have gone out twice in the last 30 days and only because I had to. I have never shopped for the sake of shopping, so joy shopping is a foreign concept to me. I understand it, but I can't comprehend it.
As in introvert, isolating alone would be a piece of cake. If this happened pre-wife and kids, I would be fine, I would probably have read 15 books, played 100 games of chess on the internet, and burned a lot more calories exercising over the past month.
Being quarantined with two young kids is very stressful at times. Especially when most of our neighborhood thinks that social isolating is discretionary and only necessary if it is convenient. A neighbor mom had a birthday yesterday, and 20 neighbors and their kids all gathered outside of her house to sing to her, then essentially had a block party for an hour. My kids weren't allowed, and both had serious meltdowns, it was awful (one mom had an Easter bunny costume "why can't we see the Easter bunny?"). We are definitely the meanest parents on the block - hopefully they will appreciate our efforts someday, but right now it is completely thankless.
Okay, that gives me a moment of gratitude. I could be quarantined with children. I can't think of a child I liked being around for 20 minutes, much less 20+ days of lockdown....although at this point, I'd probably be willing to give it a shot. I mean, I've kept a couple of plants alive for a few years now, that's pretty much the same as kids, right?
I'm childfree and laughing at all the people who droned on about how great their kids are when they don't see them most of the day. And now that they are stuck together, it's an entirely different story I'm seeing. Even my sister, who is still gone to work a lot of hours as a nurse, has a whole new perspective suddenly.🤣5 -
cwolfman13 wrote: »So the state came out with their recommendation a couple days ago about wearing masks when going out into public...ie stores, running errands, etc. Yesterday evening I went to Costco and I saw what I would estimate to be about 70% compliance with this recommendation (including myself) from both our governor, CDC, and the national government at large...also saw a ton of face touching to adjust masks, etc. which seems to be defeatist.
Also, as I thought would happen, the governor has just had to come out with a reminder that while the CDC and the state recommends masks as an additional measure to possibly curb things, it doesn't discount social distancing and staying at home, washing hands, etc...she had to do that because people are all, "we got masks...everything is fine" and more movement has been noted. I figured that would happen. That was my biggest worry with masks...not that they couldn't provide a bit more protection, though I still feel it's nominal...but that it could actually make things worse because more people going out and feeling "safe" and more people touching the crap out of their face while they adjust their mask after they've had their hands all over shopping carts and other things.
This is why NZ has thus far not been recommending masks for the general populace. If people feel safer and become more complacent as a result, then all the hard work is easily undone. I did wear one for my last grocery shop, and will for future ones, but I made sure that I know how to put it on and take it off properly, and I don't fiddle with it.3 -
Nony_Mouse wrote: »cwolfman13 wrote: »So the state came out with their recommendation a couple days ago about wearing masks when going out into public...ie stores, running errands, etc. Yesterday evening I went to Costco and I saw what I would estimate to be about 70% compliance with this recommendation (including myself) from both our governor, CDC, and the national government at large...also saw a ton of face touching to adjust masks, etc. which seems to be defeatist.
Also, as I thought would happen, the governor has just had to come out with a reminder that while the CDC and the state recommends masks as an additional measure to possibly curb things, it doesn't discount social distancing and staying at home, washing hands, etc...she had to do that because people are all, "we got masks...everything is fine" and more movement has been noted. I figured that would happen. That was my biggest worry with masks...not that they couldn't provide a bit more protection, though I still feel it's nominal...but that it could actually make things worse because more people going out and feeling "safe" and more people touching the crap out of their face while they adjust their mask after they've had their hands all over shopping carts and other things.
This is why NZ has thus far not been recommending masks for the general populace. If people feel safer and become more complacent as a result, then all the hard work is easily undone. I did wear one for my last grocery shop, and will for future ones, but I made sure that I know how to put it on and take it off properly, and I don't fiddle with it.
I've got to force myself to wear a mask into the stores. So far, I've been lazy about it. I keep a huge distance between myself and others. I have 2 different masks and they either don't stay on my nose or the elastic keeps popping off an ear. I think I must be built funny or different because I don't see anyone else having to adjust their masks all the time. Compliance here seems to be about 30%. But I do feel it's increased the last week or so. Gloves, not so much. 3 -
Shopping tip - look up your supermarket on Google Maps (web or app), there is a popular times feature that will give you live data on how busy it is (depending on if people are actually carrying their phones with them, of course).8
-
@earlnabby
I have also been told that using a non woven lining in between the two fabric layers is best. I had some fusible interfacing and made mask using higher thread count fabrics. Sheets are a great idea, I have some 600 count sheets I have been saving to use as drop cloths. Now we just need to be able to find elastic which would be easier than making my own bias tape for ties. Local stores have been sold out of Bias tape, elastic, shoe laces, etc, for weeks and online stores are projecting that they cannot ship until May.
Thank you for taking care of your local Humane Society!
Try finding hair bands. I have heard they work.3 -
T1DCarnivoreRunner wrote: »Bry_Fitness70 wrote: »amusedmonkey wrote: »
I'm isolating with my husband and two teenagers. I imagine isolating alone would be much harder and really feel for everyone in that situation. At least I have other people to interact with - even if they do annoy me occasionally; for the most part, we get along very well though. Plus we have the advantage of a yard and two outbuildings so we aren't stuck staring at each other all day.cwolfman13 wrote: »I have a question............where is the logic of shutting down certain aisles in stores such as WalMart? I'm sure their reasoning is sound, but everybody I've talked with says the same thing. Now they're going to be shoving more people into less room/ Unless they're also limiting number of consumers? And toys? I know adults are on the prowl for new and different things to do; wouldn't it make sense kids might be getting ultra bored too? Wouldn't buying toys be as essential as, oh say,....stocking up on soda, chips, or something?
No disagreeing necessary, just asking a question for opinions.
They aren't doing that here...but my guess would be to curb "joy shopping" and people just getting out of the house to browse around Wal-Mart and such.
What they're doing here as of 8 AM this morning is limiting the number of people in the store to 20% of capacity which means if you need to go get something it's probably actually going to be an essential need because you'll likely be waiting in a line outside the store to get in. I haven't seen much of an issue in regards to large numbers of people when I go to the regular grocery store or even Costco, but I've driven by the Walmart parking lot a few times and it looks like the week before Christmas or something, so I was kind of expecting these people limits to come down the pipe.
I have also heard complaints from other non-essential retailers that it isn't fair that they have to shut down, but Walmart and Target can continue to sell those "non-essential" items.
I'm reasonably sure that "joy shopping" can't be stopped. I seriously spent probably fifteen or twenty minutes looking at baby/kid clothes at Target last week, just to have something to do. I don't have kids. I don't even know anyone who has kids. But it was there, it was retail and it wasn't my *kitten* apartment. Today is going to be liquor store day and I can't decide whether I should walk or drive so I can bring more home. I am also extremely likely to examine every bottle of wine and spirits they have, just to kill an hour outside my prison. And hopefully find every clerk in the store to deeply discuss drink options with. I stay home for as long as I can stand it, but every chance I have to get out where actual living human people are is stretched out to the utmost justifiable limit. They can shut down whatever aisles they want, limit the numbers inside as much as they want, but for a lot of folks, that's our only connection with actual people and I will soak up every single second and then hoard the memory for days. Text and FaceTime are moderately adequate to try and connect, but there's nothing like the feeling of being around PEOPLE. And stores are just about the only places left that have PEOPLE in them.
Lowe's appears to be the joy shopping destination in my town. I get it. The weather is perfect for gardening and all those home tasks they suddenly have time for. It's really defeating the purpose, though...
This is just FTR, not to criticize anyone else or minimize their experience in any way at all. Humans are varied, and that variety is a wonderful thing about the world.
Whether isolating alone is hard(er) is a very individual thing. I live alone, only shopped once since 3/13, talked to a neighbor one day from a long distance, and a friend similarly on another day, and that's my in-person social contact (other than "good afternoon" or a hand wave to strangers when out for a walk). Happy as a clam.
I'm isolating with people and it's harder for me than isolating alone. I'm used to being alone while they're at work, now I feel like I've lost my "alone time" and I miss it. I can go and be alone in another room, but it isn't the same as having the entire house to myself. I'm feeling a bit suffocated, but it's not as bad as I thought. I have gone out twice in the last 30 days and only because I had to. I have never shopped for the sake of shopping, so joy shopping is a foreign concept to me. I understand it, but I can't comprehend it.
As in introvert, isolating alone would be a piece of cake. If this happened pre-wife and kids, I would be fine, I would probably have read 15 books, played 100 games of chess on the internet, and burned a lot more calories exercising over the past month.
Being quarantined with two young kids is very stressful at times. Especially when most of our neighborhood thinks that social isolating is discretionary and only necessary if it is convenient. A neighbor mom had a birthday yesterday, and 20 neighbors and their kids all gathered outside of her house to sing to her, then essentially had a block party for an hour. My kids weren't allowed, and both had serious meltdowns, it was awful (one mom had an Easter bunny costume "why can't we see the Easter bunny?"). We are definitely the meanest parents on the block - hopefully they will appreciate our efforts someday, but right now it is completely thankless.
Okay, that gives me a moment of gratitude. I could be quarantined with children. I can't think of a child I liked being around for 20 minutes, much less 20+ days of lockdown....although at this point, I'd probably be willing to give it a shot. I mean, I've kept a couple of plants alive for a few years now, that's pretty much the same as kids, right?
I'm childfree and laughing at all the people who droned on about how great their kids are when they don't see them most of the day. And now that they are stuck together, it's an entirely different story I'm seeing. Even my sister, who is still gone to work a lot of hours as a nurse, has a whole new perspective suddenly.🤣
Even the great kids are challenging to take care of during a quarantine. No one had built their lives to accommodate suddenly yanking their kids out of school with no notice in March and figuring out how to engage them while trying to work full time.13 -
bmeadows380 wrote: »janejellyroll wrote: »
I guess I don't get the thing about being horrified about the cursive writing. Our grandparents had some skills that we don't have. My great-nieces and nephews will doubtlessly possess the ability to do things that I cannot. There's no general reason why skillsets must remain unchanging through generations.
It will be rather difficult to read original source information for a historian if they can't read cursive handwriting, and before you ask, I had a friend who started into a History Master's degree and it was vital that they get their information from the original sources, not copies or typed copies.
So one downside of not learning how to read cursive is a loss of history and information. If Great-grandaddy's journal is passed down, how will the child who can't read cursive read it and learn about his ancestor's thoughts?
Lol. I suppose if someone is specializing in a certain field that they can get specialized training in how to read original source material no matter what language or style it's written in. We don't teach everyone how to decipher original ancient Greek texts in public school either. And yet somehow the people who study them manage to learn later on. And figuring out what different styles of cursive or different writing fonts look like through the ages is not nearly as hard as learning a new language. My great granddaddy's cursive looks nothing like the style I learned in the 80s. And the style of writing on the constitution is even harder to read. And yet I can still figure it out. Some people just have a hard time with change and doing things differently freaks them out. That's what it boils down to.8 -
I'm one of those people who responds to invitations with, "Oh, how kind of you to think of me, but sorry, I already have plans," and the plans are to stay home alone in my sweats. I have pets and adult children at home, so social distancing has been a pretty easy task for me; I don't need other company. I went shopping before 3/13, and just went again on 4/06. I know I am lucky, to be so contented on my own. I do worry about others and feel sad about lost lives, lost income, lost joy. I'm exercising regularly to stay upbeat, and I love the challenge of teaching online in a way to reach and engage my students who are a particularly challenging group.
I have a couple of friends who are struggling with the isolation and I am happy to have them meet me at a specific dog park that is huge (over 2 miles for one loop) and has trails a good 10-12 feet wide throughout. The dog parks around here all have signs about how to be safe while using them. Those with slightly more narrow trails still have a good 8 feet across usually, but I only walk with my kids in those, b/c they are smaller and could potentially get more crowded. My dogs--a Border Collie and an Australian Shepherd--need two loops of the big park while I throw a ball the whole time. As it gets warmer, they will wear out more quickly. I may be able to back off how much we have to walk. I can't run on my local trail with them b/c it is too narrow and people there are *not* practicing social distancing. People in the DP seem to "get it," or maybe like me they are mostly introverts who naturally practice social distancing.
6 -
I am really introverted and the first 10 days were fine. The last week I have been struggling with just an overall feeling of frustration. I live alone so I like being by myself, but i have realized that I need some kind of interaction, or at least to get out of my house every day. I am disabled, so I can't just go out and walk or jog or exercise outside, so I just get in my car and drive around. I have been stopping at the convenience store for a pop every couple of days.
I actually think the virus went through my area back at the end of January/early February. We only have 9 cases in our county at the moment. There were a lot of people who had respiratory issues, and short of breath. I got sick Feb. 8th with a sore throat and headache, then fever, coughing and somewhat short of breath, but didn't realize it at the time. If I sat in a chair and stayed still, I was fine. If I breathed in deep, I would hit a point where it felt harder to push past that point and if I did, I would cough for a minute or two. I remember the first day thinking I was coming down with a cold, then my fever spiked to 102 a couple of times. Otherwise, was around 99. I even remember saying to my coworker that for having a cold, I wasn't sneezing much. All but one day I felt well enough to go to work, so I did. In talking to several people in the last few weeks, a lot of them think they had it around the same time also.
So that feeling that I already had it isn't helping me want to stay home.6 -
moonangel12 wrote: »Going back to animals testing positive - is this now a risk to consider? Our neighbor’s dog comes over often to play with our dog (both neighbor dogs actually)... do I need to worry that our dog could share COVID either direction?
Totally aside from the issue of the dogs being infected, most people pet their dogs. I doubt many of them are washing their hands before they do so. So now any virus they may have shed onto surfaces they've touched or directly onto their hands is now on their dog's coat. I'm guessing when the dogs play together, there is some contact between their coats. Now you need to give dog a really good bath before letting it back in the house.0 -
musicfan68 wrote: »I am really introverted and the first 10 days were fine. The last week I have been struggling with just an overall feeling of frustration. I live alone so I like being by myself, but i have realized that I need some kind of interaction, or at least to get out of my house every day. I am disabled, so I can't just go out and walk or jog or exercise outside, so I just get in my car and drive around. I have been stopping at the convenience store for a pop every couple of days.
I actually think the virus went through my area back at the end of January/early February. We only have 9 cases in our county at the moment. There were a lot of people who had respiratory issues, and short of breath. I got sick Feb. 8th with a sore throat and headache, then fever, coughing and somewhat short of breath, but didn't realize it at the time. If I sat in a chair and stayed still, I was fine. If I breathed in deep, I would hit a point where it felt harder to push past that point and if I did, I would cough for a minute or two. I remember the first day thinking I was coming down with a cold, then my fever spiked to 102 a couple of times. Otherwise, was around 99. I even remember saying to my coworker that for having a cold, I wasn't sneezing much. All but one day I felt well enough to go to work, so I did. In talking to several people in the last few weeks, a lot of them think they had it around the same time also.
So that feeling that I already had it isn't helping me want to stay home.
You mean that only 9 people have tested positive in your county. Unless there is universal testing, we cannot assume that the number testing positive is actually the exact number who have it.
I think it is important to remember that about 25% of all colds are caused by other coronaviruses. I have been really sick with "just a cold" several times in the past 20 years (I can't remember before that).
If the illness wasn't spreading like wildfire and causing hospitals in your area to become overwhelmed, it probably wasn't COVID-19. That's what has been characteristic of this coronavirus from the get-go in China; it didn't have to mutate to that point. It isn't just about someone sick with fever and shortness of breath (or any other cluster of symptoms). It's the speed of transmission and the high rate of hospitalization necessary for 20% or so of those infected.
Please stay safe and stay well.
10 -
musicfan68 wrote: »I am really introverted and the first 10 days were fine. The last week I have been struggling with just an overall feeling of frustration. I live alone so I like being by myself, but i have realized that I need some kind of interaction, or at least to get out of my house every day. I am disabled, so I can't just go out and walk or jog or exercise outside, so I just get in my car and drive around. I have been stopping at the convenience store for a pop every couple of days.
I actually think the virus went through my area back at the end of January/early February. We only have 9 cases in our county at the moment. There were a lot of people who had respiratory issues, and short of breath. I got sick Feb. 8th with a sore throat and headache, then fever, coughing and somewhat short of breath, but didn't realize it at the time. If I sat in a chair and stayed still, I was fine. If I breathed in deep, I would hit a point where it felt harder to push past that point and if I did, I would cough for a minute or two. I remember the first day thinking I was coming down with a cold, then my fever spiked to 102 a couple of times. Otherwise, was around 99. I even remember saying to my coworker that for having a cold, I wasn't sneezing much. All but one day I felt well enough to go to work, so I did. In talking to several people in the last few weeks, a lot of them think they had it around the same time also.
So that feeling that I already had it isn't helping me want to stay home.
You mean that only 9 people have tested positive in your county. Unless there is universal testing, we cannot assume that the number testing positive is actually the exact number who have it.
I think it is important to remember that about 25% of all colds are caused by other coronaviruses. I have been really sick with "just a cold" several times in the past 20 years (I can't remember before that).
If the illness wasn't spreading like wildfire and causing hospitals in your area to become overwhelmed, it probably wasn't COVID-19. That's what has been characteristic of this coronavirus from the get-go in China; it didn't have to mutate to that point. It isn't just about someone sick with fever and shortness of breath (or any other cluster of symptoms). It's the speed of transmission and the high rate of hospitalization necessary for 20% or so of those infected.
Please stay safe and stay well.
I've had lots of colds over the years also, and never had shortness of breath and basically no sneezing. Also, colds don't usually cause a fever. We had half our kids absent from school over a 2 week period, which was huge, more than normal, the last half of February. 80% of people don't need to be in the hospital, which is a pretty high percentage, most people have just mild symptoms. Even if 20% needed hospitalized, I don't think it would necessarily overwhelm our hospitals any more than usual. We live in a rural county in Iowa, with several hospitals spread out around the area. They always see a huge spike in Jan/Feb with Flu/Bronchitis, and other respiratory things. They weren't bothering to test people for COVID until the beginning of March. Not outside the realm of possibility that people had it in the weeks leading up to March, even people in the hospital.
I will be interested to get the antibody test to verify.3 -
musicfan68 wrote: »I am really introverted and the first 10 days were fine. The last week I have been struggling with just an overall feeling of frustration. I live alone so I like being by myself, but i have realized that I need some kind of interaction, or at least to get out of my house every day. I am disabled, so I can't just go out and walk or jog or exercise outside, so I just get in my car and drive around. I have been stopping at the convenience store for a pop every couple of days.
I actually think the virus went through my area back at the end of January/early February. We only have 9 cases in our county at the moment. There were a lot of people who had respiratory issues, and short of breath. I got sick Feb. 8th with a sore throat and headache, then fever, coughing and somewhat short of breath, but didn't realize it at the time. If I sat in a chair and stayed still, I was fine. If I breathed in deep, I would hit a point where it felt harder to push past that point and if I did, I would cough for a minute or two. I remember the first day thinking I was coming down with a cold, then my fever spiked to 102 a couple of times. Otherwise, was around 99. I even remember saying to my coworker that for having a cold, I wasn't sneezing much. All but one day I felt well enough to go to work, so I did. In talking to several people in the last few weeks, a lot of them think they had it around the same time also.
So that feeling that I already had it isn't helping me want to stay home.
I think your story may apply to several of us. I expect it will be a while before we can just pop in for an antibody test. In the mean time I plan to keep my antioxidant intake is as high as possible to help ward off the 'ground glass' looking lungs if I develop COVID-19. One way or another this will all be behind us one day.
It seems Amazon may be running smoother. Monday I order six different health related items and I noticed all shipped from Nashville TN early this morning. On my last order my items shipped from 8 difference warehouses as far away as Las Vegas.4
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 396.9K Introduce Yourself
- 44.2K Getting Started
- 260.9K Health and Weight Loss
- 176.3K Food and Nutrition
- 47.6K Recipes
- 232.8K Fitness and Exercise
- 452 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.7K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153.3K Motivation and Support
- 8.3K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.5K Chit-Chat
- 2.6K Fun and Games
- 4.5K MyFitnessPal Information
- 16 News and Announcements
- 18 MyFitnessPal Academy
- 1.4K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 3.1K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions