Welcome to Debate Club! Please be aware that this is a space for respectful debate, and that your ideas will be challenged here. Please remember to critique the argument, not the author.
Pfizer for teens?
Replies
-
cwolfman13 wrote: »Moderna said zero COVID cases were detected among children and teens who received the vaccine in a clinical trial, giving it an efficacy of 100%..probably will be approved in June? @chocolate_owl
I would feel really bad if she got covid and had bad long term effects, but would feel just as bad if the vaccines turned out not as safe as we think. It's hard for me to decide sometimes what's best, but I am at an advantage because I've been able to homeschool, and there's not a lot she'd be missing out on if I wait til August since most of her friends have younger siblings and would have to follow the safety guidelines for the unvaccinated anyway.
I wonder why some places are so much more cautious than others!Is cautious the right word?:/ I am a little North of Florida in Georgia, and I know quite a few highly educated people dead set against it.cwolfman13 wrote: »I'm hoping 12 and under get approved soon...hopefully before school starts back in August, but we're also taking a family vacation at the end of July and I would prefer them to be fully vaccinated...especially since we're going into one of the anti-vax/COVID denier capitals of the US in Florida.
It's called politics. And from there, people find anything they want to find to fit their confirmation bias. You can be highly educated and also stupid at the same time. I trust science...people act like they just pushed this out willy nilly...it's mRNA vaccines have been in the works for decades. I also know a lot of people in the medical field and a good friend of mine is a chemist that worked on the moderna vaccine and I trust him implicitly.
The wheel was not reinvented here...
I feel like some of the most highly educated people I know were also prone to overestimate how well they knew things that they really didn't know that much about. They tend to assume that since they know a lot about one thing they can transfer that knowledge to immediately understanding subjects and situations they don't know much about.
People who are highly educated and have common sense tend to also understand their limitations and are able to acknowledge that there are many subjects in which they aren't the best source of information.6 -
janejellyroll wrote: »cwolfman13 wrote: »Moderna said zero COVID cases were detected among children and teens who received the vaccine in a clinical trial, giving it an efficacy of 100%..probably will be approved in June? @chocolate_owl
I would feel really bad if she got covid and had bad long term effects, but would feel just as bad if the vaccines turned out not as safe as we think. It's hard for me to decide sometimes what's best, but I am at an advantage because I've been able to homeschool, and there's not a lot she'd be missing out on if I wait til August since most of her friends have younger siblings and would have to follow the safety guidelines for the unvaccinated anyway.
I wonder why some places are so much more cautious than others!Is cautious the right word?:/ I am a little North of Florida in Georgia, and I know quite a few highly educated people dead set against it.cwolfman13 wrote: »I'm hoping 12 and under get approved soon...hopefully before school starts back in August, but we're also taking a family vacation at the end of July and I would prefer them to be fully vaccinated...especially since we're going into one of the anti-vax/COVID denier capitals of the US in Florida.
It's called politics. And from there, people find anything they want to find to fit their confirmation bias. You can be highly educated and also stupid at the same time. I trust science...people act like they just pushed this out willy nilly...it's mRNA vaccines have been in the works for decades. I also know a lot of people in the medical field and a good friend of mine is a chemist that worked on the moderna vaccine and I trust him implicitly.
The wheel was not reinvented here...
I feel like some of the most highly educated people I know were also prone to overestimate how well they knew things that they really didn't know that much about. They tend to assume that since they know a lot about one thing they can transfer that knowledge to immediately understanding subjects and situations they don't know much about.
People who are highly educated and have common sense tend to also understand their limitations and are able to acknowledge that there are many subjects in which they aren't the best source of information.
Yeah, I'm pretty highly educated. I'm great with business, accounting, statistics, and economics. I sucked at most of the sciences and I'm not in that field so I defer to those professionals who overwhelmingly say that the vaccine is safe.
My chemist friend told me emphatically that it is safe and has been in the works for a very long time, just lacked the funding. He says it's a game changer for vaccines in general and even thinks this could potentially be a major breakthrough for viruses like HIV. I'm just going to defer to people who are way smarter with stuff like this than I am. Not that doing research is a bad thing, but it's pretty easy to dive down a rabbit hole of misinformation, especially when you're really trying to confirm your own bias.7 -
cwolfman13 wrote: »janejellyroll wrote: »cwolfman13 wrote: »Moderna said zero COVID cases were detected among children and teens who received the vaccine in a clinical trial, giving it an efficacy of 100%..probably will be approved in June? @chocolate_owl
I would feel really bad if she got covid and had bad long term effects, but would feel just as bad if the vaccines turned out not as safe as we think. It's hard for me to decide sometimes what's best, but I am at an advantage because I've been able to homeschool, and there's not a lot she'd be missing out on if I wait til August since most of her friends have younger siblings and would have to follow the safety guidelines for the unvaccinated anyway.
I wonder why some places are so much more cautious than others!Is cautious the right word?:/ I am a little North of Florida in Georgia, and I know quite a few highly educated people dead set against it.cwolfman13 wrote: »I'm hoping 12 and under get approved soon...hopefully before school starts back in August, but we're also taking a family vacation at the end of July and I would prefer them to be fully vaccinated...especially since we're going into one of the anti-vax/COVID denier capitals of the US in Florida.
It's called politics. And from there, people find anything they want to find to fit their confirmation bias. You can be highly educated and also stupid at the same time. I trust science...people act like they just pushed this out willy nilly...it's mRNA vaccines have been in the works for decades. I also know a lot of people in the medical field and a good friend of mine is a chemist that worked on the moderna vaccine and I trust him implicitly.
The wheel was not reinvented here...
I feel like some of the most highly educated people I know were also prone to overestimate how well they knew things that they really didn't know that much about. They tend to assume that since they know a lot about one thing they can transfer that knowledge to immediately understanding subjects and situations they don't know much about.
People who are highly educated and have common sense tend to also understand their limitations and are able to acknowledge that there are many subjects in which they aren't the best source of information.
Yeah, I'm pretty highly educated. I'm great with business, accounting, statistics, and economics. I sucked at most of the sciences and I'm not in that field so I defer to those professionals who overwhelmingly say that the vaccine is safe.
My chemist friend told me emphatically that it is safe and has been in the works for a very long time, just lacked the funding. He says it's a game changer for vaccines in general and even thinks this could potentially be a major breakthrough for viruses like HIV. I'm just going to defer to people who are way smarter with stuff like this than I am. Not that doing research is a bad thing, but it's pretty easy to dive down a rabbit hole of misinformation, especially when you're really trying to confirm your own bias.
To the bolded: Moderna is taking mRNA vaccines for the flu and HIV to phase 1 trials this year. The cytomegalovirus vaccine is going to Phase 3. These haven't been concocted overnight. Pharma companies have been steadily pursuing this technology, waiting for the funding to become available to go through trials and approvals.
https://www.biopharma-reporter.com/Article/2021/04/15/Moderna-to-take-mRNA-flu-and-HIV-vaccines-into-Phase-1-trials-this-year#:~:text=FREE newsletter Subscribe-,Moderna to take mRNA flu and HIV,Phase 1 trials this year&text=Moderna will take mRNA flu,candidate is also under way.4 -
janejellyroll wrote: »cwolfman13 wrote: »Moderna said zero COVID cases were detected among children and teens who received the vaccine in a clinical trial, giving it an efficacy of 100%..probably will be approved in June? @chocolate_owl
I would feel really bad if she got covid and had bad long term effects, but would feel just as bad if the vaccines turned out not as safe as we think. It's hard for me to decide sometimes what's best, but I am at an advantage because I've been able to homeschool, and there's not a lot she'd be missing out on if I wait til August since most of her friends have younger siblings and would have to follow the safety guidelines for the unvaccinated anyway.
I wonder why some places are so much more cautious than others!Is cautious the right word?:/ I am a little North of Florida in Georgia, and I know quite a few highly educated people dead set against it.cwolfman13 wrote: »I'm hoping 12 and under get approved soon...hopefully before school starts back in August, but we're also taking a family vacation at the end of July and I would prefer them to be fully vaccinated...especially since we're going into one of the anti-vax/COVID denier capitals of the US in Florida.
It's called politics. And from there, people find anything they want to find to fit their confirmation bias. You can be highly educated and also stupid at the same time. I trust science...people act like they just pushed this out willy nilly...it's mRNA vaccines have been in the works for decades. I also know a lot of people in the medical field and a good friend of mine is a chemist that worked on the moderna vaccine and I trust him implicitly.
The wheel was not reinvented here...
I feel like some of the most highly educated people I know were also prone to overestimate how well they knew things that they really didn't know that much about. They tend to assume that since they know a lot about one thing they can transfer that knowledge to immediately understanding subjects and situations they don't know much about.
People who are highly educated and have common sense tend to also understand their limitations and are able to acknowledge that there are many subjects in which they aren't the best source of information.
Dunning-Kruger effect, buttressed by selective information sources (media and more), plus a social context that encourages certain beliefs via humans' tendency to accept immediate norms, or perceived norms. It's not a coincidence that predominating beliefs may tend to be geographically or socially regionalized.
The paragraph above is intended as a general statement about humans of many beliefs about the pandemic, vaccines, or really any other major thing. I'm not accusing any particular camp in any particular dispute of being specially biased in this respect. I do think it can be easier for people who are educated to fall into Dunning-Kruger style fallacies, but it's an equal-opportunity thing.3 -
My husband and I were all for getting the vax for ourselves, but were hesitant about our kids (13, 14 and 16). No concrete reason why, just kind of felt wrong for some reason? Then my 14 year old got covid earlier this month (traced it to church youth group).
Having gone through that miserable experience has completely changed our minds and my other two kids got their first dose the day after we got out of quarantine, from their pediatrician’s office. Though my daughter had a ‘mild’ case she was so sick for the first two days-in her own words she said she had never been so sick as she was with covid. Having to isolate her about killed me, and then the disruption of the rest of the family having to quarantine was pretty awful. The anxiety over not knowing if her symptoms would get worse was terrible, I don’t think I slept at all the first few nights!
My two kids did great with their first dose. The only part that freaked me out was that since my son has a venom/bee allergy we had to wait 30 minutes after getting the vax, instead of the normal 15 minute wait. That 30 minutes was pretty stressful, but he was totally fine and thought I was being completely silly (I think I asked him 20 times if he felt ok while we were waiting lol).7 -
ExpressoLove11 wrote: »As a researcher I am just popping in with some friendly suggestions to help people critically engage with the information they see on the internet. This isn't intended to be condescending but rather it is a polite way for me to alleviate my frustrations around this debate by contributing in a constructive manner.
Firstly, it is very easy to get your "research" published in an open access journal - studies worth paying attention to are those found in peer-reviewed journals whereby the research has been assessed by experts in the field to be of merit and significance. Additionally, those published within official government reports will also contain the same rigour and validity. Peer-review is in place to protect people from misinformation and poorly executed research. I would certainly not take for gospel academics on YouTube - I could easily present my most recent findings on YouTube and impress people with my title but I would urge you to take my findings with a pinch of salt until they are peer-reviewed by the wider research community.
The vaccine may seem rushed in comparison to others but this is simply a funding issue. Research can only stretch as far as it's investors, and the world happened to be invested in this one. There are stringent and rigorous conditions applied to the development of these medicines. Processes that have been refined over many years and have produced outstanding results (I am certainly most grateful to have never had measles, smallpox or polio!).
Anecdotal evidence from a small sample group is meaningless in terms of generalisability and reliability. In order to make correlational or even causational statements about the effect of the vaccines there would need to be large scale randomised control trials conducted over a period of time - and that RCT would need to continue producing similar results for any meaningful conclusions to be drawn. So a group of women on the internet providing vignettes about perceived side effects with no formal diagnosis or correlational confirmation is not a reliable source that can be used to make sweeping statements about the world population.
As an aside, my answer to the OPs question is yes I do think teens should be vaccinated.
Yep! Anecdotal experience is not very meaningful. But some don’t care about research, proof, real numbers. They will do what they want regardless.5 -
My opinion (and I think it is pretty well informed medically), is that covid risks are small for teenagers, and teens themselves do not really benefit from the vaccine. However, they do have a real risk of transmitting covid. So teachers and elderly people around them benefit. Of course, those people can lower their risk by vaccinating themselves, but no vaccine is 100%, so teens being vaccinated helps them a little bit. Also I teens getting vaccinated would help the society to get herd immunity. However, it is uncertain that we will ever get there. So, it is controversial how much to expect them to vaccinate for the common good --- especially when it is hard to define exactly how much it will help the common good under real-world situations (as opposed to the theoretical situation where everyone gets vaccinated.
Personally, I think the benefit to the common good is large enough that teens should get vaccinated, and that at some point they should be required to. But that's my opinion. We live in a democracy. I am willing to accept that this may not turn out to be the majority opinion and the rules should reflect the majority opinion.
3 -
Just a note. There is significant risk for them alhough its lower than for older groups (see e..g. here https://idpjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40249-020-00785-1) and you have to add risk of serious consequences. All is based on currently spread mutations. (and we know at least that british mut. has 60% higher spread potential than original one, and Indian 60% more than british so without vaccinating almost whole population (by indiam mut spread ratio) you can count number of dead children bcs sooner or later each of them will face the virus..) much more could be said.2 -
Just a note. There is significant risk for them alhough its lower than for older groups (see e..g. here https://idpjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40249-020-00785-1) and you have to add risk of serious consequences. All is based on currently spread mutations. (and we know at least that british mut. has 60% higher spread potential than original one, and Indian 60% more than british so without vaccinating almost whole population (by indiam mut spread ratio) you can count number of dead children bcs sooner or later each of them will face the virus..) much more could be said.
We have an acquaintance who's teen ended up in our local hospital with MIC-S. Over 40 days out and she's now in rehab re-learning how to walk. My own daughter had a mild case and it was a pretty awful experience. I don't know where this idea of 'it's only the flu' got started, but having a really bad bout with the flu, (what I'd equate my daughter's experience with), is really sucky.6 -
So apparently if I'm understanding this right, the immune response can cause estrogen levels to rise. So I probably wouldn't worry for a son or if my daughter were a little older, but she is about a year away from starting menstruation and I worry about giving her something that alters her hormone levels, right now. I'll keep looking into it, though, and might reevaluate if we have an outbreak this Autumn or if a new variant looks more dangerous for kids. Right now, there's not high risk for contracting it in our area. I am still glad to have gotten it myself, but wish that particular side effect was listed with the others...
Here is an interesting video talking about estrogen and Covid(from 9 months ago)
YouTube "doctor" deleted
Just to be clear, if anybody needs any more reasons to AVOID social media medicine... Social Media Influencers paid money to discredit Pfizer vaccine.5 -
A lot has been said here about confirmation bias. I think there is another sort of bias largely at play here, where people tend to be more afraid of the harm of doing something by deliberate choice, than the exact same amount of harm (or evem greater) that happened to them from inaction. Ergo, getting long-term secondary effects from the vaccine, even though much less likely, subconsciously seems more scary than getting them from Covid (more likely).
Yup - tried to find if it has a name and it does - omission bias.
I think that is even further exasperated when the action we must chose to take or not to take impacts our children.
If anyone recognizes themselves in this, think about this: you are actively choosing to withhold vaccination from your children. You are not "waiting to make a decision" - you are making one right now to expose them to one kind of risk vs another for the duration. If something happens, it will still be because of your decision. Waiting won't make the decision easier. If you still can't decide to never vaccinate them, you know deep down you should vaccinate them but fear is holding you off.
FWIW my daughter is getting the vaccine first chance she gets - in our Canadian province school authorities will bus all children wanting to get the shot in the next 3 weeks. I am happy and grateful they are doing this and I don't know a single person who is not getting the vaccine or not letting their eligible kids have it.16 -
I agree with you with you about social media, but I really don't like how you quoted me, but edited what I actually said. Isn't that sort of like what the social media influencers do?YellowD0gs wrote: »So apparently if I'm understanding this right, the immune response can cause estrogen levels to rise. So I probably wouldn't worry for a son or if my daughter were a little older, but she is about a year away from starting menstruation and I worry about giving her something that alters her hormone levels, right now. I'll keep looking into it, though, and might reevaluate if we have an outbreak this Autumn or if a new variant looks more dangerous for kids. Right now, there's not high risk for contracting it in our area. I am still glad to have gotten it myself, but wish that particular side effect was listed with the others...
Here is an interesting video talking about estrogen and Covid(from 9 months ago)
YouTube "doctor" deleted
Just to be clear, if anybody needs any more reasons to AVOID social media medicine... Social Media Influencers paid money to discredit Pfizer vaccine.
3 -
So apparently if I'm understanding this right, the immune response can cause estrogen levels to rise. So I probably wouldn't worry for a son or if my daughter were a little older, but she is about a year away from starting menstruation and I worry about giving her something that alters her hormone levels, right now. I'll keep looking into it, though, and might reevaluate if we have an outbreak this Autumn or if a new variant looks more dangerous for kids. Right now, there's not high risk for contracting it in our area. I am still glad to have gotten it myself, but wish that particular side effect was listed with the others...
Here is an interesting video
https://youtu.be/AoSHkuc0hp8YellowD0gs wrote: »
0 -
I'm not a scientist, but I do have a BA in Anthropology. I had to learn how to understand research papers for that, and am pretty good at detecting false science and bias. Dr. Campbell is on You tube, but he cites information from actual research papers and will let you know where to find it... Here is another video just simply explaining the role of estrogen in immune response. I'm not saying that the vaccine is dangerous. I'm just saying that this is something I want to look at a little more before deciding to make an appointment for my daughter.
https://youtu.be/vMTNIpt-YjU
@YellowD0gs This is a webinar from the University of Genova1 -
Short answer - approval of health authority in your country is synonym of YES said by highly educated ppl in that area.
Long answer. You have to take into account that young ppl can spread virus (and die or have serious consequences too) , the more is covid spread the higher risk for mutations that can weaken or devalue current vaccination, there are also ppl that cannot be vaccinated. Currently the focus is to vaccinate ppl under highest risk but the overall goal is to vaccinate as much ppl as possible to stop the spread of virus and lower the risk of new mutations.
(sorry for my english, hope you will understand)
This is almost identical to what I'd say too.
It's supressing the virus, reducing the risk of a mutation that's not controlled. Giving time for further research. Spanish Flu took about 3 years to get under control without vaccine/today's technology. Still odd outbreaks of flu virus globally but so much easier to control now- we'll not be rid of COVID-19 but we need to be in control not it controlling us.5 -
My 11yo daughter has a heart condition. I can't wait for her age group to be approved for vaccination!! The whole family takes the flu vaccine yearly too, for the same reason: to protect her.9
-
I just saw this article on line. I really hope that parents start paying attention to this possible outbreak within the teen population and help them schedule their vaccination. Even if the youngsters don't get too sick, and based on reports from COVID survivors, they may have lingering side effects too regardless of their age.
A rise in adolescent hospitalization rates is a reminder that children can suffer from the virus too, expert says
https://www.cnn.com/2021/06/04/health/us-coronavirus-friday/index.html2 -
I know this article has a lot of truth to it, but I think this type of reporting is one reason why many people continue to distrust the government and public health. The headlines about rises in adolescent hospitalization rates without mentioning the actual numbers just seems manipulative...
I'd rather someone tell me, "Look your kid has almost a zero chance of being hospitalized from covid unless there are previous health conditions to worry about. However, we have an abundance of vaccine in America and so why not vaccinate the kids to get closer to herd immunity since we have so many adults who refuse it...if all the adults were vaccinated we'd have no reason to vaccinate healthy kids. "
From the CDC site:
Among 376 adolescents hospitalized during January 1–March 31, 2021, who received a positive SARS-CoV-2 laboratory test result, 172 (45.7%) were analyzed separately because their primary reason for admission might not have been directly COVID-19–related (Table). Among the 204 patients who were likely admitted primarily for COVID-19–related illness, 52.5% were female, 31.4% were Hispanic or Latino (Hispanic), and 35.8% were non-Hispanic Black. Overall, 70.6% had one or more underlying medical conditions, the most common of which were obesity (35.8%), chronic lung disease, including asthma (30.9%), and neurologic disorders (14.2%); 31.4% of patients required ICU admission and 4.9% required invasive mechanical ventilation, but there were no associated deaths.I just saw this article on line. I really hope that parents start paying attention to this possible outbreak within the teen population and help them schedule their vaccination. Even if the youngsters don't get too sick, and based on reports from COVID survivors, they may have lingering side effects too regardless of their age.
A rise in adolescent hospitalization rates is a reminder that children can suffer from the virus too, expert says
https://www.cnn.com/2021/06/04/health/us-coronavirus-friday/index.html
1 -
So that was 200-300 kids out of about 25 million?
https://www.childstats.gov/AMERICASCHILDREN/tables/pop1.asp0 -
That were hospitalized. What percentage of kids with Covid do you think end up in the hospital? (Rhetorical question I don't know the exact number but I assume it is fairly low).
Which means that many more kids are infected, and capable of spreading the virus to those who have risk factors and/or can't get vaccinated or don't mount an immune response to the vaccine. It also means many more kids might have long term complications (which are not dependent on the severity of illness.)
Do you think that your kids risk of hospitalization from the vaccine is higher than 200-300 in 25 million?
5 -
Good question!:D We also have to take into account the risk of exposure... 100% if vaccinated versus maybe 1 in 1,000 chance at most of being exposed to covid in my area right now (would be a lot less if more adults were vaccinated.)That were hospitalized. What percentage of kids with Covid do you think end up in the hospital? (Rhetorical question I don't know the exact number but I assume it is fairly low).
Which means that many more kids are infected, and capable of spreading the virus to those who have risk factors and/or can't get vaccinated or don't mount an immune response to the vaccine. It also means many more kids might have long term complications (which are not dependent on the severity of illness.)
Do you think that your kids risk of hospitalization from the vaccine is higher than 200-300 in 25 million?
0 -
Also, is it ethical for wealthy countries to start vaccinating low risk children, while developing countries need vaccines for their elderly people?2
-
Also, is it ethical for wealthy countries to start vaccinating low risk children, while developing countries need vaccines for their elderly people?
When the "wealthy" countries have an abysmal healthcare system, yes.
Go into the inner cities and rural poor areas of the U.S. and tell people with no health insurance that they should wait for their vaccine because the country is so "wealthy".11 -
SuzySunshine99 wrote: »Also, is it ethical for wealthy countries to start vaccinating low risk children, while developing countries need vaccines for their elderly people?
When the "wealthy" countries have an abysmal healthcare system, yes.
Go into the inner cities and rural poor areas of the U.S. and tell people with no health insurance that they should wait for their vaccine because the country is so "wealthy".
Where in the U.S. do people not have Access to health insurance or state-funded plans?
I got it for free on my state's insurance marketplace when Obamacare kicked in - 2014 or so.3 -
cmriverside wrote: »SuzySunshine99 wrote: »Also, is it ethical for wealthy countries to start vaccinating low risk children, while developing countries need vaccines for their elderly people?
When the "wealthy" countries have an abysmal healthcare system, yes.
Go into the inner cities and rural poor areas of the U.S. and tell people with no health insurance that they should wait for their vaccine because the country is so "wealthy".
Where in the U.S. do people not have Access to health insurance or state-funded plans?
I got it for free on my state's insurance marketplace when Obamacare kicked in - 2014 or so.
State plans depend on the state you live in. Some states have refused Medicaid expansion (Wyoming, Texas, South Dakota, Wisconsin, Mississippi, Tennessee, Alabama, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Kansas and Florida)
About 30 million people in the U.S. are uninsured. Many more have crappy insurance that is designed to bankrupt you if you get seriously ill.
What's messed up is that a Supreme Court ruling is expected by July that could strike down the ACA. That would result in an additional 23 million people having to find a different plan or go without.8 -
ah. Well, I guess I'm glad I moved away from Florida...and for a lot more reasons than insurance. I admit, I don't know how that works, haven't kept up with it, don't care, etc. I guess you make do with what's in front of you.1
-
Some people do have insurance but their deductible is so high, 3-5k a year that it prevents them from seeking care. For some the monthly payments are 700+ per month. The very poor typically qualify for Medicaid and get everything free. It is those just above that threshold or even lower middle class who have a hard time.7
-
Also, is it ethical for wealthy countries to start vaccinating low risk children, while developing countries need vaccines for their elderly people?
Yes this is not a simple moral dilemma. There are 25000 ppl in the world dying daily from hunger (10000 children). There are also simply treatable diseases many ppl in third world unnecessarily are dying from. In this context it doesn't sounds as dilemma but cynicism.
On the other hand and if it helps to challenge the dilemma...i have to add that there are ppl that cannot be vaccinated between us. Currently we need to achieve more than 80%( new mutations) to have a chance to protect them and unfortunately without children this is not possible.4 -
Also, is it ethical for wealthy countries to start vaccinating low risk children, while developing countries need vaccines for their elderly people?
This is part of the debate currently in the UK.
The vaccine has been approved for use for 12 - 15 years old as being safe and effective.
But the decision has not yet been made whether to actively vaccinate this age group.
Do remember the impact of the virus is not solely around suffering adverse reactions to COVID which are typically but not exclusively mild in that age group, think of the missed education and social isolation too.
This wouldn't be the only vaccine given to children for the benefit of society as a whole of course.
There's not an easy answer whether we should prioritise vaccinating a low risk group, which besides the benefits to that cohort also reduces infection spread, versus donating to COVAX for vaccinating high risk groups in other countries. A targetted response to outbreaks and hotspots is one option.3
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.4K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.2K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 426 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.7K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions