Sugar withdrawal
Options
Replies
-
Quoting you isn't attacking you.lindsey1979 wrote: »DeguelloTex wrote: »
You mean "respectful" like telling someone to keep taking pictures of himself in the bathroom and leave the discussion to the literate people? That's a heck of an example you set.lindsey1979 wrote: »thorsmom01 wrote: »lindsey1979 wrote: »snickerscharlie wrote: »lindsey1979 wrote: »SohypocriticalOfYou wrote: »
lindsey1979 wrote: »snickerscharlie wrote: »It seems to me that people who insist sugar is an actual physical addiction, tend to do so because it removes them from taking any personal responsibility for their eating behavior, by allowing them to assume the helpless victim role, instead. I've also noticed that this "it's not my fault!" attitude prevails amongst those who are unsuccessful in achieving and maintaining weight loss.
Just my opinion and observations, to which I am entitled.
Wow. That seems like a huge assumption and sweeping generalization. I find such assumptions and sweeping generalizations, especially about people's character, to be really unhelpful. In fact, I find them to be the start of many unnecessary fights here on MFP as many can take offense at such characterization.
Why do you feel the need to characterize people in such a negative light?
@lindsey1979
I have to agree with you, why do people have to characterize others in such a negative light?
Please don't attack me and bring up things from other posts, especially when you're doing it so unfairly out of context. I could argue with you about how big of a misrepresentations is, but then this ugly cycle will never end. I'm not attacking you, please don't do it to me.
Why do you feel the need to start fights over and over again? Please stop this.
So you're saying you're the victim, here?
How are things ever going to change if this behavior continues?
I haven't attacked any of you -- and yet 5 of you piled on me from things in an old post, which is taken grossly out of context (as you all well know). The original poster has done it under a brand new name, probably so he/she can avoid censure by the moderators. I could attack you back and get into a big fight about how unfair and cruel of this is of you all, but I don't want to continue the ugly, dysfunctional cycle, so I'm asking you all to please stop needlessly attacking me.
Would it be fair if we asked others to stop posting bad info then they wouldn't feel like they where being " attacked " ?
If you disagree with someone's info, then state your reasons for it respectfully. Reasonable people can disagree -- respectfully. If someone is accusing you of attacking them, then perhaps you need to evaluate your style and consider whether it could be viewed in such a way.
I have no problem with people that disagree -- in fact, I appreciate it because that's how I learn. But, people that needlessly attack or denigrate people to start fights -- just as happened on this thread to me by 6 of you, yeah, I'd like that sort of behavior to stop. It makes these boards an unpleasant place for all of us.
I'm trying to lead by example and not just attack you back in defense of myself.
Once again, I'm asking you all to stop bringing up things from other posts. I could bring up plenty of examples for most, if not all, of you. I'm not trying to start fights; I'm trying to stop this ugly dynamic from repeating itself over and over again.
Please STOP bringing up things from old posts and attacking me with them.
"I'm trying to get away with claiming to be civil. Stop showing the evidence that I'm not. "
-1 -
DeguelloTex wrote: »
You mean "respectful" like telling someone to keep taking pictures of himself in the bathroom and leave the discussion to the literate people? That's a heck of an example you set.lindsey1979 wrote: »thorsmom01 wrote: »lindsey1979 wrote: »snickerscharlie wrote: »lindsey1979 wrote: »SohypocriticalOfYou wrote: »lindsey1979 wrote: »snickerscharlie wrote: »It seems to me that people who insist sugar is an actual physical addiction, tend to do so because it removes them from taking any personal responsibility for their eating behavior, by allowing them to assume the helpless victim role, instead. I've also noticed that this "it's not my fault!" attitude prevails amongst those who are unsuccessful in achieving and maintaining weight loss.
Just my opinion and observations, to which I am entitled.
Wow. That seems like a huge assumption and sweeping generalization. I find such assumptions and sweeping generalizations, especially about people's character, to be really unhelpful. In fact, I find them to be the start of many unnecessary fights here on MFP as many can take offense at such characterization.
Why do you feel the need to characterize people in such a negative light?
@lindsey1979
I have to agree with you, why do people have to characterize others in such a negative light?
Please don't attack me and bring up things from other posts, especially when you're doing it so unfairly out of context. I could argue with you about how big of a misrepresentations is, but then this ugly cycle will never end. I'm not attacking you, please don't do it to me.
Why do you feel the need to start fights over and over again? Please stop this.
So you're saying you're the victim, here?
How are things ever going to change if this behavior continues?
I haven't attacked any of you -- and yet 5 of you piled on me from things in an old post, which is taken grossly out of context (as you all well know). The original poster has done it under a brand new name, probably so he/she can avoid censure by the moderators. I could attack you back and get into a big fight about how unfair and cruel of this is of you all, but I don't want to continue the ugly, dysfunctional cycle, so I'm asking you all to please stop needlessly attacking me.
Would it be fair if we asked others to stop posting bad info then they wouldn't feel like they where being " attacked " ?
If you disagree with someone's info, then state your reasons for it respectfully. Reasonable people can disagree -- respectfully. If someone is accusing you of attacking them, then perhaps you need to evaluate your style and consider whether it could be viewed in such a way.
I have no problem with people that disagree -- in fact, I appreciate it because that's how I learn. But, people that needlessly attack or denigrate people to start fights -- just as happened on this thread to me by 6 of you, yeah, I'd like that sort of behavior to stop. It makes these boards an unpleasant place for all of us.
I'm trying to lead by example and not just attack you back in defense of myself.
-1 -
stevencloser wrote: »lindsey1979 wrote: »PeachyCarol wrote: »lindsey1979 wrote: »snickerscharlie wrote: »lindsey1979 wrote: »SohypocriticalOfYou wrote: »lindsey1979 wrote: »snickerscharlie wrote: »It seems to me that people who insist sugar is an actual physical addiction, tend to do so because it removes them from taking any personal responsibility for their eating behavior, by allowing them to assume the helpless victim role, instead. I've also noticed that this "it's not my fault!" attitude prevails amongst those who are unsuccessful in achieving and maintaining weight loss.
Just my opinion and observations, to which I am entitled.
Wow. That seems like a huge assumption and sweeping generalization. I find such assumptions and sweeping generalizations, especially about people's character, to be really unhelpful. In fact, I find them to be the start of many unnecessary fights here on MFP as many can take offense at such characterization.
Why do you feel the need to characterize people in such a negative light?
@lindsey1979
I have to agree with you, why do people have to characterize others in such a negative light?
Please don't attack me and bring up things from other posts, especially when you're doing it so unfairly out of context. I could argue with you about how big of a misrepresentations is, but then this ugly cycle will never end. I'm not attacking you, please don't do it to me.
Why do you feel the need to start fights over and over again? Please stop this.
So you're saying you're the victim, here?
How are things ever going to change if this behavior continues?
I haven't attacked any of you -- and yet 6 (Sohypocritical, snickerscharlie, SLRunner, queenliz99, PeachyCarol and Thorsmom01) of you piled on me from things in an old post, which is taken grossly out of context (as you all well know). The original poster (Sohypocritical) has done it under a brand new name, probably so he/she can avoid censure by the moderators under his/her original name. I could attack you back and get into a big fight about how unfair and cruel of this is of you all, but I don't want to continue the ugly, dysfunctional cycle, so I'm asking you all to please stop needlessly attacking me.
You've attacked me. See above. You didn't even do me the courtesy of properly reading what I wrote in context of the conversation before slinging insults. That's your standard MO towards anyone who doesn't agree with you.
I didn't attack you. I disagreed with the sweeping generalizations and assumptions post -- and I did so in a respectful way. I didn't say anything nasty to you AT ALL.
Are you for real? You called her ignorant, that her assertions are ridiculous and that she doesn't even know that. How in the 7 hells is that respectful?
I did nothing of the sort on this thread -- go back and read my words. I specifically said:
"Wow. That seems like a huge assumption and sweeping generalization. I find such assumptions and sweeping generalizations, especially about people's character, to be really unhelpful. In fact, I find them to be the start of many unnecessary fights here on MFP as many can take offense at such characterization.
Why do you feel the need to characterize people in such a negative light?"
There was no calling anyone ignorant or ridiculous. You're referencing some other older thread where there obviously was a fight. I'm trying to stop that dynamic from continuing. So, please stop attacking me. I haven't attacked your or anyone else on this thread.
-1 -
"Older" as in... yesterday? Or was it 2 days ago? And I'm not attacking you. Again, pointing out that you're constantly pretending you're some innocent victim when in fact you're all but is not attacking. It's saying the truth.-1
-
lindsey1979 wrote: »stevencloser wrote: »lindsey1979 wrote: »PeachyCarol wrote: »lindsey1979 wrote: »snickerscharlie wrote: »lindsey1979 wrote: »SohypocriticalOfYou wrote: »lindsey1979 wrote: »snickerscharlie wrote: »It seems to me that people who insist sugar is an actual physical addiction, tend to do so because it removes them from taking any personal responsibility for their eating behavior, by allowing them to assume the helpless victim role, instead. I've also noticed that this "it's not my fault!" attitude prevails amongst those who are unsuccessful in achieving and maintaining weight loss.
Just my opinion and observations, to which I am entitled.
Wow. That seems like a huge assumption and sweeping generalization. I find such assumptions and sweeping generalizations, especially about people's character, to be really unhelpful. In fact, I find them to be the start of many unnecessary fights here on MFP as many can take offense at such characterization.
Why do you feel the need to characterize people in such a negative light?
@lindsey1979
I have to agree with you, why do people have to characterize others in such a negative light?
Please don't attack me and bring up things from other posts, especially when you're doing it so unfairly out of context. I could argue with you about how big of a misrepresentations is, but then this ugly cycle will never end. I'm not attacking you, please don't do it to me.
Why do you feel the need to start fights over and over again? Please stop this.
So you're saying you're the victim, here?
How are things ever going to change if this behavior continues?
I haven't attacked any of you -- and yet 6 (Sohypocritical, snickerscharlie, SLRunner, queenliz99, PeachyCarol and Thorsmom01) of you piled on me from things in an old post, which is taken grossly out of context (as you all well know). The original poster (Sohypocritical) has done it under a brand new name, probably so he/she can avoid censure by the moderators under his/her original name. I could attack you back and get into a big fight about how unfair and cruel of this is of you all, but I don't want to continue the ugly, dysfunctional cycle, so I'm asking you all to please stop needlessly attacking me.
You've attacked me. See above. You didn't even do me the courtesy of properly reading what I wrote in context of the conversation before slinging insults. That's your standard MO towards anyone who doesn't agree with you.
I didn't attack you. I disagreed with the sweeping generalizations and assumptions post -- and I did so in a respectful way. I didn't say anything nasty to you AT ALL.
Are you for real? You called her ignorant, that her assertions are ridiculous and that she doesn't even know that. How in the 7 hells is that respectful?
I did nothing of the sort on this thread -- go back and read my words. I specifically said:
"Wow. That seems like a huge assumption and sweeping generalization. I find such assumptions and sweeping generalizations, especially about people's character, to be really unhelpful. In fact, I find them to be the start of many unnecessary fights here on MFP as many can take offense at such characterization.
Why do you feel the need to characterize people in such a negative light?"
There was no calling anyone ignorant or ridiculous. You're referencing some other older thread where there obviously was a fight. I'm trying to stop that dynamic from continuing. So, please stop attacking me. I haven't attacked your or anyone else on this thread.
So you're a completely different person now than you were a few days ago?
You've seen the light? Reborn?-1 -
thorsmom01 wrote: »lindsey1979 wrote: »thorsmom01 wrote: »lindsey1979 wrote: »snickerscharlie wrote: »lindsey1979 wrote: »SohypocriticalOfYou wrote: »lindsey1979 wrote: »snickerscharlie wrote: »It seems to me that people who insist sugar is an actual physical addiction, tend to do so because it removes them from taking any personal responsibility for their eating behavior, by allowing them to assume the helpless victim role, instead. I've also noticed that this "it's not my fault!" attitude prevails amongst those who are unsuccessful in achieving and maintaining weight loss.
Just my opinion and observations, to which I am entitled.
Wow. That seems like a huge assumption and sweeping generalization. I find such assumptions and sweeping generalizations, especially about people's character, to be really unhelpful. In fact, I find them to be the start of many unnecessary fights here on MFP as many can take offense at such characterization.
Why do you feel the need to characterize people in such a negative light?
@lindsey1979
I have to agree with you, why do people have to characterize others in such a negative light?
Please don't attack me and bring up things from other posts, especially when you're doing it so unfairly out of context. I could argue with you about how big of a misrepresentations is, but then this ugly cycle will never end. I'm not attacking you, please don't do it to me.
Why do you feel the need to start fights over and over again? Please stop this.
So you're saying you're the victim, here?
How are things ever going to change if this behavior continues?
I haven't attacked any of you -- and yet 5 of you piled on me from things in an old post, which is taken grossly out of context (as you all well know). The original poster has done it under a brand new name, probably so he/she can avoid censure by the moderators. I could attack you back and get into a big fight about how unfair and cruel of this is of you all, but I don't want to continue the ugly, dysfunctional cycle, so I'm asking you all to please stop needlessly attacking me.
Would it be fair if we asked others to stop posting bad info then they wouldn't feel like they where being " attacked " ?
If you disagree with someone's info, then state your reasons for it respectfully. Reasonable people can disagree -- respectfully. If someone is accusing you of attacking them, then perhaps you need to evaluate your style and consider whether it could be viewed in such a way.
I have no problem with people that disagree -- in fact, I appreciate it because that's how I learn. But, people that needlessly attack or denigrate people to start fights -- just as happened on this thread to me by 6 of you, yeah, I'd like that sort of behavior to stop. It makes these boards an unpleasant place for all of us.
I'm trying to lead by example and not just attack you back in defense of myself.
Well if that's how you learn, you still have plenty of learning to do.
Spreading misinformation on here pollutes this community. There are newcomers that lurk these threads , desperately seeking information . the last thing I would want , is for a newcomer to read bad info and think it's correct . so many of us make it a point to point out any misinformation so it will be easier for any newcomers to see what's good info and what isn't.
I have NEVER spread misinformation. Never.
-1 -
FattyBoomBatty00 wrote: »lindsey1979 wrote: »@lindsey1979 you do not have to plead with them. In any event it would not help. You have seen the behavior on here over and over. You are strong, smart, and articulate.
Thank you, emhunter. I'm just hoping to change the dynamic. Fighting fire with fire hasn't been very successful and is against the forum's rules, so now I'm respectfully asking them to not continue such ugly behavior. There are at least two people with brand new screen names, so I highly doubt that's a coincidence. I wonder who they really are...
Right responding how I normally would in real life is against the rules. So unlike some, I don't do it. Good for you by taking the high road
What would you say? Uh uh girlfriend......no she didn't. Pass me the vasoline.
Are you saying that because I am a woman of color? Hmmmm...you are really embracing intelligent discussion. I hope no one on here supports you.
0 -
lindsey1979 wrote: »PeachyCarol wrote: »lindsey1979 wrote: »snickerscharlie wrote: »lindsey1979 wrote: »SohypocriticalOfYou wrote: »lindsey1979 wrote: »snickerscharlie wrote: »It seems to me that people who insist sugar is an actual physical addiction, tend to do so because it removes them from taking any personal responsibility for their eating behavior, by allowing them to assume the helpless victim role, instead. I've also noticed that this "it's not my fault!" attitude prevails amongst those who are unsuccessful in achieving and maintaining weight loss.
Just my opinion and observations, to which I am entitled.
Wow. That seems like a huge assumption and sweeping generalization. I find such assumptions and sweeping generalizations, especially about people's character, to be really unhelpful. In fact, I find them to be the start of many unnecessary fights here on MFP as many can take offense at such characterization.
Why do you feel the need to characterize people in such a negative light?
@lindsey1979
I have to agree with you, why do people have to characterize others in such a negative light?
Please don't attack me and bring up things from other posts, especially when you're doing it so unfairly out of context. I could argue with you about how big of a misrepresentations is, but then this ugly cycle will never end. I'm not attacking you, please don't do it to me.
Why do you feel the need to start fights over and over again? Please stop this.
So you're saying you're the victim, here?
How are things ever going to change if this behavior continues?
I haven't attacked any of you -- and yet 6 (Sohypocritical, snickerscharlie, SLRunner, queenliz99, PeachyCarol and Thorsmom01) of you piled on me from things in an old post, which is taken grossly out of context (as you all well know). The original poster (Sohypocritical) has done it under a brand new name, probably so he/she can avoid censure by the moderators under his/her original name. I could attack you back and get into a big fight about how unfair and cruel of this is of you all, but I don't want to continue the ugly, dysfunctional cycle, so I'm asking you all to please stop needlessly attacking me.
You've attacked me. See above. You didn't even do me the courtesy of properly reading what I wrote in context of the conversation before slinging insults. That's your standard MO towards anyone who doesn't agree with you.
I didn't attack you. I disagreed with the sweeping generalizations and assumptions post -- and I did so in a respectful way. I didn't say anything nasty to you AT ALL.
I... didn't make sweeping generalizations. You didn't even read my post.
0 -
This thread is one of the best examples to date of just how the type of moderation that MFP does in these forums doesn't work. I firmly believe this environment was created. I know this post will be deleted (along with the thread most likely), but felt called to say it.
Cosigned.
0 -
This thread is one of the best examples to date of just how the type of moderation that MFP does in these forums doesn't work. I firmly believe this environment was created. I know this post will be deleted (along with the thread most likely), but felt called to say it.
This, all this. I'm exhausted from reading, wanting to respond, but not knowing how.......0 -
Alyssa_Is_LosingIt wrote: »lindsey1979 wrote: »stevencloser wrote: »lindsey1979 wrote: »PeachyCarol wrote: »lindsey1979 wrote: »snickerscharlie wrote: »lindsey1979 wrote: »SohypocriticalOfYou wrote: »lindsey1979 wrote: »snickerscharlie wrote: »It seems to me that people who insist sugar is an actual physical addiction, tend to do so because it removes them from taking any personal responsibility for their eating behavior, by allowing them to assume the helpless victim role, instead. I've also noticed that this "it's not my fault!" attitude prevails amongst those who are unsuccessful in achieving and maintaining weight loss.
Just my opinion and observations, to which I am entitled.
Wow. That seems like a huge assumption and sweeping generalization. I find such assumptions and sweeping generalizations, especially about people's character, to be really unhelpful. In fact, I find them to be the start of many unnecessary fights here on MFP as many can take offense at such characterization.
Why do you feel the need to characterize people in such a negative light?
@lindsey1979
I have to agree with you, why do people have to characterize others in such a negative light?
Please don't attack me and bring up things from other posts, especially when you're doing it so unfairly out of context. I could argue with you about how big of a misrepresentations is, but then this ugly cycle will never end. I'm not attacking you, please don't do it to me.
Why do you feel the need to start fights over and over again? Please stop this.
So you're saying you're the victim, here?
How are things ever going to change if this behavior continues?
I haven't attacked any of you -- and yet 6 (Sohypocritical, snickerscharlie, SLRunner, queenliz99, PeachyCarol and Thorsmom01) of you piled on me from things in an old post, which is taken grossly out of context (as you all well know). The original poster (Sohypocritical) has done it under a brand new name, probably so he/she can avoid censure by the moderators under his/her original name. I could attack you back and get into a big fight about how unfair and cruel of this is of you all, but I don't want to continue the ugly, dysfunctional cycle, so I'm asking you all to please stop needlessly attacking me.
You've attacked me. See above. You didn't even do me the courtesy of properly reading what I wrote in context of the conversation before slinging insults. That's your standard MO towards anyone who doesn't agree with you.
I didn't attack you. I disagreed with the sweeping generalizations and assumptions post -- and I did so in a respectful way. I didn't say anything nasty to you AT ALL.
Are you for real? You called her ignorant, that her assertions are ridiculous and that she doesn't even know that. How in the 7 hells is that respectful?
I did nothing of the sort on this thread -- go back and read my words. I specifically said:
"Wow. That seems like a huge assumption and sweeping generalization. I find such assumptions and sweeping generalizations, especially about people's character, to be really unhelpful. In fact, I find them to be the start of many unnecessary fights here on MFP as many can take offense at such characterization.
Why do you feel the need to characterize people in such a negative light?"
There was no calling anyone ignorant or ridiculous. You're referencing some other older thread where there obviously was a fight. I'm trying to stop that dynamic from continuing. So, please stop attacking me. I haven't attacked your or anyone else on this thread.
So you're a completely different person now than you were a few days ago?
You've seen the light? Reborn?
I'm trying a new strategy to combat the ugliness. I could continue to engage in the ugly cycle and attack you back -- as I have done in the past. Unlike some here, I can be honest and admit that. Do I think it was appropriate? Yes, frankly. I think sometimes that's the best way to deal with bullies.
But, I also recognize that (1) it has not been very effective overall (as evidenced by this thread) and (2) it's against the forum rules. So, I'm trying a new strategy.
I'm trying to be the change I'd like to see on this these threads -- so instead of attacking you back (it's what 8 on 1 or 2 now?), I'm asking you all to stop attacking me. I've done nothing on this thread that is mean or nasty, but several of you have brought up fights from old threads and piled on me. I'm asking you to stop that -- to let bygones be bygones and act kindly and decently to each other.
0 -
This thread is one of the best examples to date of just how the type of moderation that MFP does in these forums doesn't work. I firmly believe this environment was created. I know this post will be deleted (along with the thread most likely), but felt called to say it.
I absolutely agree with you. But, I'm trying to follow the moderators' recommendations nonetheless.
0 -
To quote an older thread (and even addressing the same person) "I've never seen a person trying so desperately to be right."0
-
PeachyCarol wrote: »lindsey1979 wrote: »PeachyCarol wrote: »lindsey1979 wrote: »snickerscharlie wrote: »lindsey1979 wrote: »SohypocriticalOfYou wrote: »lindsey1979 wrote: »snickerscharlie wrote: »It seems to me that people who insist sugar is an actual physical addiction, tend to do so because it removes them from taking any personal responsibility for their eating behavior, by allowing them to assume the helpless victim role, instead. I've also noticed that this "it's not my fault!" attitude prevails amongst those who are unsuccessful in achieving and maintaining weight loss.
Just my opinion and observations, to which I am entitled.
Wow. That seems like a huge assumption and sweeping generalization. I find such assumptions and sweeping generalizations, especially about people's character, to be really unhelpful. In fact, I find them to be the start of many unnecessary fights here on MFP as many can take offense at such characterization.
Why do you feel the need to characterize people in such a negative light?
@lindsey1979
I have to agree with you, why do people have to characterize others in such a negative light?
Please don't attack me and bring up things from other posts, especially when you're doing it so unfairly out of context. I could argue with you about how big of a misrepresentations is, but then this ugly cycle will never end. I'm not attacking you, please don't do it to me.
Why do you feel the need to start fights over and over again? Please stop this.
So you're saying you're the victim, here?
How are things ever going to change if this behavior continues?
I haven't attacked any of you -- and yet 6 (Sohypocritical, snickerscharlie, SLRunner, queenliz99, PeachyCarol and Thorsmom01) of you piled on me from things in an old post, which is taken grossly out of context (as you all well know). The original poster (Sohypocritical) has done it under a brand new name, probably so he/she can avoid censure by the moderators under his/her original name. I could attack you back and get into a big fight about how unfair and cruel of this is of you all, but I don't want to continue the ugly, dysfunctional cycle, so I'm asking you all to please stop needlessly attacking me.
You've attacked me. See above. You didn't even do me the courtesy of properly reading what I wrote in context of the conversation before slinging insults. That's your standard MO towards anyone who doesn't agree with you.
I didn't attack you. I disagreed with the sweeping generalizations and assumptions post -- and I did so in a respectful way. I didn't say anything nasty to you AT ALL.
I... didn't make sweeping generalizations. You didn't even read my post.
Then what are you talking about? I don't recall responding to any post of yours on this thread in a negative manner whatsoever. I'm I'm wrong, I'll apologize. Can you please point to which post of mine on this thread that you've found to be insulting?
0 -
This thread is one of the best examples to date of just how the type of moderation that MFP does in these forums doesn't work. I firmly believe this environment was created. I know this post will be deleted (along with the thread most likely), but felt called to say it.
Preach, sister!0 -
-
lindsey1979 wrote: »Alyssa_Is_LosingIt wrote: »lindsey1979 wrote: »stevencloser wrote: »lindsey1979 wrote: »PeachyCarol wrote: »lindsey1979 wrote: »snickerscharlie wrote: »lindsey1979 wrote: »SohypocriticalOfYou wrote: »lindsey1979 wrote: »snickerscharlie wrote: »It seems to me that people who insist sugar is an actual physical addiction, tend to do so because it removes them from taking any personal responsibility for their eating behavior, by allowing them to assume the helpless victim role, instead. I've also noticed that this "it's not my fault!" attitude prevails amongst those who are unsuccessful in achieving and maintaining weight loss.
Just my opinion and observations, to which I am entitled.
Wow. That seems like a huge assumption and sweeping generalization. I find such assumptions and sweeping generalizations, especially about people's character, to be really unhelpful. In fact, I find them to be the start of many unnecessary fights here on MFP as many can take offense at such characterization.
Why do you feel the need to characterize people in such a negative light?
@lindsey1979
I have to agree with you, why do people have to characterize others in such a negative light?
Please don't attack me and bring up things from other posts, especially when you're doing it so unfairly out of context. I could argue with you about how big of a misrepresentations is, but then this ugly cycle will never end. I'm not attacking you, please don't do it to me.
Why do you feel the need to start fights over and over again? Please stop this.
So you're saying you're the victim, here?
How are things ever going to change if this behavior continues?
I haven't attacked any of you -- and yet 6 (Sohypocritical, snickerscharlie, SLRunner, queenliz99, PeachyCarol and Thorsmom01) of you piled on me from things in an old post, which is taken grossly out of context (as you all well know). The original poster (Sohypocritical) has done it under a brand new name, probably so he/she can avoid censure by the moderators under his/her original name. I could attack you back and get into a big fight about how unfair and cruel of this is of you all, but I don't want to continue the ugly, dysfunctional cycle, so I'm asking you all to please stop needlessly attacking me.
You've attacked me. See above. You didn't even do me the courtesy of properly reading what I wrote in context of the conversation before slinging insults. That's your standard MO towards anyone who doesn't agree with you.
I didn't attack you. I disagreed with the sweeping generalizations and assumptions post -- and I did so in a respectful way. I didn't say anything nasty to you AT ALL.
Are you for real? You called her ignorant, that her assertions are ridiculous and that she doesn't even know that. How in the 7 hells is that respectful?
I did nothing of the sort on this thread -- go back and read my words. I specifically said:
"Wow. That seems like a huge assumption and sweeping generalization. I find such assumptions and sweeping generalizations, especially about people's character, to be really unhelpful. In fact, I find them to be the start of many unnecessary fights here on MFP as many can take offense at such characterization.
Why do you feel the need to characterize people in such a negative light?"
There was no calling anyone ignorant or ridiculous. You're referencing some other older thread where there obviously was a fight. I'm trying to stop that dynamic from continuing. So, please stop attacking me. I haven't attacked your or anyone else on this thread.
So you're a completely different person now than you were a few days ago?
You've seen the light? Reborn?
I'm trying a new strategy to combat the ugliness. I could continue to engage in the ugly cycle and attack you back -- as I have done in the past. Unlike some here, I can be honest and admit that. Do I think it was appropriate? Yes, frankly. I think sometimes that's the best way to deal with bullies.
But, I also recognize that (1) it has not been very effective overall (as evidenced by this thread) and (2) it's against the forum rules. So, I'm trying a new strategy.
I'm trying to be the change I'd like to see on this these threads -- so instead of attacking you back (it's what 8 on 1 or 2 now?), I'm asking you all to stop attacking me. I've done nothing on this thread that is mean or nasty, but several of you have brought up fights from old threads and piled on me. I'm asking you to stop that -- to let bygones be bygones and act kindly and decently to each other.
Be the change you want to see. Really. LMAO.-1
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 391.5K Introduce Yourself
- 43.5K Getting Started
- 259.7K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.6K Food and Nutrition
- 47.3K Recipes
- 232.3K Fitness and Exercise
- 392 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.4K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 152.7K Motivation and Support
- 7.8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.2K MyFitnessPal Information
- 22 News and Announcements
- 926 Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.3K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions