Welcome to Debate Club! Please be aware that this is a space for respectful debate, and that your ideas will be challenged here. Please remember to critique the argument, not the author.
What are your unpopular opinions about health / fitness?
Replies
-
I don't believe exercise helps longevity.
But please argue with me!
0 -
Okay, derailing with human evolution stuff again, cos this is pretty cool! And it does mention scavenging and hunting, so, y'know, kind of diet related...
https://youtu.be/nrcK0tGTrQ83 -
For what it's worth, my PhD dissertation was partly on the mechanics of carbohydrate metabolism. I also poured through the literature, on more than one occasion as it's been a long interest of mine over my 20 years of laboratory research, and I have also been unable to find any real evidence that any diet abrogates or advantages cico. I am of the professional opinion that forcing yourself into ketosis long term is playing biological roulette, and hold deep disagreement with the scientists who advocate for it (and there aren't many who don't also have major self - interest in the diet promotion).
I'm also not convinced by the scientists who claim long term very low calorie diets are sustainable, and actually believe several of the labs doing this work engage in coercive and cult-like control of the graduate students, having met these people and say through their presentations. Further, they present a severe moral and ethical hazard which makes trusting their spurious claims much more difficult.
I realize here I'm just another person on the net, but I feel very strongly this is something not confronted enough because of the way in which professional scientists interact.
As to the bolded, I have a friend who is deep into this product called Keto//OS which is a drink that allegedly puts you into ketosis everyday without eating a keto diet. I've tried looking up studies to see if exogenous ketones are safe and so far there doesn't seem to be anything (I will admit, I don't always know how to dissect studies). The thought of ingesting something that the body expels when you are sick (diabetic ketoacidosis comes to mind) just seems potentially hazardous. I do know that keto diets are used in cases of patients with severe epilepsy that is resistant to medication. I guess, what I am trying to say, is more research needs to be done.
3 -
savannahbanks7315 wrote: »I don't believe exercise helps longevity.
But please argue with me!
Can you clarify? You don't think fitness (which is created by exercise) helps people live longer?2 -
For what it's worth, my PhD dissertation was partly on the mechanics of carbohydrate metabolism. I also poured through the literature, on more than one occasion as it's been a long interest of mine over my 20 years of laboratory research, and I have also been unable to find any real evidence that any diet abrogates or advantages cico. I am of the professional opinion that forcing yourself into ketosis long term is playing biological roulette, and hold deep disagreement with the scientists who advocate for it (and there aren't many who don't also have major self - interest in the diet promotion).
I'm also not convinced by the scientists who claim long term very low calorie diets are sustainable, and actually believe several of the labs doing this work engage in coercive and cult-like control of the graduate students, having met these people and say through their presentations. Further, they present a severe moral and ethical hazard which makes trusting their spurious claims much more difficult.
I realize here I'm just another person on the net, but I feel very strongly this is something not confronted enough because of the way in which professional scientists interact.
As to the bolded, I have a friend who is deep into this product called Keto//OS which is a drink that allegedly puts you into ketosis everyday without eating a keto diet. I've tried looking up studies to see if exogenous ketones are safe and so far there doesn't seem to be anything (I will admit, I don't always know how to dissect studies). The thought of ingesting something that the body expels when you are sick (diabetic ketoacidosis comes to mind) just seems potentially hazardous. I do know that keto diets are used in cases of patients with severe epilepsy that is resistant to medication. I guess, what I am trying to say, is more research needs to be done.
not that I am a fan of Keto diet but diabetic ketoacidosis is different0 -
savannahbanks7315 wrote: »I don't believe exercise helps longevity.
But please argue with me!
I'm guessing you hate to exercise?1 -
For what it's worth, my PhD dissertation was partly on the mechanics of carbohydrate metabolism. I also poured through the literature, on more than one occasion as it's been a long interest of mine over my 20 years of laboratory research, and I have also been unable to find any real evidence that any diet abrogates or advantages cico. I am of the professional opinion that forcing yourself into ketosis long term is playing biological roulette, and hold deep disagreement with the scientists who advocate for it (and there aren't many who don't also have major self - interest in the diet promotion).
I'm also not convinced by the scientists who claim long term very low calorie diets are sustainable, and actually believe several of the labs doing this work engage in coercive and cult-like control of the graduate students, having met these people and say through their presentations. Further, they present a severe moral and ethical hazard which makes trusting their spurious claims much more difficult.
I realize here I'm just another person on the net, but I feel very strongly this is something not confronted enough because of the way in which professional scientists interact.
As to the bolded, I have a friend who is deep into this product called Keto//OS which is a drink that allegedly puts you into ketosis everyday without eating a keto diet. I've tried looking up studies to see if exogenous ketones are safe and so far there doesn't seem to be anything (I will admit, I don't always know how to dissect studies). The thought of ingesting something that the body expels when you are sick (diabetic ketoacidosis comes to mind) just seems potentially hazardous. I do know that keto diets are used in cases of patients with severe epilepsy that is resistant to medication. I guess, what I am trying to say, is more research needs to be done.
not that I am a fan of Keto diet but diabetic ketoacidosis is different
Yes, you are right.0 -
savannahbanks7315 wrote: »I don't believe exercise helps longevity.
But please argue with me!
Even if that were true, it certainly helps with quality of life as you age.5 -
savannahbanks7315 wrote: »I don't believe exercise helps longevity.
But please argue with me!
Strong first post. Welcome to the debate section.4 -
savannahbanks7315 wrote: »I don't believe exercise helps longevity.
But please argue with me!
I'm convinced that it shortens late-life illness and incapability.
I'm 61. Many of my friends are in one of two groups, recreational athletes (mostly rowers), and artists/craftspeople. I value them all - wonderful people.
The artists/craftspeople are largely inactive. Those closest to me are in their 50s/60s. The athletes are 50s-70s.
On average, the (inactive) artists/craftspeople are much more overweight, have mobility issues, have needed more joint replacements, take more drugs routinely (for things like diabetes, hypertension, etc.), and seem frequently to need help from their children/grandchildren with routine household chores (flipping the mattress, washing windows, yard work). They're definitely more frequently experiencing physical discomfort and even pain, and seem to be ill more often in minor ways (viruses, infections). When they require surgery, they have more complications and recover more slowly.
Will they die younger? No idea - there's a certain amount of random blind luck involved in that. Definitely sick and unhappy younger, though.
Could causation go the other way, that being naturally less robust makes people inactive, and fosters sedentary interests? Possible - but keep in mind that these are friends, so I often know their back story. I think it's inactivity leading to ill health.
I'm very glad that I enjoy being active as well as creative.
Oh, and: When I go to the doctor's office, the waiting room tends to have a much higher proportion of people who look like the inactive artists than like the recreational athletes. Coincidence?8 -
savannahbanks7315 wrote: »I don't believe exercise helps longevity.
But please argue with me!
You're wrong.
http://commonhealth.legacy.wbur.org/2013/03/minutes-exercise-longer-life
https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2012/11/how-much-exercise-is-enough/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3395188/
http://www.bbc.com/news/health-32735723
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/30-minutes-of-exercise-can-increase-longevity-even-if-youre-60-or-70/2015/05/18/f80967ee-fb02-11e4-a13c-193b1241d51a_story.html?utm_term=.73c1b7bc0ff110 -
I just want to be able to get myself on and off the toilet for as long as possible. Squat to keep independently pooping, people! Getting yourself dressed is pretty great too.28
-
VintageFeline wrote: »I just want to be able to get myself on and off the toilet for as long as possible. Squat to keep independently pooping, people! Getting yourself dressed is pretty great too.
I'm mmapags and I endorse this message!8 -
VintageFeline wrote: »I just want to be able to get myself on and off the toilet for as long as possible. Squat to keep independently pooping, people! Getting yourself dressed is pretty great too.
Do this exercise it will help:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o0_DoicHg2E3 -
WayTooHonest wrote: »826_Midazaslam wrote: »Blaming your metabolism is such a cop-out.
Nothing drives me crazier than someone telling me they can't lose ANY weight because their metabolism is too slow. It's simple, CICO. Yes there are cellular differences in how your body metabolizes things, but at the end of the day, if you burn 2000 calories and only put in 1500, you're going to lose weight. Your metabolism is not some magical thing that defies the laws of thermodynamics.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA you obviously haven't hit menopause yet.
Or have pcos...
1 -
Mysterious_Dreamer wrote: »WayTooHonest wrote: »826_Midazaslam wrote: »Blaming your metabolism is such a cop-out.
Nothing drives me crazier than someone telling me they can't lose ANY weight because their metabolism is too slow. It's simple, CICO. Yes there are cellular differences in how your body metabolizes things, but at the end of the day, if you burn 2000 calories and only put in 1500, you're going to lose weight. Your metabolism is not some magical thing that defies the laws of thermodynamics.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA you obviously haven't hit menopause yet.
Or have pcos...
@GottaBurnEmAll has a thing or two to say about that I imagine.4 -
WayTooHonest wrote: »826_Midazaslam wrote: »Blaming your metabolism is such a cop-out.
Nothing drives me crazier than someone telling me they can't lose ANY weight because their metabolism is too slow. It's simple, CICO. Yes there are cellular differences in how your body metabolizes things, but at the end of the day, if you burn 2000 calories and only put in 1500, you're going to lose weight. Your metabolism is not some magical thing that defies the laws of thermodynamics.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA you obviously haven't hit menopause yet.
I found weight loss to be much easier after I hit menopause.
7 -
I don't believe in diet version of drinks. It's just as bad if not more harmful. Putting that on food diary to attempt to keep cal count low is just fooling yourself. Same goes for sugar substitutes. Just man up and consume the real thing, it's not the end of the world.23
-
I don't believe in diet version of drinks. It's just as bad if not more harmful. Putting that on food diary to attempt to keep cal count low is just fooling yourself. Same goes for sugar substitutes. Just man up and consume the real thing, it's not the end of the world.
Except that "full fat" versions have calories I'd rather spend on vegetables.9 -
I don't believe in diet version of drinks. It's just as bad if not more harmful. Putting that on food diary to attempt to keep cal count low is just fooling yourself. Same goes for sugar substitutes. Just man up and consume the real thing, it's not the end of the world.
What's bad about a diet drink?
What am I fooling myself about?
If I'm drinking calories then it's going to wine.9 -
RuNaRoUnDaFiEld wrote: »I don't believe in diet version of drinks. It's just as bad if not more harmful. Putting that on food diary to attempt to keep cal count low is just fooling yourself. Same goes for sugar substitutes. Just man up and consume the real thing, it's not the end of the world.
What's bad about a diet drink?
What am I fooling myself about?
If I'm drinking calories then it's going to wine.
To answer your questions, again it's just my person opinion. I understand there r studies that disagree just like there r studies that reaffirm it.
I believe there is more than just CICO when it comes to health. Stuff you eat matters to the organs. If organ malfunction, your CICO will be even harder to measure with the current at home device for average joe. If a person drink diet version of something for 0 cal purpose, it would be harmful in the long run. These diet drink tend to make people thinks it's alright to keep going at it. Compared with drinking the real thing, you would be alert a lot earlier.
24 -
I don't believe in diet version of drinks. It's just as bad if not more harmful. Putting that on food diary to attempt to keep cal count low is just fooling yourself. Same goes for sugar substitutes. Just man up and consume the real thing, it's not the end of the world.
How is it more harmful? Why can't I spend those calories on something else? Or do you not believe that they're actually 0 calorie and that the manufacturers are lying and getting away with it?4 -
Alatariel75 wrote: »I don't believe in diet version of drinks. It's just as bad if not more harmful. Putting that on food diary to attempt to keep cal count low is just fooling yourself. Same goes for sugar substitutes. Just man up and consume the real thing, it's not the end of the world.
How is it more harmful? Why can't I spend those calories on something else? Or do you not believe that they're actually 0 calorie and that the manufacturers are lying and getting away with it?
15 -
Alatariel75 wrote: »I don't believe in diet version of drinks. It's just as bad if not more harmful. Putting that on food diary to attempt to keep cal count low is just fooling yourself. Same goes for sugar substitutes. Just man up and consume the real thing, it's not the end of the world.
How is it more harmful? Why can't I spend those calories on something else? Or do you not believe that they're actually 0 calorie and that the manufacturers are lying and getting away with it?
You keep dancing around the question. WHAT is bad about it.4 -
I don't believe in diet version of drinks. It's just as bad if not more harmful. Putting that on food diary to attempt to keep cal count low is just fooling yourself. Same goes for sugar substitutes. Just man up and consume the real thing, it's not the end of the world.
I think sugary sodas taste too sweet and sticky somehow, and dislike them. I can always tell immediately if I am given the wrong kind of soda (I also hate some diet sodas, like diet pepsi, but like diet coke pretty well). I also HATE wasting calories on a drink. So yes, I think it's bad if I end up consuming one.
I don't think it's harmful (certainly not in sensible, non excessive amounts), but even if it were (contrary to the evidence, of course), I KNOW it's not caloric, so how is it fooling myself if what I am specifically concerned with is calories and taste?5 -
WayTooHonest wrote: »826_Midazaslam wrote: »Blaming your metabolism is such a cop-out.
Nothing drives me crazier than someone telling me they can't lose ANY weight because their metabolism is too slow. It's simple, CICO. Yes there are cellular differences in how your body metabolizes things, but at the end of the day, if you burn 2000 calories and only put in 1500, you're going to lose weight. Your metabolism is not some magical thing that defies the laws of thermodynamics.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA you obviously haven't hit menopause yet.
I found weight loss to be much easier after I hit menopause.
Oh boy I sure didn't. Fat loss was the same but weight loss was a whole new ballgame for me.2 -
Alatariel75 wrote: »I don't believe in diet version of drinks. It's just as bad if not more harmful. Putting that on food diary to attempt to keep cal count low is just fooling yourself. Same goes for sugar substitutes. Just man up and consume the real thing, it's not the end of the world.
How is it more harmful? Why can't I spend those calories on something else? Or do you not believe that they're actually 0 calorie and that the manufacturers are lying and getting away with it?
Too much of anything is bad for you. How is drinking non diet soda(which you suggested people should "man up" and drink) any better for you? You can't make the claim that diet soda is worse with no data to back it up and expect anyone here to not say anything. This is the same unsubstantiated and uneducated claim that gets made all of the time around here and I have yet to see a single person successfully defend that position.1 -
Alatariel75 wrote: »I don't believe in diet version of drinks. It's just as bad if not more harmful. Putting that on food diary to attempt to keep cal count low is just fooling yourself. Same goes for sugar substitutes. Just man up and consume the real thing, it's not the end of the world.
How is it more harmful? Why can't I spend those calories on something else? Or do you not believe that they're actually 0 calorie and that the manufacturers are lying and getting away with it?
Too much of anything is bad for you. How is drinking non diet soda(which you suggested people should "man up" and drink) any better for you? You can't make the claim that diet soda is worse with no data to back it up and expect anyone here to not say anything. This is the same unsubstantiated and uneducated claim that gets made all of the time around here and I have yet to see a single person successfully defend that position.
All I know is this:
Too much diet soda: potentially bad
Too much sugary soda: potentially bad + lots of calories
Reasonable amounts of diet soda: likely fine
Reasonable amounts of sugary soda: likely fine + calories I would rather use elsewhere
Diet soda: tastes fine to me
Regular soda: tastes fine to me + calories I would rather use elsewhere.
I see no single scenario in which "manning up" and drinking sugary soda is better for me. The scale does not tip in its favor for me in any comparison.19 -
Regular soda right after a workout can be a good use of a calories and a nice treat.5
-
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.2K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.2K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 422 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.7K MyFitnessPal Information
- 23 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions