The Official MFP Love Match Thread for Totally Not Nude People
Replies
-
The fact of the matter here, folks, is that we simply know better than you. It's that simple. Oh sure, some people, who shall remain nameless - *cough* - seem to believe themselves to be the shadchans of MFP. They are mistaken. Only we chosen few, we happy few, we kilt-wearing chewers of caq have been blessed with the divine vision to make the choices here in this thread that carry the weight of God himself.
Thus sayeth the Swan.
You are hilarious.
Not the best matchmaker though.1 -
-
The fact of the matter here, folks, is that we simply know better than you. It's that simple. Oh sure, some people, who shall remain nameless - *cough* - seem to believe themselves to be the shadchans of MFP. They are mistaken. Only we chosen few, we happy few, we kilt-wearing chewers of caq have been blessed with the divine vision to make the choices here in this thread that carry the weight of God himself.
Thus sayeth the Swan.
You are hilarious.
Not the best matchmaker though.
Our powers are unimpeachable. Our choices impeccable. Some people, sadly, are living in a world of their own delusion. That cannot be helped. Denial ain't just a river in Egypt.
We are matchmakers, not plastic surgeons or psychiatrists. We can only put the right naughty bits in proximity. It's up to the matchees to make it work.
Faith.
2 -
The fact of the matter here, folks, is that we simply know better than you. It's that simple. Oh sure, some people, who shall remain nameless - *cough* - seem to believe themselves to be the shadchans of MFP. They are mistaken. Only we chosen few, we happy few, we kilt-wearing chewers of caq have been blessed with the divine vision to make the choices here in this thread that carry the weight of God himself.
Thus sayeth the Swan.
YOU still haven't matched me.... have I been deemed "unmatchable"?
You walked in and claimed a match and she whipped off her slip and leapt into your arms suckling like a hungry infant. I was equally aroused and threatened by your sudden coupling. There seemed to be no need to deny that you, @tinak33, and @RhiAnLewis17 were THE Sapphic Sisters of the thread.
I don't allow slips in my presence.
I was just happy for the breeze...
That's MY breeze.1 -
RhiAnLewis17 wrote: »The fact of the matter here, folks, is that we simply know better than you. It's that simple. Oh sure, some people, who shall remain nameless - *cough* - seem to believe themselves to be the shadchans of MFP. They are mistaken. Only we chosen few, we happy few, we kilt-wearing chewers of caq have been blessed with the divine vision to make the choices here in this thread that carry the weight of God himself.
Thus sayeth the Swan.
YOU still haven't matched me.... have I been deemed "unmatchable"?
You walked in and claimed a match and she whipped off her slip and leapt into your arms suckling like a hungry infant. I was equally aroused and threatened by your sudden coupling. There seemed to be no need to deny that you, @tinak33, and @RhiAnLewis17 were THE Sapphic Sisters of the thread.
I don't allow slips in my presence.
I was just happy for the breeze...
That's MY breeze.
It left me all a'flutter.1 -
The fact of the matter here, folks, is that we simply know better than you. It's that simple. Oh sure, some people, who shall remain nameless - *cough* - seem to believe themselves to be the shadchans of MFP. They are mistaken. Only we chosen few, we happy few, we kilt-wearing chewers of caq have been blessed with the divine vision to make the choices here in this thread that carry the weight of God himself.
Thus sayeth the Swan.
You are hilarious.
Not the best matchmaker though.
How DARE you question @SwannySez . Do you know how difficult it is to find a match for an owner of 4 parrots?Oh, I guess maybe you do know.
The parrots are an asset. They are not why I'm single. Lol. Who wouldn't want 4 adorably fluffy potty trained birds around?1 -
george5911 wrote: »She deserves more than a touch-n-go relationship.RomaineCalm wrote: »george5911 wrote: »RomaineCalm wrote: »The only match I'm backing so far is @george5911 and @nooshi713.
Apologies if it makes things more awkward for ya, I know it's been said before, but you two would seriously be a cute couple.
IMHO overall I think the "matchmakers" here are not putting a thoughtful process to work.
Who watched that show "Love Connection"?
Not awkward at all. She's gorgeous, smart, has her own, nothing not to like.
I'm just happy AF being single and raising my kids. Also like 45 or so of the states are in between us.
That's why they made airplanes. Don't give up so easily, man.
Who brought R Kelly into this?2 -
standenvernet wrote: »george5911 wrote: »She deserves more than a touch-n-go relationship.RomaineCalm wrote: »george5911 wrote: »RomaineCalm wrote: »The only match I'm backing so far is @george5911 and @nooshi713.
Apologies if it makes things more awkward for ya, I know it's been said before, but you two would seriously be a cute couple.
IMHO overall I think the "matchmakers" here are not putting a thoughtful process to work.
Who watched that show "Love Connection"?
Not awkward at all. She's gorgeous, smart, has her own, nothing not to like.
I'm just happy AF being single and raising my kids. Also like 45 or so of the states are in between us.
That's why they made airplanes. Don't give up so easily, man.
Who brought R Kelly into this?
Pretty sure she's no child, and no one said anything about urine, so I guess you did my man.2 -
This content has been removed.
-
The fact of the matter here, folks, is that we simply know better than you. It's that simple. Oh sure, some people, who shall remain nameless - *cough* - seem to believe themselves to be the shadchans of MFP. They are mistaken. Only we chosen few, we happy few, we kilt-wearing chewers of caq have been blessed with the divine vision to make the choices here in this thread that carry the weight of God himself.
Thus sayeth the Swan.
You are hilarious.
Not the best matchmaker though.
How DARE you question @SwannySez . Do you know how difficult it is to find a match for an owner of 4 parrots?Oh, I guess maybe you do know.
The parrots are an asset. They are not why I'm single. Lol. Who wouldn't want 4 adorably fluffy potty trained birds around?
6 -
standenvernet wrote: »george5911 wrote: »She deserves more than a touch-n-go relationship.RomaineCalm wrote: »george5911 wrote: »RomaineCalm wrote: »The only match I'm backing so far is @george5911 and @nooshi713.
Apologies if it makes things more awkward for ya, I know it's been said before, but you two would seriously be a cute couple.
IMHO overall I think the "matchmakers" here are not putting a thoughtful process to work.
Who watched that show "Love Connection"?
Not awkward at all. She's gorgeous, smart, has her own, nothing not to like.
I'm just happy AF being single and raising my kids. Also like 45 or so of the states are in between us.
That's why they made airplanes. Don't give up so easily, man.
Who brought R Kelly into this?
Again today? Now i have to go listen to Ignition.0 -
CaptainFantastic01 wrote: »The fact of the matter here, folks, is that we simply know better than you. It's that simple. Oh sure, some people, who shall remain nameless - *cough* - seem to believe themselves to be the shadchans of MFP. They are mistaken. Only we chosen few, we happy few, we kilt-wearing chewers of caq have been blessed with the divine vision to make the choices here in this thread that carry the weight of God himself.
Thus sayeth the Swan.
You are hilarious.
Not the best matchmaker though.
How DARE you question @SwannySez . Do you know how difficult it is to find a match for an owner of 4 parrots?Oh, I guess maybe you do know.
The parrots are an asset. They are not why I'm single. Lol. Who wouldn't want 4 adorably fluffy potty trained birds around?
You would or wouldn't want to be around the fluffers?1 -
CookingWithCumin wrote: »george5911 wrote: »standenvernet wrote: »george5911 wrote: »She deserves more than a touch-n-go relationship.RomaineCalm wrote: »george5911 wrote: »RomaineCalm wrote: »The only match I'm backing so far is @george5911 and @nooshi713.
Apologies if it makes things more awkward for ya, I know it's been said before, but you two would seriously be a cute couple.
IMHO overall I think the "matchmakers" here are not putting a thoughtful process to work.
Who watched that show "Love Connection"?
Not awkward at all. She's gorgeous, smart, has her own, nothing not to like.
I'm just happy AF being single and raising my kids. Also like 45 or so of the states are in between us.
That's why they made airplanes. Don't give up so easily, man.
Who brought R Kelly into this?
Pretty sure she's no child, and no one said anything about urine, so I guess you did my man.
Urine for it now George!
Fak1 -
CaptainFantastic01 wrote: »The fact of the matter here, folks, is that we simply know better than you. It's that simple. Oh sure, some people, who shall remain nameless - *cough* - seem to believe themselves to be the shadchans of MFP. They are mistaken. Only we chosen few, we happy few, we kilt-wearing chewers of caq have been blessed with the divine vision to make the choices here in this thread that carry the weight of God himself.
Thus sayeth the Swan.
You are hilarious.
Not the best matchmaker though.
How DARE you question @SwannySez . Do you know how difficult it is to find a match for an owner of 4 parrots?Oh, I guess maybe you do know.
The parrots are an asset. They are not why I'm single. Lol. Who wouldn't want 4 adorably fluffy potty trained birds around?
You would or wouldn't want to be around the fluffers?
5 -
CookingWithCumin wrote: »george5911 wrote: »standenvernet wrote: »george5911 wrote: »She deserves more than a touch-n-go relationship.RomaineCalm wrote: »george5911 wrote: »RomaineCalm wrote: »The only match I'm backing so far is @george5911 and @nooshi713.
Apologies if it makes things more awkward for ya, I know it's been said before, but you two would seriously be a cute couple.
IMHO overall I think the "matchmakers" here are not putting a thoughtful process to work.
Who watched that show "Love Connection"?
Not awkward at all. She's gorgeous, smart, has her own, nothing not to like.
I'm just happy AF being single and raising my kids. Also like 45 or so of the states are in between us.
That's why they made airplanes. Don't give up so easily, man.
Who brought R Kelly into this?
Pretty sure she's no child, and no one said anything about urine, so I guess you did my man.
Urine for it now George!
3 -
CaptainFantastic01 wrote: »The fact of the matter here, folks, is that we simply know better than you. It's that simple. Oh sure, some people, who shall remain nameless - *cough* - seem to believe themselves to be the shadchans of MFP. They are mistaken. Only we chosen few, we happy few, we kilt-wearing chewers of caq have been blessed with the divine vision to make the choices here in this thread that carry the weight of God himself.
Thus sayeth the Swan.
You are hilarious.
Not the best matchmaker though.
How DARE you question @SwannySez . Do you know how difficult it is to find a match for an owner of 4 parrots?Oh, I guess maybe you do know.
The parrots are an asset. They are not why I'm single. Lol. Who wouldn't want 4 adorably fluffy potty trained birds around?
You would or wouldn't want to be around the fluffers?
Fluffers I can deal with, but live birds?
Hey, @SwannySez , since your match for me classifies me as an undesirably geriatric, can I get a refund on my payment, or is there some kinda of "exchange" program?2 -
CaptainFantastic01 wrote: »The fact of the matter here, folks, is that we simply know better than you. It's that simple. Oh sure, some people, who shall remain nameless - *cough* - seem to believe themselves to be the shadchans of MFP. They are mistaken. Only we chosen few, we happy few, we kilt-wearing chewers of caq have been blessed with the divine vision to make the choices here in this thread that carry the weight of God himself.
Thus sayeth the Swan.
You are hilarious.
Not the best matchmaker though.
How DARE you question @SwannySez . Do you know how difficult it is to find a match for an owner of 4 parrots?Oh, I guess maybe you do know.
The parrots are an asset. They are not why I'm single. Lol. Who wouldn't want 4 adorably fluffy potty trained birds around?
You would or wouldn't want to be around the fluffers?
You have got to stop calling them that. My sides hurt.4 -
standenvernet wrote: »CaptainFantastic01 wrote: »The fact of the matter here, folks, is that we simply know better than you. It's that simple. Oh sure, some people, who shall remain nameless - *cough* - seem to believe themselves to be the shadchans of MFP. They are mistaken. Only we chosen few, we happy few, we kilt-wearing chewers of caq have been blessed with the divine vision to make the choices here in this thread that carry the weight of God himself.
Thus sayeth the Swan.
You are hilarious.
Not the best matchmaker though.
How DARE you question @SwannySez . Do you know how difficult it is to find a match for an owner of 4 parrots?Oh, I guess maybe you do know.
The parrots are an asset. They are not why I'm single. Lol. Who wouldn't want 4 adorably fluffy potty trained birds around?
You would or wouldn't want to be around the fluffers?
Fluffers I can deal with, but live birds?
Hey, @SwannySez , since your match for me classifies me as an undesirably geriatric, can I get a refund on my payment, or is there some kinda of "exchange" program?
Oh c'mon, now. You're not so old that you need a fluffer. No one here buys that.
But since we do not stand for age discrimination in these parts, we will find you another match.1 -
george5911 wrote: »CaptainFantastic01 wrote: »The fact of the matter here, folks, is that we simply know better than you. It's that simple. Oh sure, some people, who shall remain nameless - *cough* - seem to believe themselves to be the shadchans of MFP. They are mistaken. Only we chosen few, we happy few, we kilt-wearing chewers of caq have been blessed with the divine vision to make the choices here in this thread that carry the weight of God himself.
Thus sayeth the Swan.
You are hilarious.
Not the best matchmaker though.
How DARE you question @SwannySez . Do you know how difficult it is to find a match for an owner of 4 parrots?Oh, I guess maybe you do know.
The parrots are an asset. They are not why I'm single. Lol. Who wouldn't want 4 adorably fluffy potty trained birds around?
You would or wouldn't want to be around the fluffers?
You have got to stop calling them that. My sides hurt.
You like their nickname.
0 -
This content has been removed.
-
Clearly, I can't be matched... or maybe I can't be matched 🤔4
-
standenvernet wrote: »CaptainFantastic01 wrote: »The fact of the matter here, folks, is that we simply know better than you. It's that simple. Oh sure, some people, who shall remain nameless - *cough* - seem to believe themselves to be the shadchans of MFP. They are mistaken. Only we chosen few, we happy few, we kilt-wearing chewers of caq have been blessed with the divine vision to make the choices here in this thread that carry the weight of God himself.
Thus sayeth the Swan.
You are hilarious.
Not the best matchmaker though.
How DARE you question @SwannySez . Do you know how difficult it is to find a match for an owner of 4 parrots?Oh, I guess maybe you do know.
The parrots are an asset. They are not why I'm single. Lol. Who wouldn't want 4 adorably fluffy potty trained birds around?
You would or wouldn't want to be around the fluffers?
Fluffers I can deal with, but live birds?
Hey, @SwannySez , since your match for me classifies me as an undesirably geriatric, can I get a refund on my payment, or is there some kinda of "exchange" program?
Agreed.
Fluffers yes. Birds no.
Not that the dogs wouldn't enjoy chasing them around the house. It would be entertaining while it lasted.0 -
Bullet_with_Butterfly_Wings wrote: »Clearly, I can't be matched... or maybe I can't be matched 🤔
Funny that you should pop in at just this EXACT moment. I didn't realize that you wanted a match. But since you do and since we have a jilted man rebouncing like a rubber biscuit, I hereby declare that @Bullet_with_Butterfly_Wings and @standenvernet to be matched now and forever more.
Can you feel it babies?
It's the love! The LOVE!2 -
standenvernet wrote: »CaptainFantastic01 wrote: »The fact of the matter here, folks, is that we simply know better than you. It's that simple. Oh sure, some people, who shall remain nameless - *cough* - seem to believe themselves to be the shadchans of MFP. They are mistaken. Only we chosen few, we happy few, we kilt-wearing chewers of caq have been blessed with the divine vision to make the choices here in this thread that carry the weight of God himself.
Thus sayeth the Swan.
You are hilarious.
Not the best matchmaker though.
How DARE you question @SwannySez . Do you know how difficult it is to find a match for an owner of 4 parrots?Oh, I guess maybe you do know.
The parrots are an asset. They are not why I'm single. Lol. Who wouldn't want 4 adorably fluffy potty trained birds around?
You would or wouldn't want to be around the fluffers?
Fluffers I can deal with, but live birds?
Hey, @SwannySez , since your match for me classifies me as an undesirably geriatric, can I get a refund on my payment, or is there some kinda of "exchange" program?
Oh c'mon, now. You're not so old that you need a fluffer. No one here buys that.
But since we do not stand for age discrimination in these parts, we will find you another match.
Hey, hey, hey!! My match was already matched a second time with someone else and then rejected her. I'm still waiting for my rematch!0 -
DickVernon wrote: »So, @SabAteNine , since we have been matched, there’s a few things I need to know about you.
1. Do you replace empty toilet paper?
2. Do you like piña colada’s?
3. Getting caught in the rain?- Are you kidding me?! Toilet paper stands with a minimum of 2 TP rolls are *mandatory* - and, of course, kept up. Also, the use of Zewa flushable toilet paper tubes is a must. It's all about convenience and comfort in there. Contrary to popular middle-school belief, women go number 2 as well.
- You know Dick, I'm not big on fancy stuff. Beer, wine, whiskey and bitters. Those are my things. And they're kind of at the base of Maslow's pyramid.
- Yes, often. And still, the most time I owned an umbrella before losing / abandoning it was 2 days.
My turn.- Are you high maintenance? Maybe helpless and in need of hand holding when you're sick?
- Do you feel the need to fill every moment with *something*? Is procrastination or silence making you uncomfortable?
- What's the one thing you're really, REALLY bad at?
0 -
_BlahBlah_BlackSheep_ wrote: »standenvernet wrote: »CaptainFantastic01 wrote: »The fact of the matter here, folks, is that we simply know better than you. It's that simple. Oh sure, some people, who shall remain nameless - *cough* - seem to believe themselves to be the shadchans of MFP. They are mistaken. Only we chosen few, we happy few, we kilt-wearing chewers of caq have been blessed with the divine vision to make the choices here in this thread that carry the weight of God himself.
Thus sayeth the Swan.
You are hilarious.
Not the best matchmaker though.
How DARE you question @SwannySez . Do you know how difficult it is to find a match for an owner of 4 parrots?Oh, I guess maybe you do know.
The parrots are an asset. They are not why I'm single. Lol. Who wouldn't want 4 adorably fluffy potty trained birds around?
You would or wouldn't want to be around the fluffers?
Fluffers I can deal with, but live birds?
Hey, @SwannySez , since your match for me classifies me as an undesirably geriatric, can I get a refund on my payment, or is there some kinda of "exchange" program?
Oh c'mon, now. You're not so old that you need a fluffer. No one here buys that.
But since we do not stand for age discrimination in these parts, we will find you another match.
Hey, hey, hey!! My match was already matched a second time with someone else and then rejected her. I'm still waiting for my rematch!
You've heard the saying "the squeaky wheel gets the grease"? That *kitten* don't fly in these here parts, lady. We're more akin to kindergarten: you get what you get and you don't get upset.1 -
HappilyDistracted wrote: »standenvernet wrote: »CaptainFantastic01 wrote: »The fact of the matter here, folks, is that we simply know better than you. It's that simple. Oh sure, some people, who shall remain nameless - *cough* - seem to believe themselves to be the shadchans of MFP. They are mistaken. Only we chosen few, we happy few, we kilt-wearing chewers of caq have been blessed with the divine vision to make the choices here in this thread that carry the weight of God himself.
Thus sayeth the Swan.
You are hilarious.
Not the best matchmaker though.
How DARE you question @SwannySez . Do you know how difficult it is to find a match for an owner of 4 parrots?Oh, I guess maybe you do know.
The parrots are an asset. They are not why I'm single. Lol. Who wouldn't want 4 adorably fluffy potty trained birds around?
You would or wouldn't want to be around the fluffers?
Fluffers I can deal with, but live birds?
Hey, @SwannySez , since your match for me classifies me as an undesirably geriatric, can I get a refund on my payment, or is there some kinda of "exchange" program?
Agreed.
Fluffers yes. Birds no.
Not that the dogs wouldn't enjoy chasing them around the house. It would be entertaining while it lasted.
How about a fluffernutter?
1 -
_BlahBlah_BlackSheep_ wrote: »standenvernet wrote: »CaptainFantastic01 wrote: »The fact of the matter here, folks, is that we simply know better than you. It's that simple. Oh sure, some people, who shall remain nameless - *cough* - seem to believe themselves to be the shadchans of MFP. They are mistaken. Only we chosen few, we happy few, we kilt-wearing chewers of caq have been blessed with the divine vision to make the choices here in this thread that carry the weight of God himself.
Thus sayeth the Swan.
You are hilarious.
Not the best matchmaker though.
How DARE you question @SwannySez . Do you know how difficult it is to find a match for an owner of 4 parrots?Oh, I guess maybe you do know.
The parrots are an asset. They are not why I'm single. Lol. Who wouldn't want 4 adorably fluffy potty trained birds around?
You would or wouldn't want to be around the fluffers?
Fluffers I can deal with, but live birds?
Hey, @SwannySez , since your match for me classifies me as an undesirably geriatric, can I get a refund on my payment, or is there some kinda of "exchange" program?
Oh c'mon, now. You're not so old that you need a fluffer. No one here buys that.
But since we do not stand for age discrimination in these parts, we will find you another match.
Hey, hey, hey!! My match was already matched a second time with someone else and then rejected her. I'm still waiting for my rematch!
You've heard the saying "the squeaky wheel gets the grease"? That *kitten* don't fly in these here parts, lady. We're more akin to kindergarten: you get what you get and you don't get upset.
Hey, it's not my fault you matched me with someone who wants to stay single! That's gotta be against the rules or something.0 -
This content has been removed.
-
CookingWithCumin wrote: »_BlahBlah_BlackSheep_ wrote: »_BlahBlah_BlackSheep_ wrote: »standenvernet wrote: »CaptainFantastic01 wrote: »The fact of the matter here, folks, is that we simply know better than you. It's that simple. Oh sure, some people, who shall remain nameless - *cough* - seem to believe themselves to be the shadchans of MFP. They are mistaken. Only we chosen few, we happy few, we kilt-wearing chewers of caq have been blessed with the divine vision to make the choices here in this thread that carry the weight of God himself.
Thus sayeth the Swan.
You are hilarious.
Not the best matchmaker though.
How DARE you question @SwannySez . Do you know how difficult it is to find a match for an owner of 4 parrots?Oh, I guess maybe you do know.
The parrots are an asset. They are not why I'm single. Lol. Who wouldn't want 4 adorably fluffy potty trained birds around?
You would or wouldn't want to be around the fluffers?
Fluffers I can deal with, but live birds?
Hey, @SwannySez , since your match for me classifies me as an undesirably geriatric, can I get a refund on my payment, or is there some kinda of "exchange" program?
Oh c'mon, now. You're not so old that you need a fluffer. No one here buys that.
But since we do not stand for age discrimination in these parts, we will find you another match.
Hey, hey, hey!! My match was already matched a second time with someone else and then rejected her. I'm still waiting for my rematch!
You've heard the saying "the squeaky wheel gets the grease"? That *kitten* don't fly in these here parts, lady. We're more akin to kindergarten: you get what you get and you don't get upset.
Hey, it's not my fault you matched me with someone who wants to stay single! That's gotta be against the rules or something.
IF ITS MEANT TO BEEEE ITLL BEEEEE ITLLL BEEEE
BABY JUST LET IT BE
So far this thread is ending up eerily similar to my actual dating life....
4
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.4K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.2K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 427 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.7K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions