The Official MFP Love Match Thread for Totally Not Nude People
Options
Replies
-
george5911 wrote: »RomaineCalm wrote: »george5911 wrote: »She deserves more than a touch-n-go relationship.RomaineCalm wrote: »george5911 wrote: »RomaineCalm wrote: »The only match I'm backing so far is @george5911 and nooshi713.
Apologies if it makes things more awkward for ya, I know it's been said before, but you two would seriously be a cute couple.
IMHO overall I think the "matchmakers" here are not putting a thoughtful process to work.
Who watched that show "Love Connection"?
Not awkward at all. She's gorgeous, smart, has her own, nothing not to like.
I'm just happy AF being single and raising my kids. Also like 45 or so of the states are in between us.
That's why they made airplanes. Don't give up so easily, man.
Agreed.
But once you meet in person and fall in love and know that you never ever wanna be apart ever...then one of you moves. You gotta sacrifice for love.
Did you read the part where I said I'm happy AF? No? So ignored.
😂😂😂
The sign of any solid relationship0 -
Pour_Decisions wrote: »What the heck happened in here overnight? I missed the entire matchmaking party.
Hello??? We're already MFP married. Unless you want to open this thing up to others and we start MFP swingin...
Oh I know we are. I didn't want to be matched with anyone. I just wondered what all I missed.
ps. When do we consummate our MFP marriage?
0 -
george5911 wrote: »RomaineCalm wrote: »george5911 wrote: »She deserves more than a touch-n-go relationship.RomaineCalm wrote: »george5911 wrote: »RomaineCalm wrote: »The only match I'm backing so far is @george5911 and nooshi713.
Apologies if it makes things more awkward for ya, I know it's been said before, but you two would seriously be a cute couple.
IMHO overall I think the "matchmakers" here are not putting a thoughtful process to work.
Who watched that show "Love Connection"?
Not awkward at all. She's gorgeous, smart, has her own, nothing not to like.
I'm just happy AF being single and raising my kids. Also like 45 or so of the states are in between us.
That's why they made airplanes. Don't give up so easily, man.
Agreed.
But once you meet in person and fall in love and know that you never ever wanna be apart ever...then one of you moves. You gotta sacrifice for love.
Did you read the part where I said I'm happy AF? No? So ignored.
😂😂😂
How did you get matched again but I'm still sitting over here all lonely and waiting??
0 -
_BlahBlah_BlackSheep_ wrote: »george5911 wrote: »RomaineCalm wrote: »george5911 wrote: »She deserves more than a touch-n-go relationship.RomaineCalm wrote: »george5911 wrote: »RomaineCalm wrote: »The only match I'm backing so far is @george5911 and nooshi713.
Apologies if it makes things more awkward for ya, I know it's been said before, but you two would seriously be a cute couple.
IMHO overall I think the "matchmakers" here are not putting a thoughtful process to work.
Who watched that show "Love Connection"?
Not awkward at all. She's gorgeous, smart, has her own, nothing not to like.
I'm just happy AF being single and raising my kids. Also like 45 or so of the states are in between us.
That's why they made airplanes. Don't give up so easily, man.
Agreed.
But once you meet in person and fall in love and know that you never ever wanna be apart ever...then one of you moves. You gotta sacrifice for love.
Did you read the part where I said I'm happy AF? No? So ignored.
😂😂😂
How did you get matched again but I'm still sitting over here all lonely and waiting??
Better to be lucky than good I suppose0 -
george5911 wrote: »RomaineCalm wrote: »george5911 wrote: »She deserves more than a touch-n-go relationship.RomaineCalm wrote: »george5911 wrote: »RomaineCalm wrote: »The only match I'm backing so far is @george5911 and nooshi713.
Apologies if it makes things more awkward for ya, I know it's been said before, but you two would seriously be a cute couple.
IMHO overall I think the "matchmakers" here are not putting a thoughtful process to work.
Who watched that show "Love Connection"?
Not awkward at all. She's gorgeous, smart, has her own, nothing not to like.
I'm just happy AF being single and raising my kids. Also like 45 or so of the states are in between us.
That's why they made airplanes. Don't give up so easily, man.
Agreed.
But once you meet in person and fall in love and know that you never ever wanna be apart ever...then one of you moves. You gotta sacrifice for love.
Did you read the part where I said I'm happy AF? No? So ignored.
😂😂😂
Not ignored. I'm just saying, I typically know a good match when I see one.
But please accept my apologies and continue with your happy AF life, I won't impose my matchmaking on you any longer.3 -
You're good, this is both fun for me to participate and watch. I'm not offended in the least.0
-
RomaineCalm wrote: »george5911 wrote: »RomaineCalm wrote: »george5911 wrote: »She deserves more than a touch-n-go relationship.RomaineCalm wrote: »george5911 wrote: »RomaineCalm wrote: »The only match I'm backing so far is @george5911 and nooshi713.
Apologies if it makes things more awkward for ya, I know it's been said before, but you two would seriously be a cute couple.
IMHO overall I think the "matchmakers" here are not putting a thoughtful process to work.
Who watched that show "Love Connection"?
Not awkward at all. She's gorgeous, smart, has her own, nothing not to like.
I'm just happy AF being single and raising my kids. Also like 45 or so of the states are in between us.
That's why they made airplanes. Don't give up so easily, man.
Agreed.
But once you meet in person and fall in love and know that you never ever wanna be apart ever...then one of you moves. You gotta sacrifice for love.
Did you read the part where I said I'm happy AF? No? So ignored.
😂😂😂
Not ignored. I'm just saying, I typically know a good match when I see one.
But please accept my apologies and continue with your happy AF life, I won't impose my matchmaking on you any longer.
No one on these forums, and in particular, this thread is Happy AF.
Das a mask.
Wrong. Is a filter. Someone will get that.2 -
Will_Workout_for_food wrote: »burlygirl91 wrote: »george5911 wrote: »You're good, this is both fun for me to participate and watch. I'm not offended in the least.
So, you're not open for matching? Damn
looks like someone wants to be matched with u george5911
And here I thought you and @burlygirl91 had a thing for each other.4 -
Will_Workout_for_food wrote: »RomaineCalm wrote: »Will_Workout_for_food wrote: »burlygirl91 wrote: »george5911 wrote: »You're good, this is both fun for me to participate and watch. I'm not offended in the least.
So, you're not open for matching? Damn
looks like someone wants to be matched with u george5911
And here I thought you and @burlygirl91 had a thing for each other.
I thought I was with the banana lady?
I think this whole place is basically one big love triangle with just a few bystanders.1 -
*thread watching*
5 -
leut_underpants wrote: »RomaineCalm wrote: »Will_Workout_for_food wrote: »RomaineCalm wrote: »Will_Workout_for_food wrote: »burlygirl91 wrote: »george5911 wrote: »You're good, this is both fun for me to participate and watch. I'm not offended in the least.
So, you're not open for matching? Damn
looks like someone wants to be matched with u george5911
And here I thought you and @burlygirl91 had a thing for each other.
I thought I was with the banana lady?
I think this whole place is basically one big love triangle with just a few bystanders.
It's a love polygon of some sort. Even an isocagon isn't enough sides for all of the side action.
True. Although I didn't feel like googling what shape had the most sides so just went with the standard triangle.1 -
burlygirl91 wrote: »RomaineCalm wrote: »Will_Workout_for_food wrote: »burlygirl91 wrote: »george5911 wrote: »You're good, this is both fun for me to participate and watch. I'm not offended in the least.
So, you're not open for matching? Damn
looks like someone wants to be matched with u george5911
And here I thought you and @burlygirl91 had a thing for each other.
Is it that obvious?
No I'm just that perceptive.3 -
Will_Workout_for_food wrote: »RomaineCalm wrote: »leut_underpants wrote: »RomaineCalm wrote: »Will_Workout_for_food wrote: »RomaineCalm wrote: »Will_Workout_for_food wrote: »burlygirl91 wrote: »george5911 wrote: »You're good, this is both fun for me to participate and watch. I'm not offended in the least.
So, you're not open for matching? Damn
looks like someone wants to be matched with u george5911
And here I thought you and @burlygirl91 had a thing for each other.
I thought I was with the banana lady?
I think this whole place is basically one big love triangle with just a few bystanders.
It's a love polygon of some sort. Even an isocagon isn't enough sides for all of the side action.
True. Although I didn't feel like googling what shape had the most sides so just went with the standard triangle.
how bout a ball?
Hey, hey, HEY, smoothie. Just keep 'em in the banana hammock for now.3 -
Will_Workout_for_food wrote: »RomaineCalm wrote: »leut_underpants wrote: »RomaineCalm wrote: »Will_Workout_for_food wrote: »RomaineCalm wrote: »Will_Workout_for_food wrote: »burlygirl91 wrote: »george5911 wrote: »You're good, this is both fun for me to participate and watch. I'm not offended in the least.
So, you're not open for matching? Damn
looks like someone wants to be matched with u george5911
And here I thought you and @burlygirl91 had a thing for each other.
I thought I was with the banana lady?
I think this whole place is basically one big love triangle with just a few bystanders.
It's a love polygon of some sort. Even an isocagon isn't enough sides for all of the side action.
True. Although I didn't feel like googling what shape had the most sides so just went with the standard triangle.
how bout a ball?
Yup that could work.
Balls are good.2 -
The fact of the matter here, folks, is that we simply know better than you. It's that simple. Oh sure, some people, who shall remain nameless - *cough* - seem to believe themselves to be the shadchans of MFP. They are mistaken. Only we chosen few, we happy few, we kilt-wearing chewers of caq have been blessed with the divine vision to make the choices here in this thread that carry the weight of God himself.
Thus sayeth the Swan.8 -
CookingWithCumin wrote: »The fact of the matter here, folks, is that we simply know better than you. It's that simple. Oh sure, some people, who shall remain nameless - *cough* - seem to believe themselves to be the shadchans of MFP. They are mistaken. Only we chosen few, we happy few, we kilt-wearing chewers of caq have been blessed with the divine vision to make the choices here in this thread that carry the weight of God himself.
Thus sayeth the Swan.
Hereforth repeated by the spicy boi
Oh shush, you.1 -
CookingWithCumin wrote: »The fact of the matter here, folks, is that we simply know better than you. It's that simple. Oh sure, some people, who shall remain nameless - *cough* - seem to believe themselves to be the shadchans of MFP. They are mistaken. Only we chosen few, we happy few, we kilt-wearing chewers of caq have been blessed with the divine vision to make the choices here in this thread that carry the weight of God himself.
Thus sayeth the Swan.
Hereforth repeated by the spicy boi
1
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 391.6K Introduce Yourself
- 43.5K Getting Started
- 259.7K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.6K Food and Nutrition
- 47.3K Recipes
- 232.3K Fitness and Exercise
- 393 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.4K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 152.7K Motivation and Support
- 7.8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.3K MyFitnessPal Information
- 23 News and Announcements
- 931 Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.3K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions