Motivation or "hate speech"?

Options
1…1213151718…23

Replies

  • mammamaurer
    mammamaurer Posts: 418 Member
    Options
    to the op well she should have kept her mouth shut instead of being a bit of a fame **** and to the rest of you BF% weirdos it is truly terrible to see that we can only "make love with our eyes" today.... trust me its more fun with your hands try it some time you'll like it

    Who are you referring to when you say "BF% weirdo's"? I am afraid that I am not familiar with that term.

    people obsessed with very low (or high) body fat %

    And by "obsessed" you mean "concerned enough to be healthy" . . .

    nope i mean obsessed: 1.) never stop thinking about something: to occupy somebody's thoughts constantly and exclusively
    be preoccupied: 2.) to think or worry about something constantly and compulsively

    So, who would that be in this thread? The 'you' of the 'you' people?

    lol naw i was going with the 9 pages before me

    Like whom? Specifically?

    read it for your self

    Can't. My low bodyfat obsession is keeping me from focusing on something else long enough to read 9 pages.

    My high body fat obsession is making me too lazy to read it.

    :tongue:
  • PikaKnight
    PikaKnight Posts: 34,971 Member
    Options

    i did

    And yet, you failed to respond. Make accusations/insults of 'you people' but are not willing to address people specifically. Typical really.

    i did respond i told you to read the pages your self, and i havent insulted anyone


    You didn't?
    ...and to the rest of you BF% weirdos ...

    Oh. Okay.
  • Cranquistador
    Cranquistador Posts: 39,744 Member
    Options

    i did

    And yet, you failed to respond. Make accusations/insults of 'you people' but are not willing to address people specifically. Typical really.

    i did respond i told you to read the pages your self, and i havent insulted anyone


    You didn't?
    ...and to the rest of you BF% weirdos ...

    Oh. Okay.
    heh
  • Sarauk2sf
    Sarauk2sf Posts: 28,072 Member
    Options

    i did

    And yet, you failed to respond. Make accusations/insults of 'you people' but are not willing to address people specifically. Typical really.

    i did respond i told you to read the pages your self, and i havent insulted anyone


    You didn't?
    ...and to the rest of you BF% weirdos ...

    Oh. Okay.

    Funny way of not insulting people. I was just trying to work out who they wee insulting. Apparently everyone from at least page 9 and prior.
  • mammamaurer
    mammamaurer Posts: 418 Member
    Options

    i did

    And yet, you failed to respond. Make accusations/insults of 'you people' but are not willing to address people specifically. Typical really.

    i did respond i told you to read the pages your self, and i havent insulted anyone


    You didn't?
    ...and to the rest of you BF% weirdos ...

    Oh. Okay.

    are you a weirdo to? i know im a weirdo i like food, and a lack of restrictions on it.. also porn but its cool to restrict that alittle

    edited because it would be weird not to:tongue:
  • Sarauk2sf
    Sarauk2sf Posts: 28,072 Member
    Options

    i did

    And yet, you failed to respond. Make accusations/insults of 'you people' but are not willing to address people specifically. Typical really.

    i did respond i told you to read the pages your self, and i havent insulted anyone

    And I told you I did, and yes you did.

    And you did not answer the question, so you may have responded, but by being evasive and not actually answer the question of who you were specifically insulting.
  • kregerems
    kregerems Posts: 100 Member
    Options
    I did not find anything wrong with what she had to say. The FB Police violated her 1st Amendment rights of Freedom of Speech. If people don't want to hear, or read the truth they don't have to read or listen to it. She is trying to help people battle this epidemic called obesity, but some people take it personally which they shouldn't. Oh well, some people just don't have it.......
  • MyChocolateDiet
    MyChocolateDiet Posts: 22,281 Member
    Options

    i did

    And yet, you failed to respond. Make accusations/insults of 'you people' but are not willing to address people specifically. Typical really.

    i did respond i told you to read the pages your self, and i havent insulted anyone


    You didn't?
    ...and to the rest of you BF% weirdos ...

    Oh. Okay.

    Funny way of not insulting people. I was just trying to work out who they wee insulting. Apparently everyone from at least page 9 and prior.

    Thats what I' m saying. Why not take the opportunity to single out who it was meant for instead of letting everyone beleive they are the intended?
  • Cranquistador
    Cranquistador Posts: 39,744 Member
    Options

    i did

    And yet, you failed to respond. Make accusations/insults of 'you people' but are not willing to address people specifically. Typical really.

    i did respond i told you to read the pages your self, and i havent insulted anyone


    You didn't?
    ...and to the rest of you BF% weirdos ...

    Oh. Okay.

    Funny way of not insulting people. I was just trying to work out who they wee insulting. Apparently everyone from at least page 9 and prior.

    Thats what I' m saying. Why not take the opportunity to single out who it was meant for instead of letting everyone beleive they are the intended?

    because its more fun this way:happy:
    no it really is not.
  • Sarauk2sf
    Sarauk2sf Posts: 28,072 Member
    Options
    I think most people aren't actually responding to the OP (or even to responses to the OP). They're responding to a chain that started with a since-deleted post that came right afterward the OP that - basically - called the fit mom in question (paraphrasing) "a heartless ***** who is too vain to spend time with her kids".

    Thanks. Gotta love the lack of context when that happens =)
    Luv U Both :flowerforyou: I'm going to have a drink now and fill my body with empty alcohol calories. Anyone care to join me? :drinker:

    Sorry for the side note tete a tete.

    Have fun...I may join you =)
  • PikaKnight
    PikaKnight Posts: 34,971 Member
    Options

    i did

    And yet, you failed to respond. Make accusations/insults of 'you people' but are not willing to address people specifically. Typical really.

    i did respond i told you to read the pages your self, and i havent insulted anyone


    You didn't?
    ...and to the rest of you BF% weirdos ...

    Oh. Okay.

    are you a weirdo to? i know im a weirdo i like food, and a lack of restrictions on it.. also porn but its cool to restrict that alittle

    edited because it would be weird not to:tongue:

    nice-try.gif
  • BeachIron
    BeachIron Posts: 6,490 Member
    Options
    I did not find anything wrong with what she had to say. The FB Police violated her 1st Amendment rights of Freedom of Speech. If people don't want to hear, or read the truth they don't have to read or listen to it. She is trying to help people battle this epidemic called obesity, but some people take it personally which they shouldn't. Oh well, some people just don't have it.......

    I think someone needs to teach a con law course on MFP . . . not it . . .
  • wheird
    wheird Posts: 7,963 Member
    Options
    I did not find anything wrong with what she had to say. The FB Police violated her 1st Amendment rights of Freedom of Speech. If people don't want to hear, or read the truth they don't have to read or listen to it. She is trying to help people battle this epidemic called obesity, but some people take it personally which they shouldn't. Oh well, some people just don't have it.......

    Psst. I'm a little embarrassed to have to tell you this, but the Constitutional Amendments only apply to government interaction. Meaning the government cannot infringe on your freedom of speech, religion, etc. This does not apply to private entities. Meaning that Facebook has every right to censor the hell out of anyone they want that uses their social media site.

    How awkward for you...
  • mammamaurer
    mammamaurer Posts: 418 Member
    Options

    i did

    And yet, you failed to respond. Make accusations/insults of 'you people' but are not willing to address people specifically. Typical really.

    i did respond i told you to read the pages your self, and i havent insulted anyone


    You didn't?
    ...and to the rest of you BF% weirdos ...

    Oh. Okay.

    Funny way of not insulting people. I was just trying to work out who they wee insulting. Apparently everyone from at least page 9 and prior.

    Thats what I' m saying. Why not take the opportunity to single out who it was meant for instead of letting everyone beleive they are the intended?

    because its more fun this way:happy:
    no it really is not.

    yes it is:tongue:
  • ILiftHeavyAcrylics
    ILiftHeavyAcrylics Posts: 27,732 Member
    Options
    Some people in this thread are being ridiculous. Of course I'm not going to say which. This way no one can say I was attacking them.


    Did I do it right?
  • mammamaurer
    mammamaurer Posts: 418 Member
    Options
    Some people in this thread are being ridiculous. Of course I'm not going to say which. This way no one can say I was attacking them.


    Did I do it right?

    lol yes, yes you did:wink:
  • egrusy
    egrusy Posts: 196 Member
    Options
    I did not find anything wrong with what she had to say. The FB Police violated her 1st Amendment rights of Freedom of Speech. If people don't want to hear, or read the truth they don't have to read or listen to it. She is trying to help people battle this epidemic called obesity, but some people take it personally which they shouldn't. Oh well, some people just don't have it.......

    Psst. I'm a little embarrassed to have to tell you this, but the Constitutional Amendments only apply to government interaction. Meaning the government cannot infringe on your freedom of speech, religion, etc. This does not apply to private entities. Meaning that Facebook has every right to censor the hell out of anyone they want that uses their social media site.

    How awkward for you...

    ^^^ Also, freedom of speech does not protect you from the consequences of what you say. This includes, but is not limited, to people on social media sites disagreeing. You can not actually have them arrested for disagreeing. Believe it or not, it's true.
  • bulbadoof
    bulbadoof Posts: 1,058 Member
    Options
    You only need an "excuse" if you want to look like that. If you don't, and you're happy with what you look like, that post has no reason to offend you. So if you want to look like that and now you feel challenged by some random mom on the Internet, well, getting her banned might make you feel better, but it won't get you any closer to your goals.
  • Hauntinglyfit
    Hauntinglyfit Posts: 5,537 Member
    Options
    Some people in this thread are being ridiculous. Of course I'm not going to say which. This way no one can say I was attacking them.


    Did I do it right?

    OMG, is it mammamaurer?
  • BrainyBurro
    BrainyBurro Posts: 6,129 Member
    Options
    what is facebook and why do books need faces? which books?

    H5xHX.gif
This discussion has been closed.

Categories