A Calorie is NOT just a Calorie

12829303234

Replies

  • silken555
    silken555 Posts: 478 Member
    Differences in diet induced thermogensis are represented on the calories-out side of the equation. Isocaloric foods across different macronutrients would have identical calories but you would expend a different amount of calories digesting them.

    this is like word porn.

    :heart: sidesteel!

    *breaths om deeply* I love the smell of smart in the evening...:)
  • HappyStack
    HappyStack Posts: 802 Member
    No I was questioning the fact a comment was made that it doesn't matter where you get your calories from - be it a Twinkie or something else.

    Before disputing this I wanted to clarify the statement meant the energy was used by the body in the same way.

    I think you need to be more specific on context for that question or statement to be answered correctly.

    For the most part your body, like honey badger, don't care.

    It works based on a sufficient unit of measurement per mass. In this case grams per kilogram. Twinkie diet will allow you to lose weight, provided you hit a consistent calorie deficit, and the body will efficiently use the calories provided by a diet consisting of just Twinkies.

    Whether it's particularly healthful to subsist on Twinkies alone is debatable. How much protein is in a Twinkie? that'd be the only macro of concern, I think. Micros would be a bigger concern, but the SAD (or should we call it the standard Western diet?) - even the new & improved healthier SAD! - is deficient in a lot of micros anyway...

    Ultimately a variation in diet is only necessary for three things... interest in food, a good variety of micronutrients, and manipulating your intake of macronutrients. Food energy is a separate entity.

    When I'm shooting for a calorie surplus, I like to eat a handful of jellybeans for my excess carbs. True story.
  • psuLemon
    psuLemon Posts: 38,432 MFP Moderator
    Sustainment and diet adherence are the reason for moderation.

    Is diet adherence required for losing weight?

    absolutely, because if you can't adhere to a calorie deficit, you won't lose weight.
  • ChrisM8971
    ChrisM8971 Posts: 1,067 Member
    Yes but they don't all deliver the same end hit.

    Ok I cannot post the study but am sure that I read that the differences are so small as to make no noticeable difference when counting calories for weight loss.

    Fats 98%
    Animal based proteins 90 - 95%

    Some carbs (probably twinkles) less than 80%

    Yeah not much difference!!!!

    Always open to new ideas so would love to read the studies if you could message me or post them and a list of what foods give what levels
  • tennisdude2004
    tennisdude2004 Posts: 5,609 Member
    well we might as well just keep talking so the thread rolls again. even though we all basically agree

    You have created a monster!
  • DamePiglet
    DamePiglet Posts: 3,730 Member
    FuP8Hzh_zps4f5fc860.gif

    You & me both.
    awkward.gif

    filionwaitwhat_zpsa3701768.gif
    tumblr_mfl2tzQRK61r7fg2wo1_250.gif
  • MireyGal76
    MireyGal76 Posts: 7,334 Member
    well we might as well just keep talking so the thread rolls again. even though we all basically agree

    You have created a monster!

    cookie-monster-waiting-for-cookie.gif
    This one?
  • MireyGal76
    MireyGal76 Posts: 7,334 Member
    cuz... well...
    hA8A213EC
  • DamePiglet
    DamePiglet Posts: 3,730 Member
    well we might as well just keep talking so the thread rolls again. even though we all basically agree

    You have created a monster!

    cookie-monster-waiting-for-cookie.gif
    This one?

    No.
    That's a carb gif.
  • tennisdude2004
    tennisdude2004 Posts: 5,609 Member
    Yes but they don't all deliver the same end hit.

    Ok I cannot post the study but am sure that I read that the differences are so small as to make no noticeable difference when counting calories for weight loss.

    Fats 98%
    Animal based proteins 90 - 95%

    Some carbs (probably twinkles) less than 80%

    Yeah not much difference!!!!

    Always open to new ideas so would love to read the studies if you could message me or post them and a list of what foods give what levels

    There are. Few sources but a well explained one is http://www.bodyrecomposition.com/fat-loss/the-energy-balance-equation.html

    Worth a read.
  • DamePiglet
    DamePiglet Posts: 3,730 Member
    Yes but they don't all deliver the same end hit.

    Ok I cannot post the study but am sure that I read that the differences are so small as to make no noticeable difference when counting calories for weight loss.

    Fats 98%
    Animal based proteins 90 - 95%

    Some carbs (probably twinkles) less than 80%

    Yeah not much difference!!!!

    Always open to new ideas so would love to read the studies if you could message me or post them and a list of what foods give what levels

    There are. Few sources but a well explained one is www.bodyrecomposition.com/fatloss/energy-balance-equation

    Worth a read.

    Except its a 404
  • psuLemon
    psuLemon Posts: 38,432 MFP Moderator
    To lock or not to lock.. that is the question...
  • DamePiglet
    DamePiglet Posts: 3,730 Member
    To lock or not to lock.. that is the question...

    Please?
  • psuLemon
    psuLemon Posts: 38,432 MFP Moderator
    Yes but they don't all deliver the same end hit.

    Ok I cannot post the study but am sure that I read that the differences are so small as to make no noticeable difference when counting calories for weight loss.

    Fats 98%
    Animal based proteins 90 - 95%

    Some carbs (probably twinkles) less than 80%

    Yeah not much difference!!!!

    Always open to new ideas so would love to read the studies if you could message me or post them and a list of what foods give what levels

    There are. Few sources but a well explained one is www.bodyrecomposition.com/fatloss/energy-balance-equation

    Worth a read.

    Except its a 404

    I fixed his link...
  • MireyGal76
    MireyGal76 Posts: 7,334 Member
    To lock or not to lock.. that is the question...

    Train%2Bderailment_ff13aa_4431331.gif

    eta changed gif... cuz the other one looked real
  • ChrisM8971
    ChrisM8971 Posts: 1,067 Member
    Yes but they don't all deliver the same end hit.

    Ok I cannot post the study but am sure that I read that the differences are so small as to make no noticeable difference when counting calories for weight loss.

    Fats 98%
    Animal based proteins 90 - 95%

    Some carbs (probably twinkles) less than 80%

    Yeah not much difference!!!!

    Always open to new ideas so would love to read the studies if you could message me or post them and a list of what foods give what levels

    There are. Few sources but a well explained one is http://www.bodyrecomposition.com/fat-loss/the-energy-balance-equation.html

    Worth a read.

    Unfortunately I get "page not found" but was thinking more of scientific studies
  • tennisdude2004
    tennisdude2004 Posts: 5,609 Member
    Yes but they don't all deliver the same end hit.

    Ok I cannot post the study but am sure that I read that the differences are so small as to make no noticeable difference when counting calories for weight loss.

    Fats 98%
    Animal based proteins 90 - 95%

    Some carbs (probably twinkles) less than 80%

    Yeah not much difference!!!!

    Always open to new ideas so would love to read the studies if you could message me or post them and a list of what foods give what levels

    There are. Few sources but a well explained one is www.bodyrecomposition.com/fatloss/energy-balance-equation

    Worth a read.

    Except its a 404

    Try a google search. I couldn't cut and paste so had to type it may be slightly wrong
  • ChrisM8971
    ChrisM8971 Posts: 1,067 Member
    To lock or not to lock.. that is the question...

    I would
  • psuLemon
    psuLemon Posts: 38,432 MFP Moderator
    To lock or not to lock.. that is the question...

    Please?

    In all honesty, if there isn't any new information, I just might because its starting to become off topic, which violates rule # 2
  • lawnis04
    lawnis04 Posts: 20 Member
    A guy lost a ton of weight on a diet based off twinkies... a calorie is just that. A calorie. Nutrients however, are a different story.

    http://www.cnn.com/2010/HEALTH/11/08/twinkie.diet.professor/
  • ChrisM8971
    ChrisM8971 Posts: 1,067 Member
  • Cortelli
    Cortelli Posts: 1,369 Member
    tumblr_mfl2tzQRK61r7fg2wo1_250.gif

    WTF_zps595d1418.gif
  • tennisdude2004
    tennisdude2004 Posts: 5,609 Member
    Do your own research dude

    However a good place to look - the university of Glasgow have done a good study on obesity and energy baba once equation. Their summary was similar to the body recomp explanation.
  • tennisdude2004
    tennisdude2004 Posts: 5,609 Member
    To be fair we've all been off track from the original op since about page 2 of part 1.

    The original topic was the validity of the report the op posted, which discussed calories in / calories out!!!!
  • ironanimal
    ironanimal Posts: 5,922 Member
    To lock or not to lock.. that is the question...

    Please?

    In all honesty, if there isn't any new information, I just might because its starting to become off topic, which violates rule # 2
    I like purple badgers and long, dry baths in desert sand.

    Is that off-topic enough for you?
  • MireyGal76
    MireyGal76 Posts: 7,334 Member
    To be fair we've all been off track from the original op since about page 2 of part 1.

    The original topic was the validity of the report the op posted, which discussed calories in / calories out!!!!

    Wants to argue some more. Has had way too much espresso

    In reality... Half have been arguing the title. Half have been arguing the link. And half have been arguing that the title means the same as the article.

    Yes that gives you three halves...
    Cuz

    Well

    Math
  • tennisdude2004
    tennisdude2004 Posts: 5,609 Member
    To be fair we've all been off track from the original op since about page 2 of part 1.

    The original topic was the validity of the report the op posted, which discussed calories in / calories out!!!!

    Wants to argue some more. Has had way too much espresso

    In reality... Half have been arguing the title. Half have been arguing the link. And half have been arguing that the title means the same as the article.

    Yes that gives you three halves...
    Cuz

    Well

    Math

    Your math is off about 90% have been arguing the title the other 20% have been arguing god knows what.
  • psuLemon
    psuLemon Posts: 38,432 MFP Moderator
    To be fair we've all been off track from the original op since about page 2 of part 1.

    The original topic was the validity of the report the op posted, which discussed calories in / calories out!!!!

    Wants to argue some more. Has had way too much espresso

    In reality... Half have been arguing the title. Half have been arguing the link. And half have been arguing that the title means the same as the article.

    Yes that gives you three halves...
    Cuz

    Well

    Math

    Holy Mathematics Batman!!! That's a lot of halves.
  • MireyGal76
    MireyGal76 Posts: 7,334 Member
    To be fair we've all been off track from the original op since about page 2 of part 1.

    The original topic was the validity of the report the op posted, which discussed calories in / calories out!!!!

    Wants to argue some more. Has had way too much espresso

    In reality... Half have been arguing the title. Half have been arguing the link. And half have been arguing that the title means the same as the article.

    Yes that gives you three halves...
    Cuz

    Well

    Math

    Your math is off about 90% have been arguing the title the other 20% have been arguing god knows what.

    Now you're telling me I can't even math right!

    Reported!
    :sad:
  • tennisdude2004
    tennisdude2004 Posts: 5,609 Member
    :smile: