People who say cardio is "too boring" are full of crap

16791112

Replies

  • bigmuneymfp
    bigmuneymfp Posts: 2,235 Member
    I love cardio
  • theflatpick
    theflatpick Posts: 106 Member
    Whenever I start getting board with my cadio routine, it just means it is time to mix it up and find some other exercise to do.
  • Traveler120
    Traveler120 Posts: 712 Member
    ninerbuff wrote: »
    ninerbuff wrote: »
    tjkita wrote: »
    Cardio may be boring but it works for weight loss! Gotta get that heart rate up somehow!
    Incorrect. Lots and lots of people spend HOURS on cardio a week with no results. They may be fitter, but if their EATING isn't conducive to weight loss, they aren't going to lose weight.

    A.C.E. Certified Personal and Group Fitness Trainer
    IDEA Fitness member
    Kickboxing Certified Instructor
    Been in fitness for 30 years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition

    9285851.png


    LOL. Just because people undo their deficit by eating too much, doesn't mean that cardio doesn't work for weight loss. Unless you want to imply that doing cardio automatically will result in a person eating too much, which is just silly. Many of us have used cardio as the primary way to increase energy expenditure and therefore deficit without having to restrict ourselves to very little food. And we've lost weight. So it obviously works.

    For someone who advertises their expertise on every post, you should not be peddling misinformation. And saying cardio doesn't work for weight loss IS misinformation.
    Cardio DOESN'T work for weight loss if there isn't a calorie deficit. One could do all the cardio they want, but if they still consume maintenance or higher, they aren't going to lose weight. That's NOT DISPUTED in any Journal of Science.
    Cardio can HELP to create a deficit, but the deficit is created more by INTAKE not output. Think about it, how long would it take to burn 500 calories? Now how long does it take to eat 500 calories? If one burned 300 calories from doing cardio, but ate 500 calories because they felt they exercised to offset it, then they are +200 calories on their eating. So no misinformation, it still comes down to CICO.
    Again, if you don't believe that, you'd still have to explain how so many do cardio for hours and hours a week, but don't lose weight.

    A.C.E. Certified Personal and Group Fitness Trainer
    IDEA Fitness member
    Kickboxing Certified Instructor
    Been in fitness for 30 years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition

    9285851.png


    CICO is CICO. A deficit is a deficit.

    If you want a 500 calorie deficit, you can keep your activity the same and eat 500 less.
    OR
    You can keep your intake the same and do 500 calories of cardio or other exercise.
    OR a little of both.

    Which one you choose is a matter if preference.
    ALL of these WILL lead to a deficit and fat loss.
    It's as simple as that
    .

    One reason folks struggle with weightloss is coz so called "experts" complicate weight loss for no reason.
  • Nixi3Knox
    Nixi3Knox Posts: 182 Member
    You don't get to decide what other people think about anything. It may very well be boring to some people. To each his own.
  • MarziPanda95
    MarziPanda95 Posts: 1,326 Member
    Ah yes because we all have enough money and space to buy a home treadmill to park in front of the TV /Sarcasm. I find cardio boring. I would probably find it less boring if I had a treadmill and put it in front of the TV, but I'm a university student. I can barely afford food shopping... forget about buying gym equipment.
  • pinklife1117
    pinklife1117 Posts: 79 Member
    Cardio is boring etc... however there is something good for your mental being that cardio at least gives me. Just that I don't have to think too much and get dopamine and lose weight... sweat out toxins. Weight training you have to take breaks to recover. But yes I think it can be boring....
  • tsortsor
    tsortsor Posts: 830 Member
    Cardio usually is boring unless your playing a sport
  • pinklife1117
    pinklife1117 Posts: 79 Member
    Cardio is boring etc... however there is something good for your mental being that cardio at least gives me. Just that I don't have to think too much and get dopamine and lose weight... sweat out toxins. Weight training you have to take breaks to recover. But yes I think it can be boring....

    I do weight train three times a week so mix it up!!

  • ninerbuff
    ninerbuff Posts: 48,915 Member
    edited April 2017
    ninerbuff wrote: »
    ninerbuff wrote: »
    tjkita wrote: »
    Cardio may be boring but it works for weight loss! Gotta get that heart rate up somehow!
    Incorrect. Lots and lots of people spend HOURS on cardio a week with no results. They may be fitter, but if their EATING isn't conducive to weight loss, they aren't going to lose weight.

    A.C.E. Certified Personal and Group Fitness Trainer
    IDEA Fitness member
    Kickboxing Certified Instructor
    Been in fitness for 30 years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition

    9285851.png


    LOL. Just because people undo their deficit by eating too much, doesn't mean that cardio doesn't work for weight loss. Unless you want to imply that doing cardio automatically will result in a person eating too much, which is just silly. Many of us have used cardio as the primary way to increase energy expenditure and therefore deficit without having to restrict ourselves to very little food. And we've lost weight. So it obviously works.

    For someone who advertises their expertise on every post, you should not be peddling misinformation. And saying cardio doesn't work for weight loss IS misinformation.
    Cardio DOESN'T work for weight loss if there isn't a calorie deficit. One could do all the cardio they want, but if they still consume maintenance or higher, they aren't going to lose weight. That's NOT DISPUTED in any Journal of Science.
    Cardio can HELP to create a deficit, but the deficit is created more by INTAKE not output. Think about it, how long would it take to burn 500 calories? Now how long does it take to eat 500 calories? If one burned 300 calories from doing cardio, but ate 500 calories because they felt they exercised to offset it, then they are +200 calories on their eating. So no misinformation, it still comes down to CICO.
    Again, if you don't believe that, you'd still have to explain how so many do cardio for hours and hours a week, but don't lose weight.

    A.C.E. Certified Personal and Group Fitness Trainer
    IDEA Fitness member
    Kickboxing Certified Instructor
    Been in fitness for 30 years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition

    9285851.png


    CICO is CICO. A deficit is a deficit.

    If you want a 500 calorie deficit, you can keep your activity the same and eat 500 less.
    OR
    You can keep your intake the same and do 500 calories of cardio or other exercise.
    OR a little of both.

    Which one you choose is a matter if preference.
    ALL of these WILL lead to a deficit and fat loss.
    It's as simple as that
    .

    One reason folks struggle with weightloss is coz so called "experts" complicate weight loss for no reason.
    Again, it's still matters on consumption. Cardio is for fitness and health. No debate there. It can help with a calorie deficit IF the person doing the cardio is aware that they aren't EATING more than they need to. And that's precisely the issue in many gyms and with people today. They think they HAVE to do some form of cardio to lose weight and it's just not true. Do you dispute that? If so, then how do people who are immobile able to lose weight without cardio?
    Cardio can HELP to lose weight IF there is a deficit. If no deficit, then it's just exercise.

    BTW, you CANNOT just keep the intake the same for a long period time if weight loss occurs, do a 500 calorie burn and expect to keep losing weight. Common sense will tell you that you'd have to LOWER YOUR INTAKE as your weight goes down. Unless you're a unicorn or something.

    A.C.E. Certified Personal and Group Fitness Trainer
    IDEA Fitness member
    Kickboxing Certified Instructor
    Been in fitness for 30 years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition

    9285851.png



  • smartin168
    smartin168 Posts: 9 Member
    I'm the exact opposite. Love, love, love my cardio. Last night...55 minutes on my bowflex M5 with a new external speaker cranked and my video feed of Taylor Swift in Australia.....boogied to the beat and sweat bullets.
  • comeonnow142857
    comeonnow142857 Posts: 310 Member
    edited April 2017
    [soapbox] It drives me nuts when people claim they don't do cardio because it's just too boring. If sitting on a couch watching TV/movies isn't too boring for you then how can running on a treadmill/riding a stationary bike/etc. while watching the exact same TV/movies be too boring?
    Please explain how doing X while sitting on the couch can be less boring than doing X while running?
    I honestly don't see how running on a treadmill watching TV can possibly be more boring than sitting on a couch watching the same show.
    How is watching TV from a couch more "mentally stimulating" than watching the same show while doing something else?


    Because how engaging/nonboring/mentally stimulating activities are, doesn't stack up linearly and so don't follow a simple additional math formula. Multitasking can greatly reduce the ability to focus and the quality/efficiency of thinking when it comes to mental stimulation.

    To me, doing cardio while watching TV makes BOTH activities more boring (I've done it). I much prefer to immerse myself in one or the other. Running ruins Ingmar Bergman, and by God Ingmar Bergman ruins running.
    You aren't doing cardio because it's too hard or you don't enjoy sweating or whatever, not because it's too boring. If you don't want to do cardio then don't, just be honest with yourself. [/soapbox]

    When I skip cardio (and I do plenty of cardio, but sometimes I won't follow through on a planned run etc) it's because the circumstances leave the available cardio as booooring. That's the fact. A 30 minute run on my own around my shed is boring as hell, but nowhere near as hard or sweaty as the other stuff I do which I enjoy greatly.

    You're simply wrong about other people.
  • ninerbuff
    ninerbuff Posts: 48,915 Member
    Cardio is boring etc... however there is something good for your mental being that cardio at least gives me. Just that I don't have to think too much and get dopamine and lose weight... sweat out toxins. Weight training you have to take breaks to recover. But yes I think it can be boring....
    Just a note: you don't sweat out toxins.

    A.C.E. Certified Personal and Group Fitness Trainer
    IDEA Fitness member
    Kickboxing Certified Instructor
    Been in fitness for 30 years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition

    9285851.png
  • JaxxieKat
    JaxxieKat Posts: 427 Member
    It drives me nuts when people claim they don't do cardio because it's just too boring.

    I find indoor cardio somewhat boring. A necessary evil, if you will. I love dancing, cycling, and running, but some days I just have to knock out that necessary cardio at the gym.

  • Rocknut53
    Rocknut53 Posts: 1,794 Member
    ninerbuff wrote: »
    ninerbuff wrote: »
    ninerbuff wrote: »
    tjkita wrote: »
    Cardio may be boring but it works for weight loss! Gotta get that heart rate up somehow!
    Incorrect. Lots and lots of people spend HOURS on cardio a week with no results. They may be fitter, but if their EATING isn't conducive to weight loss, they aren't going to lose weight.

    A.C.E. Certified Personal and Group Fitness Trainer
    IDEA Fitness member
    Kickboxing Certified Instructor
    Been in fitness for 30 years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition

    9285851.png


    LOL. Just because people undo their deficit by eating too much, doesn't mean that cardio doesn't work for weight loss. Unless you want to imply that doing cardio automatically will result in a person eating too much, which is just silly. Many of us have used cardio as the primary way to increase energy expenditure and therefore deficit without having to restrict ourselves to very little food. And we've lost weight. So it obviously works.

    For someone who advertises their expertise on every post, you should not be peddling misinformation. And saying cardio doesn't work for weight loss IS misinformation.
    Cardio DOESN'T work for weight loss if there isn't a calorie deficit. One could do all the cardio they want, but if they still consume maintenance or higher, they aren't going to lose weight. That's NOT DISPUTED in any Journal of Science.
    Cardio can HELP to create a deficit, but the deficit is created more by INTAKE not output. Think about it, how long would it take to burn 500 calories? Now how long does it take to eat 500 calories? If one burned 300 calories from doing cardio, but ate 500 calories because they felt they exercised to offset it, then they are +200 calories on their eating. So no misinformation, it still comes down to CICO.
    Again, if you don't believe that, you'd still have to explain how so many do cardio for hours and hours a week, but don't lose weight.

    A.C.E. Certified Personal and Group Fitness Trainer
    IDEA Fitness member
    Kickboxing Certified Instructor
    Been in fitness for 30 years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition

    9285851.png


    CICO is CICO. A deficit is a deficit.

    If you want a 500 calorie deficit, you can keep your activity the same and eat 500 less.
    OR
    You can keep your intake the same and do 500 calories of cardio or other exercise.
    OR a little of both.

    Which one you choose is a matter if preference.
    ALL of these WILL lead to a deficit and fat loss.
    It's as simple as that
    .

    One reason folks struggle with weightloss is coz so called "experts" complicate weight loss for no reason.
    Again, it's still matters on consumption. Cardio is for fitness and health. No debate there. It can help with a calorie deficit IF the person doing the cardio is aware that they aren't EATING more than they need to. And that's precisely the issue in many gyms and with people today. They think they HAVE to do some form of cardio to lose weight and it's just not true. Do you dispute that? If so, then how do people who are immobile able to lose weight without cardio?
    Cardio can HELP to lose weight IF there is a deficit. If no deficit, then it's just exercise.

    BTW, you CANNOT just keep the intake the same for a long period time if weight loss occurs, do a 500 calorie burn and expect to keep losing weight. Common sense will tell you that you'd have to LOWER YOUR INTAKE as your weight goes down. Unless you're a unicorn or something.

    A.C.E. Certified Personal and Group Fitness Trainer
    IDEA Fitness member
    Kickboxing Certified Instructor
    Been in fitness for 30 years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition

    9285851.png




    Aren't you two saying the same thing? Anyway, I'm living proof that you cannot do enough cardio to burn enough calories to lose weight if you are eating too much. Did it for almost 40 years til I came on here and listened to people like @ninerbuff and decreased my intake enough to make my cardio worthwhile for weight loss.
  • tomteboda
    tomteboda Posts: 2,171 Member
    ninerbuff wrote: »
    Again, it's still matters on consumption. Cardio is for fitness and health. No debate there. It can help with a calorie deficit IF the person doing the cardio is aware that they aren't EATING more than they need to. And that's precisely the issue in many gyms and with people today. They think they HAVE to do some form of cardio to lose weight and it's just not true. Do you dispute that? If so, then how do people who are immobile able to lose weight without cardio?
    Cardio can HELP to lose weight IF there is a deficit. If no deficit, then it's just exercise.

    BTW, you CANNOT just keep the intake the same for a long period time if weight loss occurs, do a 500 calorie burn and expect to keep losing weight. Common sense will tell you that you'd have to LOWER YOUR INTAKE as your weight goes down. Unless you're a unicorn or something.
    Worse, your cardio burns significantly less when lighter, too.

    I am at 14,000 steps for today and took a 4.5 mile walk, and I've only got 400 calories above "sedentary". This makes me very sad.
  • ninerbuff
    ninerbuff Posts: 48,915 Member
    Rocknut53 wrote: »
    ninerbuff wrote: »
    ninerbuff wrote: »
    ninerbuff wrote: »
    tjkita wrote: »
    Cardio may be boring but it works for weight loss! Gotta get that heart rate up somehow!
    Incorrect. Lots and lots of people spend HOURS on cardio a week with no results. They may be fitter, but if their EATING isn't conducive to weight loss, they aren't going to lose weight.

    A.C.E. Certified Personal and Group Fitness Trainer
    IDEA Fitness member
    Kickboxing Certified Instructor
    Been in fitness for 30 years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition

    9285851.png


    LOL. Just because people undo their deficit by eating too much, doesn't mean that cardio doesn't work for weight loss. Unless you want to imply that doing cardio automatically will result in a person eating too much, which is just silly. Many of us have used cardio as the primary way to increase energy expenditure and therefore deficit without having to restrict ourselves to very little food. And we've lost weight. So it obviously works.

    For someone who advertises their expertise on every post, you should not be peddling misinformation. And saying cardio doesn't work for weight loss IS misinformation.
    Cardio DOESN'T work for weight loss if there isn't a calorie deficit. One could do all the cardio they want, but if they still consume maintenance or higher, they aren't going to lose weight. That's NOT DISPUTED in any Journal of Science.
    Cardio can HELP to create a deficit, but the deficit is created more by INTAKE not output. Think about it, how long would it take to burn 500 calories? Now how long does it take to eat 500 calories? If one burned 300 calories from doing cardio, but ate 500 calories because they felt they exercised to offset it, then they are +200 calories on their eating. So no misinformation, it still comes down to CICO.
    Again, if you don't believe that, you'd still have to explain how so many do cardio for hours and hours a week, but don't lose weight.

    A.C.E. Certified Personal and Group Fitness Trainer
    IDEA Fitness member
    Kickboxing Certified Instructor
    Been in fitness for 30 years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition

    9285851.png


    CICO is CICO. A deficit is a deficit.

    If you want a 500 calorie deficit, you can keep your activity the same and eat 500 less.
    OR
    You can keep your intake the same and do 500 calories of cardio or other exercise.
    OR a little of both.

    Which one you choose is a matter if preference.
    ALL of these WILL lead to a deficit and fat loss.
    It's as simple as that
    .

    One reason folks struggle with weightloss is coz so called "experts" complicate weight loss for no reason.
    Again, it's still matters on consumption. Cardio is for fitness and health. No debate there. It can help with a calorie deficit IF the person doing the cardio is aware that they aren't EATING more than they need to. And that's precisely the issue in many gyms and with people today. They think they HAVE to do some form of cardio to lose weight and it's just not true. Do you dispute that? If so, then how do people who are immobile able to lose weight without cardio?
    Cardio can HELP to lose weight IF there is a deficit. If no deficit, then it's just exercise.

    BTW, you CANNOT just keep the intake the same for a long period time if weight loss occurs, do a 500 calorie burn and expect to keep losing weight. Common sense will tell you that you'd have to LOWER YOUR INTAKE as your weight goes down. Unless you're a unicorn or something.

    A.C.E. Certified Personal and Group Fitness Trainer
    IDEA Fitness member
    Kickboxing Certified Instructor
    Been in fitness for 30 years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition

    9285851.png




    Aren't you two saying the same thing? Anyway, I'm living proof that you cannot do enough cardio to burn enough calories to lose weight if you are eating too much. Did it for almost 40 years til I came on here and listened to people like @ninerbuff and decreased my intake enough to make my cardio worthwhile for weight loss.
    Not really. You're actually the example I spoke of. Someone that did cardio with the likely thought that it was enough to help with weight loss, when the truth actually is that one's intake is the more important factor.
    Again, I'm not against cardio at all. I do it because I know it's beneficial for cardio vascular health. My input is for the people to know that it's still about consumption for weight loss and not directly because they are doing a cardio regimen.
    It's especially annoying when you hear trainers and cardio instructors saying that they're "burning fat" while exercising that hard. Maybe if they were on keto, but a standard approach of calorie deficit, not so much.

    A.C.E. Certified Personal and Group Fitness Trainer
    IDEA Fitness member
    Kickboxing Certified Instructor
    Been in fitness for 30 years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition

    9285851.png

  • MelodyandBarbells
    MelodyandBarbells Posts: 7,725 Member
    Cardio meaning machines at the gym. I mean, the TV is not mine. What if I get hit over the head changing channels away from somebody's politics talk show? And I don't have a tablet and my phone's screen is too tiny to watch any of this stuff with any degree of satisfaction. And besides, who'd be paying for all that data, anyway? I don't have unlimited anything. What's the rating of the shows I watch? Can I watch them in public? I seldom watch live tv and frequently pause my shows. So now hypothetically we're back to the quiet of just me and the equipment. Oh and the fun part of screwing around with headphones, cueing the music, getting the earphones to stay on. agh just forget it.

    And then the other reasons why I don't love the machines - I do them so infrequently that each time I get back on I'm figuring out the *kittens* all over again. Way to begin my confidence boosting workout by feeling like an idiot. I've thought about doing the machines if I got to the gym early for a class, but then my knees hurt just a smidge and I'm kind of worn out before the class has ever started, kind of diminishing my performance on the actual reason for my visit. So I'd rather just sit off to the side and sip coffee in the gym's cafe or something.
  • dewd2
    dewd2 Posts: 2,445 Member
    dewd2 wrote: »
    dewd2 wrote: »
    @mburgess458 - What do you do for cardio/exercise? I see no picture, no stats on your profile. How is your fitness level? Do you run? Lift? Spend hours on a machine watching Netflix?

    Can you keep up with me?

    @mburgess458 - Still waiting. You've been on the site since I posted this last night. Why suddenly so shy?

    Still waiting?

    Yes.

    Today would have been good day too. I only managed to get 18 of my planned 20 miles in since I bonked 'big time' around mile 14ish.