Viewing the message boards in:
Welcome to Debate Club! Please be aware that this is a space for respectful debate, and that your ideas will be challenged here. Please remember to critique the argument, not the author.

What are your unpopular opinions about health / fitness?

12122242627239

Replies

  • Posts: 1,291 Member
    edited June 2017
    stealthq wrote: »

    +1

    Good example of that is grains. Because guess what the US produces a lot of - and yet no one with any knowledge claims that grains and grain products are a necessary part of a nutritious diet. We don't need so much as a single serving, and yet there they sit as the base of the old pyramid.

    I mean, I find the entire food pyramid suspect, and its history is kind of sordid. The dairy industry lobbied HARD for the position that they have, and I'm not aware of any other industry doing the same (maybe the egg people did? I admit that my memory of this is somewhat fuzzy. I ought to research this more, probably).
  • Posts: 679 Member
    ninerbuff wrote: »
    It's HARDER with hypothyroid, but it STILL comes down to CICO. You CAN'T gain MASS by eating less than you burn. You can retain water, but that's not REAL weight in terms of body composition (lean mass and fat).

    A.C.E. Certified Personal and Group Fitness Trainer
    IDEA Fitness member
    Kickboxing Certified Instructor
    Been in fitness for 30 years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition

    9285851.png



    Oh yes the legendary "fake" weight then it must be?

    If its not lean mass or fat mass, what could it be?

    Water is lean mass
  • Posts: 6,771 Member
    DamieBird wrote: »
    All of this dairy talk brings up an unpopular opinion that I have:
    I hate the very concept of alternative milks. Okay, I get it, if you have a medical reason and can't process dairy then use the almond/soy/cashew or whatever milk in your smoothie/coffee/cereal, etc. Or, get Lactiad. I've seen nothing that convinces me that they are healthier or better alternatives to plain ol' dairy. They may be lower calories, but that doesn't automatically make them more nutritious.

    I agree. I have used chocolate almond in my smoothies but mostly because it's delicious and lower calorie than the dairy version. If i have a large milky coffee when out I will generally go for soy because the combination of lots of milk and coffee isn't pleasant for me or anyone with the misfortune to be in my vicinity.
  • Posts: 6,252 Member
    DamieBird wrote: »
    All of this dairy talk brings up an unpopular opinion that I have:
    I hate the very concept of alternative milks. Okay, I get it, if you have a medical reason and can't process dairy then use the almond/soy/cashew or whatever milk in your smoothie/coffee/cereal, etc. Or, get Lactiad. I've seen nothing that convinces me that they are healthier or better alternatives to plain ol' dairy. They may be lower calories, but that doesn't automatically make them more nutritious.

    In agreement. It's just different...not better. That's nothing more than marketing of an alternative product and not to be confused with facts.
  • Posts: 30,886 Member
    JeepHair77 wrote: »

    But the dairy industry convinced the USDA that it deserved representation on the "food pyramid" on which most of us were raised, promoting, through government and medical sources, the belief that dairy, in significant serving numbers (3-7 servings per day), was an essential element of a nutritious diet.

    That's not your average marketing scheme by your average retail product.

    It kind of is -- although I do think the history of the food pyramid is more complicated.

    Meat producers did the same, and grain producers certainly did far better. Yet we can easily go without meat (I'd rather not, but we don't need it for nutrition), and same with grains.
  • Posts: 30,886 Member
    edited June 2017
    DamieBird wrote: »
    All of this dairy talk brings up an unpopular opinion that I have:
    I hate the very concept of alternative milks. Okay, I get it, if you have a medical reason and can't process dairy then use the almond/soy/cashew or whatever milk in your smoothie/coffee/cereal, etc. Or, get Lactiad. I've seen nothing that convinces me that they are healthier or better alternatives to plain ol' dairy. They may be lower calories, but that doesn't automatically make them more nutritious.

    I'm cool with alternative milks because they have a historical pedigree. (I am not saying this is a good reason, particularly, I hope I'd be cool with them regardless, but I tend to be affected stupidly by such things.) I like researching old recipes and cuisines, and nut milks played a role in medieval cooking, for example, for various reasons, including the restrictions on dairy during fasting days.

    I don't think they are healthier, but they taste different and I actually really like homemade nut milks and coconut milk (which at least until recently no one thought was healthier). Ironically, of course, a homemade cashew milk (which usually includes the nuts and is not just nut flavored) will be higher cal than dairy, and lower protein, but higher fat (like nuts!). (I mostly use it, though, because I usually have cashews around and rarely have milk around, because I don't drink it often enough to buy it, it would go bad.)
  • Posts: 1,639 Member
    JeepHair77 wrote: »

    I mean, I find the entire food pyramid suspect, and its history is kind of sordid. The dairy industry lobbied HARD for the position that they have, and I'm not aware of any other industry doing the same (maybe the egg people did? I admit that my memory of this is somewhat fuzzy. I ought to research this more, probably).

    It's not so much sordid as it's seeing inside the sausage-making (never that pretty) and churning out a one-size-fits-all prescription, mixed in with the lobbying of the wheat, dairy and meat factions that are part of the USDA organization. A lot of it involves our national economic interests, and there are myriad good and bad aspects of that.

    On my hard core gardening days, the food pyramid is perfect for me, because I am going to burn off all that bread* (this weekend I worked for hours on 3 snickerdoodles, a bell pepper, and a glass of milk); but I am racking up the kinds of calorie expenditure that was much more common for people back in the 1950s and 1960s--it's a recipe for disaster for the horrifically sedentary American (or Brit) of today. Also, genetically I am a carb and dairy processing machine, but people with other genetic backgrounds are going to struggle more with fitting in those 2-3 servings of dairy.

    Interestingly, in the 1940s, butter was considered to be its own crucial food group--one of seven that you should have every day. Now THAT is some propaganda I can get behind!!

    *Bread is also very economical--another crucial concern when your daily job involved things like burning 4,000 calories baling hay and such.
  • DamieBird wrote: »

    I fully understand the taste preference and I wouldn't give anyone side eye for choosing to consume them for whatever reason . . just don't be like that one person {or several} on Facebook {or in the office} who thinks you've found the secret to all of life's mysteries in your diet almond milk Shakeology chalk smoothie that you chase with ACV and start shaming the dairy loving folks for eating Greek Yogurt and berries. Just- no. I also had someone I know on FB who has a very limited food budget and wanted to get healthy, but felt that they only way to do that was to drink green smoothies made with expensive fresh produce and almond milk every morning, even though there was no dietary reason for it, even though frozen fruit/veg and dairy would cost half as much. The alterna-milk marketing machine is effective if nothing else :/.

    Yeah nut "milk" and touted as healthier without any evidence is annoying too. The chalky flavor usually ruins any coffee drink for me. Not great flavor and texture, higher calorie and no real health benefits, so why?

    I view them as something generally to avoid unless you love the flavor since the protein and general nutritional value is low vs calories. However I did like the taste of one I tried drinking it alone...but the calories were huge for half a glass of "pressed nut dessert" (not milk). ;)
  • Posts: 651 Member
    From a kosher perspective, meat and dairy can't be combined and even cooking milk and meat in the same oven at the same time is problematic. I'm vegetarian and make a lot of multicultural recipes, mostly because Eastern European Jewish cuisine is pretty low on vegetarian mains. But I'm married to a meat-eater and cook meat for him. So, I look to dairy alternatives, mostly so that I can try out certain recipes and cook/heat them up to eat while Hubby is having his meat. I still eat regular dairy, in the form of Greek yogurt and cheese (never been much of a milk-drinker), but for cooking and baking, it's the alternatives.

    TBH, I've never even thought about potential religious reasons for it. I wonder if that was part of the historical pedigree that @lemurcat12 mentioned? Thanks for the info :)!
  • Posts: 19,251 Member
    DamieBird wrote: »
    All of this dairy talk brings up an unpopular opinion that I have:
    I hate the very concept of alternative milks. Okay, I get it, if you have a medical reason and can't process dairy then use the almond/soy/cashew or whatever milk in your smoothie/coffee/cereal, etc. Or, get Lactiad. I've seen nothing that convinces me that they are healthier or better alternatives to plain ol' dairy. They may be lower calories, but that doesn't automatically make them more nutritious.
    Oooh, we love milk alternatives in this house.
    There's a long tradition of them. And they are fine by us.

    Oh, and you can buy them by the case at costco and they don't spoil!
  • Posts: 8,911 Member
    rdridi12 wrote: »


    Oh yes the legendary "fake" weight then it must be?

    If its not lean mass or fat mass, what could it be?

    Water is lean mass

    Water is as important in your body composition as your clothes, and almost as easily lost and gained.
  • Posts: 1,639 Member
    From a kosher perspective, meat and dairy can't be combined and even cooking milk and meat in the same oven at the same time is problematic. I'm vegetarian and make a lot of multicultural recipes, mostly because Eastern European Jewish cuisine is pretty low on vegetarian mains. But I'm married to a meat-eater and cook meat for him. So, I look to dairy alternatives, mostly so that I can try out certain recipes and cook/heat them up to eat while Hubby is having his meat. I still eat regular dairy, in the form of Greek yogurt and cheese (never been much of a milk-drinker), but for cooking and baking, it's the alternatives.

    Get that man a grill and an appropriately manly apron, and some cool tongs and other accoutrements, and tell him to get his butt to work. (But not pork butt...not kosher).
  • Posts: 1,639 Member

    Well I'm Scottish, my cheese knife is more like a cutlass......

    You can cut the cheese and then pin your kilt shut with it. o:)
  • Posts: 651 Member
    I have a vegan (and epic pretty terrible person, I keep her for the carcrash can't look away element) on my FB and she posted a meme about people asking where they get their protein with an image of almond milk. Oh how I laughed.

    I have a particular hate for almond milk in terms of the cost to the environment, but I haven't researched that in a while, so I could admittedly be off based about it. I thought at one point I read that it took insane amounts of water to grow almonds, and the almond milk industry has increased demand so much that it was contributing to the strain in certain drought areas. It kinda leads me into a rant about water -_- . . . not ALL water, just bottled water and anything and everything produced by Nestle (to include food products and subsidiaries!), but that's another topic altogether ;)

    *whew* that feels kinda good
  • Posts: 36,121 Member
    DamieBird wrote: »

    I have a particular hate for almond milk in terms of the cost to the environment, but I haven't researched that in a while, so I could admittedly be off based about it. I thought at one point I read that it took insane amounts of water to grow almonds, and the almond milk industry has increased demand so much that it was contributing to the strain in certain drought areas. It kinda leads me into a rant about water -_- . . . not ALL water, just bottled water and anything and everything produced by Nestle (to include food products and subsidiaries!), but that's another topic altogether ;)

    *whew* that feels kinda good

    I've never understood why bottled water seems to arouse more outrage, environmentally speaking, than soda/pop or beer, among other beverages. They all involved taking a bunch of water, putting it in bottles, and shipping it all over the place. Do the sugar/sweetener and flavorings somehow remove the taint, despite being a small percentage by volume?

    Does the cows drinking the water in order to create milk somehow exonerate dairy drinks, compared to bottled water?

    Even wine and pure, fresh juices simply run the water through the precipitation cycle, before making the beverage - does that make it less environmentally worrisome?

    (I'm not stumping for Big Bev here: I drink mostly faucet water, and put that back into the local water table via septic system. I'm genuinely puzzled about the narrow bottled water focus of activism.)
  • Posts: 18,902 Member
    AnnPT77 wrote: »

    I've never understood why bottled water seems to arouse more outrage, environmentally speaking, than soda/pop or beer, among other beverages. They all involved taking a bunch of water, putting it in bottles, and shipping it all over the place. Do the sugar/sweetener and flavorings somehow remove the taint, despite being a small percentage by volume?

    Does the cows drinking the water in order to create milk somehow exonerate dairy drinks, compared to bottled water?

    Even wine and pure, fresh juices simply run the water through the precipitation cycle, before making the beverage - does that make it less environmentally worrisome?

    (I'm not stumping for Big Bev here: I drink mostly faucet water, and put that back into the local water table via septic system. I'm genuinely puzzled about the narrow bottled water focus of activism.)

    I always figured it was because I can't just go to my faucet and refill my bottle with anything but water. Oh, how good that would be.
  • Posts: 18,343 Member
    AnnPT77 wrote: »

    I've never understood why bottled water seems to arouse more outrage, environmentally speaking, than soda/pop or beer, among other beverages. They all involved taking a bunch of water, putting it in bottles, and shipping it all over the place. Do the sugar/sweetener and flavorings somehow remove the taint, despite being a small percentage by volume?

    Does the cows drinking the water in order to create milk somehow exonerate dairy drinks, compared to bottled water?

    Even wine and pure, fresh juices simply run the water through the precipitation cycle, before making the beverage - does that make it less environmentally worrisome?

    (I'm not stumping for Big Bev here: I drink mostly faucet water, and put that back into the local water table via septic system. I'm genuinely puzzled about the narrow bottled water focus of activism.)

    From what I've seen when people expound upon it, the outrage comes from the fact that bottled water is bottled, and the plastic bottles are extra waste/garbage (but every other beverage you buy is canned/bottled too, so it's kind of a head scratcher to me). I guess the line of thought is that you should use refillable bottles and cut down on the waste.
  • Posts: 12,871 Member

    I always figured it was because I can't just go to my faucet and refill my bottle with anything but water. Oh, how good that would be.

    It's probably a very good thing I don't have Dr. Pepper on tap!
  • Posts: 28,439 Member
    pinuplove wrote: »

    It's probably a very good thing I don't have Dr. Pepper on tap!

    I had a picture pop into my head of what I would look like if I had DP on tap at my house...not pretty. :#
This discussion has been closed.