Welcome to Debate Club! Please be aware that this is a space for respectful debate, and that your ideas will be challenged here. Please remember to critique the argument, not the author.
What are your unpopular opinions about health / fitness?
Replies
-
Hemlock, lol. Certainly natural, but kind of ignores the "healthy" part. Keep it relevant.2
-
-
The link between sodium nitrites and cancer
CTCA
May 31, 2013
A study by the Cancer Research Center of Hawaii and the University of Southern California suggests a link between eating processed meats and cancer risk. The study followed 190,000 people, ages 45-75, for seven years and found that people who ate the most processed meats had a 67% higher risk of pancreatic cancer than those who ate the least amount.0 -
The link between sodium nitrites and cancer
CTCA
May 31, 2013
A study by the Cancer Research Center of Hawaii and the University of Southern California suggests a link between eating processed meats and cancer risk. The study followed 190,000 people, ages 45-75, for seven years and found that people who ate the most processed meats had a 67% higher risk of pancreatic cancer than those who ate the least amount.
Did you know that celery, cabbage, beets, carrots, radishes, and spinach are all naturally high in sodium nitrate? I found a University of Minnesota study when I googled to check my recollection of this that stated that the average person consumes 90% of their intake of nitrite from vegetables and 10% from processed meats.10 -
The link between sodium nitrites and cancer
CTCA
May 31, 2013
A study by the Cancer Research Center of Hawaii and the University of Southern California suggests a link between eating processed meats and cancer risk. The study followed 190,000 people, ages 45-75, for seven years and found that people who ate the most processed meats had a 67% higher risk of pancreatic cancer than those who ate the least amount.
Did you know that celery, cabbage, beets, carrots, radishes, and spinach are all naturally high in sodium nitrate? I found a University of Minnesota study when I googled to check my recollection of this that stated that the average person consumes 90% of their intake of nitrite from vegetables and 10% from processed meats.
It's a hard to pronounce word, it can't possibly be natural. Only evil cancer chemikillz have hard names.7 -
The link between sodium nitrites and cancer
CTCA
May 31, 2013
A study by the Cancer Research Center of Hawaii and the University of Southern California suggests a link between eating processed meats and cancer risk. The study followed 190,000 people, ages 45-75, for seven years and found that people who ate the most processed meats had a 67% higher risk of pancreatic cancer than those who ate the least amount.
What things other than process meat did those people also eat? I haven't read the study, but it seems like it would be difficult to assign the increased risk only one type of food that a person is consuming as opposed to an overall diet. It reminds me of the correlation between people who drink diet soda and obesity (as a reminder, they aren't actually related).4 -
You can improve all your numbers by losing weight. That's a fact. But saying the quality of your food doesn't matter? Saying it's ok to eat foods laden with chemicals we cannot pronounce and are PROVEN to cause cancer and are even banned in other countries, doesn't matter? Dyes, preservatives, pesticides...they matter.
can you pronounce all the chemicals in a strawberry?5 -
The link between sodium nitrites and cancer
CTCA
May 31, 2013
A study by the Cancer Research Center of Hawaii and the University of Southern California suggests a link between eating processed meats and cancer risk. The study followed 190,000 people, ages 45-75, for seven years and found that people who ate the most processed meats had a 67% higher risk of pancreatic cancer than those who ate the least amount.
What things other than process meat did those people also eat? I haven't read the study, but it seems like it would be difficult to assign the increased risk only one type of food that a person is consuming as opposed to an overall diet. It reminds me of the correlation between people who drink diet soda and obesity (as a reminder, they aren't actually related).
i would put money on it being a correlational type study where they found that obese men with cancer consumed a higher amount of processed meat and then extrapolated...6 -
You can improve all your numbers by losing weight. That's a fact. But saying the quality of your food doesn't matter? Saying it's ok to eat foods laden with chemicals we cannot pronounce and are PROVEN to cause cancer and are even banned in other countries, doesn't matter? Dyes, preservatives, pesticides...they matter.
can you pronounce all the chemicals in a strawberry?
Just for reference... lol
(+)-ABSCISIC-ACID Plant DUKE1992A
2-HEXEN-1-AL Plant DUKE1992A
2-METHYL-NAPHTHALENE Plant DUKE1992A
AGRIMONIIN Leaf BIS
ALANINE Fruit 310 3677 USA
ALPHA-LINOLENIC-ACID Fruit 780 9253 USA
ALPHA-TERPINEOL Leaf DUKE1992A
ALPHA-TOCOPHEROL Fruit 1 54 TOT USA
ALUMINUM Fruit 3 70 AAS
ANTHOCYANIN Plant DUKE1992A
ARBUTIN Leaf WOI
ARGININE Fruit 260 3084 USA
ARSENIC Fruit 0.01 AAS
ASCORBIC-ACID Fruit 400 6948 HHB USA WOI
ASCORBIC-ACID Leaf 3190 4350 WOI
ASH Fruit 3900 52065 AAS USA
ASPARAGINE Plant DUKE1992A
ASPARAGINIC-ACID Plant DUKE1992A
ASPARTIC-ACID Fruit 1380 16370 USA
BETA-CAROTENE Fruit 0.089 7 CRC JAF37:657
BETA-SITOSTEROL Fruit 100 1000 GAS
BORON Fruit 1 160 AAS BOB
BROMINE Fruit 1 AAS
CADMIUM Fruit 0.004 0.18 AAS
CAFFEIC-ACID Fruit 15 34 CRC(FNS)
CALCIUM Fruit 135 2900 HHB USA
CAMPESTEROL Fruit GAS
CARBOHYDRATES Fruit 70200 850000 CRC USA
CATECHIN Fruit HHB
CATECHOL Fruit HHB
CHLOROGENIC-ACID Fruit CRC(FNS)
CHROMIUM Fruit 0.005 0.18 AAS
CINNAMIC-ACID-METHYL-ESTER Plant DUKE1992A
CIS-3-HEXEN-1-OL Plant DUKE1992A
CITRAL Leaf HHB
CITRIC-ACID Fruit 3500 8000 WOI
COBALT Fruit 0.004 2 AAS ABS
COPPER Fruit 0.4 17 USA
CYANIDIN Plant JLS58:130
CYSTINE Fruit 50 593 USA
DIHYDROTRIMETHYLNAPHTHALENE Leaf DUKE1992A
ELLAGIC-ACID Fruit 430 8430 HS26(1):66
ELLAGIC-ACID Leaf 8080 32300 HS26(1):66
ELLAGIC-ACID Seed 1370 21650 HS26(1):66
ELLAGITANNIN Leaf HHB
EO Plant DUKE1992A
FAT Fruit 2350 59893 USA
FAT Seed 190000 DUKE1992A
FIBER Fruit 5300 181000 USA
FLAVONOIDS Plant BIS
FLUORINE Fruit 0.03 0.9 AAS
FOLACIN Fruit 0.1 0.2 USA
FURFURAL Leaf DUKE1992A
GALLIC-ACID Fruit 80 121 CRC(FNS)
GALLOCATECHIN Fruit HHB
GAMMA-AMINOBUTYRIC-ACID Plant DUKE1992A
GENTISIC-ACID Fruit CRC(FNS)
GLUTAMIC-ACID Fruit 900 10676 USA
GLUTAMINE Plant DUKE1992A
GLYCINE Fruit 240 2847 USA
HISTIDINE Fruit 120 1423 USA
IMPERATORIN Leaf JBH
IODINE Plant 0.157 0.23 DUKE1992A
IRON Fruit 3 100 CRC USA
ISOLEUCINE Fruit 140 1661 USA
KAEMPFEROL Leaf HHB
KAEMPFEROL-3-BETA-GLUCURONIDE Plant DUKE1992A
KAEMPFEROL-3-BETA-MONOGLUCOSIDE Fruit HHB
KAEMPFEROL-7-MONOGLUCOSIDE Fruit HHB
KILOCALORIES Fruit 300 3559 USA
LECITHIN Fruit 620 DUKE1992A
LEUCINE Fruit 310 3667 USA
LEUCOANTHOCYANIN Leaf HHB
LINALOOL Leaf DUKE1992A
LINOLEIC-ACID Fruit 1080 12811 USA
LINOLEIC-ACID Seed 153900 WOI
LINOLENIC-ACID Seed 9975 WOI
LUTEIN Fruit 0.3 3 JAF37:657
LUTEOFOROL Leaf HHB
LYSINE Fruit 250 2966 USA
MAGNESIUM Fruit 98 1545 AAS USA
MALIC-ACID Fruit 3500 8000 WOI
MALVIDIN-3,5-DIGLUCOSIDE Fruit DUKE1992A
MANGANESE Fruit 1.4 125 AAS FNF USA
MERCURY Fruit 0 0.009 AAS
METHIONINE Fruit 10 119 USA
METHYL-FURFURAL Plant DUKE1992A
METHYL-SALICYLATE Leaf DUKE1992A
MOLYBDENUM Fruit 0.1 AAS
MUFA Fruit 520 6168 USA
N-NONAL Leaf DUKE1992A
N-NONANOL Leaf DUKE1992A
N-OCTANOL Leaf HHB
NEO-CHLOROGENIC-ACID Fruit CRC(FNS)
NIACIN Fruit 2.3 27 USA
NICKEL Fruit 0.03 0.36 AAS
NICOTINIC-ACID Plant 2 DUKE1992A
NITROGEN Fruit 880 10000 AAS
OLEIC-ACID Fruit 510 6050 USA
OLEIC-ACID Seed 9975 WOI
P-COUMARIC-ACID Fruit 63 125 CRC(FNS)
P-HYDROXY-BENZOIC-ACID Fruit 19 108 CRC(FNS)
PALMITIC-ACID Fruit 140 1661 USA
PALMITOLEIC-ACID Fruit 10 119 USA
PANTOTHENIC-ACID Fruit 3.4 40 USA
PECTIN Fruit 5400 DUKE1992A
PEDUNCULAGIN Leaf BIS
PELARGONIC-ACID Leaf HHB
PELARGONIDIN-3-GLUCOSIDE Fruit JBH
PELARGONIDIN-3-MONOGLUCOSIDE Fruit HHB
PHOSPHORUS Fruit 185 3191 USA WOI
PHYLLOQUINONE Fruit 0.03 JN126:1183S
PHYTATE Fruit 60 230 PHY
PHYTOSTEROLS Fruit 120 1423 USA
POTASSIUM Leaf 1400 22500 AAS USA WOI
POTASSIUM-OXIDE Plant DUKE1992A
PROLINE Fruit 190 1898 USA
PROTEIN Fruit 5840 85000 CRC USA
PROTOCATECHUIC-ACID Fruit CRC(FNS)
PUFA Fruit 1860 22064 USA
QUERCETIN Leaf JLS58:130
QUERCETIN-3-BETA-GLUCURONIDE Fruit HHB
QUERCETIN-3-BETA-MONOGLUCOSIDE Fruit DUKE1992A
QUERCITRIN Leaf HHB
RIBOFLAVIN Fruit 0.7 8 CRC HHB USA
RUBIDIUM Fruit 0.2 6.5 AAS
SALICYLATES Fruit 0 JAD85:9501
SALICYLIC-ACID Fruit CRC(FNS)
SELENIUM Fruit 0.002 AAS
SERINE Fruit 230 2728 USA
SFA Fruit 200 2372 USA
SILICON Fruit 10 270 AAS
SODIUM Fruit 8 106 CRC USA
STEARIC-ACID Fruit 40 475 USA
STIGMASTEROL Fruit GAS
SULFUR Fruit 77 1270 AAS
TANNIN Leaf DUKE1992A
THIAMIN Fruit 0.2 4 WOI CRC USA
THREONINE Fruit 190 2254 USA
TRYPTOPHAN Fruit 70 830 USA
VALINE Fruit 180 2135 USA
VANILLIC-ACID Fruit 3 25 CRC(FNS)
VIT-B-6 Fruit 0.6 7 USA
WATER Fruit 870000 917000 CRC USA
ZINC9 -
Huskeryogi wrote: »I'm not just starting.
If you are referring to my post, that wasn't a specific "you" but a general "you" -- i.e., not meant as advice, but how it works.My feelings are based on 15 years of paying attention to my body and as much research as I can stand to consume.
What feelings? That CICO does not work? You have said nothing to support that claim.Nothing you have said has contradicted my assertion that we don't have the tools to accurately calculate Calories Out. So we're arguing in circles.
I agree that we don't have the tools to accurately calculate calories out. It does not matter. What I can do is track what I eat and my weight and see based on my estimate of what I'm eating what my current calories out is (an estimate). And then I can EASILY adjust calories out to be higher or lower OR adjust calories in to be higher or lower.
That's all that is necessary.
This idea that you need to know exact numbers is puzzling to me. Why would you?3 -
I disagree that what you eat doesn't matter. Sure you'll lose weight eating at a deficit, but HEALTH should be the ultimate goal. Natural is better and I'm sticking to it!
With whom do you think you are disagreeing?
I don't recall anyone saying that what you eat overall does not matter for health. Do people misread this badly or what?
Yes, to some extent just losing weight will improve health, but I don't think anyone has been arguing that nutrition should be ignored.
Not sure what "natural is better" means. How do we define what is natural?2 -
Not a believer: The only way to lose weight is to eat boring.
Ugh. If I ate boring then I'd gain all my weight back and then some. Just eat healthy whole foods, watch your macros, get the right amount of exercise. Go ahead and eat boring to kill some vanity pounds, sure. But to eat the same thing all the time or a bland diet of lean meat and steamed veggies? Kill me now.
Not a believer: Okay, and the same for clean eating (or the "true" clean eating).
Sorry, I'm going to spiral my zucchini, I'm going to make my own tomato sauce and salsa, and I'm going to mash my potatoes. I will avoid processed packaged foods or at least the ones with every unintelligible preservative and additive known to man. But, when I'm are busy and hungry, grabbing a Kind Bar keeps me from biting my co-workers in a fit of the hangries.
Not a believer: Slowing metabolism makes and keeps you fat.
Cop out excuse. I know, I used to use it. It is what got me to go from overweight to obese. I could pull of 5 lbs in less than a week in my 20s. In my forties, it took a lot more to just get a pound down in the same time. After 40, yes, things slow down. But, there are enough examples, mine included that if you manage calories in and calories out with a 300 - 500 calorie in deficiency, you will lose weight. Just be honest when tracking what you eat and the amount of calories burned during activity/exercise.
My belief: Date and Coconut bites are better than cookies and cookie dough.
Can you substitute healthy food or imposter foods for the real thing/sugary thing? Oh yeah! I saw these little date and coconut nuggets at Whole Foods (67 calories per piece) and grabbed them on a whim. I'd seen similar recipes for these bites on MFP but didn't really want to make them myself. Well, I love cookies. In fact, I'm more fond of scraping the mixing bowl and eating the raw cookie dough (NO, YOU WON'T GET SICK). So, when I popped one of these in my mouth, I was immediately reminded of all my mixing bowl heists. So yummy! As a test, I had my son, who we call Cookie Monster because he eats them all before anyone gets to them, try them. He likes them too! So, yes, there are some imposter foods that are better than the real thing.
0 -
This is how Organic eaters get a bad reputation. I get eye rolls still after 13 years eating that way because people assume I'm anti-GMO (I'm not), anti-vaxxer (pro vax), and think maple syrup can cure medical problems (I don't). I like to avoid refined sugars, antibiotics in food and particularly limit unnecessary hormones mostly. That's it.
And it's because of these people with the "can't pronounce it, don't eat it" and paranoia over GMO stuff. People think anything that sounds too much like "Science" doesn't belong in food and it's woefully misunderstood and turned into a woo-lapalooza of ignorance.15 -
It's a hot topic, clearly. But I, for one, do not think it's a good idea to put chemicals with little testing of long term effects into my body. Especially when lobbyists work hard to get them approved. I used the inability to pronounce some of the chemicals as an example, not as a rule. Plenty of natural ingredients have scientific names. I didn't write a long diatribe originally, I merely stated my pet peeve. Stuff made in a lab and created with the sole intent to make food look like candy (dyes), last forever, (preservatives), and kill bugs (pesticides) and other highly industrialized food production methods, is not for me. It bothers me that people think they are the picture of health just because they lost weight eating twinkies and don't consider the other potential risk factors associated with such foods. To me health is more than CICO, it's limiting the intake or questionable substances on a daily basis. Eat whatever you want, I just disagree.11
-
It's my unpopular opinion. That's the thread. I get flack from lots of people. I didn't call anyone out. I just stated my unpopular opinion. And I'm not anti-vaccination, nor do I think science is a bad thing. I just don't trust current regulations to provide adequate testing and protection about what goes in and on my food.8
-
I think any diet CAN work. The one that works the best is simply the one that you can stick with. I don't care if you do low carb, low fat, paleo, high protein, calorie counting, WLS, diet pills or eat just cat food. If you can stick with it long term then you will be successful.
(Also, I drink diet soda....so sue me.)8 -
It's a hot topic, clearly. But I, for one, do not think it's a good idea to put chemicals with little testing of long term effects into my body. Especially when lobbyists work hard to get them approved. I used the inability to pronounce some of the chemicals as an example, not as a rule. Plenty of natural ingredients have scientific names. I didn't write a long diatribe originally, I merely stated my pet peeve. Stuff made in a lab and created with the sole intent to make food look like candy (dyes), last forever, (preservatives), and kill bugs (pesticides) and other highly industrialized food production methods, is not for me. It bothers me that people think they are the picture of health just because they lost weight eating twinkies and don't consider the other potential risk factors associated with such foods. To me health is more than CICO, it's limiting the intake or questionable substances on a daily basis. Eat whatever you want, I just disagree.
Like what? Which chemicals do you believe need more testing?4 -
The link between sodium nitrites and cancer
CTCA
May 31, 2013
A study by the Cancer Research Center of Hawaii and the University of Southern California suggests a link between eating processed meats and cancer risk. The study followed 190,000 people, ages 45-75, for seven years and found that people who ate the most processed meats had a 67% higher risk of pancreatic cancer than those who ate the least amount.
Did you know that celery, cabbage, beets, carrots, radishes, and spinach are all naturally high in sodium nitrate? I found a University of Minnesota study when I googled to check my recollection of this that stated that the average person consumes 90% of their intake of nitrite from vegetables and 10% from processed meats.
Welp, I'm dead. I eat cabbage and carrots just about every day.
3 -
janejellyroll wrote: »The link between sodium nitrites and cancer
CTCA
May 31, 2013
A study by the Cancer Research Center of Hawaii and the University of Southern California suggests a link between eating processed meats and cancer risk. The study followed 190,000 people, ages 45-75, for seven years and found that people who ate the most processed meats had a 67% higher risk of pancreatic cancer than those who ate the least amount.
Did you know that celery, cabbage, beets, carrots, radishes, and spinach are all naturally high in sodium nitrate? I found a University of Minnesota study when I googled to check my recollection of this that stated that the average person consumes 90% of their intake of nitrite from vegetables and 10% from processed meats.
Welp, I'm dead. I eat cabbage and carrots just about every day.
I keep telling people to avoid those vitamin/mineral contaminated vegetables, but does anyone listen? How many children do we have to lose before broccoli is banned once and for all?!11 -
It's my unpopular opinion. That's the thread. I get flack from lots of people. I didn't call anyone out. I just stated my unpopular opinion. And I'm not anti-vaccination, nor do I think science is a bad thing. I just don't trust current regulations to provide adequate testing and protection about what goes in and on my food.
You pretended like something everyone agrees with (it matters what you eat) was an unpopular opinion.
As for the natural thing, that's current trendiness that means little, as you haven't defined what's natural. (I understand, though, I took "eating only natural" to a major extreme for a while and still mostly eat that way, I've just stopped pretending "natural" has a clear meaning or that it has anything much to do with health.)4 -
It's my unpopular opinion. That's the thread. I get flack from lots of people. I didn't call anyone out. I just stated my unpopular opinion. And I'm not anti-vaccination, nor do I think science is a bad thing. I just don't trust current regulations to provide adequate testing and protection about what goes in and on my food.
I wasn't referring to you. I was speaking of my own *personal* experience with eating mostly organic and people's assumptions. There IS a lot of people who are outrageously ignorant to Science in the Organic and/or "clean eating" population, though. And the regular eaters think we all subscribe to their nonsense.
My mother still doesn't understand why I buy organic milk. I'm like "PCOS mom. I have enough hormonal issues... it's worth trying to avoid the extras".
For the record, I eat regular ice cream *frequently* and indulge in Diet Cherry Pepsi, too. For me... it's the hormones thing. For you... it seems to be needless additives/dyes you avoid. Everyone is different and I wasn't implying that you're some crazed anti-vaxxing hipster.3 -
The "natural" thing, though. Lots of terribly unhealthy foods and diets are natural. I mean, swallowing tapeworms to lose weight was all the rage back in the olden days. It's natural, but definitely not healthy.2
-
janejellyroll wrote: »The link between sodium nitrites and cancer
CTCA
May 31, 2013
A study by the Cancer Research Center of Hawaii and the University of Southern California suggests a link between eating processed meats and cancer risk. The study followed 190,000 people, ages 45-75, for seven years and found that people who ate the most processed meats had a 67% higher risk of pancreatic cancer than those who ate the least amount.
Did you know that celery, cabbage, beets, carrots, radishes, and spinach are all naturally high in sodium nitrate? I found a University of Minnesota study when I googled to check my recollection of this that stated that the average person consumes 90% of their intake of nitrite from vegetables and 10% from processed meats.
Welp, I'm dead. I eat cabbage and carrots just about every day.
Surely you don't eat types of brassica oleracea and daucus carota. Many people would find those words intimidating to pronounce. Always a bad sign!5 -
Unpopular in some circles: "All-Natural", "Paleo" and "Clean Eating" are all nonsense terms.3
-
Christine_72 wrote: »-
- I unequivocally do not support the HAES movement.
I am so late to this thread but this is mine. I am so completely against this but cannot say that out loud to many people.
4 -
Yeah, people around here would be "what's the HAES movement?"3
-
The point was eating for overall health. Eating a tapeworm is not healthy. And I have already stated many natural foods have scientific names, I was over-simplifying to make a point, not vilify everything with multiple syllables.
For the record: science is good. Natural, non-injected, sustainable, organic FOOD is what I feel is best for me. I also believe in moderation. I eat ice cream too, but I'll pick the one with less dye and preservatives over the imitation-flavored, chemically created sugar-free option. I'll pick the cereal without red dye #2, blue dye # 5 and bht because I like to eat food less chemically altered. I choose organic produce not just for me, but to save the poor souls spraying the pesticides and the water sources of those living nearby. I like to support local farmers when possible - it makes sense and is more natural to me than buying from another country. Given the choice between canned peaches and an organic peach, I'll choose the latter. A Twinkie or a cookie I made myself using whole ingredients, easy choice Milk from a sick cow treated with antibiotics and injected with hormones to increase production or milk from a healthy cow? No brainer. Chickens crammed in coops is unnatural - free-range? That's for me.
Keep arguing. I knew it was unpopular. That's why I posted it in this exact thread.7 -
I'm not arguing, I'm asking for a definition of natural.
I'm into home cooking and always think that a homemade baked good is delicious and difficult to resist (well, if made well and something I personally like). I don't care for most packaged cookies or candies and haven't had a Twinkie since I was around 10, when I did not like them and wondered what the fuss was.
However, if I make a cookie of, say, flour, baking soda, butter, sugar, vanilla, a bit of salt, eggs, chocolate chips (pretty basic chocolate chip cookie recipe I took from my recipe box), it still has 200 calories per cookie and is really easy to overeat, so I don't know why it would be more "healthy" than one I'd buy at, say, Potbelly's (although the one at Potbelly's has twice as many calories, because they are huge) or some supermarket one.
Also, I'm puzzled why the cookie is "natural" -- it takes a lot of human involvement to get flour, refined sugar, butter, etc.
As for canned vs. plain peaches -- I'm not convinced that canned peaches are the reason for obesity (Al Swearingen was always serving them in Deadwood, and I don't think the obesity rate was all that high there!), but canned vs. "fresh" vs. frozen is kind of misleading when it comes to natural. After all, I could grow peaches at my house (well, not really, I don't have room, but in theory, if I didn't live in a condo in the city), and then can them. I grow tomatoes and always mean to can those, after all. And even with storebought many canned foods (tomatoes, say) have little added ingredients. (Most canned vegetables and fruits I dislike, but tomatoes and beans are exceptions.) Frozen peaches are probably more nutrient dense than out of season peaches. Canned and frozen are no less natural than being able to buy a peach in the supermarket in January, also.
I think treating animals well is good for ethical reasons, and support that, but is farming "natural"? (Typing on a computer sure isn't.)
I don't believe milk comes from sick cows, anyway, but certainly there's an argument upthread that dairy is not "natural."
The natural thing (which again I have a soft spot for myself, which is why I'm trying to be strict in how it's used) seems like mixing up what's actually healthy with words that just sound good.
Also, like I said, I used to be obsessive leaning and was interested in stuff like locavorism, but if I ate a "natural" diet as in what's fresh and available here at any particular time (even ignoring that it might not have been here 300 years ago or more), I'd have a great diet now, but a horrible diet in the winter. That we have a food industry means that we have a lot more healthful foods available year-round (and also starving is not healthful). What's naturally here in January is pretty poor when it comes to vegetables and fruit, period.7 -
The point was eating for overall health. Eating a tapeworm is not healthy. And I have already stated many natural foods have scientific names, I was over-simplifying to make a point, not vilify everything with multiple syllables.
For the record: science is good. Natural, non-injected, sustainable, organic FOOD is what I feel is best for me. I also believe in moderation. I eat ice cream too, but I'll pick the one with less dye and preservatives over the imitation-flavored, chemically created sugar-free option. I'll pick the cereal without red dye #2, blue dye # 5 and bht because I like to eat food less chemically altered. I choose organic produce not just for me, but to save the poor souls spraying the pesticides and the water sources of those living nearby. I like to support local farmers when possible - it makes sense and is more natural to me than buying from another country. Given the choice between canned peaches and an organic peach, I'll choose the latter. A Twinkie or a cookie I made myself using whole ingredients, easy choice Milk from a sick cow treated with antibiotics and injected with hormones to increase production or milk from a healthy cow? No brainer. Chickens crammed in coops is unnatural - free-range? That's for me.
Keep arguing. I knew it was unpopular. That's why I posted it in this exact thread.
You're very fortunate to be able to purchase organic, non-preserved, and local produce, as well as meat, dairy, and eggs from free-range animals. People with advantages (sometimes financial, sometimes leisure time, sometimes location) can make these choices. Others cannot, so I don't quite get the level of moral virtue dripping off your posts.
As for me, I have a grocery budget and I live in a place with very cold winters, so I think I'll continue to sometimes choose preserved food, food that comes from other places, or food produced via conventional agricultural techniques.21 -
janejellyroll wrote: »The link between sodium nitrites and cancer
CTCA
May 31, 2013
A study by the Cancer Research Center of Hawaii and the University of Southern California suggests a link between eating processed meats and cancer risk. The study followed 190,000 people, ages 45-75, for seven years and found that people who ate the most processed meats had a 67% higher risk of pancreatic cancer than those who ate the least amount.
Did you know that celery, cabbage, beets, carrots, radishes, and spinach are all naturally high in sodium nitrate? I found a University of Minnesota study when I googled to check my recollection of this that stated that the average person consumes 90% of their intake of nitrite from vegetables and 10% from processed meats.
Welp, I'm dead. I eat cabbage and carrots just about every day.
Broccoli kills, yo.
The nitrates thing is my pet peeve because my husband insists on the "all-natural" bacon...cured with celery seed extract instead of "nitrates" Can't talk any sense into him though so I spend $17 on a Costco two-pack of the stuff every time. 1
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.4K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.2K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 426 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.7K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions