Welcome to Debate Club! Please be aware that this is a space for respectful debate, and that your ideas will be challenged here. Please remember to critique the argument, not the author.
We are pleased to announce that as of March 4, 2025, an updated Rich Text Editor has been introduced in the MyFitnessPal Community. To learn more about the changes, please click here. We look forward to sharing this new feature with you!

Why are most mfp users against holistic nutrition?

1568101128

Replies

  • Posts: 14,464 Member
    The danger in using patient satisfaction as a measure of performance.

    https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2015/04/the-problem-with-satisfied-patients/390684/

    I think transparency is key to seeing improvement in health care.

    https://www.oecd.org/els/health-systems/Caring-for-Quality-in-Health-Final-report.pdf
  • Posts: 8,911 Member
    Wait, there's a voodoo marriage spammer?
  • Posts: 5,727 Member
    edited October 2017

    i would argue there is a different between acupunture and the blood type diet. Acupuncture/chiro/massage therapy are documented as being helpful for certain conditions (there are studies to support the efficacy)...the blood type diet is woo - there is no data that even say its a legit diet (in fact, several of us on the boards who if we were to eat according to diet would have severe medical issues)

    Just like Chiro is great for shoulder/back/neck pain/disfunction, less good for digestive issues.
  • This content has been removed.
  • Posts: 776 Member
    edited October 2017

    even if they end up killing themselves because they refuse to treat something that is medically treatable because of their believe in holistic medicine? (see the court cases of children dying because parents believed in holistic healing from what are treatable diseases)

    These people would be failing the "and healthy" part of my equation.

    Where I live, there is NO legal basis to force the non-institutionalized mentally ill to take their medication as prescribed. If we're not going to force people of certifiably diminished mental capacity to take medication they don't want to, then we certainly can't force people to undergo other forms of treatment, can we? The only reason those cases are of note is that the parents perpetrated something upon their children.

    Self-determination is a basic human right, even when it results in self-harm. Adult people decide to compromise their health each and every day and there's nothing any of us can do about it aside from specific, strict circumstances that certainly don't amount to you disagreeing with their ideas about what constitutes legitimate medical treatment.

    *missed a very important "NO"
  • Posts: 14,464 Member
    Heck, dentists don't routinely use general anesthetic in Canada, either. Which makes me question the dentist under scrutiny right now.

    I don't understand the comment about legally forcing the mentally ill to take their medication. Does your country require it or not?

    There's such a thing as informed consent. Every person has a right to be fully informed of the consequences of their treatment. If a woo peddler makes outrageous claims, they can be called in to account/sued/decertified.

    Hence the popularity of personal accounts and testimonials (woo peddler says "I didn't make these claims; my satisfied customers did.")

    Hence the popularity of hair growth and weight loss aids (nobody dies).
  • Posts: 1,758 Member

    Pebbles. All-natural.

    this literally made my teeth cringe, i didn't know they could do that
  • Posts: 14,464 Member
    The active ingredient in Stevia was approved by the FDA long before the whole leaf was. It's a lot easier to work out the side effects of a single ingredient.
  • Posts: 444 Member
    jgnatca wrote: »
    The active ingredient in Stevia was approved by the FDA long before the whole leaf was. It's a lot easier to work out the side effects of a single ingredient.

    Sure, very true. But the Guaraní people of South America have been using Stevia for at least a thousand years.
  • Posts: 444 Member
    edited October 2017
    jgnatca wrote: »
    Also tested and ingested by South American native tribes; tobacco, cocoa, cocaine, ebene, yopo, peyote, morning glory, and ayahuasca. To name a few.

    https://www.culturalsurvival.org/publications/cultural-survival-quarterly/hallucinogenic-plants-and-their-use-traditional-societies

    You don't ingest Morning Glory, you soak in a warm tub full of it. Totally not worth it btw.

    Edit: apparently ingestion can include absorbtion, but is usually applied to single cell organisms.
  • Posts: 6,771 Member
    edited October 2017

    FWIW my little brother's seizures have been under control with medical marijuana - the occurrence is down about 95% from his previous treatments (of which there were MANY over the past 23 years). YMMV

    I think marijuana is one of the rare situations where it was actively prevented from being used medicinally and legally (and is still completely illegal in the UK). Even now it's not being prescribed in the "traditional" way which is frustrating as hell due to the number of things it could potentially be used for. I'm sure someone knows why and I'm naturally inclined to think it's because it was one of the first drugs to be demonised and part of the "war on drugs". Same for hallucinogens that could have some interesting applications but because fo their leak and use recreationally back when it was developed there's a big nope on it too (though isn't there some research now being done? Did I make that up?).

    And then again I could be making up conspiracy theories, I'm open to that too. But I think the above examples are not the norm on the whole when people try to say effective treatments are withheld from us because x.y.z.
This discussion has been closed.