A Personal View on Exercise Cals and Underfeeding
Replies
-
Your story and mine are so alike~ I made every mistake that can be made in the weight loss world!
Bump!!!0 -
Bump0
-
This content has been removed.
-
I haven't read all the posts on here yet (but plan to as soon as I have time!) But I really wanted to ask; what's your take on intermittent fasting, Ladyhawk? Because what you were doing sounds a lot like IF, but if that's what damaged your metabolism then I am slightly concerned... Do you think it was the long period of time without food, or too little food, or a combination of both? I've been researching IF and ESE and have been trying it out for the last week or so with no ill effects, but your story does worry me... Did you gain weight WHILE eating 800-1200cals and only at night, or did something change? Sorry if you've already been asked, I will read through the thread when I get time. Thanks :flowerforyou:
ETA: So now I have read about half the posts, and it seems to me like maybe you were gaining because of the binges? Like you were keeping you body in fat storing mode because you weren't eating enough, but the reason you were gaining weight was because it was holding into the binge cals (and the day to day cals, but they wouldn't be enough to make you gain, would they?) I see a lot of people say they are gaining while eating very low calories which has never made sense to me, but now I'm think it's the times that they are eating more than their 'usual' cals which are making them gain, rather than the 800 or so calories they eat every day. Does that make sense? I mean even if you are in fat storing mode (I think the term starvation mode is greatly overused and exaggerated on this site, so I am making it clear what I am referring to) your body needs calories to survive, so it would take those 800cals to keep your body functioning. So if you stayed at a steady 800, you would either lose or maintain, not gain. There wouldn't be any spare calories for a gain. Sure your BMR would slow down and non essential functions would be shut down, but I still don't think you would gain unless you went over that 800 (or however many) and if you did, it would be minimal simply because there would be no calories to spare. I don't know, this is just what makes sense to me Any help would be appreciated
What she was doing was more along the lines of Long Term Fasting or to be specific, Long Term Underfeeding as she wasn't actually fasting. Short term (intermittent fasting) is usually classified as less than 72 hours but usually less than 24 hours of no calorie intake. Which can be determined acceptable because of the glycogen repletion going on during the feeding periods.0 -
This content has been removed.
-
I have not been on MFP for long but found in week 3 when I ate my exercise calories I didn't even lose a pound but when I ignore them or eat half, I lose weight. I would much prefer to eat them!
Also, what's your take on Saturdays off? If I was at 1200 all week then did not 'diet' on Saturdays, would this stop my metabolism from slowing as one day in 7 would not be 'dieting'? I'm not talking binging, just letting go a little and enjoying a few treats.
Many thanks for your interesting post and for other people's replies - thought provoking.0 -
Was really worth the read. This is one of the best post I have read since joining this site. Well wrote and put fourth that even I can understand it.0
-
I haven't read all the posts on here yet (but plan to as soon as I have time!) But I really wanted to ask; what's your take on intermittent fasting, Ladyhawk? Because what you were doing sounds a lot like IF, but if that's what damaged your metabolism then I am slightly concerned... Do you think it was the long period of time without food, or too little food, or a combination of both? I've been researching IF and ESE and have been trying it out for the last week or so with no ill effects, but your story does worry me... Did you gain weight WHILE eating 800-1200cals and only at night, or did something change? Sorry if you've already been asked, I will read through the thread when I get time. Thanks :flowerforyou:
ETA: So now I have read about half the posts, and it seems to me like maybe you were gaining because of the binges? Like you were keeping you body in fat storing mode because you weren't eating enough, but the reason you were gaining weight was because it was holding into the binge cals (and the day to day cals, but they wouldn't be enough to make you gain, would they?) I see a lot of people say they are gaining while eating very low calories which has never made sense to me, but now I'm think it's the times that they are eating more than their 'usual' cals which are making them gain, rather than the 800 or so calories they eat every day. Does that make sense? I mean even if you are in fat storing mode (I think the term starvation mode is greatly overused and exaggerated on this site, so I am making it clear what I am referring to) your body needs calories to survive, so it would take those 800cals to keep your body functioning. So if you stayed at a steady 800, you would either lose or maintain, not gain. There wouldn't be any spare calories for a gain. Sure your BMR would slow down and non essential functions would be shut down, but I still don't think you would gain unless you went over that 800 (or however many) and if you did, it would be minimal simply because there would be no calories to spare. I don't know, this is just what makes sense to me Any help would be appreciated
What she was doing was more along the lines of Long Term Fasting or to be specific, Long Term Underfeeding as she wasn't actually fasting. Short term (intermittent fasting) is usually classified as less than 72 hours but usually less than 24 hours of no calorie intake. Which can be determined acceptable because of the glycogen repletion going on during the feeding periods.
Ah... Thank you for clearing that up I've been intermittent fasting for no more than 24hrs at a time so I'm glad it isn't the same thing Thanks for the response!
Yes, as Banks said it was LTUF, not IF.
And yes, the reason for the gain is
1) Decreased metabolism - (Just using generic numbers for example here) If maintenance cals when healthy are 2000, and through underfeeding they get lowered to 1400, then I now HAVE to eat only 1400 to maintain. Also, it's not just RMR that may decrease - cals burned through activity level will be decreased as well, because typically when you are at that much of a deficit and burning muscle, you have less energy on a daily basis, so you tend to be much less active overall and therefore burn even fewer cals on a daily basis.
2) Binges/carb loading - If metabolism is decreased, and maintenance cals are much lower, but there are occasional binges (and especially if they are mostly simple carbs), the body has been trained to store fat easier, and will immediately shuttle that large intake to fat storage.
However, I want to point out here that there are a LOT of other issues with this other than just the weight gain. Psychological, hormonal, bone density...the list goes on and on, and I experienced (and am still going through) a lot of them. It's not enjoyable. And avoiding the binges doesn't remove all of the risks/drawbacks.0 -
I have not been on MFP for long but found in week 3 when I ate my exercise calories I didn't even lose a pound but when I ignore them or eat half, I lose weight. I would much prefer to eat them!
Also, what's your take on Saturdays off? If I was at 1200 all week then did not 'diet' on Saturdays, would this stop my metabolism from slowing as one day in 7 would not be 'dieting'? I'm not talking binging, just letting go a little and enjoying a few treats.
Many thanks for your interesting post and for other people's replies - thought provoking.
If you've been at too large of a deficit (either from dieting or simple underfeeding) for a significant period, it is common and expected to see no loss or even a gain when you begin eating sufficient calories again. However, this is usually temporary and within a few weeks the loss will usually start again.
Having a "free" or "spike" day is fine, IMO, and usually helpful (if it's not taken too far). However, I couldn't tell you how it would affect you without a lot more specific info about your situation:
Height, weight, age, activity level (for work and home)
Current weight, goal weight
Access to diary
Your exercise program (ie type, frequency, length, intensity)
The reason being that if your deficit is too large, then one day of refeeding won't necessarily undo all the damage - or, conversely, if your deficit is too conservative, then a day of refeeding can conceivably cause no loss/gain. So we'd need to figure out if 1200 is the appropriate deficit for you to begin with.0 -
Was really worth the read. This is one of the best post I have read since joining this site. Well wrote and put fourth that even I can understand it.
Thank you! Glad you liked it.0 -
I have not been on MFP for long but found in week 3 when I ate my exercise calories I didn't even lose a pound but when I ignore them or eat half, I lose weight. I would much prefer to eat them!
Also, what's your take on Saturdays off? If I was at 1200 all week then did not 'diet' on Saturdays, would this stop my metabolism from slowing as one day in 7 would not be 'dieting'? I'm not talking binging, just letting go a little and enjoying a few treats.
Many thanks for your interesting post and for other people's replies - thought provoking.
this usually means you have your calorie deficit wrong, or there is something else going on (medical or other) but usually it's just either an incorrect calorie deficit, or one of the numbers is incorrect (or you aren't calculating your calories right). MFP's a great tool, but it's not intuitive, by that I mean, you have to put in the right numbers to receive the right results.0 -
This content has been removed.
-
bump for later0
-
Great info! Thank you!0
-
I haven't read all the posts on here yet (but plan to as soon as I have time!) But I really wanted to ask; what's your take on intermittent fasting, Ladyhawk? Because what you were doing sounds a lot like IF, but if that's what damaged your metabolism then I am slightly concerned... Do you think it was the long period of time without food, or too little food, or a combination of both? I've been researching IF and ESE and have been trying it out for the last week or so with no ill effects, but your story does worry me... Did you gain weight WHILE eating 800-1200cals and only at night, or did something change? Sorry if you've already been asked, I will read through the thread when I get time. Thanks :flowerforyou:
ETA: So now I have read about half the posts, and it seems to me like maybe you were gaining because of the binges? Like you were keeping you body in fat storing mode because you weren't eating enough, but the reason you were gaining weight was because it was holding into the binge cals (and the day to day cals, but they wouldn't be enough to make you gain, would they?) I see a lot of people say they are gaining while eating very low calories which has never made sense to me, but now I'm think it's the times that they are eating more than their 'usual' cals which are making them gain, rather than the 800 or so calories they eat every day. Does that make sense? I mean even if you are in fat storing mode (I think the term starvation mode is greatly overused and exaggerated on this site, so I am making it clear what I am referring to) your body needs calories to survive, so it would take those 800cals to keep your body functioning. So if you stayed at a steady 800, you would either lose or maintain, not gain. There wouldn't be any spare calories for a gain. Sure your BMR would slow down and non essential functions would be shut down, but I still don't think you would gain unless you went over that 800 (or however many) and if you did, it would be minimal simply because there would be no calories to spare. I don't know, this is just what makes sense to me Any help would be appreciated
What she was doing was more along the lines of Long Term Fasting or to be specific, Long Term Underfeeding as she wasn't actually fasting. Short term (intermittent fasting) is usually classified as less than 72 hours but usually less than 24 hours of no calorie intake. Which can be determined acceptable because of the glycogen repletion going on during the feeding periods.
Ah... Thank you for clearing that up I've been intermittent fasting for no more than 24hrs at a time so I'm glad it isn't the same thing Thanks for the response!
Yes, as Banks said it was LTUF, not IF.
And yes, the reason for the gain is
1) Decreased metabolism - (Just using generic numbers for example here) If maintenance cals when healthy are 2000, and through underfeeding they get lowered to 1400, then I now HAVE to eat only 1400 to maintain. Also, it's not just RMR that may decrease - cals burned through activity level will be decreased as well, because typically when you are at that much of a deficit and burning muscle, you have less energy on a daily basis, so you tend to be much less active overall and therefore burn even fewer cals on a daily basis.
2) Binges/carb loading - If metabolism is decreased, and maintenance cals are much lower, but there are occasional binges (and especially if they are mostly simple carbs), the body has been trained to store fat easier, and will immediately shuttle that large intake to fat storage.
However, I want to point out here that there are a LOT of other issues with this other than just the weight gain. Psychological, hormonal, bone density...the list goes on and on, and I experienced (and am still going through) a lot of them. It's not enjoyable. And avoiding the binges doesn't remove all of the risks/drawbacks.
How many carbs would be considered carb loading? What were you eating to be carb loading?
I wouldn't say there's a specific number (but likely a significant amount more than normal), but probably more about the source of the carbs. And again, we're not talking about intentional carb loading (as an athlete does before a big competition/race.) The majority of my binges (which were not all that frequent, or massive binges) would be with something like homemade cookies, cereal, or crackers.0 -
Thanks so much, lovely read!! It taught me a lot. ( by the way..love your username..My fave movie!!)0
-
Thanks!:flowerforyou:
Bumpin to read later0 -
This content has been removed.
-
Big Bump-a-roo0
-
Big Bump-a-roo
Bumpalicious0 -
This was interesting but I have been bouncing back fourth with gaining and losing the same4 pounds since May. I spin three days a week and work out five days a week. I think sometimes exercise may be over caclulated so I eat most but not all. I wish i knew what my balance is to get out of the cycle0
-
This was interesting but I have been bouncing back fourth with gaining and losing the same4 pounds since May. I spin three days a week and work out five days a week. I think sometimes exercise may be over caclulated so I eat most but not all. I wish i knew what my balance is to get out of the cycle
Congrats on your progress - you've done fantastic!
Have you adjusted your goals as you've lost weight? You'll need a lower loss per week goal as you get leaner and have less fat stores to draw from.
You do still have a decent amount to lose, so as long as you're eating around 50-75% of them, you should be ok. Ideally, using an HRM with a chest strap will give you the most accurate account - but if you don't have one and can't get one, for the "standard" exercises like spinning, running, walking, etc, MFP should be fairly close because those are repetitive movements where calories burned don't vary a lot.
But making sure your settings are appropriate for where you're at is the first step, cause if those are wrong, everything else will be too. Also, make sure you're weighing/measuring food as that can throw a big inaccuracy in.
Another thing to consider is going on maintenance for a week or two. Being in a constant deficit for a long period is very stressful for the body, and it often just plain needs a break. Giving it a chance to re-regulate hormones and adjust to the changes that 93 lbs of fat loss brings can be very helpful.0 -
Bump0
-
and... bump0
-
and... bump
Well, if you insist... :happy:0 -
Ah, why not...0
-
thank you, BUMP0
-
bump0
-
Wow, I just came across your post and I was blown away at how similar our stories are. I am going to think long and hard about everything you just wrote. Thank you so much for taking the time to post it.0
-
i just wanted to thank you for taking the time to write all of this. i have been in a debate (with myself) doing research and studying what to do about calorie intake and the like. it has been a real source of frustration for me. this week, i increased my calories, and i'm eating most (if not all) of my exercise calories. it is threads such as this one that provide REAL answers with concrete real-world experiences. i realize that everyone is different, but this information was very helpful and informative.0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.7K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.3K Health and Weight Loss
- 176K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.6K Fitness and Exercise
- 431 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.6K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8.1K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.4K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.8K MyFitnessPal Information
- 23 News and Announcements
- 1.2K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions