Welcome to Debate Club! Please be aware that this is a space for respectful debate, and that your ideas will be challenged here. Please remember to critique the argument, not the author.

Fast food and obesity

13468911

Replies

  • The_Enginerd
    The_Enginerd Posts: 3,982 Member
    AnnPT77 wrote: »
    The bowls/plates on average were smaller. (I recently replaced some standard salad/cereal/soup bowls I bought back in the 70s/80s: The smallest ones I could find (“dessert bowls”) were at least 1/3 larger than the ones they replaced (unless I wanted to buy custard cups, which, by the way, are 25% larger in the smallest-size current incarnation compared to the earlier ones).
    I have a dip bowl I use for my ice cream because any bowl they sell now looks downright empty and sad with one real serving of ice cream in it. I had the darnedest time finding cereal bowls that weren't made for holding 1/2 a box of cereal either.
  • stevencloser
    stevencloser Posts: 8,911 Member
    lemurcat12 wrote: »
    The problem is that you are right CI/CO but unfortunately we live in a world where everything has been supersized!

    No they haven't, as shown by the fact that you have to supersize the McD's meal for it to be supersized. You can still get small fries and a regular burger. (I almost never eat that kind of fast food, but I stopped at Culvers this summer and got a burger and small fries for a lunch not much more than my normal lunch calories -- around 500 or so. This was after 5 hours biking hills, so I felt I probably could have justified more, actually.)
    The least calorific main meal would be six chicken nuggets with no dip (boo!), a garden side salad and a bottle of water or a medium black coffee, which would result in a man consuming 10.4% of his daily intake and a woman chowing down 13% of her recommended daily average. For me, I can think of far more foods that would fill me up and be less calorie dense which means that I am not going to go hungry. chicken nuggets and a garden salad from Maccy D's - who does it!!

    Why would you want to limit lunch or dinner to 13% of your recommended intake? My goal is around 1600-1700, and I usually have 500+ calories for at least one of those, maybe both depending on breakfast and whether I snack (I often don't snack at all, so meals can be larger or I have some kind of dessert after dinner). And my maintenance is a lot more than 1600-1700 -- doing that I can have a dinner out over the weekend for a lot more if I want. (I wouldn't waste them at McD's or KFC, but again, personal preference.)

    I'm also confused why one of on average 2-3 meals a person has should be less than 13% of your intake.
  • auddii
    auddii Posts: 15,357 Member
    AnnPT77 wrote: »
    The bowls/plates on average were smaller. (I recently replaced some standard salad/cereal/soup bowls I bought back in the 70s/80s: The smallest ones I could find (“dessert bowls”) were at least 1/3 larger than the ones they replaced (unless I wanted to buy custard cups, which, by the way, are 25% larger in the smallest-size current incarnation compared to the earlier ones).
    I have a dip bowl I use for my ice cream because any bowl they sell now looks downright empty and sad with one real serving of ice cream in it. I had the darnedest time finding cereal bowls that weren't made for holding 1/2 a box of cereal either.

    We just registered for our wedding earlier this year. We went to a ton of stores; for me the deciding factor was finding a cereal bowl that wasn't ridiculous and the set had a "snack" bowl that would work for gelato and ice cream.
  • Dnarules
    Dnarules Posts: 2,081 Member
    gothchiq wrote: »
    Dnarules wrote: »
    gothchiq wrote: »
    What kind of crappy salad would I make that would rival a big mac fries and coke??? One with a pound of bacon?

    I could make a totally awesome salad that could come close to those calories, and it wouldn't have a pound of bacon. I guess it depends on your idea of what crappy means.

    Suddenly I'm interested! If it's gonna be *that* tasty, I might make the indulgence and use your salad recipe on an intense gym day. So a certain amount of bacon, some kind of cheese, and... ? *gets out note pad*

    Houmous, edamame beans....

    Exactly. Avocado as well (for me).
  • Dnarules
    Dnarules Posts: 2,081 Member
    gothchiq wrote: »
    Dnarules wrote: »
    gothchiq wrote: »
    What kind of crappy salad would I make that would rival a big mac fries and coke??? One with a pound of bacon?

    I could make a totally awesome salad that could come close to those calories, and it wouldn't have a pound of bacon. I guess it depends on your idea of what crappy means.

    Suddenly I'm interested! If it's gonna be *that* tasty, I might make the indulgence and use your salad recipe on an intense gym day. So a certain amount of bacon, some kind of cheese, and... ? *gets out note pad*

    LOL. Again, it comes down to your definition of crappy. One of my favorite salads at Wendy's has very little bacon (I believe it does have some). I get it with the homestyle chicken breast and use the barbecue ranch dressing. If you get a full one, it is pretty dang caloric, but also very tasty to me. I've also made some salads at Ruby Tuesday's that are pretty caloric. My salads may be crappy to you, but they are tasty to me, even with no bacon.
  • Aaron_K123
    Aaron_K123 Posts: 7,122 Member
    edited September 2016
    The problem is that you are right CI/CO but unfortunately we live in a world where everything has been supersized! A McDonalds Meal, or KFC for that matter comes in at a lot of calories. The recommended daily average calorie intake for men is 2,500, and for women it's 2,000. This means if I waltz into a McD's for lunch and order a Chicken Legend with medium fries and a milkshake, A man would be consuming 51.4% of his recommended daily calories. For a me, a woman, the percentage would rise to 64.25%. Which means it don't leave a lot for breakfast and dinner.

    The least calorific main meal would be six chicken nuggets with no dip (boo!), a garden side salad and a bottle of water or a medium black coffee, which would result in a man consuming 10.4% of his daily intake and a woman chowing down 13% of her recommended daily average. For me, I can think of far more foods that would fill me up and be less calorie dense which means that I am not going to go hungry. chicken nuggets and a garden salad from Maccy D's - who does it!!

    yeah but entering mcdonalds and ordering food from the menu is a choice. If you are trying to argue that it is not a choice but the only option for the empoverished then what exactly is your suggested solution? I mean grocery shopping and cooking you can make healthy meals for less money so its not just about money. If it is about time and money then are you suggesting some sort of goverment subsidization of home cooked style meals provided in a convinience sort of way?

    I don't fault McDonalds for existing..McDonald's exists because a heck of a lot of people choose to go eat there.

    I avoid McDonalds...but mostly because I think their food actually tastes pretty crap. I love me some Panda Express or Taco bell though and I continue to eat it even if I am losing weight (my diary is open, wouldn't take long to find examples of that). Its a choice and I for one am for having choices.

    If McDonalds was literally the only way to acquire food then okay perhaps we need to take a hard look at it and what it offers...but it isn't so we don't.
  • ouryve
    ouryve Posts: 572 Member
    Packerjohn wrote: »
    Packerjohn wrote: »
    selina884 wrote: »
    it's a lack of education if anything.

    I'm sorry, but does anyone really think eating a couple Big Macs, giant order of fries and a giant Coke at lunch is good for them?

    'good' or not is a different matter, but eating mcdonalds doesn't make someone obese... eating too many calories does.


    Understand, that was why my example was of a 1500 calorie + lunch. A Big Mac, side salad (light on dressing) and Diet Coke not so bad. It's how much one eats. And I would be pretty sure most people know the 2 Big Mac lunch in my example is too much.

    so a long distance cyclist or runner who has burned a couple of thousand calories cant use those calories on McDonalds as a refuel...? 1500 cal lunch is not 'too much' for everyone.

    Late to the thread, but it's definitely too much for people who never walk any further than from their sofa to their car.
  • Aaron_K123
    Aaron_K123 Posts: 7,122 Member
    ouryve wrote: »
    Packerjohn wrote: »
    Packerjohn wrote: »
    selina884 wrote: »
    it's a lack of education if anything.

    I'm sorry, but does anyone really think eating a couple Big Macs, giant order of fries and a giant Coke at lunch is good for them?

    'good' or not is a different matter, but eating mcdonalds doesn't make someone obese... eating too many calories does.


    Understand, that was why my example was of a 1500 calorie + lunch. A Big Mac, side salad (light on dressing) and Diet Coke not so bad. It's how much one eats. And I would be pretty sure most people know the 2 Big Mac lunch in my example is too much.

    so a long distance cyclist or runner who has burned a couple of thousand calories cant use those calories on McDonalds as a refuel...? 1500 cal lunch is not 'too much' for everyone.

    Late to the thread, but it's definitely too much for people who never walk any further than from their sofa to their car.

    Then they should order less off the menu, save some money.
  • ouryve
    ouryve Posts: 572 Member
    This article might be interesting in light of this discussion...http://www.mass.gov/eohhs/docs/dmr/nutrition-portion-distortion.pdf. We choose what we eat, but our culture has also done a major shift in the distortion of sizes of any food. Is fast food to blame? I love fast food, but have had to drastically cut back, not necessarily because of the calorie counts, but because of the sodium count. Fast food can be nutritious, but again, it comes down to what and how much we choose to eat. Just my two cents, anyway.

    That article is a load of nonsense. 20 years ago, single serving bottles of pop were 500ml, here, just like today. And the basil with the meatballs magically grew.

    It's like the published nonsense suggesting that a single portion of ready meal cottage pie used to be 200g. Nope. I remember it being 300g in the 80s/90s and we had it with chips (fries) on the side and a load of baked beans.These days, the 400g cottage pie is more likely to be served with just the beans (or even veg, actual veg!)
  • ouryve
    ouryve Posts: 572 Member
    auddii wrote: »
    Hm, considering the hamburger is German in origin, that surprises me. And honestly, I'd think the more common associate is for uniquely American items, like apple pie.

    Wiki tells me the national food in the US includes hamburgers, hot dogs, apple pie, fried chicken, buffalo wings, and mac and cheese.

    Those 9 year olds know what's up.

    Although I was surprised to see mac and cheese on pretty much every menu I saw in Scotland. I guess it's an easy vegetarian option?

    My youngest doesn't have school dinners, but for the brief period my oldest did, the veggie options on the 4 week menu included 5 days of macaroni cheese and as many of "baked potato with [baked] beans or cheese"

    In England, the default pub lunch veggie option is "vegetarian lasagna" with goat's cheese and beetroot tart or mushroom risotto appearing on the more sophisticated menus.
  • gothchiq
    gothchiq Posts: 4,590 Member
    OK sorry.... crappy salads. Truly crappy to me and probably many others, and very fatty..... Mom used to do this. Plain mayonnaise on top and lots of it. Not even miracle whip, plain mayo.

    *shudders*
  • ouryve
    ouryve Posts: 572 Member
    Karb_Kween wrote: »
    One time I had a chicken sandwich over doused with mayo and gained 5 lbs over night

    The struggle is real folks

    Not every item of FF is created equal as the last, and also the maker of your food might click mayo pump more than once

    You don't take it back because there's too much mayo do you?

    No you eat it,

    As the mayo, tomato and meat juice dribbles over the side of your bun, falling onto the food wrapper you're holding it over

    You get a fry and dip it into the mayo, tomato juice cocktail

    You're in fat, salt and sugar Heaven

    Caloric Hell

    if the mayo weighed 5lb, I'm surprised you could even eat it.
  • Sloth2016
    Sloth2016 Posts: 838 Member
    edited September 2016
    auddii wrote: »
    Hm, considering the hamburger is German in origin, that surprises me. And honestly, I'd think the more common associate is for uniquely American items, like apple pie.

    Wiki tells me the national food in the US includes hamburgers, hot dogs, apple pie, fried chicken, buffalo wings, and mac and cheese.

    Those 9 year olds know what's up.

    Although I was surprised to see mac and cheese on pretty much every menu I saw in Scotland. I guess it's an easy vegetarian option?

    I always thought it was sushi. Cuz sushi. ;)
  • selina884
    selina884 Posts: 826 Member
    edited September 2016
    Gamliela wrote: »
    The series Superfat to Superskinny was one. At least I think thats what it was called.
    They took obese UK people over to the US and had them see Americans homhad been obese for years, were undergoing surgery and all the problems like, wheelchairs, special medical teams and beds for the obese etc.
    It did seem to help th UK people get the motivation to lose weight before it got any worse.

    The UK doesn't have any morbidly obese people of their own they could've used?

    not to the extreme levels of what you have.
    However we have an "Obesity crisis" (still incomparable to you) and the country is trying to do something about it which is commendable.

    Over the last 10 years, the country started with tackling schools to ensure nutritious meals are provided to children and Jamie Oliver is to salute for this. He started the trend.

    Just today it was announced on the radio that all of the food retail businesses have a responsibility to reduce salt/sugar by 20% over the next 5 years. Good or bad, I don't know but it's an attempt to move forward.

    ..and there might be more but I am not versed on everything.

    Also, we DONT use Americans as an example to motivate ourselves. We do have a growing concern here and there are several programs on TV that bring awareness to that using brits as an example.

    However big and successful documentaries from the states do get aired here for educational/awareness.
    There's certain things where the UK cannot compare itself to America and I will not deny it!
  • selina884
    selina884 Posts: 826 Member
    selina884 wrote: »
    Packerjohn wrote: »
    Packerjohn wrote: »
    selina884 wrote: »
    it's a lack of education if anything.

    I'm sorry, but does anyone really think eating a couple Big Macs, giant order of fries and a giant Coke at lunch is good for them?

    'good' or not is a different matter, but eating mcdonalds doesn't make someone obese... eating too many calories does.


    Understand, that was why my example was of a 1500 calorie + lunch. A Big Mac side salad (light on dressing) and Diet Coke not so bad. It's how much one eats. And I would be pretty sure most people know the 2 Big Mac lunch in my example is too much.

    Why diet coke as opposed to normal coke?

    You are kidding - sugar is a killer

    You'll find that the chemicals in diet coke are generally more harmful than sugar which comes from a natural plant.
  • Alyssa_Is_LosingIt
    Alyssa_Is_LosingIt Posts: 4,696 Member
    selina884 wrote: »
    selina884 wrote: »
    Packerjohn wrote: »
    Packerjohn wrote: »
    selina884 wrote: »
    it's a lack of education if anything.

    I'm sorry, but does anyone really think eating a couple Big Macs, giant order of fries and a giant Coke at lunch is good for them?

    'good' or not is a different matter, but eating mcdonalds doesn't make someone obese... eating too many calories does.


    Understand, that was why my example was of a 1500 calorie + lunch. A Big Mac side salad (light on dressing) and Diet Coke not so bad. It's how much one eats. And I would be pretty sure most people know the 2 Big Mac lunch in my example is too much.

    Why diet coke as opposed to normal coke?

    You are kidding - sugar is a killer

    You'll find that the chemicals in diet coke are generally more harmful than sugar which comes from a natural plant.

    Really? How so?
  • selina884
    selina884 Posts: 826 Member
    Carlos_421 wrote: »
    selina884 wrote: »
    Gamliela wrote: »
    The series Superfat to Superskinny was one. At least I think thats what it was called.
    They took obese UK people over to the US and had them see Americans homhad been obese for years, were undergoing surgery and all the problems like, wheelchairs, special medical teams and beds for the obese etc.
    It did seem to help th UK people get the motivation to lose weight before it got any worse.

    The UK doesn't have any morbidly obese people of their own they could've used?

    not to the extreme levels of what you have.
    However we have an "Obesity crisis" (still incomparable to you) and the country is trying to do something about it which is commendable.

    Over the last 10 years, the country started with tackling schools to ensure nutritious meals are provided to children and Jamie Oliver is to salute for this. He started the trend.

    Just today it was announced on the radio that all of the food retail businesses have a responsibility to reduce salt/sugar by 20% over the next 5 years. Good or bad, I don't know but it's an attempt to move forward.

    ..and there might be more but I am not versed on everything.

    Also, we DONT use Americans as an example to motivate ourselves. We do have a growing concern here and there are several programs on TV that bring awareness to that using brits as an example.

    However big and successful documentaries from the states do get aired here for educational/awareness.
    There's certain things where the UK cannot compare itself to America and I will not deny it!

    The ignorance and offensiveness of the bolded is just astounding.

    Yes, our numbers are worse but they are in no way incomparable. America has an obesity problem just like most of the industrialized world but we're not a population made up exclusively of obese slobs like you continue to insinuate.

    You're assuming what I am insinuating by picking up a few words and throwing them out of context.

    Your problem.




  • Gamliela
    Gamliela Posts: 2,468 Member
    I've gone on holiday and travelled in the UK a few times. I didn't see any difference in the size of people compared to when I've been back to the US.

    I hink, looking a the graph of obesity in the countries listed that unless we compare the top to the lowest, its not really that impressive of a difference. I mean obesity is a problem to those who suffer from it period, and it happens world wide, even in Japan.

    Side note, I think the wikipedia list of obeseity in nations includes the category 'oceana' or something like that.

    It tops the list, evidently Island people have the highest rate of obesity, knocking the US on the present graph down a notch, for those who care about graphs and things.
This discussion has been closed.