Welcome to Debate Club! Please be aware that this is a space for respectful debate, and that your ideas will be challenged here. Please remember to critique the argument, not the author.
What are your unpopular opinions about health / fitness?
Replies
-
Don't hate me but the whole "you can be obese and healthy" mindset is absurd to me. Define healthy. You mean to tell me your joints don't ever hurt? You aren't at risk for more diseases than if you were of a normal weight? Be honest with yourself! Let's stop sugar coating (no pun intended) this by calling it "body positivity."
Totally agree with this. I mean, there's a difference between being "chubby" or "curvy" or whatever euphemism is in style, and being OBESE. Obesity is NOT a healthy way to be. And I say this as a person who IS obese. I am also on high blood pressure meds, high cholesterol meds, and I just started Metformin. I think that once some of the "body positivity" crusaders age, and their bodies start punishing them for not taking better care in their youth, their attitudes will change. (Mine sure as hell did once I hit 40.)3 -
Don't hate me but the whole "you can be obese and healthy" mindset is absurd to me. Define healthy. You mean to tell me your joints don't ever hurt? You aren't at risk for more diseases than if you were of a normal weight? Be honest with yourself! Let's stop sugar coating (no pun intended) this by calling it "body positivity."
Totally agree with this. I mean, there's a difference between being "chubby" or "curvy" or whatever euphemism is in style, and being OBESE. Obesity is NOT a healthy way to be. And I say this as a person who IS obese. I am also on high blood pressure meds, high cholesterol meds, and I just started Metformin. I think that once some of the "body positivity" crusaders age, and their bodies start punishing them for not taking better care in their youth, their attitudes will change. (Mine sure as hell did once I hit 40.)
Reentering my profile photo into evidence.3 -
Don't hate me but the whole "you can be obese and healthy" mindset is absurd to me. Define healthy. You mean to tell me your joints don't ever hurt? You aren't at risk for more diseases than if you were of a normal weight? Be honest with yourself! Let's stop sugar coating (no pun intended) this by calling it "body positivity."
I have found that where honesty is in conflict with feelings, honesty becomes secondary, and "sugar coating" and enabling carry the day. Truth shaming is a real thing in these forums, lol.9 -
Bry_Lander wrote: »Don't hate me but the whole "you can be obese and healthy" mindset is absurd to me. Define healthy. You mean to tell me your joints don't ever hurt? You aren't at risk for more diseases than if you were of a normal weight? Be honest with yourself! Let's stop sugar coating (no pun intended) this by calling it "body positivity."
I have found that where honesty is in conflict with feelings, honesty becomes secondary, and "sugar coating" and enabling carry the day. Truth shaming is a real thing in these forums, lol.
It isn't one or the other. There can very easily be a balance. I've read a lot of your posts and, while they may be the truth, they lack compassion. You'd be well served to moderate your replies.
26 -
Tacklewasher wrote: »Bry_Lander wrote: »Don't hate me but the whole "you can be obese and healthy" mindset is absurd to me. Define healthy. You mean to tell me your joints don't ever hurt? You aren't at risk for more diseases than if you were of a normal weight? Be honest with yourself! Let's stop sugar coating (no pun intended) this by calling it "body positivity."
I have found that where honesty is in conflict with feelings, honesty becomes secondary, and "sugar coating" and enabling carry the day. Truth shaming is a real thing in these forums, lol.
It isn't one or the other. There can very easily be a balance. I've read a lot of your posts and, while they may be the truth, they lack compassion. You'd be well served to moderate your replies.
There is certainly something to be said for choice of words influencing how it comes across, thereby either helping or hindering communication.7 -
Tacklewasher wrote: »Bry_Lander wrote: »Don't hate me but the whole "you can be obese and healthy" mindset is absurd to me. Define healthy. You mean to tell me your joints don't ever hurt? You aren't at risk for more diseases than if you were of a normal weight? Be honest with yourself! Let's stop sugar coating (no pun intended) this by calling it "body positivity."
I have found that where honesty is in conflict with feelings, honesty becomes secondary, and "sugar coating" and enabling carry the day. Truth shaming is a real thing in these forums, lol.
It isn't one or the other. There can very easily be a balance. I've read a lot of your posts and, while they may be the truth, they lack compassion. You'd be well served to moderate your replies.
It is an interesting dynamic to participate on certain message boards that have topics like "What are your unpopular opinions about health / fitness?", "All of my friends are getting bigger...", "Who's NOT Overweight", etc., where it is evident that there will be a more real/candid dialogue, with the perspective that people who share their unpopular opinions should be criticized for lacking compassion and are encouraged to "moderate themselves".9 -
SiegfriedXXL wrote: »joemac1988 wrote: »Another unpopular opinion I have is that fat-shaming has its place as long as the person doesn't have a legitimate eating disorder or medical problem. Hey, I was obese and if it wasn't for being fat-shamed I'd be even bigger today instead of 195lbs and 10%bf with an addiction to nutrition and working out. So don't say I haven't walked in their shoes. The problem I have with it is your obesity is affecting EVERYONE. Medical costs, health insurance costs, fast food on every corner from demand, you flowing onto my lap on the plane, etc, etc, etc.
Yawn....another former fatty who's turned the self hate they had for themselves while obese into a judgmental attitude for those still struggling.
Look, you don't ever have the right to tell someone they're too fat. YOUR obesity ALSO affected EVERYONE while you were obese and if you got a kick in the pants and fixed it, good on ya. However, a kick in the pants doesn't work for everyone and, again, you aren't the one who gets to make that choice for other people.
For me, I don't approve of obesity, my own, or anyone else's. All the problems you listed are legitimate consequences of obesity. I would never try to shame someone into losing weight, however, and the person who tried to do so to me would find out just how mistaken they were in the assumption that they had any right to do so.
Ok, I can accept this. I should have put it in the converse. What I should have said is the fat acceptance movement is BS. And is somewhat overlaps what I said in the sense of the family and friends that are enablers when they should be giving you tough love but supporting you.1 -
Bry_Lander wrote: »joemac1988 wrote: »Another unpopular opinion I have is that fat-shaming has its place as long as the person doesn't have a legitimate eating disorder or medical problem. Hey, I was obese and if it wasn't for being fat-shamed I'd be even bigger today instead of 195lbs and 10%bf with an addiction to nutrition and working out. So don't say I haven't walked in their shoes. The problem I have with it is your obesity is affecting EVERYONE. Medical costs, health insurance costs, fast food on every corner from demand, you flowing onto my lap on the plane, etc, etc, etc.
I remember a world where everyone wasn't so damned fragile, where people weren't obsessed with political correctness, and (gasp) people communicated honestly. Tactful, honest, constructive criticism has a place in society and redacting honesty from communication to spare feelings can (and has) enable(d) people to comfortably engage in destructive behavior and suffer real damage that is far beyond anything that words can inflict upon them.
Sometimes the best helping hand is a swift kick in the *kitten*5 -
Bry_Lander wrote: »Don't hate me but the whole "you can be obese and healthy" mindset is absurd to me. Define healthy. You mean to tell me your joints don't ever hurt? You aren't at risk for more diseases than if you were of a normal weight? Be honest with yourself! Let's stop sugar coating (no pun intended) this by calling it "body positivity."
I have found that where honesty is in conflict with feelings, honesty becomes secondary, and "sugar coating" and enabling carry the day. Truth shaming is a real thing in these forums, lol.
I think you can be honest and not harsh...but that being said who the kitten cares what some stranger on the internet says anyway.
and that goes both ways...
I have been accused of being harsh and mean on these forums and I don't give a flying kitten what these people say...I am not being being...I am not being harsh....but I am being honest...
So no it doesn't become secondary unless you care what others say/think...and if you care you probably aren't being harsh in the first place....hehe5 -
Bry_Lander wrote: »Don't hate me but the whole "you can be obese and healthy" mindset is absurd to me. Define healthy. You mean to tell me your joints don't ever hurt? You aren't at risk for more diseases than if you were of a normal weight? Be honest with yourself! Let's stop sugar coating (no pun intended) this by calling it "body positivity."
I have found that where honesty is in conflict with feelings, honesty becomes secondary, and "sugar coating" and enabling carry the day. Truth shaming is a real thing in these forums, lol.
Oh lordy if I had a dollar for every time someone labelled criticism as not being able to handle truth. I'd be a very rich lady indeed.8 -
I'm all for the truth, but I'm also all for compassion and not attacking someone with the facts directly in a way that feels like I'm attacking them personally. I'm not perfect, but I try to pick my words to the best of my ability not to be hurtful. The way I found well-received without overtly sugar coating or attacking someone is to try and make my posts factual and informative rather than accusatory. This puts the person in a position to self-reflect and think about what is being said instead of feeling hurt and immediately putting up defences. Kindness goes a long way, even if it's masquerading as dry facts. Another way I use is to simply share my experience with something without words of judgement directed at anyone.15
-
amusedmonkey wrote: »I'm all for the truth, but I'm also all for compassion and not attacking someone with the facts directly in a way that feels like I'm attacking them personally. I'm not perfect, but I try to pick my words to the best of my ability not to be hurtful. The way I found well-received without overtly sugar coating or attacking someone is to try and make my posts factual and informative rather than accusatory. This puts the person in a position to self-reflect and think about what is being said instead of feeling hurt and immediately putting up defences. Kindness goes a long way, even if it's masquerading as dry facts. Another way I use is to simply share my experience with something without words of judgement directed at anyone.
Precisely. Unvarnished direct criticism may be honest, and it might be fun (for someone(s)), but it's a heckuva poor and low-percentage persuasion strategy.
That's completely leaving out any consideration of whether it's desirable to be, y'know, kind to people.
9 -
Bry_Lander wrote: »Don't hate me but the whole "you can be obese and healthy" mindset is absurd to me. Define healthy. You mean to tell me your joints don't ever hurt? You aren't at risk for more diseases than if you were of a normal weight? Be honest with yourself! Let's stop sugar coating (no pun intended) this by calling it "body positivity."
I have found that where honesty is in conflict with feelings, honesty becomes secondary, and "sugar coating" and enabling carry the day. Truth shaming is a real thing in these forums, lol.
This suggests that you think some posts here are doing what Enjch5 is talking about, claiming that it is perfectly healthy to be obese (by which I mean to have body fat at obese levels, not just BMI). Curious to what posts you are referring.
In particular, I am not sure who Enjcg5 thinks would say that one can be healthy with weight resulting in "high blood pressure meds, high cholesterol meds, and...Metformin" or who would claim that obesity is not a health risk factor. Seems like a bit of a strawman to me.
On the other hand, when I was obese, I found it helpful to focus on making healthy changes rather than losing weight (although of course I wanted to and planned to lose weight too). For me, because I had a bit of a fear that I could not lose weight (which is dumb, but people have weird mental issues about weight loss), it was FAR easier to just take control of what I could: eating a healthy and calorie appropriate (i.e., deficit) diet, working up to doing more physically and getting back into shape. I think that was an excellent approach, for me, and part of that was deciding that I would be as healthy as possible, no matter what my weight did.
(And of course I lost weight.)
If you want to say that's "sugar coating" and enabling, whatever, worked for me.5 -
Bry_Lander wrote: »Don't hate me but the whole "you can be obese and healthy" mindset is absurd to me. Define healthy. You mean to tell me your joints don't ever hurt? You aren't at risk for more diseases than if you were of a normal weight? Be honest with yourself! Let's stop sugar coating (no pun intended) this by calling it "body positivity."
I have found that where honesty is in conflict with feelings, honesty becomes secondary, and "sugar coating" and enabling carry the day. Truth shaming is a real thing in these forums, lol.
"Truth shaming"?!
Heh. Dish out some "honesty", gotta expect some back atcha.9 -
amusedmonkey wrote: »I'm all for the truth, but I'm also all for compassion and not attacking someone with the facts directly in a way that feels like I'm attacking them personally. I'm not perfect, but I try to pick my words to the best of my ability not to be hurtful. The way I found well-received without overtly sugar coating or attacking someone is to try and make my posts factual and informative rather than accusatory. This puts the person in a position to self-reflect and think about what is being said instead of feeling hurt and immediately putting up defences. Kindness goes a long way, even if it's masquerading as dry facts. Another way I use is to simply share my experience with something without words of judgement directed at anyone.
Precisely. Unvarnished direct criticism may be honest, and it might be fun (for someone(s)), but it's a heckuva poor and low-percentage persuasion strategy.
That's completely leaving out any consideration of whether it's desirable to be, y'know, kind to people.
So you don't like the unpopular opinions that I have posted in the "What are your unpopular opinions about health / fitness?" forum?
4 -
Bry_Lander wrote: »amusedmonkey wrote: »I'm all for the truth, but I'm also all for compassion and not attacking someone with the facts directly in a way that feels like I'm attacking them personally. I'm not perfect, but I try to pick my words to the best of my ability not to be hurtful. The way I found well-received without overtly sugar coating or attacking someone is to try and make my posts factual and informative rather than accusatory. This puts the person in a position to self-reflect and think about what is being said instead of feeling hurt and immediately putting up defences. Kindness goes a long way, even if it's masquerading as dry facts. Another way I use is to simply share my experience with something without words of judgement directed at anyone.
Precisely. Unvarnished direct criticism may be honest, and it might be fun (for someone(s)), but it's a heckuva poor and low-percentage persuasion strategy.
That's completely leaving out any consideration of whether it's desirable to be, y'know, kind to people.
So you don't like the unpopular opinions that I have posted in the "What are your unpopular opinions about health / fitness?" forum?
And you don't like that people are pointing out that they don't like your unpopular opinion?
See how that works?11 -
VintageFeline wrote: »Bry_Lander wrote: »amusedmonkey wrote: »I'm all for the truth, but I'm also all for compassion and not attacking someone with the facts directly in a way that feels like I'm attacking them personally. I'm not perfect, but I try to pick my words to the best of my ability not to be hurtful. The way I found well-received without overtly sugar coating or attacking someone is to try and make my posts factual and informative rather than accusatory. This puts the person in a position to self-reflect and think about what is being said instead of feeling hurt and immediately putting up defences. Kindness goes a long way, even if it's masquerading as dry facts. Another way I use is to simply share my experience with something without words of judgement directed at anyone.
Precisely. Unvarnished direct criticism may be honest, and it might be fun (for someone(s)), but it's a heckuva poor and low-percentage persuasion strategy.
That's completely leaving out any consideration of whether it's desirable to be, y'know, kind to people.
So you don't like the unpopular opinions that I have posted in the "What are your unpopular opinions about health / fitness?" forum?
And you don't like that people are pointing out that they don't like your unpopular opinion?
See how that works?
On the debate section, no less.1 -
VintageFeline wrote: »Bry_Lander wrote: »amusedmonkey wrote: »I'm all for the truth, but I'm also all for compassion and not attacking someone with the facts directly in a way that feels like I'm attacking them personally. I'm not perfect, but I try to pick my words to the best of my ability not to be hurtful. The way I found well-received without overtly sugar coating or attacking someone is to try and make my posts factual and informative rather than accusatory. This puts the person in a position to self-reflect and think about what is being said instead of feeling hurt and immediately putting up defences. Kindness goes a long way, even if it's masquerading as dry facts. Another way I use is to simply share my experience with something without words of judgement directed at anyone.
Precisely. Unvarnished direct criticism may be honest, and it might be fun (for someone(s)), but it's a heckuva poor and low-percentage persuasion strategy.
That's completely leaving out any consideration of whether it's desirable to be, y'know, kind to people.
So you don't like the unpopular opinions that I have posted in the "What are your unpopular opinions about health / fitness?" forum?
And you don't like that people are pointing out that they don't like your unpopular opinion?
See how that works?
So let me see if I understand it - people come to the unpopular opinion thread to chastise others for having an unpopular opinion. Got it...diannethegeek wrote: »VintageFeline wrote: »Bry_Lander wrote: »amusedmonkey wrote: »I'm all for the truth, but I'm also all for compassion and not attacking someone with the facts directly in a way that feels like I'm attacking them personally. I'm not perfect, but I try to pick my words to the best of my ability not to be hurtful. The way I found well-received without overtly sugar coating or attacking someone is to try and make my posts factual and informative rather than accusatory. This puts the person in a position to self-reflect and think about what is being said instead of feeling hurt and immediately putting up defences. Kindness goes a long way, even if it's masquerading as dry facts. Another way I use is to simply share my experience with something without words of judgement directed at anyone.
Precisely. Unvarnished direct criticism may be honest, and it might be fun (for someone(s)), but it's a heckuva poor and low-percentage persuasion strategy.
That's completely leaving out any consideration of whether it's desirable to be, y'know, kind to people.
So you don't like the unpopular opinions that I have posted in the "What are your unpopular opinions about health / fitness?" forum?
And you don't like that people are pointing out that they don't like your unpopular opinion?
See how that works?
On the debate section, no less.
Actually, a debate entails discussing the merits of ideas and opinions from different points of view, not trying to shut down people because of your feelz...10 -
nutmegoreo wrote: »Tacklewasher wrote: »Bry_Lander wrote: »Don't hate me but the whole "you can be obese and healthy" mindset is absurd to me. Define healthy. You mean to tell me your joints don't ever hurt? You aren't at risk for more diseases than if you were of a normal weight? Be honest with yourself! Let's stop sugar coating (no pun intended) this by calling it "body positivity."
I have found that where honesty is in conflict with feelings, honesty becomes secondary, and "sugar coating" and enabling carry the day. Truth shaming is a real thing in these forums, lol.
It isn't one or the other. There can very easily be a balance. I've read a lot of your posts and, while they may be the truth, they lack compassion. You'd be well served to moderate your replies.
There is certainly something to be said for choice of words influencing how it comes across, thereby either helping or hindering communication.
It is always difficult to discern from written text, particularly in a message board with complete strangers, but it seems the crux of the issue with the choice of words and the way they are presented is that often the proposed feedback comes from a place of judgement, rather than a place of compassion, empathy and support. The comments people are taking issue with seem to have an underlying spirit of shallow focus solely on one's appearance - not on a genuine concern with the person's health (including both physical and mental health in that) and wanting to support them in their efforts. No acknowledgement of how difficult life can be, how challenging it can be to make the decision to make major changes to lose weight, to get healthier, to give up things you love - an example from another thread.... that if someone has "let themself go" then of course the spouse has the right to let them know that they are no longer attractive, no longer keeping up their end of the 'physical attraction part of the marriage contract', etc and if the person doesn't make the appropriate changes then of course the fit spouse is within their rights to choose to end the relationship.
I am all for direct, honest feedback - but the difference I see in the way some posters are presenting their viewpoint seems to lack a general compassion and empathy for human element of the hypothetical individuals that they are communicating with.15 -
This is my observation after reading about how WLS works. There's multiple consultations with doctors, dieticians, and other members of a support team that take a patient through pre-surgery weight loss, the surgery itself, and a period of time after. Most patients will lose weight because of the financial, physical and emotional investment they've made to the process along with the on-going education on how to continue losing on their own and maintaining that loss. Re-gaining the weight usually doesn't happen until they're on their own, and might not happen as often if that support was always available no matter how long ago the surgery.
My belief is that if a person who is candidate for WLS (whether they plan to go that route or not) had that same support system the success rate without surgery rate would be the same as with surgery. If that kind of intensive support system was available to anyone who needs to lose any amount of weight to get into a healthy range the success rate of weight loss maintenance would be significantly higher.
I'm not presenting this as an unpopular opinion, just some thoughts
observation/reading on how it is suppose to work vs reality are starkly different...I can guarantee it.
No matter the "support" or "education" people receive either before WLS, during or after...or for those who are losing without that if they do not take responsibility for what they put in the mouth aka food and quantity of it and apply the knowledge they get then they will always gain the weight back....
those are the facts and the bolded is unpopular I am sure...I will probably get a smack down for it.
I think you are absolutely right. One of my dear friends in college got WLS and dropped 200 pounds in a year. She looked great and had relatively few complications with the surgery, though none of them are fun. I just saw her at a concert we were singing together and she has gained it all back and more. At the after concert gala, I saw her walking around with a plate laden with canapes, methodically eating as she spoke to the donors. It breaks my heart to see this especially as she commented on my weight loss and asked if I had the surgery done as well. I haven't. It's been two years of trial and error. WLS didn't save her from anything because all of her weight related issues are back with the regained weight.5 -
curiouskate wrote: »My unpopular opinion: most people who got fat as children/teens will never maintain a healthy weight, and the best we can hope for is yo yo dieting. The other option is accepting being fat for good. The existence of a few exceptions to this rule doesn't change my opinion. Statistically, it's an obvious fact.curiouskate wrote: »Just wanted to say it seems like a lot of people got mad and didn't actually read what I initially said. I said "most people." If that's not you, then it wasn't about you. But I think it might be worth looking at why you feel super definsive reading that little blurb.
The part in bold is what I object to. If only 20% are able to maintain a healthy weight, or even if it's only 10% or 5% or even just 1%... that means that all of us can hope that we will be able to be in that minority. Yo-yo dieting is NOT the best we can hope for.Bry_Lander wrote: »So let me see if I understand it - people come to the unpopular opinion thread to chastise others for having an unpopular opinion. Got it...
Or perhaps to point out to others why that opinion might be unpopular. I'm more surprised by someone posting an opinion in such a thread without expecting a good bit of disagreement. Isn't that kind of what an unpopular idea IS?10 -
Bry_Lander wrote: »So let me see if I understand it - people come to the unpopular opinion thread to chastise others for having an unpopular opinion. Got it...
there are also people who enjoy delivering 'unvarnished truth' because they've basically got a bit of the bully in them. so sometimes it's not just about whether whatever a person says is true; it's also about people intuiting that and developing a mistrust and/or dislike of the speaker based on that sense that they're getting a little bit more out of it than they pretend.
17 -
Bry_Lander wrote: »amusedmonkey wrote: »I'm all for the truth, but I'm also all for compassion and not attacking someone with the facts directly in a way that feels like I'm attacking them personally. I'm not perfect, but I try to pick my words to the best of my ability not to be hurtful. The way I found well-received without overtly sugar coating or attacking someone is to try and make my posts factual and informative rather than accusatory. This puts the person in a position to self-reflect and think about what is being said instead of feeling hurt and immediately putting up defences. Kindness goes a long way, even if it's masquerading as dry facts. Another way I use is to simply share my experience with something without words of judgement directed at anyone.
Precisely. Unvarnished direct criticism may be honest, and it might be fun (for someone(s)), but it's a heckuva poor and low-percentage persuasion strategy.
That's completely leaving out any consideration of whether it's desirable to be, y'know, kind to people.
So you don't like the unpopular opinions that I have posted in the "What are your unpopular opinions about health / fitness?" forum?
You were neither quoted nor mentioned in my post. I expressed the opinion that criticism is an ineffective means of persuasion. That's it.
8 -
NorthCascades wrote: »Packerjohn wrote: »AlabasterVerve wrote: »kommodevaran wrote: »I think WLS is plain wrong. Operating on a healthy stomach and forcing people to starve themselves instead of improving eating habits, attitudes and environment. In the future it's going to be viewed the same way lobotomy is viewed today: Torture, barbaric, cruel.
Daily activity is all over more important than exercise. Incorporating movement into our daily life makes it more natural and easy and more likely to stick. Exhausting oneself to burn calories is futile. Enjoying sports is something completely different.
Snacking is contributing to the obesity epidemic. I am all for reintroducing meals. If IF can do that, I may have to settle for that solution.
This, this and this too for me. Also, what you eat matters - there's good foods and bad foods.
This. There are junk foods.
I don't think you're allowed to say that on MFP. You're allowed to eat cocaine laced with gasoline as long as you measure it to the gram on a food scale and fit the calories into your day.
^^^omg...this is SO true! lmao when I read this3 -
Eh, I think what you eat matters (I mean overall diet, of course), and I never thought that particular opinion of mine was an unpopular one. Seems to me to be shared by most.10
-
This content has been removed.
-
JerSchmare wrote: »lemurcat12 wrote: »Eh, I think what you eat matters (I mean overall diet, of course), and I never thought that particular opinion of mine was an unpopular one. Seems to me to be shared by most.
The problem with you statement is that it's not specific enough. It depends on your goals.
The statement is not true, per se. If my goal is to lose weight, I can do that eating McDonalds everyday.
So, for weight loss, what you eat does not matter. How much of it you eat matters a lot.
I would say what you eat matters for some purpose, namely health, perhaps how you feel and satiety. Agreed not for weight loss, if you control calories in some other way and don't eat a diet that makes you feel bad, which is why I did not say "what you eat matters for weight loss."
Whether you care about those things does not mean they don't matter. Just that they aren't concerns/goals of yours. I totally agree that plenty of people don't care to concern themselves with nutrition.
Similarly, I would say that eating calories over one's TDEE matters (or makes a difference, if you prefer). Some people may not care if they gain weight, or gain a little weight in the short term, or may want to or need to gain weight -- that's their goal. Fact remains that eating calories over TDEE makes a difference (matters). Same for "what you eat."
I'd also say that at the calories the average person eats in the US and with the variety of foods available and common supplementation, most people are unlikely to have nutrient deficiencies. I just don't think that's the end-all of why nutrition matters.
3 -
To add to that last post, I get frustrated by this discussion, because I really think it's mostly misunderstanding, and to some extent intentional misunderstanding. I wonder why that is -- I get the impression that for some members of the community it makes them feel good to portray the rest of us as if we don't care about nutrition at all -- some weird way to feel superior?
Anyway, that aside (it might be my unpopular opinion)! I think there are a couple ways this misunderstanding happens.
(1) People say "calories are all that matter for weight loss." Some people read that to mean "and for everything else, period," although that's not said and would be a bizarre thing to say, as I don't think anyone believes it.
(2) People say "foods are not individually good or bad" (not my personal battle, but I understand why people feel strongly about this). People read this to mean -- again, weirdly and apparently with an intent to misunderstand -- that they are claiming that no diets can be good or bad or that individual foods are not different in any way or that some foods are not more nutrient dense than others (or contribute nutrients that tend to be less likely to be overrepresented in a diet). None of that was what was said, and it's a weird assumption from the first statement.
A possible misunderstanding from the other side or genuine disagreement: of course, what you eat matters. The question is what does this mean? Does it mean a diet that is nutrient dense, balanced and calorie appropriate but has NO lower nutrient foods is inherently better than one that is very similar but that it fits in some "indulgences"? I'd say no, that difference does not matter, except as to the individual, and on that people differ. Does it mean that it makes a difference if you choose (mostly) spinach vs. kale or broccoli vs. cauliflower or potatoes vs. sweet potatoes or the like (questions that drive me crazy)? No, obviously not. Does it mean that it is crucially important that you be at under 40% carbs rather than 55% or have any particular macro ratio? No. So on. There's a huge variety of good, healthy diets, but that doesn't mean that "what you eat does not matter."
So to suggest that thinking that what you eat matters in some sense is an unpopular opinion strikes me as wrong.
I could be wrong, though, tell me if I am. (Since I do think part of the reason to post unpopular opinions is to get feedback.)15 -
lemurcat12 wrote: »Eh, I think what you eat matters (I mean overall diet, of course), and I never thought that particular opinion of mine was an unpopular one. Seems to me to be shared by most.
Oh no you din't.
Why did you decide to revisit this little gem? Like it is in the Top Ten of unpopular genpop opinion, but...well, I guess it IS page 116.
0 -
lemurcat12 wrote: »Eh, I think what you eat matters (I mean overall diet, of course), and I never thought that particular opinion of mine was an unpopular one. Seems to me to be shared by most.
I bloody love you.1
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.4K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.2K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 424 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.7K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions