Coronavirus prep
Replies
-
Antiopelle wrote: »missysippy930 wrote: »I suppose it would be possible to stop people at borders, leaving and entering states, but logistically a nightmare for law enforcement. It’s done in states bordering Canada and Mexico, with varying degrees of success. Minnesota has miles of natural waterway borders, various rivers, and Lake Superior, that we share with Canada, No Dak, & Wisconsin, where there is limited bridge access to other jurisdictions. There are also a lot of miles of borders with abundant road access to our neighboring states, So Dak, No Dak, Iowa, Wisconsin and Canada. Multiply that times 50. Not an easy, nor inexpensive task. Millions of miles of roads in the US.
All of our individual states are part of the whole country. Governed by federal, state, and local jurisdictions. It would be a much better solution to have had a federal mandate from the beginning. Hindsight is 20/20, but, we may have had a much different outcome than the “over by Easter” (04/10/20) that we heard 9 months ago.
Exactly.
Since March, apparently if we were "really trying" enough, we would have hired something from thousands to tens (hundreds?) of thousands of new state-border guards, trained them, put up many thousands of barricades to close roads (don't know what we do about the very common ORVs and privately-owned boats, not to mention cyclists/pedestrians), and closed those state borders . . . a thing for which we have neither precedent nor obvious legal structure.
That, in parallel with trying to hire and train something like tens of thousands if not hundreds of thousands of contract tracers (estimated in itself, under one proposal, to cost something like $12 billion).
Ooookaaaayyyyyyy.
Just to give you a little insight from a small European country (Belgium), surrounded by the big ones: Germany, France and the Netherlands and across the Channel the UK. Since March, our borders are closed (they were open when things got better over the summer). And yes, we have a vast network of roads that cross all borders as well, ranging from large highways to small hiking paths.
We also have loads of people working in one country and living in another; we have people who's closest supermarket is around the corner but in another country. When the borders were closed, it was mainly a communication and people stuck to it without much enforcement. At a certain time, the police was doing random checks as it seemed that traffic was picking up and that was enough to discourage people again.
A personal example: I'm an avid scuba diver but there is no available salt water where I live. The best spots are in The Netherlands and we could go there very safely. We could get in the car, park at the waterfront, gear up, dive, change and get into our car again without actually meeting anyone. The probability that we would be checked by police is extremely small, but we don't do it because it is asked from the population to refrain crossing borders. None of our friends and acquaintances are crossing neither.
My point is that I think there is mainly a large cultural difference, not as much a logistical one. When our government tells people that there is a restriction some people will question it and be critical but the vast majority will comply and enforcement will hardly be needed.
Although I am scared that during Christmas and New Year's eve compliance will slide and the wish to host family events will prevail; and we will see a spike in deaths again after these holidays.
I live in France now, and have lived in Spain Portugal and Italy Europe in general for 13 years. Some people mistakenly like to compare the Eu to the US as if it is the same. There is nothing that is the same governmentally or culturally.
We have groups of men now defying the curfew by yelling in the streets during curfew hours. Workers like painters, plumbers don’t wear masks and there is about 50 percent compliance with masks at this point.
It could be that Belgium and Holland are a more Compliant people, that is definitely a good possibility as countries in the EU vary incredibly. Much more than Americans do State to State. That is why even though we now say it is the European Union it is not United like the United States is.10 -
Antiopelle wrote: »missysippy930 wrote: »I suppose it would be possible to stop people at borders, leaving and entering states, but logistically a nightmare for law enforcement. It’s done in states bordering Canada and Mexico, with varying degrees of success. Minnesota has miles of natural waterway borders, various rivers, and Lake Superior, that we share with Canada, No Dak, & Wisconsin, where there is limited bridge access to other jurisdictions. There are also a lot of miles of borders with abundant road access to our neighboring states, So Dak, No Dak, Iowa, Wisconsin and Canada. Multiply that times 50. Not an easy, nor inexpensive task. Millions of miles of roads in the US.
All of our individual states are part of the whole country. Governed by federal, state, and local jurisdictions. It would be a much better solution to have had a federal mandate from the beginning. Hindsight is 20/20, but, we may have had a much different outcome than the “over by Easter” (04/10/20) that we heard 9 months ago.
Exactly.
Since March, apparently if we were "really trying" enough, we would have hired something from thousands to tens (hundreds?) of thousands of new state-border guards, trained them, put up many thousands of barricades to close roads (don't know what we do about the very common ORVs and privately-owned boats, not to mention cyclists/pedestrians), and closed those state borders . . . a thing for which we have neither precedent nor obvious legal structure.
That, in parallel with trying to hire and train something like tens of thousands if not hundreds of thousands of contract tracers (estimated in itself, under one proposal, to cost something like $12 billion).
Ooookaaaayyyyyyy.
Just to give you a little insight from a small European country (Belgium), surrounded by the big ones: Germany, France and the Netherlands and across the Channel the UK. Since March, our borders are closed (they were open when things got better over the summer). And yes, we have a vast network of roads that cross all borders as well, ranging from large highways to small hiking paths.
We also have loads of people working in one country and living in another; we have people who's closest supermarket is around the corner but in another country. When the borders were closed, it was mainly a communication and people stuck to it without much enforcement. At a certain time, the police was doing random checks as it seemed that traffic was picking up and that was enough to discourage people again.
A personal example: I'm an avid scuba diver but there is no available salt water where I live. The best spots are in The Netherlands and we could go there very safely. We could get in the car, park at the waterfront, gear up, dive, change and get into our car again without actually meeting anyone. The probability that we would be checked by police is extremely small, but we don't do it because it is asked from the population to refrain crossing borders. None of our friends and acquaintances are crossing neither.
My point is that I think there is mainly a large cultural difference, not as much a logistical one. When our government tells people that there is a restriction some people will question it and be critical but the vast majority will comply and enforcement will hardly be needed.
Although I am scared that during Christmas and New Year's eve compliance will slide and the wish to host family events will prevail; and we will see a spike in deaths again after these holidays.
I live in France now, and have lived in Spain Portugal and Italy Europe in general for 13 years. Some people mistakenly like to compare the Eu to the US as if it is the same. There is nothing that is the same governmentally or culturally.
We have groups of men now defying the curfew by yelling in the streets during curfew hours. Workers like painters, plumbers don’t wear masks and there is about 50 percent compliance with masks at this point.
It could be that Belgium and Holland are a more Compliant people, that is definitely a good possibility as countries in the EU vary incredibly. Much more than Americans do State to State. That is why even though we now say it is the European Union it is not United like the United States is.
Exactly this^^^^^. Also my husband always says that he doesn't understand how the EU can work since all the individual countries have been at each others throats for thousands of years. And yes, this comes out when one country is irritated with another. The US only had State against State during the Civil War--and there are still feelings and reprecussions from that. So, you can't compare the two at all.
Italian teens are exploding--doing a "Fight Club" at various points of Rome with announcements on Internet. Why? Because they are too restricted--no gym, no school, no activities, no sports to work off energy. It doesn't take a scientist to figure out that you can't coop up a teenager for months and tell him or her to stay home. Common Sense is missing many times. For the most part Italians are following the rules, except bars are chock full at cocktail hour, and the main shopping streets are overrun. People that work in the North are already planning their escape to the South for the holidays, and this will spread COVID from North to South and back again.8 -
A huge snowstorm is coming to NYC in 2 days which will essentially shut down any outdoor dining. We are looking at 8-14 inches. Indoor dining has already been closed as of Monday. I really feel for my former colleagues struggling so hard with no relief in sight.11
-
IME, a lot of those who are less personally affected but who think the restrictions are important and are compliant want generous unemployment and other relief for those people and businesses who need it (and believe that restrictions or not business that rely on tourism, conventions, and travel generally would be in trouble, among others), whereas IME it is often those opposed to the restrictions who are against the relief efforts (or certain of them, like the more generous unemployment).
I 100% believe that the restrictions are important and that those impacted by a shut down need a safety net that is better then what we currently offer in the US. We can not expect to just close everything up, make people stay home, and then tell them "too bad so sad" when they don't have money for bills or groceries. Unemployment was not created to handle something like this. It is to keep someone afloat long enough to get another job. It is not a long term solution to job loss. Something else needs to be provided if we want tighter restrictions.
I am blessed and luck as heck that I can do my job from home. I have been work from home since March with no current end in sight. In face, even after all this is over, I will most likely still be WFH at least part time with a day or two in the office. If there is any silver lining, it has shown the people at the top that WFH is a viable option which they were against before.
15 -
GaleHawkins wrote: »https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/13474181/new-coronavirus-strain-spreading-hancock/
I hope this is fake news.
The Sun is like the UK's version of the National Enquirer. In this article, they basically are saying there's a mutation that spreads more and isn't more deadly and also should be susceptible to the vaccine. That's been pretty much the pattern of the mutations so far. More contagious, but also less deadly (but still very deadly to those with compromised immune systems or certain genetic dispositions as they are finding). Don't know where I saw it, but they have found 3 genetic variants that tend to correlate strongly with worse outcomes.9 -
IME, a lot of those who are less personally affected but who think the restrictions are important and are compliant want generous unemployment and other relief for those people and businesses who need it (and believe that restrictions or not business that rely on tourism, conventions, and travel generally would be in trouble, among others), whereas IME it is often those opposed to the restrictions who are against the relief efforts (or certain of them, like the more generous unemployment).
I 100% believe that the restrictions are important and that those impacted by a shut down need a safety net that is better then what we currently offer in the US. We can not expect to just close everything up, make people stay home, and then tell them "too bad so sad" when they don't have money for bills or groceries. Unemployment was not created to handle something like this. It is to keep someone afloat long enough to get another job. It is not a long term solution to job loss. Something else needs to be provided if we want tighter restrictions.
I am blessed and luck as heck that I can do my job from home. I have been work from home since March with no current end in sight. In face, even after all this is over, I will most likely still be WFH at least part time with a day or two in the office. If there is any silver lining, it has shown the people at the top that WFH is a viable option which they were against before.
I'd been WFM since 2011 for an employer that was generally against it, but was willing to do that for me because I'd worked in the office for 3 years before moving out of state to be closer to my aging mother. During those three years he'd also observed me checking in (well, working really) remotely while on vacation, so was confident in my work ethic.
I want to get another WFM job and am hoping one silver lining from this dreadful experience is that more employers are open to it now.7 -
kshama2001 wrote: »IME, a lot of those who are less personally affected but who think the restrictions are important and are compliant want generous unemployment and other relief for those people and businesses who need it (and believe that restrictions or not business that rely on tourism, conventions, and travel generally would be in trouble, among others), whereas IME it is often those opposed to the restrictions who are against the relief efforts (or certain of them, like the more generous unemployment).
I 100% believe that the restrictions are important and that those impacted by a shut down need a safety net that is better then what we currently offer in the US. We can not expect to just close everything up, make people stay home, and then tell them "too bad so sad" when they don't have money for bills or groceries. Unemployment was not created to handle something like this. It is to keep someone afloat long enough to get another job. It is not a long term solution to job loss. Something else needs to be provided if we want tighter restrictions.
I am blessed and luck as heck that I can do my job from home. I have been work from home since March with no current end in sight. In face, even after all this is over, I will most likely still be WFH at least part time with a day or two in the office. If there is any silver lining, it has shown the people at the top that WFH is a viable option which they were against before.
I'd been WFM since 2011 for an employer that was generally against it, but was willing to do that for me because I'd worked in the office for 3 years before moving out of state to be closer to my aging mother. During those three years he'd also observed me checking in (well, working really) remotely while on vacation, so was confident in my work ethic.
I want to get another WFM job and am hoping one silver lining from this dreadful experience is that more employers are open to it now.
I've said from the beginning that if nothing else good comes out of COVID, maybe it will at least kill the open floor plan office trend that so many companies adopted in the last few years. I don't want to be packed into a big room with 150 co-workers. It's too loud, there's no privacy, there's no sense of individuality, and now it's just a good place to spread diseases.14 -
My company is taking surveys about how we would feel WFH 3 days/wk, in office for two, but no assigned cubes. (i.e. you just get assigned one on the two days you're in).
I'm all for that. I work more from home without the 45 min commute each way.
7 -
HawkingRadiation wrote: »My company is taking surveys about how we would feel WFH 3 days/wk, in office for two, but no assigned cubes. (i.e. you just get assigned one on the two days you're in).
I'm all for that. I work more from home without the 45 min commute each way.
My company has tossed around a similar possibility and I have to say, the thought of sitting at a desk that some other random person sat at the day before makes me gag. There's the in-office nail clippers, the people that eat all kinds of greasy or crumbly food at their desks, etc. There are not enough sanitizing wipes in the world to make me comfortable 😷7 -
HawkingRadiation wrote: »My company is taking surveys about how we would feel WFH 3 days/wk, in office for two, but no assigned cubes. (i.e. you just get assigned one on the two days you're in).
I'm all for that. I work more from home without the 45 min commute each way.
We're moving to a hybrid starting in January. 40 hrs in office and 40 hrs WFH during an 80 hour pay period. This namely stems from us having some employees for whom it is essential for them to be in office most of the time and others who can remote work most of the time and those in office thinking it's unfair.
Some people doing 95% or more WFH are definitely up in arms...but personally, I'm looking forward to getting back into the office on a somewhat regular schedule. I can do most of my work from pretty much anywhere in the world so long as I have internet, a printer, and a scanner...but working at home, living at home, and everything outside of home being severely restricted is getting old and I'm looking forward to being out of the house more.
My home office is a setup in a little nook in our master bedroom...it was set up pre-covid to be used on those occasions my wife or I needed to work from home (kid sick, plumber coming, etc) or just a place to sit down at the computer and surf the internet...it was never intended to be a full time office that my wife and I share on alternating days and now our master bedroom oasis getaway looks like a combination of a mail room and a full time office that is lacking filing capacity.
Everyone at my office has either an assigned cubicle or designated office...so that's not really an issue.6 -
HawkingRadiation wrote: »My company is taking surveys about how we would feel WFH 3 days/wk, in office for two, but no assigned cubes. (i.e. you just get assigned one on the two days you're in).
I'm all for that. I work more from home without the 45 min commute each way.
My company has tossed around a similar possibility and I have to say, the thought of sitting at a desk that some other random person sat at the day before makes me gag. There's the in-office nail clippers, the people that eat all kinds of greasy or crumbly food at their desks, etc. There are not enough sanitizing wipes in the world to make me comfortable 😷
So you never use public transportation?4 -
I'm following this whole WFH trend pretty close. Around 70% of my clients (I'm a headhunter) are the companies that put up the glass/metal on mid-rise and high-rise buildings across the US. I work with many of the top firms in NYC, Chicago, DC, Baltimore, Nashville, Philly and a few other cities. If we don't return to the offices (and I'm seeing signs of business pick back up), my business, at least on that side of it, will drop. I played a huge role in putting the teams together for Hudson Yards in NYC. It's not even completed yet and, from what I've heard, is like a ghost town compared to what it could be.
Having worked in packed offices before I started my own consulting firm years ago, I can relate to what others have experience. I HATED open office concepts. The most ridiculous idea ever. The idea that the person screaming on the phone next to you would somehow make you more efficient was idiotic.
I'm hearing from many clients, at least on the design side, that they are needing to get their teams back in the office. That work from home hasn't been easy at all. But companies are hesitant to do it right now with the numbers peaking. I've also been asked to "confidentially replace" people whose productivity has fallen off a cliff since working from home. This is the ugly part of recruiting, but I've learned over the years that if someone isn't productive, it also usually means they aren't happy or are already looking for another job. So, though I think we'll see some changes in the near future, I think it will be more like a few days from home, rather than 100% virtual offices. But commercial real estate is going to take a huge hit.
I'm lucky that I've switched industries before and I'm also known for working with high tech startups and building teams in that area. But even that industry has taken a bit of a hit in 2020 with VC (Venture Capital) firms and Angel investors reigning back the purse strings.6 -
Theoldguy1 wrote: »HawkingRadiation wrote: »My company is taking surveys about how we would feel WFH 3 days/wk, in office for two, but no assigned cubes. (i.e. you just get assigned one on the two days you're in).
I'm all for that. I work more from home without the 45 min commute each way.
My company has tossed around a similar possibility and I have to say, the thought of sitting at a desk that some other random person sat at the day before makes me gag. There's the in-office nail clippers, the people that eat all kinds of greasy or crumbly food at their desks, etc. There are not enough sanitizing wipes in the world to make me comfortable 😷
So you never use public transportation?
Nope, owned my own car since the age of 16. I've never lived in an area where public transport was a big thing.5 -
Theoldguy1 wrote: »HawkingRadiation wrote: »My company is taking surveys about how we would feel WFH 3 days/wk, in office for two, but no assigned cubes. (i.e. you just get assigned one on the two days you're in).
I'm all for that. I work more from home without the 45 min commute each way.
My company has tossed around a similar possibility and I have to say, the thought of sitting at a desk that some other random person sat at the day before makes me gag. There's the in-office nail clippers, the people that eat all kinds of greasy or crumbly food at their desks, etc. There are not enough sanitizing wipes in the world to make me comfortable 😷
So you never use public transportation?
Nope, owned my own car since the age of 16. I've never lived in an area where public transport was a big thing.
I'm in the same situation with car since 16. We have public transit were I live now but have never been on it. Have been on subways, etc. on trips to larger cities as well as planes, airport and other shuttles. Those are dirty as all get our but I just suck it up and figure I'm building my immune system.
They were redoing some of our offices before 'rona and in the new designs nobody had an assigned area (except for a small locker) with typically working there 5 days a week. You just came in and sat down in an open slot.1 -
Theoldguy1 wrote: »HawkingRadiation wrote: »My company is taking surveys about how we would feel WFH 3 days/wk, in office for two, but no assigned cubes. (i.e. you just get assigned one on the two days you're in).
I'm all for that. I work more from home without the 45 min commute each way.
My company has tossed around a similar possibility and I have to say, the thought of sitting at a desk that some other random person sat at the day before makes me gag. There's the in-office nail clippers, the people that eat all kinds of greasy or crumbly food at their desks, etc. There are not enough sanitizing wipes in the world to make me comfortable 😷
So you never use public transportation?
I haven't since March 16 (I remember since it was a Monday after the week in which covid gradually became the biggest thing, and immediately after the St Patrick's Day observed weekend when lots of people locally were acting like complete idiots in the bars). After I got to work that day, I was "am I crazy." I rode it home that night (the L, brown line) and it was already pretty much empty (had been that morning too), and drove to work the next three days (worked from home on that Friday). Since then, I've driven every time I've come into the office or gone somewhere I would ordinarily take public transit since (unless close enough to walk).
Personally, though, pre covid, it never bothered me (some lines were cleaner than others), but it's also a limited time and IME you don't feel like it's yours so you are touching things in the way I do when sitting in my office. It is likely irrational, but I'd really hate having a communal desk. (Probably not likely, but I do think there will be a movement to reduce/consolidate office space after this, and to let people work more from home. I like the flexibility, but I miss working in the office with my co workers a lot, and still do about once a week (was doing it more before the cases spiked up again). However, I also do like that it takes me no time to get to work. Back in the day even the L was faster than commuting, but now driving is way faster. Parking would be too expensive to be worth it if my employer weren't currently paying, however.)4 -
MikePfirrman wrote: »I'm following this whole WFH trend pretty close. Around 70% of my clients (I'm a headhunter) are the companies that put up the glass/metal on mid-rise and high-rise buildings across the US. I work with many of the top firms in NYC, Chicago, DC, Baltimore, Nashville, Philly and a few other cities. If we don't return to the offices (and I'm seeing signs of business pick back up), my business, at least on that side of it, will drop. I played a huge role in putting the teams together for Hudson Yards in NYC. It's not even completed yet and, from what I've heard, is like a ghost town compared to what it could be.
I've wondered for a long time...long before COVID about the sustainability of expensive office space in high rises in big cities. Years ago I worked as a financial auditor for a local CPA firm in Albuquerque (a fairly large local firm) and we merged with Moss Adams, a medium sized western regional CPA firm based out of Seattle (mergers are so much fun...). When we would attend trainings, auditors from Seattle, Portland, San Francisco, LA, Phoenix, etc were all surprised that we occupied two floors of a mid rise in Uptown Albuquerque as, for the most part, if they weren't at a client's premises, they worked from home as office space was too much overhead. Most of the offices did have a small amount of office space which was primarily a conference room for face to face meetings with clients, and some cubicles if one needed to be in the office. That was over a decade ago...I left about 2 years after the merger and I think they cut back the office space here from two to one floor after I left, even though it's pretty cheap here in NM.
My sister-in-law works for some swanky consulting firm in NYC and other than when she's at a client or traveling oversees to see a client, she's been working at home for about 15 years now. My brother-in-law is much the same...he's a senior manager for Deloite and he's either at home or in the field with a client.
I've just wondered about this for a very long time.4 -
cwolfman13 wrote: »MikePfirrman wrote: »I'm following this whole WFH trend pretty close. Around 70% of my clients (I'm a headhunter) are the companies that put up the glass/metal on mid-rise and high-rise buildings across the US. I work with many of the top firms in NYC, Chicago, DC, Baltimore, Nashville, Philly and a few other cities. If we don't return to the offices (and I'm seeing signs of business pick back up), my business, at least on that side of it, will drop. I played a huge role in putting the teams together for Hudson Yards in NYC. It's not even completed yet and, from what I've heard, is like a ghost town compared to what it could be.
I've wondered for a long time...long before COVID about the sustainability of expensive office space in high rises in big cities. Years ago I worked as a financial auditor for a local CPA firm in Albuquerque (a fairly large local firm) and we merged with Moss Adams, a medium sized western regional CPA firm based out of Seattle (mergers are so much fun...). When we would attend trainings, auditors from Seattle, Portland, San Francisco, LA, Phoenix, etc were all surprised that we occupied two floors of a mid rise in Uptown Albuquerque as, for the most part, if they weren't at a client's premises, they worked from home as office space was too much overhead. Most of the offices did have a small amount of office space which was primarily a conference room for face to face meetings with clients, and some cubicles if one needed to be in the office. That was over a decade ago...I left about 2 years after the merger and I think they cut back the office space here from two to one floor after I left, even though it's pretty cheap here in NM.
My sister-in-law works for some swanky consulting firm in NYC and other than when she's at a client or traveling oversees to see a client, she's been working at home for about 15 years now. My brother-in-law is much the same...he's a senior manager for Deloite and he's either at home or in the field with a client.
I've just wondered about this for a very long time.
It's human nature, IMHO, to slack off a bit from home. While the opportunity is there to be way more productive, some can't. I would say 80% of people just can't work from home. I hate to sound cynical, but when I started my own recruiting firm, I paid people very non-traditionally with double or triple compensation of brick and mortar places. I also managed everyone remotely. Though they were 1099 (because of that, I could never require quotas or legally push metrics), I could see what everyone produced through the shared software. Even my own son and his best friend, neither of who I would consider lazy, couldn't produce 1/3 of the numbers I produce, though they had every tool I had starting in the business and way more (they had myself as a mentor -- when I started, I had no one). But I started in a boiler room environment with someone standing over my shoulder making sure I placed 50 to 60 calls a day (now it's different -- you use texts, emails and Linkedin, but there still are metrics). I had to tell my son and his friend (my last two recruiters) to find something different last year. They are both killing it selling solar in California now, when Covid doesn't prevent them from sales calls. Both of them needed an environment where someone was pushing numbers, just like I did years ago, every single day. Most businesses are finding the same thing.
This may sound controversial, but WFH is something you have to prove and earn. It's tough to do and focus. I actually keep software that times my own productivity through the day and measures it. I hired a consultant just to track MY numbers and I own the company! I just find that helps me. If my numbers are off, I have a paid consultant questioning me at the end of the month. I know, sounds weird, but it works for me.
Longer term, HR does not want to be babysitters. I read a study where the younger generation touches their phones, on average, 2617 times a day. That's staggering. How many times a day do you think they are touching them without anyone being able to watch them? Most in offices at least try to hide how addicted they are to their mobile devices.
I think that good companies will reward folks that have proven they can be productive during Covid. It's shown companies things can get done without a brick and mortar building, which has always been the case, and it's given them the processes/mechanisms to do so. But have they been as productive? Yahoo (yeah, I know, not a great company) worked from home for a decade before asking everyone to come back into the offices. Their employees weren't working as hard.
All these things are cyclical. I've been around in the recruiting business nearly 30 years now. When times are good, people are talking about six hour work days and four day work weeks and unlimited vacations. I've cautioned that the "good times" wouldn't last forever. When I talk to unemployed millennials now, they are (overall, there are exceptions) hot messes. They have never been through an economic downturn and have always been wined and dined to go to work for a different firm. Now, unfortunately, many can't even get an interview. It's a stark contrast. Very hard adjustment.
And in my industry? Total chaos and around 40% to 50% of headhunters will find different work. Happens every recession. Unless you've developed deep relationships with clients, which I'm fortunate enough to have, you're out of the business. Most transactional recruiters will be gone by middle of next year. They are really struggling already.1 -
Millennials "have never been through an economic downturn"? I beg to differ. Millennials currently make up adults ages 24-40, approximately. A good number of us were already out in the workforce when the 2007-2008 recession hit.11
-
kshama2001 wrote: »IME, a lot of those who are less personally affected but who think the restrictions are important and are compliant want generous unemployment and other relief for those people and businesses who need it (and believe that restrictions or not business that rely on tourism, conventions, and travel generally would be in trouble, among others), whereas IME it is often those opposed to the restrictions who are against the relief efforts (or certain of them, like the more generous unemployment).
I 100% believe that the restrictions are important and that those impacted by a shut down need a safety net that is better then what we currently offer in the US. We can not expect to just close everything up, make people stay home, and then tell them "too bad so sad" when they don't have money for bills or groceries. Unemployment was not created to handle something like this. It is to keep someone afloat long enough to get another job. It is not a long term solution to job loss. Something else needs to be provided if we want tighter restrictions.
I am blessed and luck as heck that I can do my job from home. I have been work from home since March with no current end in sight. In face, even after all this is over, I will most likely still be WFH at least part time with a day or two in the office. If there is any silver lining, it has shown the people at the top that WFH is a viable option which they were against before.
I'd been WFM since 2011 for an employer that was generally against it, but was willing to do that for me because I'd worked in the office for 3 years before moving out of state to be closer to my aging mother. During those three years he'd also observed me checking in (well, working really) remotely while on vacation, so was confident in my work ethic.
I want to get another WFM job and am hoping one silver lining from this dreadful experience is that more employers are open to it now.
Good for you. My employer was never comfortable with people working in places where he couldn't see them (salesmen on the road for example).
Now I'm mostly into office work, I had opportunity to work from home in the early days of COVID19. Then one day I got a call saying they were bringing everybody back in to the office and would appreciate my return as well. My bosses are 10 and 15 years younger than I am, so they have a hard time being tactful telling me things that don't make sense.
1 -
cwolfman13 wrote: »MikePfirrman wrote: »I'm following this whole WFH trend pretty close. Around 70% of my clients (I'm a headhunter) are the companies that put up the glass/metal on mid-rise and high-rise buildings across the US. I work with many of the top firms in NYC, Chicago, DC, Baltimore, Nashville, Philly and a few other cities. If we don't return to the offices (and I'm seeing signs of business pick back up), my business, at least on that side of it, will drop. I played a huge role in putting the teams together for Hudson Yards in NYC. It's not even completed yet and, from what I've heard, is like a ghost town compared to what it could be.
I've wondered for a long time...long before COVID about the sustainability of expensive office space in high rises in big cities. Years ago I worked as a financial auditor for a local CPA firm in Albuquerque (a fairly large local firm) and we merged with Moss Adams, a medium sized western regional CPA firm based out of Seattle (mergers are so much fun...). When we would attend trainings, auditors from Seattle, Portland, San Francisco, LA, Phoenix, etc were all surprised that we occupied two floors of a mid rise in Uptown Albuquerque as, for the most part, if they weren't at a client's premises, they worked from home as office space was too much overhead. Most of the offices did have a small amount of office space which was primarily a conference room for face to face meetings with clients, and some cubicles if one needed to be in the office. That was over a decade ago...I left about 2 years after the merger and I think they cut back the office space here from two to one floor after I left, even though it's pretty cheap here in NM.
My sister-in-law works for some swanky consulting firm in NYC and other than when she's at a client or traveling oversees to see a client, she's been working at home for about 15 years now. My brother-in-law is much the same...he's a senior manager for Deloite and he's either at home or in the field with a client.
I've just wondered about this for a very long time.
That's one reason I think this will vary: The cost of space. It's always expensive (compared to requiring little or none), but office space here (mid Michigan, medium sized metro, lots of land close-in) is *much* more affordable than in dense, expensive cities, especially cities with spread somewhat limited by geography (water, mountains, etc.) or political factors (transit options/timing/logistics, say). That space cost needs to be balanced off against the productivity implications Mike is talking about (among other things), when it comes to overall costs (and I'm not saying all decisions will be rational, because humans).
There are other factors, too, like type of work. Some forms of work benefit more from informal co-worker interaction (some innovation-oriented places are noting this, I understand), whereas for other work that matters very little (like the sales or some consulting work, maybe, where the link to customers can be more important than to co-workers; or things that are very solo by nature).
In general, something I'm finding interesting to consider is which things in society will reach some kind of tipping point, or reach it much quicker, because of the pandemic, and which will wither away if we reach a point where potential contagion is no longer a major influence. I'm thinking not just about WFH, but also things like alternative shopping modes (online, curbside, etc.), tele-health, interactive exercise equipment (Peloton and what-not) vs. gym activities, webcast live music events, online education, and more. All of these things have been growing trends, and the pandemic has given them a bit of a push. It's interesting to me to consider which will snowball, and which may not.
Overall, in my paranoid-ish moments, I wonder if the pandemic is pushing us closer to the world of Wall-E, where there are more of us in our comfy rolly chairs in front of screens to do nearly everything, eating yummy snacks, and interacting mostly virtually. A huge difference between that world and our current one is that we don't have the robot servants; instead we're relying on (and sometimes poorly treating) a class of front-line human service workers.
4 -
Millennials "have never been through an economic downturn"? I beg to differ. Millennials currently make up adults ages 24-40, approximately. A good number of us were already out in the workforce when the 2007-2008 recession hit.
Millennials are around 39 tops now. 12 years ago they were 27. Every single company wants someone with five years of experience or less in the worst of times. The market is still decent for cheaper employees, as it always is in harder times. No one in that age group had a harder time in the last recession finding a job. They were the ones displacing older employees in droves. But you're right, I'm more referring to the younger ones in that group that are finding themselves unemployed for the first time ever. It's not easy to go from a hot job market where everyone is fighting over you (if you have certain skills) to the opposite.3 -
MikePfirrman wrote: »cwolfman13 wrote: »MikePfirrman wrote: »I'm following this whole WFH trend pretty close. Around 70% of my clients (I'm a headhunter) are the companies that put up the glass/metal on mid-rise and high-rise buildings across the US. I work with many of the top firms in NYC, Chicago, DC, Baltimore, Nashville, Philly and a few other cities. If we don't return to the offices (and I'm seeing signs of business pick back up), my business, at least on that side of it, will drop. I played a huge role in putting the teams together for Hudson Yards in NYC. It's not even completed yet and, from what I've heard, is like a ghost town compared to what it could be.
I've wondered for a long time...long before COVID about the sustainability of expensive office space in high rises in big cities. Years ago I worked as a financial auditor for a local CPA firm in Albuquerque (a fairly large local firm) and we merged with Moss Adams, a medium sized western regional CPA firm based out of Seattle (mergers are so much fun...). When we would attend trainings, auditors from Seattle, Portland, San Francisco, LA, Phoenix, etc were all surprised that we occupied two floors of a mid rise in Uptown Albuquerque as, for the most part, if they weren't at a client's premises, they worked from home as office space was too much overhead. Most of the offices did have a small amount of office space which was primarily a conference room for face to face meetings with clients, and some cubicles if one needed to be in the office. That was over a decade ago...I left about 2 years after the merger and I think they cut back the office space here from two to one floor after I left, even though it's pretty cheap here in NM.
My sister-in-law works for some swanky consulting firm in NYC and other than when she's at a client or traveling oversees to see a client, she's been working at home for about 15 years now. My brother-in-law is much the same...he's a senior manager for Deloite and he's either at home or in the field with a client.
I've just wondered about this for a very long time.
It's human nature, IMHO, to slack off a bit from home. While the opportunity is there to be way more productive, some can't. I would say 80% of people just can't work from home. I hate to sound cynical, but when I started my own recruiting firm, I paid people very non-traditionally with double or triple compensation of brick and mortar places. I also managed everyone remotely. Though they were 1099 (because of that, I could never require quotas or legally push metrics), I could see what everyone produced through the shared software. Even my own son and his best friend, neither of who I would consider lazy, couldn't produce 1/3 of the numbers I produce, though they had every tool I had starting in the business and way more (they had myself as a mentor -- when I started, I had no one). But I started in a boiler room environment with someone standing over my shoulder making sure I placed 50 to 60 calls a day (now it's different -- you use texts, emails and Linkedin, but there still are metrics). I had to tell my son and his friend (my last two recruiters) to find something different last year. They are both killing it selling solar in California now, when Covid doesn't prevent them from sales calls. Both of them needed an environment where someone was pushing numbers, just like I did years ago, every single day. Most businesses are finding the same thing.
This may sound controversial, but WFH is something you have to prove and earn. It's tough to do and focus. I actually keep software that times my own productivity through the day and measures it. I hired a consultant just to track MY numbers and I own the company! I just find that helps me. If my numbers are off, I have a paid consultant questioning me at the end of the month. I know, sounds weird, but it works for me.
[snip]
@MikePfirrman, (or anyone) are you familiar with the time tracker HubStaff? I had a one time gig with a company who used that. I only worked a few hours a day, so it was super easy for me to focus. But although I was working continuously, I got scores like Activity = 70%, when I thought it should have been in the 90s. Since I'd always been an A student, this really bothered me.
I was doing QC for a company in which the writers had English as a second language. I worked in their QC system and also spent some time documenting common grammatical and other errors in a Google doc. While my time in the Google doc may have been part of the problem, by the second part of the project I was no longer documenting and 100% in their system.3 -
Theoldguy1 wrote: »HawkingRadiation wrote: »My company is taking surveys about how we would feel WFH 3 days/wk, in office for two, but no assigned cubes. (i.e. you just get assigned one on the two days you're in).
I'm all for that. I work more from home without the 45 min commute each way.
My company has tossed around a similar possibility and I have to say, the thought of sitting at a desk that some other random person sat at the day before makes me gag. There's the in-office nail clippers, the people that eat all kinds of greasy or crumbly food at their desks, etc. There are not enough sanitizing wipes in the world to make me comfortable 😷
So you never use public transportation?
I haven't since March 16 (I remember since it was a Monday after the week in which covid gradually became the biggest thing, and immediately after the St Patrick's Day observed weekend when lots of people locally were acting like complete idiots in the bars). After I got to work that day, I was "am I crazy." I rode it home that night (the L, brown line) and it was already pretty much empty (had been that morning too), and drove to work the next three days (worked from home on that Friday). Since then, I've driven every time I've come into the office or gone somewhere I would ordinarily take public transit since (unless close enough to walk).
Personally, though, pre covid, it never bothered me (some lines were cleaner than others), but it's also a limited time and IME you don't feel like it's yours so you are touching things in the way I do when sitting in my office. It is likely irrational, but I'd really hate having a communal desk. (Probably not likely, but I do think there will be a movement to reduce/consolidate office space after this, and to let people work more from home. I like the flexibility, but I miss working in the office with my co workers a lot, and still do about once a week (was doing it more before the cases spiked up again). However, I also do like that it takes me no time to get to work. Back in the day even the L was faster than commuting, but now driving is way faster. Parking would be too expensive to be worth it if my employer weren't currently paying, however.)Theoldguy1 wrote: »Theoldguy1 wrote: »HawkingRadiation wrote: »My company is taking surveys about how we would feel WFH 3 days/wk, in office for two, but no assigned cubes. (i.e. you just get assigned one on the two days you're in).
I'm all for that. I work more from home without the 45 min commute each way.
My company has tossed around a similar possibility and I have to say, the thought of sitting at a desk that some other random person sat at the day before makes me gag. There's the in-office nail clippers, the people that eat all kinds of greasy or crumbly food at their desks, etc. There are not enough sanitizing wipes in the world to make me comfortable 😷
So you never use public transportation?
Nope, owned my own car since the age of 16. I've never lived in an area where public transport was a big thing.
I'm in the same situation with car since 16. We have public transit were I live now but have never been on it. Have been on subways, etc. on trips to larger cities as well as planes, airport and other shuttles. Those are dirty as all get our but I just suck it up and figure I'm building my immune system.
They were redoing some of our offices before 'rona and in the new designs nobody had an assigned area (except for a small locker) with typically working there 5 days a week. You just came in and sat down in an open slot.
There basically isn’t public transportation in Memphis. We have buses but they have limited routes and hours. Most people would not consider it as a possibility. Even extremely poor people here have cars. Taxis are also prohibitively expensive. Before Uber existed, if your car broke down you just laid down on the sidewalk and cried.
I find the discussion about working from home being distracting interesting, because in my experience it’s the opposite. I work as a video game artist and being in an office meant everyone was always hanging out together or gaming or eating, when it wasn’t time for a pointless meeting. Working from home, you do what needs done to meet the deadline in a focused fashion, then the rest of your time is your own.13 -
rheddmobile wrote: »Theoldguy1 wrote: »HawkingRadiation wrote: »My company is taking surveys about how we would feel WFH 3 days/wk, in office for two, but no assigned cubes. (i.e. you just get assigned one on the two days you're in).
I'm all for that. I work more from home without the 45 min commute each way.
My company has tossed around a similar possibility and I have to say, the thought of sitting at a desk that some other random person sat at the day before makes me gag. There's the in-office nail clippers, the people that eat all kinds of greasy or crumbly food at their desks, etc. There are not enough sanitizing wipes in the world to make me comfortable 😷
So you never use public transportation?
I haven't since March 16 (I remember since it was a Monday after the week in which covid gradually became the biggest thing, and immediately after the St Patrick's Day observed weekend when lots of people locally were acting like complete idiots in the bars). After I got to work that day, I was "am I crazy." I rode it home that night (the L, brown line) and it was already pretty much empty (had been that morning too), and drove to work the next three days (worked from home on that Friday). Since then, I've driven every time I've come into the office or gone somewhere I would ordinarily take public transit since (unless close enough to walk).
Personally, though, pre covid, it never bothered me (some lines were cleaner than others), but it's also a limited time and IME you don't feel like it's yours so you are touching things in the way I do when sitting in my office. It is likely irrational, but I'd really hate having a communal desk. (Probably not likely, but I do think there will be a movement to reduce/consolidate office space after this, and to let people work more from home. I like the flexibility, but I miss working in the office with my co workers a lot, and still do about once a week (was doing it more before the cases spiked up again). However, I also do like that it takes me no time to get to work. Back in the day even the L was faster than commuting, but now driving is way faster. Parking would be too expensive to be worth it if my employer weren't currently paying, however.)Theoldguy1 wrote: »Theoldguy1 wrote: »HawkingRadiation wrote: »My company is taking surveys about how we would feel WFH 3 days/wk, in office for two, but no assigned cubes. (i.e. you just get assigned one on the two days you're in).
I'm all for that. I work more from home without the 45 min commute each way.
My company has tossed around a similar possibility and I have to say, the thought of sitting at a desk that some other random person sat at the day before makes me gag. There's the in-office nail clippers, the people that eat all kinds of greasy or crumbly food at their desks, etc. There are not enough sanitizing wipes in the world to make me comfortable 😷
So you never use public transportation?
Nope, owned my own car since the age of 16. I've never lived in an area where public transport was a big thing.
I'm in the same situation with car since 16. We have public transit were I live now but have never been on it. Have been on subways, etc. on trips to larger cities as well as planes, airport and other shuttles. Those are dirty as all get our but I just suck it up and figure I'm building my immune system.
They were redoing some of our offices before 'rona and in the new designs nobody had an assigned area (except for a small locker) with typically working there 5 days a week. You just came in and sat down in an open slot.
...I find the discussion about working from home being distracting interesting, because in my experience it’s the opposite. I work as a video game artist and being in an office meant everyone was always hanging out together or gaming or eating, when it wasn’t time for a pointless meeting. Working from home, you do what needs done to meet the deadline in a focused fashion, then the rest of your time is your own.
Yes, I found my coworkers FAR more distracting when I was in the same building with them as opposed to 1,000 + miles away.5 -
HawkingRadiation wrote: »My company is taking surveys about how we would feel WFH 3 days/wk, in office for two, but no assigned cubes. (i.e. you just get assigned one on the two days you're in).
I'm all for that. I work more from home without the 45 min commute each way.
My company has tossed around a similar possibility and I have to say, the thought of sitting at a desk that some other random person sat at the day before makes me gag. There's the in-office nail clippers, the people that eat all kinds of greasy or crumbly food at their desks, etc. There are not enough sanitizing wipes in the world to make me comfortable 😷
Agreed, but also... how do I find co-workers that I need to talk to in-person if at the office? Part of the benefit of working at a physical office is being able to find people who refuse to respond to emails, etc. If they are not there on my 2 days or are at some random desk, that doesn't work. Also, if I'm going to have a desk, I like to be able to keep stuff in the desk (such as a BG meter and supplies in case of a hypoglycemic event) and on the desk and wall (my calendars of choice). It just would make more sense to WFH all 5 days and not have a desk.5 -
kshama2001 wrote: »rheddmobile wrote: »Theoldguy1 wrote: »HawkingRadiation wrote: »My company is taking surveys about how we would feel WFH 3 days/wk, in office for two, but no assigned cubes. (i.e. you just get assigned one on the two days you're in).
I'm all for that. I work more from home without the 45 min commute each way.
My company has tossed around a similar possibility and I have to say, the thought of sitting at a desk that some other random person sat at the day before makes me gag. There's the in-office nail clippers, the people that eat all kinds of greasy or crumbly food at their desks, etc. There are not enough sanitizing wipes in the world to make me comfortable 😷
So you never use public transportation?
I haven't since March 16 (I remember since it was a Monday after the week in which covid gradually became the biggest thing, and immediately after the St Patrick's Day observed weekend when lots of people locally were acting like complete idiots in the bars). After I got to work that day, I was "am I crazy." I rode it home that night (the L, brown line) and it was already pretty much empty (had been that morning too), and drove to work the next three days (worked from home on that Friday). Since then, I've driven every time I've come into the office or gone somewhere I would ordinarily take public transit since (unless close enough to walk).
Personally, though, pre covid, it never bothered me (some lines were cleaner than others), but it's also a limited time and IME you don't feel like it's yours so you are touching things in the way I do when sitting in my office. It is likely irrational, but I'd really hate having a communal desk. (Probably not likely, but I do think there will be a movement to reduce/consolidate office space after this, and to let people work more from home. I like the flexibility, but I miss working in the office with my co workers a lot, and still do about once a week (was doing it more before the cases spiked up again). However, I also do like that it takes me no time to get to work. Back in the day even the L was faster than commuting, but now driving is way faster. Parking would be too expensive to be worth it if my employer weren't currently paying, however.)Theoldguy1 wrote: »Theoldguy1 wrote: »HawkingRadiation wrote: »My company is taking surveys about how we would feel WFH 3 days/wk, in office for two, but no assigned cubes. (i.e. you just get assigned one on the two days you're in).
I'm all for that. I work more from home without the 45 min commute each way.
My company has tossed around a similar possibility and I have to say, the thought of sitting at a desk that some other random person sat at the day before makes me gag. There's the in-office nail clippers, the people that eat all kinds of greasy or crumbly food at their desks, etc. There are not enough sanitizing wipes in the world to make me comfortable 😷
So you never use public transportation?
Nope, owned my own car since the age of 16. I've never lived in an area where public transport was a big thing.
I'm in the same situation with car since 16. We have public transit were I live now but have never been on it. Have been on subways, etc. on trips to larger cities as well as planes, airport and other shuttles. Those are dirty as all get our but I just suck it up and figure I'm building my immune system.
They were redoing some of our offices before 'rona and in the new designs nobody had an assigned area (except for a small locker) with typically working there 5 days a week. You just came in and sat down in an open slot.
...I find the discussion about working from home being distracting interesting, because in my experience it’s the opposite. I work as a video game artist and being in an office meant everyone was always hanging out together or gaming or eating, when it wasn’t time for a pointless meeting. Working from home, you do what needs done to meet the deadline in a focused fashion, then the rest of your time is your own.
Yes, I found my coworkers FAR more distracting when I was in the same building with them as opposed to 1,000 + miles away.
There's a certain portion of my job that benefits from bouncing ideas off each other and arguing things out or just generally working collaboratively. That part suffers, as although there are phones and (ugh) Zoom, it's just not the same. I also miss the human contact (that wasn't any more distracting than stuff at home). But not commuting does save time and my workout schedule is more flexible (although it was reasonably flexible at home). Although I like the extra time, I do miss some things about public transit, as it was an opportunity to just read a book or o something else (I had a Duolingo streak going and found that a fun thing to do when commuting). Even for things like writing, though, I just like being in the office. I can do all that stuff from home, but it's why I go into the office regularly (although most of the time I am home), even though I do not have to.
In ordinary times I wouldn't be using transit just to go to work, but to get around the city for things not in walking distance. I used to drive extremely rarely, unless I had bulky/heavy things to transport or were going somewhere where public transit was not convenient. I've always liked that this city has decent public transit (as well as that I live in a walkable neighborhood where I can do shopping and such locally).3 -
Millennials "have never been through an economic downturn"? I beg to differ. Millennials currently make up adults ages 24-40, approximately. A good number of us were already out in the workforce when the 2007-2008 recession hit.
Agreed. I'm a millennial and graduated with my first college degree in 2005... so I was in the workforce during the 2008-2009 recession. I was laid off in Feb. 2009 and spent 9 months unemployed while the unemployment rate was very high and jobs were competitive.7 -
FDA authorizes nation's first at-home, over-the-counter COVID-19 test
"The U.S. Food and Drug Administration on Tuesday authorized the nation's first home COVID-19 test that doesn't need a lab or medical provider's prescription.
The test, made by Australia-based Ellume, can deliver results in about 15 minutes and will cost about $30. The FDA authorized the Ellume tests for people age 2 and up, with or without symptoms.
Ellume's rapid antigen test includes a nasal swab for users to collect a sample and place into a cartridge. A smartphone app instructs consumers how to use the test and displays results. It allows results to be shared with a health provider."
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/health/2020/12/15/fda-authorizes-first-home-covid-19-test-ellume/3910420001/7 -
kshama2001 wrote: »rheddmobile wrote: »Theoldguy1 wrote: »HawkingRadiation wrote: »My company is taking surveys about how we would feel WFH 3 days/wk, in office for two, but no assigned cubes. (i.e. you just get assigned one on the two days you're in).
I'm all for that. I work more from home without the 45 min commute each way.
My company has tossed around a similar possibility and I have to say, the thought of sitting at a desk that some other random person sat at the day before makes me gag. There's the in-office nail clippers, the people that eat all kinds of greasy or crumbly food at their desks, etc. There are not enough sanitizing wipes in the world to make me comfortable 😷
So you never use public transportation?
I haven't since March 16 (I remember since it was a Monday after the week in which covid gradually became the biggest thing, and immediately after the St Patrick's Day observed weekend when lots of people locally were acting like complete idiots in the bars). After I got to work that day, I was "am I crazy." I rode it home that night (the L, brown line) and it was already pretty much empty (had been that morning too), and drove to work the next three days (worked from home on that Friday). Since then, I've driven every time I've come into the office or gone somewhere I would ordinarily take public transit since (unless close enough to walk).
Personally, though, pre covid, it never bothered me (some lines were cleaner than others), but it's also a limited time and IME you don't feel like it's yours so you are touching things in the way I do when sitting in my office. It is likely irrational, but I'd really hate having a communal desk. (Probably not likely, but I do think there will be a movement to reduce/consolidate office space after this, and to let people work more from home. I like the flexibility, but I miss working in the office with my co workers a lot, and still do about once a week (was doing it more before the cases spiked up again). However, I also do like that it takes me no time to get to work. Back in the day even the L was faster than commuting, but now driving is way faster. Parking would be too expensive to be worth it if my employer weren't currently paying, however.)Theoldguy1 wrote: »Theoldguy1 wrote: »HawkingRadiation wrote: »My company is taking surveys about how we would feel WFH 3 days/wk, in office for two, but no assigned cubes. (i.e. you just get assigned one on the two days you're in).
I'm all for that. I work more from home without the 45 min commute each way.
My company has tossed around a similar possibility and I have to say, the thought of sitting at a desk that some other random person sat at the day before makes me gag. There's the in-office nail clippers, the people that eat all kinds of greasy or crumbly food at their desks, etc. There are not enough sanitizing wipes in the world to make me comfortable 😷
So you never use public transportation?
Nope, owned my own car since the age of 16. I've never lived in an area where public transport was a big thing.
I'm in the same situation with car since 16. We have public transit were I live now but have never been on it. Have been on subways, etc. on trips to larger cities as well as planes, airport and other shuttles. Those are dirty as all get our but I just suck it up and figure I'm building my immune system.
They were redoing some of our offices before 'rona and in the new designs nobody had an assigned area (except for a small locker) with typically working there 5 days a week. You just came in and sat down in an open slot.
...I find the discussion about working from home being distracting interesting, because in my experience it’s the opposite. I work as a video game artist and being in an office meant everyone was always hanging out together or gaming or eating, when it wasn’t time for a pointless meeting. Working from home, you do what needs done to meet the deadline in a focused fashion, then the rest of your time is your own.
Yes, I found my coworkers FAR more distracting when I was in the same building with them as opposed to 1,000 + miles away.
ITA. In office, I spent at least an hour a day with someone standing in my office doorway rambling on about something I did not need to know. Not to mention people having loud conversations, smelling their food. I get more sleep now too, minus the commute, so I get more done in the AM than I used to. I intend to ask to WFH at least a day or two a week when the apocalypse is over.
To be fair, I'm 100% an introvert, and have no trouble focusing and ignoring the world when I'm by myself
16 -
https://www.reuters.com/article/health-coronavirus-britain-variant-idUSKBN28P158
Here is a source that I trust a bit more. Can anyone from UK tell if this is getting any air time this morning?0
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.6K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.3K Health and Weight Loss
- 176K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.6K Fitness and Exercise
- 431 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.6K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8.1K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.4K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.8K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.2K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions